< Back to IRS

Nalani Liu

How to properly fill out a W9 for a disregarded LLC owned by a corporate parent?

I think I have a silly question, but it's been causing me headaches with clients and vendors lately. I need some clarity on W9 forms for our company structure. Our business is set up as an LLC that's disregarded for federal tax purposes (SMLLC) with a corporate parent. When completing W9s, I've been putting our parent company "Mountain Ridge Enterprises" on Line 1, our LLC "Valleyview Services" on Line 2, and using Mountain Ridge's EIN in Part 1. Based on the W9 instructions, I believe this is correct. The problem is this confuses everyone we work with because previously, the company just put "Valleyview Services" on Line 1 with Valleyview's EIN. Now clients keep questioning the EIN change and asking "who is Mountain Ridge Enterprises?" It's creating so much confusion that I've started reverting to the old (but I think incorrect) way of filling out W9s just to avoid the hassle. I feel like I'm doing something wrong by not following the proper instructions, but it makes everything so much easier. How do you all handle W9s for disregarded LLCs with corporate parents? Is there a better way to do this that won't confuse clients but still follows IRS rules?

You're actually doing it right the first time. For a single-member LLC that's disregarded for federal tax purposes, the W9 should list the owner's name on Line 1 (your corporate parent), the disregarded entity's name on Line 2, and the owner's EIN in Part 1. The confusion from your clients is understandable but doesn't change the correct way to complete the form. The IRS specifically addresses this in their W9 instructions. The disregarded entity's legal name goes on Line 2 as "doing business as" (DBA), and the parent corporation's information goes everywhere else because they're the actual taxpayer from the IRS perspective. If it helps, you could add a brief cover letter explaining the change when you send W9s to vendors who previously had the incorrect version. Something like: "Please note our W9 now correctly reflects our company structure per IRS requirements. The parent company listed is the appropriate taxpayer entity.

0 coins

But what about the business name field in Part 1 where you check Corporate? Do you put the parent name or the LLC name there too? And what about state tax forms - do they follow the same rules?

0 coins

For the business name field in Part 1 where you check "Corporation," you should put the parent company's name since they are the actual taxpayer entity. The LLC name only goes on Line 2. For state tax forms, it varies by state. Some states respect the federal disregarded entity status, while others may treat the LLC as a separate entity for state tax purposes. You should check with each state's tax department where you do business. In many cases, you may need to file separate documentation notifying the state of the disregarded status.

0 coins

After spending hours trying to sort out my LLC tax stuff, I finally found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it completely solved my W9 confusion. I uploaded my company structure documents and the IRS instructions, and it analyzed everything and confirmed exactly how to fill out the form correctly. It highlighted the specific parts of the W9 instructions that apply to disregarded entities and showed me examples of properly completed forms. What really helped was that it created a custom explanation I could send to my clients explaining why the W9 looks different than before. The vendors stopped questioning it once they understood the tax rules behind it.

0 coins

Does this tool work for more complicated structures? We have multiple LLCs under different parent entities and I'm wondering if it can handle figuring out all the different W9 configurations we need.

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these AI tools. How accurate is it really with complex tax situations? Does an actual tax professional review the recommendations or is it just spitting out generic advice?

0 coins

It definitely works for more complicated structures. I've seen people use it with tiered partnerships, multi-member LLCs, and even complex international entity structures. You can upload your entire organizational chart and it will analyze each entity relationship separately. As for accuracy, I had the same concern initially. What impressed me was that it actually cites specific sections of the tax code and IRS publications with every recommendation. It's not just giving generic advice - it's pulling directly from IRS sources. I cross-checked some of its recommendations with my CPA and they confirmed everything was correct. It's been a huge time-saver for our company.

0 coins

I was really skeptical about taxr.ai at first, but after struggling with our complicated business structure, I decided to give it a try. I've been pleasantly surprised. I uploaded our operating agreements and corporate docs, and it accurately identified our disregarded entity status and provided the correct W9 completion instructions. What I found most helpful was the explanation feature - it generated a simple PDF I could send to vendors explaining why the W9 shows our corporate parent rather than just the LLC they're familiar with. The vendors have stopped questioning us about it, and I'm confident we're following the proper IRS guidelines now. It saved me from having to revert to the incorrect method just to avoid confusion.

0 coins

If you're tired of explaining your W9 situation to every client, you might want to try what I did. I had the same issue with my disregarded LLC, and after weeks of back and forth with clients, I called the IRS to get official clarification I could reference. It took FOREVER to reach someone - like 3 hours on hold. I finally discovered Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and used their service to get an IRS agent on the phone in about 15 minutes. I recorded the call (with permission) where the agent confirmed the correct way to fill out the W9 for a disregarded LLC. Now I just send that recording along with my W9 to any client who questions it. Check out how it works: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c

0 coins

Is this service actually legit? How does it get you through to the IRS faster than just calling directly? Seems too good to be true.

0 coins

I don't believe this works. I've been told by multiple people there's no way to skip the IRS phone queue. This sounds like a scam to get people to pay for something that doesn't work.

0 coins

It's completely legitimate. They use an automated system that dials repeatedly using multiple lines until one gets through, then transfers that call to you. It's not "skipping" the queue - it's just automating the process of calling back repeatedly until you get in. The reason it works is simple - most people give up after being on hold for an hour, but their system never gives up. I've used it three times now for different tax questions, and it's worked every time. The longest I waited was 23 minutes, which is a miracle compared to the hours I used to spend on hold. They don't guarantee an immediate connection, just a much faster one than you'd likely get yourself.

0 coins

I can't believe I'm saying this, but I tried Claimyr after my skeptical comment, and it actually worked. After struggling for weeks with our complex W9 situation, I got connected to an IRS representative in about 18 minutes. The agent walked me through exactly how to complete the W9 for our disregarded LLC and confirmed what others said here - parent company on Line 1, LLC on Line 2, parent's EIN in Part 1. The agent also emailed me official IRS documentation explaining this requirement, which I now include when sending W9s to new clients. No more confusion or arguments about whose EIN should be used. I wish I had done this months ago instead of sending out forms I knew were technically incorrect just to avoid the hassle.

0 coins

There's actually another approach I've used that works well. Fill out the W9 correctly (parent on Line 1, LLC on Line 2, parent's EIN), but in the "Notes" section or in a cover letter, I include: "For payments, please reference [LLC Name] on all documentation. This W9 reflects our parent company for tax purposes per IRS requirements." Most accounting systems allow you to set the "doing business as" name different from the legal entity name, so this helps clients correctly process payments while still having proper tax documentation.

0 coins

Do you ever have issues with 1099s being issued incorrectly at year-end? I'm worried that even with a note, clients will issue 1099s to the LLC instead of the parent company.

0 coins

That's a valid concern. I've found that about 80% of clients still get it right, but for the other 20%, I do sometimes receive incorrectly issued 1099s in the LLC name instead of the parent company name. When that happens, I contact the client right away and ask them to correct and reissue the 1099 with the proper information. It's a bit of a hassle, but most are willing to fix it once I explain the situation. For very stubborn clients, I have my tax accountant prepare a reconciliation schedule that explains the discrepancy to include with our tax filings. The IRS is generally understanding of these situations as long as you have documentation showing you attempted to correct the issue.

0 coins

I think this could actually be a good situation to use the new Form W-9 (Rev. October 2024) since they updated it specifically to address confusion with disregarded entities. The new form has clearer instructions for this exact scenario and a dedicated spot to put "For tax filing purposes only" next to the corporate parent name. You should be able to download it from the IRS website. The new form makes it much more obvious to clients why you're listing both names.

0 coins

There's a new W-9 form? I haven't seen this update. Last time I downloaded it from the IRS site it was still the 2018 version. Do you have a direct link to this new form with the disregarded entity improvements?

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact same situation for the past two years! What finally worked for me was creating a standardized "W-9 Explanation Sheet" that I attach to every W-9 I send out. It includes a simple diagram showing our corporate structure and a brief explanation that says something like: "Our LLC (Valleyview Services) is a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes, meaning the IRS treats it as part of our parent corporation (Mountain Ridge Enterprises) for tax reporting. This is why Line 1 shows our parent company name and we use their EIN - it's required by IRS regulations, not a mistake." I also include a reference to the specific IRS Publication 1635 section that covers this. Since I started doing this about 6 months ago, I've had maybe 2-3 follow-up questions total instead of the constant back-and-forth I used to get. Most clients just file it away and move on once they understand it's an IRS requirement, not our choice. The key is being proactive about the explanation rather than waiting for them to question it. It's saved me probably 10+ hours of phone calls and emails per month.

0 coins

This is such a smart approach! I'm definitely going to create something similar for our company. Do you mind sharing what you included in your diagram? I'm trying to figure out the best way to visually show the relationship between our LLC and parent corp without making it too complicated for clients to understand. Also, that reference to IRS Publication 1635 is really helpful - I didn't know there was a specific publication that addressed this. Having that official backing should help a lot with skeptical clients who think we're just making things up.

0 coins

I've been lurking on this thread because I'm facing the exact same W-9 headaches with our disregarded LLC structure. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - it's reassuring to know I'm not the only one dealing with confused clients and vendors. What really resonates with me is the proactive explanation approach that several of you mentioned. I think I've been making this harder on myself by just sending the W-9 without context and then having to explain it after people get confused. The idea of creating a standardized explanation sheet or cover letter seems like it could save so much time and frustration. I'm particularly interested in the IRS Publication 1635 reference - I had no idea there was specific guidance on this. Does anyone know if there are other IRS publications or resources that address disregarded entity W-9 completion? Having multiple official sources to reference would probably help with the more stubborn clients who keep insisting we're doing it wrong. Also, for those who have successfully implemented the explanation sheet approach - do you find that clients are more accepting when they see it's an IRS requirement rather than just our preference? I'm hoping that emphasizing the regulatory aspect will reduce the pushback we get.

0 coins

Yes, clients are definitely more accepting when you frame it as an IRS requirement! I've found that people stop arguing once they realize it's not our choice but a federal tax regulation we have to follow. Besides IRS Publication 1635, you should also look at the Instructions for Form W-9 (especially the section on "Name" requirements) and IRS Publication 3402 which covers tax issues for limited liability companies. Having multiple official sources really helps when you get those clients who think they know better. One thing I learned the hard way - make sure your explanation is simple and doesn't use too much tax jargon. I originally wrote something very technical and it just confused people more. Now I use plain language like "The IRS requires us to list our parent company for tax purposes, even though you're working with our LLC" and that works much better. The key is getting ahead of the confusion before it starts. Once clients understand it's a compliance issue, they usually just accept it and move on.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I've been struggling with the same W-9 confusion for months with our disregarded LLC. What I'm taking away from all these responses is that I need to stop second-guessing myself and stick with the correct IRS method (parent company on Line 1, LLC on Line 2, parent's EIN). I love the idea of creating a proactive explanation sheet. I think part of my problem has been that I keep flip-flopping between the correct and incorrect methods depending on who I'm dealing with, which probably makes me look unprofessional and inconsistent. Having a standardized approach with official IRS references should give me the confidence to do it right every time. One question for those who have implemented the explanation sheet approach - do you customize it for each client or use the same template for everyone? I'm wondering if mentioning the specific LLC and parent company names makes it more personal and therefore more credible, or if a generic explanation works just as well. Also, has anyone dealt with international clients who might not be familiar with US disregarded entity rules? I have a few overseas vendors who seem especially confused by our W-9, and I'm wondering if there are additional explanations that might help in those situations.

0 coins

I customize my explanation sheet with the specific company names - it definitely makes it feel more personal and credible rather than like a generic form letter. I use a template but fill in "Valleyview Services LLC" and "Mountain Ridge Enterprises Corp" so clients can see exactly how it applies to our situation. For international clients, I've found it helpful to add a brief note explaining that this is a US-specific tax classification that doesn't affect how they work with us day-to-day. I usually include something like: "This tax designation is purely for US federal tax purposes and doesn't change our business relationship or contract terms." That seems to reassure them that they don't need to understand the complexities of US tax law to work with us. The consistency point you made is spot-on - once I stopped switching back and forth based on who was asking, everything got so much easier. Clients respect consistency and official compliance more than they appreciate having their preferences accommodated when those preferences are technically incorrect.

0 coins

This has been such a valuable discussion! I've been dealing with this exact same issue for over a year with our disregarded LLC, and reading everyone's experiences has given me the confidence to finally do this right consistently. What really helped was seeing that multiple people confirmed the correct approach (parent company on Line 1, LLC on Line 2, parent's EIN) and that the confusion from clients is normal and manageable. I think I've been overthinking this and making it harder than it needs to be. I'm definitely going to implement the proactive explanation sheet approach that several people mentioned. Having official IRS publication references seems like it will eliminate most of the pushback I've been getting. The idea of framing it as "IRS requirement" rather than our preference is brilliant - people tend to stop arguing once they understand it's regulatory compliance. For anyone else still struggling with this - it sounds like the key is consistency and proactive communication. Stop flip-flopping between methods and stick with what's correct according to IRS rules, then get ahead of the confusion with clear explanations that reference official sources. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences and solutions. This community is incredibly helpful for navigating these tricky business situations!

0 coins

I'm so glad I found this discussion! I just started handling tax paperwork for our disregarded LLC and was completely confused about the W-9 situation. Reading through everyone's experiences has been incredibly enlightening - especially learning that the confusion from clients is totally normal and not a sign that we're doing something wrong. I had no idea about IRS Publication 1635 or that there were specific official guidelines for this situation. The proactive explanation sheet idea is genius - I can already see how that would save so much time compared to explaining it after people get confused. One thing I'm curious about - for those who have been doing this correctly for a while, do you find that repeat clients eventually stop questioning it once they get used to seeing the parent company information? Or do you still need to include explanations every time you send a W-9, even to clients you've worked with for years?

0 coins

I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm in a very similar situation with our disregarded LLC. What struck me most is how many of us have been second-guessing ourselves and flip-flopping between the correct and incorrect methods just to avoid client confusion. After reading through all these responses, I'm convinced that the proactive explanation approach is the way to go. I especially appreciate the specific references to IRS Publication 1635 and the Instructions for Form W-9 - having those official sources to cite should eliminate most of the pushback. One thing I'd add for anyone implementing this: consider timing your W-9 updates strategically. I plan to send out corrected W-9s with explanation sheets to all our regular clients during our annual contract renewals, so it feels like part of a routine administrative update rather than a sudden change. This might reduce the "why are you changing this now?" questions. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions. It's reassuring to know this is a common challenge and that there are proven ways to handle it professionally while staying compliant with IRS requirements.

0 coins

That's a really smart timing strategy! I never thought about coordinating W-9 updates with contract renewals, but that makes so much sense. It frames it as routine administrative maintenance rather than a sudden policy change, which should definitely reduce client confusion and resistance. I'm actually going to steal this idea for our company. We have annual service agreements with most of our clients, so including updated W-9s with proper explanations as part of that renewal process feels much more natural than sending them out randomly mid-year. This whole thread has been incredibly helpful - it's amazing how a simple tax form can cause so much headache, but seeing everyone's solutions gives me confidence we can handle this professionally while staying compliant. The combination of correct IRS methodology + proactive explanations + strategic timing seems like the perfect approach.

0 coins

This discussion has been incredibly valuable! I've been dealing with the exact same W-9 confusion for our disregarded LLC, and it's such a relief to see that so many others have faced this challenge. The consensus here is clear - we need to stick with the correct IRS method (parent company on Line 1, LLC on Line 2, parent's EIN) and stop second-guessing ourselves. What I'm taking away from this thread: 1. Create a proactive explanation sheet with IRS publication references (1635, Form W-9 instructions) 2. Frame it as regulatory compliance, not our preference 3. Be consistent - no more flip-flopping based on client preferences 4. Time updates strategically (like during contract renewals) The amount of time and stress this could save is huge. I've probably spent 20+ hours over the past year explaining and re-explaining our W-9s to confused clients. Having a standardized, professional explanation that cites official IRS sources should eliminate most of that back-and-forth. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences and practical solutions. This is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that makes navigating business compliance so much easier!

0 coins

This summary is perfect! As someone who just joined this community, I'm amazed at how thorough and practical all the advice has been. I'm currently setting up our business structure and was dreading the W-9 complexity, but now I feel like I have a clear roadmap to follow. The four-point takeaway you outlined is exactly what I needed - especially the emphasis on consistency and regulatory compliance framing. It makes total sense that clients would be more accepting when they understand it's an IRS requirement rather than our arbitrary choice. I'm definitely going to bookmark this thread as a reference. The specific publication citations (IRS Pub 1635, Form W-9 instructions) and the proactive explanation approach seem like they'll save so much hassle down the road. Thanks to everyone who shared their hard-won experience - this kind of practical guidance is invaluable for those of us just starting to navigate these complexities!

0 coins

This entire discussion has been a game-changer for me! I've been struggling with our disregarded LLC's W-9 situation for almost two years, constantly switching between the correct and incorrect methods based on client reactions. Reading through everyone's experiences has finally given me the confidence to do this right consistently. What really resonates is how many of us have been in the exact same position - knowing the IRS requires parent company on Line 1, LLC on Line 2, and parent's EIN, but then reverting to the "easier" incorrect method to avoid client confusion. That inconsistency probably made us look unprofessional and unreliable. I'm implementing the proactive explanation sheet approach immediately. Having official IRS publication references (1635, W-9 instructions) and framing it as regulatory compliance rather than our preference should eliminate 90% of the pushback. The strategic timing suggestion of coordinating updates with contract renewals is brilliant too. One additional tip I'd add: I plan to keep a digital copy of this thread bookmarked to reference when I need to explain the situation to particularly stubborn clients. Sometimes seeing that multiple businesses face this exact same challenge helps validate that we're not just making things complicated for no reason. Thanks everyone for the practical wisdom and encouragement. This community's real-world experience is so much more valuable than just reading IRS publications in isolation!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly enlightening for me as a newcomer dealing with this exact situation! I just formed a disregarded LLC under our parent corporation and was completely lost on how to handle W-9s properly. What's been most helpful is seeing the consensus that we shouldn't compromise on IRS compliance just to avoid client confusion. I was actually leaning toward the "easier but incorrect" method after getting pushback from our first few vendors, but now I understand that consistency and proper regulatory compliance will serve us much better in the long run. The proactive explanation sheet concept is something I'm definitely implementing from day one. Having those official IRS publication references ready to go should establish credibility immediately rather than making it look like we're just making up our own rules. I love how this approach turns potential confusion into an educational opportunity that actually strengthens client relationships. Thanks for sharing your journey and insights - it's reassuring to know that even seasoned business owners have wrestled with this same challenge. The practical tips in this entire discussion are exactly what I needed to start handling this professionally from the beginning!

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm a new member here dealing with this exact W-9 nightmare for our disregarded LLC. After months of going back and forth with confused clients and vendors, I was starting to think I was the only one struggling with this. Reading through everyone's experiences has been so reassuring - especially learning that client confusion is totally normal and doesn't mean we're doing anything wrong. I've been flip-flopping between the correct method (parent company on Line 1, LLC on Line 2, parent's EIN) and the incorrect-but-easier method just to avoid the constant explanations and pushback. The proactive explanation sheet approach is brilliant! I had never thought about getting ahead of the confusion instead of just reacting to it. Having those official IRS publication references (especially Publication 1635) should give me the credibility I need to stick with the correct method consistently. What really clicked for me is framing this as "regulatory compliance" rather than our preference. That completely changes the conversation - clients tend to accept IRS requirements even when they don't love them. I'm going to create a standardized explanation that emphasizes this is federal tax law, not our arbitrary choice. Thanks everyone for sharing your hard-won wisdom! This community is such a valuable resource for navigating these tricky business compliance issues that aren't always covered clearly in official documentation.

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Zoe! Your experience sounds so familiar - I think most of us here have been in that exact same position of knowing what's technically correct but wavering because of client pushback. It's frustrating when you're trying to follow IRS rules but feel like you're constantly having to defend basic compliance. The "regulatory compliance" framing really is a game-changer. I've found that once clients understand this isn't our preference but a federal requirement, they stop treating it like a negotiation. Most people won't argue with tax law once they realize that's what it is. One thing I'd add to your implementation plan - consider creating a simple FAQ document alongside your explanation sheet. I've found that addressing common questions upfront (like "Why did this change?" and "Does this affect our payments?") prevents a lot of the back-and-forth emails. It shows you've anticipated their concerns and have professional answers ready. You're definitely on the right track with the standardized approach. Consistency really does make you look more professional and credible than constantly switching methods based on who you're dealing with.

0 coins

As someone new to this community and dealing with a similar disregarded LLC situation, this entire thread has been incredibly helpful! I've been struggling with the same W-9 confusion for months - knowing the correct IRS method but constantly second-guessing myself when clients push back. What really stands out to me is how many experienced business owners have faced this exact challenge. It's reassuring to know that client confusion is normal and doesn't indicate we're doing something wrong. I've been making the same mistake of flip-flopping between correct and incorrect methods just to avoid the hassle. The consensus here is clear: stick with IRS requirements (parent company Line 1, LLC Line 2, parent's EIN) and use proactive education rather than reactive explanations. I'm particularly excited about implementing the explanation sheet approach with official publication references - especially IRS Publication 1635 which I had never heard of before. The strategic timing suggestion of coordinating W-9 updates with contract renewals is brilliant too. It frames compliance updates as routine business maintenance rather than sudden policy changes. Thanks everyone for sharing your real-world solutions. This kind of practical guidance is exactly what new business owners need to navigate complex compliance requirements professionally!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today