


Ask the community...
Quick question for anyone who's dealt with this - if I already provided my SSN to Venmo but STILL got hit with backup withholding, what went wrong? Do I need to contact them specifically about this?
That's unusual if you definitely provided your SSN before the transaction occurred. There might be a mismatch between the name on your Venmo account and your tax records, or possibly the SSN was entered incorrectly. I'd contact Venmo support directly about this specific issue.
I went through something very similar with Venmo last year! The key thing to understand is that backup withholding isn't necessarily a bad thing - it's just the IRS making sure they get their cut upfront when tax info is missing. Since this was a legitimate loan repayment, you'll definitely get that 24% back. Make sure you keep records of the original loan (texts, emails, bank records showing the initial $2,700 going out) in case the IRS ever questions it. Also, definitely update your tax information with Venmo right away. You can do this in your account settings under "Tax Information" - it'll prevent this headache from happening again. One thing that caught me off guard was that the 1099-K might show up as "business income" in some tax software, so you'll need to make sure you're categorizing it correctly as a non-taxable personal transaction. The backup withholding credit will show up separately and should give you a nice refund boost since you won't actually owe taxes on the repayment amount.
This is really helpful, especially the tip about keeping records of the original loan! I'm curious though - when you say the backup withholding credit shows up separately, where exactly does that appear on the tax return? I want to make sure I don't miss it when I'm filing. Also, did you have any issues with tax software automatically categorizing it wrong, and if so, how did you fix that?
I went through this exact same confusion last year! The key thing that helped me understand it was thinking about it from the IRS perspective - they want to see the full economic activity of your business, not just what hits your bank account after third parties take their cuts. So yes, report the gross amount customers pay as income, then deduct PayPal fees as a business expense. This is actually beneficial for you because it gives you a larger deduction and more accurately reflects your business activity. One practical tip: PayPal's monthly statements make this pretty easy to track. They show both your gross sales and total fees for each month, so you don't have to calculate transaction by transaction. I just download the monthly summaries and use those numbers for my tax prep. Also worth noting - if you're using PayPal Goods & Services, those fees are definitely deductible business expenses. But if you ever use Friends & Family for business (which you shouldn't), those transactions get murkier from a tax perspective since that's technically not a business payment method.
This is super helpful, thanks! I'm just starting my business and had no idea about the Friends & Family thing being problematic for business use. I almost set that up to avoid fees - glad I didn't! One quick question - when you say download the monthly summaries, do you mean the actual PayPal statements or is there a specific report I should be looking for? I want to make sure I'm getting the right documentation for my records.
You'll want to look for the "Monthly Financial Summary" that Liam mentioned earlier in the thread - it's under your PayPal Business account reports section. This breaks down your total payments received, fees charged, and net deposits for each month. You can also download your full transaction history as a CSV file which gives you line-by-line detail of every transaction and fee. For tax purposes, either works, but the monthly summary is cleaner if you just need the totals for your Schedule C. And yes, definitely avoid Friends & Family for business! The IRS expects business transactions to go through proper merchant services, plus you lose buyer/seller protections. Always use Goods & Services even though the fees are higher - those fees are tax deductible anyway, so it's not as painful as it seems.
Great question! I had the same confusion when I started my business. You definitely want to report the FULL amount customers pay as income and deduct the PayPal fees separately as business expenses on Schedule C. Here's why this matters: If you only report the net amount, you're essentially letting PayPal reduce your income without getting the tax benefit of those fees as deductions. By reporting gross income and deducting fees, you get the full business expense deduction you're entitled to. Also, keep in mind that if you receive a 1099-K from PayPal (which reports the gross amounts to the IRS), your tax return needs to match what they've already told the IRS you received. If you only report the net amounts, there will be a discrepancy that could trigger questions. The fees typically go under "Commissions and fees" or "Payment processing fees" on your Schedule C. Make sure to keep good records - I save my PayPal monthly statements which clearly show both gross receipts and total fees charged. This makes tax prep much easier and gives you solid documentation if the IRS ever has questions. One last tip: set up a separate PayPal account just for business if you haven't already. Mixing personal and business transactions makes everything more complicated come tax time!
This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I needed! I've been stressing about this for weeks. Just to make sure I understand correctly - if a customer pays me $500 and PayPal takes $15.20 in fees, I report $500 as income and $15.20 as a business expense, right? And this way I'm still paying tax on $484.80 of actual income but I get the proper deduction? Also, when you mention keeping PayPal monthly statements, do you print them out or just save the PDFs? I'm trying to figure out the best way to organize all this paperwork for my records.
Is there a time limit on these corporate write-offs? Like could Warner Bros claim the loss now for the tax benefit, but then release the movie in a few years? Or once they claim it as a loss, are they permanently prevented from ever making money from it?
Great question. Generally, once a company claims an asset as a complete loss for tax purposes, they can't later turn around and generate revenue from it. If they did, the IRS would likely require them to recognize that as income and potentially reverse the original deduction. However, tax laws do change, and there might be structuring options where they could potentially release the film years later through a different entity or after a significant reworking that makes it a "new" asset. But this would be complex and might invite IRS scrutiny.
This is such a fascinating example of how corporate tax strategy works at scale! As someone who's dealt with business losses on a much smaller level, I can see the logic even though the numbers are mind-boggling. What really strikes me is how this illustrates the difference between accounting loss and economic loss. Warner Bros already spent the $90 million - that money is gone regardless. The question becomes: can they minimize the total financial impact through tax strategy? If the write-off saves them $19+ million in taxes, and they genuinely believe the movie won't generate more than that in net revenue (after marketing costs, potential brand damage, etc.), then mathematically it makes sense. It's the same principle that applies to any business loss deduction, just with way more zeros. When I had to write off some equipment that didn't work out for my consulting business, I was essentially doing the same thing - reducing my taxable income by the amount of the loss to minimize the overall financial impact. The part that's hardest to wrap my head around is the permanence of it. Once they claim that loss, they're essentially burning the bridge to ever monetizing that content. That's a level of financial commitment that shows how confident they are in their analysis.
This is a really insightful way to think about it! I never considered the "burning bridges" aspect - that once they claim the loss, they can't ever change their mind. It makes me wonder if there are cases where companies regretted taking these write-offs because the content later became valuable in ways they didn't anticipate. Like what if in 10 years there's some huge nostalgia wave for unreleased superhero movies, or the actors become mega-stars and suddenly there's massive demand to see their early work? Warner Bros would be stuck watching potential goldmine content they can never touch because they already claimed it was worthless for tax purposes. It's kind of like permanently deleting something from your computer to free up space, except the "space" here is tax savings. Really shows how these corporate decisions are all about immediate financial optimization rather than preserving future options.
I'm dealing with this exact situation right now - starting a new job next month and I've already hit the SS limit at my current employer. This thread has been incredibly helpful! Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like the W-4 adjustment strategy is the most practical approach. I'm planning to calculate my expected SS overpayment and adjust my federal withholding accordingly, similar to what Miles and Connor described. One question I have - for those who successfully made W-4 adjustments, did you explain the situation to your new employer's HR/payroll team when you submitted the form? I'm wondering if providing context might help them understand why I'm claiming additional allowances, or if it's better to just submit the adjusted W-4 without explanation to avoid any confusion or pushback. Also, has anyone had experience with how this affects state tax withholding? I'm moving from one state to another with my job change, so I'm trying to figure out if I need to make any adjustments there too. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is such a frustrating situation but at least now I have a game plan!
Great question about whether to explain the situation! I actually did provide a brief explanation when I submitted my adjusted W-4, and I'm glad I did. I just wrote a short note saying "Adjusting withholding to offset expected Social Security tax overpayment due to job change mid-year after reaching annual limit at previous employer." The payroll person actually thanked me for the explanation because it helped them understand it wasn't an error or oversight. Without context, they might have questioned why someone was claiming additional allowances or even suggested I was making a mistake. Regarding state taxes, that's a great point to consider! Since you're moving between states, you'll want to research both states' tax policies. Most states don't have the same Social Security tax issue since they typically use different tax structures, but the timing of your move might affect things like resident vs non-resident status and apportionment of income. You might want to consult with a tax professional who knows both states' rules to make sure you're handling the transition correctly. Good luck with the new job and the move! Sounds like you have a solid plan in place.
This is such a helpful thread! I'm actually a tax preparer and see this situation come up frequently with clients who switch jobs mid-year. Just wanted to add a few additional points that might be useful: 1) When you do get your W-2s next year, make sure both employers correctly report your Social Security wages and taxes withheld. I've seen cases where there were reporting errors that complicated the refund process. 2) If you're doing the W-4 adjustment strategy, keep detailed records of your calculations and reasoning. If you ever get questioned by the IRS about your withholding, having documentation showing you were trying to offset legitimate overwithholding will be helpful. 3) For those asking about state taxes - most states don't have Social Security taxes, but if you're moving between states, you might have other withholding considerations like different state income tax rates or reciprocity agreements. The W-4 adjustment approach really is the most practical solution available under current tax law. Just remember that the 2025 W-4 form is different from previous years, so make sure you're using the current version and following the updated instructions. One last tip: consider doing a mid-year tax projection in November or December to make sure your withholding adjustments are on track. Better to make a small correction then than be surprised at tax time!
This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping to find! As someone new to this situation, I really appreciate the practical tips about record-keeping and the mid-year tax projection idea. Quick question about point #1 - what kind of W-2 reporting errors should I be watching out for? Is it usually mistakes in the Social Security wages box or the taxes withheld amounts? And if I do spot an error, what's the best way to get it corrected? Also, when you mention doing a mid-year projection in November/December, are there specific tools or worksheets you'd recommend for someone who isn't a tax professional? I want to make sure I'm staying on track with my withholding adjustments but don't want to overcomplicate things. Thanks for sharing your expertise - it's really reassuring to hear from someone who deals with this regularly!
Douglas Foster
This happened to a relative of mine in 2023. The IRS actually has a specific procedure for this. If you google "IRS erroneous refund procedures" you'll find their official guidance. Main thing is documenting everything and not spending the money. Is there any chance someone could have filed a tax return using your personal info? Might be worth checking your credit report just to make sure there's no other funny business going on. Identity theft with tax refunds has been increasing lately.
0 coins
Nina Chan
ā¢Yeah this happened to me but it was actually tax identity theft. Someone had filed a return using my SSN but somehow my bank account info got mixed up in it. Check your credit reports ASAP and maybe put a fraud alert on your credit file just to be safe.
0 coins
Arjun Patel
ā¢I hadn't even thought about identity theft! I just checked my credit report and everything looks normal, no suspicious activities. But I'm going to put a fraud alert on my file anyway just to be extra careful. The weird thing is that I was planning to file my taxes next week, so it's not like someone else could have already filed them for me. Unless they somehow used my bank info with a different SSN? Is that even possible?
0 coins
Daniel Price
Actually, it's totally possible for someone to use your bank account info with a different SSN - this is more common than you'd think. Tax scammers sometimes get banking information through data breaches or phishing schemes, then file fraudulent returns using stolen SSNs but legitimate bank accounts for the refunds. The fact that there are two separate deposits ($7,250 and $1,750) makes me think this could be two different fraudulent returns rather than just a simple IRS mistake. Most legitimate refunds would come as one deposit, not split amounts like this. When you call the IRS, make sure to ask them specifically if any returns have been filed using your banking information but different SSNs. They can check this and will be able to tell you if this is fraud-related rather than just an administrative error. If it is fraud, they'll need to flag your account and potentially investigate how your banking information was compromised. Also consider changing your bank account numbers just to be safe. Better to deal with the hassle of updating your direct deposit info than risk this happening again.
0 coins
Omar Fawzi
ā¢This is really helpful - I never would have considered that someone could use my bank info with different SSNs. The two separate deposits definitely seemed odd to me too. When I call the IRS, I'll make sure to ask about any returns filed with my banking information and different SSNs like you suggested. I'm also going to contact my bank about changing my account numbers. You're right that dealing with updating direct deposit info is way better than having this happen again. Thanks for the detailed explanation - this gives me a much better understanding of what might have actually happened here.
0 coins