IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Kai Santiago

•

Another option nobody mentioned is Form 3115 (Change in Accounting Method) if you've been depreciating things incorrectly for years. I had to use this for my rental properties when I realized I had lumped together items with different class lives. It's complicated but lets you correct past mistakes without amending returns.

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

Form 3115 is serious overkill for this situation. That's for systematic accounting method changes, not for disposing of a single asset. It's a complex form that usually requires professional help and should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•

I went through this exact same situation with my rental property last year when I had to replace a combined HVAC/electrical system that was originally entered as one line item back in 2014. Here's what I learned from my CPA: The key is documentation and reasonable allocation. Since you can't go back and break down the original $8,700 into components, you need to make a reasonable estimate of what portion was actually the HVAC system versus other improvements. Look at current replacement costs - if a similar HVAC system today costs $6,000 and you spent $8,700 total, you might reasonably allocate 70% ($6,090) to the HVAC disposal. In TurboTax, dispose of the portion you're attributing to the HVAC ($6,090 in my example), and the remaining undepreciated value will create a loss that offsets your rental income. Keep the remaining portion ($2,610) on your depreciation schedule for any components still in use. The most important thing is being able to justify your allocation method if questioned. Save your research on current replacement costs and any contractor quotes you got - this shows you made a good faith effort to be reasonable and accurate.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

This is really helpful - the documentation approach makes a lot of sense. One question though: when you say "keep the remaining portion on your depreciation schedule," do you need to create a new asset entry for that amount, or can you just adjust the existing depreciation schedule? I'm worried about creating inconsistencies in my records if I handle this wrong.

0 coins

I just went through this exact same nightmare situation last month and wanted to share what I learned. The whole "never received the money" thing is so frustrating, but unfortunately the IRS doesn't care - they consider it income used for your benefit regardless. What ended up saving me was creating a comprehensive spreadsheet of ALL my education-related expenses for the year, not just what showed up in Box 1. I found nearly $3,200 in additional qualified expenses: required textbooks from Amazon ($580), mandatory online homework systems ($420), lab goggles and supplies ($180), a scientific calculator required for multiple courses ($160), and even the application fees for graduate programs that were required for my major ($240). The biggest eye-opener was realizing that many "hidden" fees on my student account weren't included in Box 1. Things like technology fees, student activity fees (if mandatory), and even health center fees can sometimes qualify if they're required for enrollment. My advice: Print out your entire student account statement for the tax year, gather every receipt for school-related purchases, and document everything. Even small expenses add up quickly. I went from owing an extra $1,400 in taxes to actually getting money back once I properly documented all my qualified education expenses. The stress was absolutely worth it to get this figured out correctly rather than just hoping for the best!

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

This is incredibly helpful, thank you for sharing your detailed breakdown! I'm in almost the exact same situation and was feeling totally overwhelmed. Your spreadsheet approach sounds like exactly what I need to do. Quick question about those "hidden" fees you mentioned - how did you determine which student activity fees actually qualified as mandatory for enrollment? My student account has like 10 different fees and I'm not sure which ones the IRS would accept as legitimate education expenses versus just optional services. Did you have to get documentation from your school about which fees were truly required, or was it clear from how they were labeled on your account? Also, I'm curious about the graduate program application fees - I had no idea those could count! I applied to several programs as part of my degree requirements and those fees really added up. That alone might help offset a good chunk of my taxable scholarship amount.

0 coins

For the student activity fees, I looked at my enrollment documentation and course registration materials to see which fees were automatically charged to all students versus ones I could have opted out of. Fees that were mandatory for all enrolled students (like technology fees, library fees, or student government fees that you can't avoid) generally qualify. Optional things like gym memberships or parking passes you chose to purchase typically don't count unless they were required for your specific program. The easiest way to tell is if the fee was automatically added when you registered for classes and you had no choice to remove it - those are usually mandatory and qualify. I didn't need special documentation from the school since my student account clearly showed these as required enrollment fees, not optional services. The graduate application fees were a game-changer for me too! Since applying to grad programs was a requirement for completing my undergraduate degree (it was literally listed in my major requirements), those fees counted as qualified education expenses. Just make sure you can show the applications were required for your program, not just something you chose to do. Keep any documentation showing it was a degree requirement - program handbooks, advisor emails, or course syllabi that mention the application requirement.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation two years ago and it was absolutely maddening! The feeling of being taxed on money you never received is so frustrating, but unfortunately that's exactly how the IRS treats excess scholarship funds - they consider it a benefit to you even if the university kept it. Here's what really helped me tackle this: I created a detailed inventory of EVERY education-related expense I had that year, going way beyond what was included in Box 1. I'm talking about required course packets ($45 here, $60 there), mandatory online proctoring fees for exams ($25 per test), required field trip costs, lab notebooks, even special pens required for certain exams (like non-programmable calculators for math courses). The biggest revelation was finding expenses I didn't even think counted initially. Things like mandatory student teaching fees, clinical rotation expenses, required background checks for certain programs, and even required uniforms or safety equipment for lab courses. I ended up finding over $2,000 in legitimate qualified expenses that weren't reflected in Box 1. My suggestion: go through your bank statements, credit card bills, and student account with a magnifying glass. Every required textbook, access code, lab fee, and program-specific expense counts. Keep detailed records because if you're ever audited, you'll need to prove these were truly required for your coursework. Don't modify the Box 5 amount (that would be incorrect reporting), but definitely make sure you're claiming every legitimate qualified expense you can. The stress of figuring this out is worth it to avoid paying taxes on money you never actually received!

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive approach - thank you for breaking it down so thoroughly! I'm in the exact same boat and was starting to panic about the tax implications. Your point about going through bank statements with a magnifying glass is spot on - I bet I'm missing tons of smaller expenses that add up. I'm particularly interested in what you mentioned about mandatory student teaching fees and clinical rotation expenses. I'm in an education program and had to pay for background checks, fingerprinting, and even special liability insurance for my student teaching placement. I never thought these would count as qualified education expenses since they weren't directly billed by my university. Did you need any special documentation to prove these were required for your program, or were receipts and program handbooks sufficient? Also, the online proctoring fees are genius - I probably spent $200+ on those throughout the year and never considered them. This gives me so much hope that I can actually get my taxable scholarship amount down to something reasonable!

0 coins

Demi Lagos

•

Has anyone seen the 2024 updates to how LLC members are classified? There were some proposed regulations that would have changed the test for who qualifies as a limited partner for self-employment tax purposes, but I'm not sure if they were finalized.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

•

I believe those proposed regulations are still pending. For now, the IRS is still using the general guidelines where active participation in management = general partner status for SE tax purposes. But it's worth keeping an eye on those proposed changes if you're trying to optimize your tax strategy.

0 coins

Just want to add some clarity from my experience as a tax preparer - the confusion here is totally understandable because you're dealing with two different classification systems that use similar terminology but serve different purposes. Your LLC operating agreement designates you as "members" under state law. But when that LLC elects partnership taxation (which happens automatically with 2+ members), the IRS needs to categorize each member's role for self-employment tax purposes using the GP/LP framework from partnership law. The key test is simple: if you materially participate in the business (which includes management decisions, day-to-day operations, or working more than 500 hours annually), you're classified as a general partner equivalent for tax purposes. This means you'll pay self-employment tax on your share of ordinary business income. Since both you and your wife are active in managing the business, you should both be classified as general partners on your Form 1065 and Schedule K-1s. This won't affect your LLC liability protection at all - that's governed by state law, not federal tax classification. Your CPA needs this info because it determines how your self-employment taxes are calculated on Schedule SE of your personal returns.

0 coins

This is exactly the clear explanation I was looking for! As someone new to LLC taxation, I was getting confused by all the different terms being thrown around. Your breakdown of how state law classification (members) differs from federal tax classification (GP/LP equivalent) makes perfect sense now. So just to confirm my understanding: my wife and I will remain "members" in our LLC operating agreement for legal/liability purposes, but we'll be classified as "general partners" on our tax forms because we both actively manage the business. And this GP classification only affects our self-employment taxes, not our liability protection. Is that correct? Also, you mentioned the 500-hour test - is that per person or combined? We definitely both work way more than 500 hours each in the business annually.

0 coins

Can someone explain 1099-DIV with "Paid/adjusted in 2024, but for 2023" dividends? Confused about qualified vs ordinary reporting

I'm going through my husband's 2023 1099-DIV forms and noticed several stocks have amounts in the "Paid/adjusted in 2024, but for 2023" column. I'm trying to understand what this means for our taxes. Looking closer, I see two stocks where the adjustment basically moves money from ordinary dividends to qualified dividends. But for three other stocks, it's not a clean swap - only some of the ordinary dividends are getting reclassified as qualified. Since qualified and ordinary dividends are taxed differently, I'm wondering how to figure out exactly which dividends got reclassified. For example: Stock ABC shows $365.75 paid in 2023 dividends, initially all as ordinary. Then they adjusted it in 2024 to remove $218.45 as ordinary dividends and added $244.80 as qualified dividends. In our transaction history, we received $245.25 in December, $1.75 in September, and $118.75 in June, totaling $365.75. But how do I know which portions are now considered qualified? I think we're fine for safe harbor rules this year (we've withheld at least 90% of current year tax through even payments). But what if next year I need to use the annualized method and figure out which quarter each dividend belongs to? Should I assume the adjustment applies only to the last quarter, meaning higher tax in earlier quarters? Also, there's no specific date showing when foreign tax was paid, but that might explain the difference between the $218.45 removed from ordinary dividends and $244.80 added to qualified dividends for Stock ABC.

Ravi Gupta

•

This is a great explanation of dividend reclassifications! I work in tax prep and see this confusion every year. What you're experiencing is completely normal and actually shows the tax system working in your favor. The key thing to remember is that these "paid/adjusted in 2024, but for 2023" entries aren't new income - they're just corrections to how your 2023 dividends should be classified. Companies have until a certain deadline to finalize their determinations about qualified vs ordinary dividend status. For your specific question about quarterly tracking, I'd recommend keeping records of when dividends were actually paid, but don't stress about trying to match specific payments to the reclassifications. The IRS expects you to use the final corrected 1099-DIV numbers on your return. One tip: if you're concerned about estimated tax planning for future years, consider slightly overestimating your ordinary dividend income in your quarterlies. You'll get any overpayment back as a refund, and it helps avoid underpayment penalties if more dividends end up being ordinary than you expected.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice, especially the tip about slightly overestimating ordinary dividend income for quarterlies! I'm new to dealing with these dividend reclassifications and was getting overwhelmed trying to track everything perfectly. Your point about the corrections showing the system working in our favor is reassuring. I was worried I was missing something important or doing my taxes wrong when I saw these adjustments. It sounds like the conservative approach of overestimating ordinary dividends for estimated payments and then getting the benefit of qualified treatment on the actual return is the way to go. Thanks for the practical guidance - it's nice to hear from someone who sees this regularly in their work!

0 coins

I've been dealing with similar dividend reclassification issues for the past few years, and I wanted to share something that might help clarify the timing aspect of your question. The reason companies make these adjustments is often related to the "holding period" requirement for qualified dividends. For a dividend to be qualified, you generally need to hold the stock for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date. Sometimes companies initially classify all dividends as ordinary because they're not sure investors will meet this requirement. After year-end, when they have more complete data about trading patterns and holding periods, they can reclassify dividends that do meet the qualified requirements. This is particularly common with stocks that had significant trading volume around dividend dates. For your Stock ABC example with the December, September, and June payments - the company likely determined that investors who received those dividends generally held the stock long enough for qualified treatment. You don't need to figure out which specific payment was reclassified because the holding period requirement applies to your individual situation, not the payment date. The bottom line is exactly what others have said - use the final corrected numbers on your 1099-DIV, and don't overthink the individual payment tracking. The company has already done the complex calculations for you!

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

This is such a helpful explanation of the holding period requirements! I never realized that the reclassifications could be related to whether investors as a whole met the 60-day holding period rule. That makes so much more sense than trying to figure out which specific dividend payments got reclassified. Your point about not needing to track individual payments because the holding period applies to my personal situation is really reassuring. I was getting caught up in trying to match specific dates and amounts when the company has already done all that analysis. This thread has been incredibly educational - I feel much more confident about just using the final corrected 1099-DIV numbers and not overcomplicating things. Thanks for taking the time to explain the underlying mechanics of why these adjustments happen!

0 coins

This has been such a helpful thread! I'm also a new business owner and was completely confused about the 1099 requirements for different entity types. One thing I learned the hard way is to also check if your state has different rules. I'm in California and discovered they have additional reporting requirements that caught me off guard. Even though federal law says no 1099 needed for S-corp elected LLCs, some states might have their own quirks. Also, for anyone just starting out like me, I'd recommend setting up a simple tracking system from day one. I created a basic spreadsheet with contractor name, entity type, total payments, and 1099 status. Takes just a minute to update each time I pay someone, but saves hours of scrambling at year-end. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and tools - definitely going to check out some of the resources mentioned here!

0 coins

Aiden Chen

•

Excellent point about state requirements! I'm also new to business ownership and learned about state-specific rules the hard way. Each state can have different thresholds, deadlines, and even entity exemptions that don't match federal rules. Your spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I wish I had started tracking from day one instead of trying to piece everything together at year-end. I ended up creating something similar but had to go back through months of payments to get it set up properly. For anyone else reading this, I'd also suggest adding a column for the date you received each contractor's W-9. Some of the tools mentioned earlier in this thread check for missing or outdated W-9s, which has been super helpful for staying compliant. Thanks for sharing your California experience - it's a good reminder that federal compliance is just the starting point!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As a tax professional, I want to add a few additional points that might help other business owners: 1. **Multi-member LLCs**: If you have an LLC with multiple members that hasn't elected S-corp status, they're typically taxed as a partnership and DO require 1099s. 2. **Single-member LLCs**: These are "disregarded entities" by default (taxed like sole proprietorships) and also require 1099s unless they've elected corporate tax treatment. 3. **Box 3 on W-9**: Pay special attention to this box where contractors indicate their tax classification. If it's blank or says "other," follow up for clarification. 4. **Legal services exception**: Even S-corps and C-corps must receive 1099-MISC for legal services if you paid them $600+ (Box 1). Also, regarding the state requirements mentioned - this varies significantly by state. Some states like California require 1099s to be sent to certain entities that are exempt federally, while others mirror federal rules exactly. Always check your specific state's requirements. Great job everyone on emphasizing proper documentation and W-9 collection. That really is the foundation of compliant 1099 reporting!

0 coins

Thank you for breaking down those additional entity types! As someone completely new to this, the distinction between multi-member and single-member LLCs is something I hadn't even considered. I only have a couple contractors right now, but knowing about these different classifications will definitely help as I grow. The point about Box 3 on the W-9 is especially helpful - I'll make sure to double-check that section on all the forms I collect going forward. And wow, I had no idea about the legal services exception applying even to S-corps and C-corps. That's definitely something I would have missed! Do you happen to know if there's an easy way to find out the specific state requirements for 1099 reporting? I'm in Texas and want to make sure I'm not missing anything state-specific that might differ from federal rules.

0 coins

Prev1...713714715716717...5644Next