IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm confused about how this affects the actual tax credits. If I allocate my scholarship to room and board instead of tuition, doesn't that make my scholarship taxable income? Wouldn't that cancel out any benefit from the education credit?

0 coins

Ally Tailer

•

That's a great question that trips up many students! Here's how it works: When you allocate scholarship money to room and board instead of tuition, yes, that portion becomes taxable income. However, this often works out in your favor because it might allow you to claim more of the American Opportunity Credit (up to $2,500) against your now "unpaid" tuition expenses. The tax on the scholarship income is usually less than the credit you gain.

0 coins

Jibriel Kohn

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar situation with scholarships exceeding my tuition costs. Just wanted to add one more resource that helped me - Publication 970 from the IRS specifically covers this in Chapter 2 under "Coordination with Pell Grants and Other Scholarships." The key point everyone's making is correct: off-campus housing absolutely counts as "room and board" for scholarship allocation purposes, but you're limited to the school's published Cost of Attendance figures. What I found really helpful was calling my school's financial aid office directly - they had the exact COA breakdown readily available and even explained how other students typically handle this situation. One thing to keep in mind: make sure you're looking at the COA for the correct academic year (2024-2025 in your case) since schools sometimes adjust these figures annually. Good luck with maximizing your education credits!

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

Thanks for mentioning Publication 970! I'm new to all this tax stuff as a first-year college student and didn't even know the IRS had specific publications for education. Just downloaded it and you're right - Chapter 2 is really helpful. One quick question though - when you called your financial aid office, did they have any forms or documentation they could send you showing the official COA breakdown? I want to make sure I have proper documentation in case the IRS ever asks questions about how I allocated my scholarship funds.

0 coins

Yuki Nakamura

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As a new member here, I'm impressed by how much practical knowledge everyone has shared about qualified improvement property and leasehold improvements. I'm currently in the planning stages for renovating a small manufacturing facility that we lease (about $75,000 budget), and reading through everyone's experiences has already helped me identify several important considerations I hadn't thought of. A few key takeaways I'm noting for my situation: - Get lease agreement reviewed BEFORE starting work to confirm who can claim deductions - Plan timing strategically to take advantage of 100% bonus depreciation while it's still available through 2025 - Separate costs between removable personal property and permanent improvements for optimal tax treatment - Document everything thoroughly with photos and detailed contractor invoices One question for the group - several people mentioned the importance of the building being "placed in service more than 3 years ago" for QIP qualification. Our leased facility was built in 2020, so we should meet this requirement. But does anyone know if there are any other timing restrictions I should be aware of? For example, does it matter how long we've been tenants, or is it just about the building's original service date? Also, @Ava Johnson - I hope you were able to get your lease reviewed and figure out the deduction situation! Your original question really sparked an amazing discussion that's going to help a lot of business owners navigate these complex rules. Thanks to everyone who has shared their real-world experiences and expertise!

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

Welcome to the community @Yuki Nakamura! Great to see another newcomer benefiting from this discussion. Your takeaways list shows you've really absorbed the key points from everyone's experiences. Regarding your timing question - the 3-year building age requirement is specifically about when the building was first placed in service, not about your tenancy duration. Since your facility was built in 2020, you're definitely good on that front! The length of time you've been a tenant doesn't affect QIP eligibility - what matters is the building age and that you're making interior improvements to nonresidential space. The main timing considerations you should focus on are: 1) Getting improvements completed and "placed in service" while 100% bonus depreciation is still available through 2025, and 2) Making sure any tax elections (like Section 179) are made on your original tax return including extensions. For a manufacturing facility, you might also want to consider whether any of your improvements could qualify as manufacturing equipment versus building improvements, since equipment might have different depreciation treatment. Things like specialized flooring for heavy machinery, industrial lighting, or built-in ventilation systems could potentially be classified in ways that optimize your deductions. Your $75,000 budget is perfect for taking full advantage of these rules. Definitely get that lease reviewed early - manufacturing leases sometimes have more complex clauses about tenant improvements than typical office or retail leases. Keep us posted on how your planning goes!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful for this detailed discussion! I just started a small consulting business and am about to sign my first commercial lease. Reading through everyone's experiences has been like getting a masterclass in commercial property tax planning. I'm particularly struck by how many people mentioned getting professional help BEFORE starting renovations rather than after. That seems like such obvious advice in hindsight, but I probably would have made the mistake of doing the work first and figuring out the taxes later. A few questions for the group: For someone just starting out with a modest renovation budget (around $35,000), is it still worth investing in professional tax advice upfront? And are there any red flags I should specifically look for in lease language that might affect my ability to claim improvement deductions? Also, I noticed several people mentioned state tax conformity issues - is there a good resource for checking whether my state (Colorado) follows the federal QIP rules, or is that something I need to ask a local tax professional about? Thanks to everyone for creating such a helpful resource for business owners navigating these complex rules. This thread is exactly the kind of practical guidance that's hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Luca Greco

•

As someone who recently went through this exact decision process, I wanted to share my perspective. I ultimately chose the EA route and couldn't be happier with that choice. The key factor for me was scalability. With a CRTP, you're essentially locked into California and limited to basic tax preparation. The EA opens doors not just geographically, but professionally - you can handle complex tax issues, represent clients before the IRS, and command significantly higher fees. Since you mentioned possibly relocating to Oregon, that alone should push you toward the EA. I have colleagues who started with state-specific credentials and later regretted having to essentially restart their certification journey when they moved. From a practical standpoint, the EA exam is challenging but very doable with your bookkeeping background. The three-part structure actually makes it less overwhelming than it initially appears. I used a combination of Gleim for structured learning and supplemented with additional practice questions from other sources. One thing that really helped me was connecting with local EA study groups through the National Association of Enrolled Agents. Having that peer support made a huge difference, especially when tackling the more complex business taxation concepts. Bottom line: if you're serious about advancing in the tax field, go straight for the EA. The time and money investment pays off much faster than taking the incremental CRTP route.

0 coins

This is really helpful perspective, thank you! I'm starting to lean heavily toward the EA route after reading everyone's experiences here. The scalability point really resonates with me - I don't want to box myself in geographically or professionally. I'm curious about the local EA study groups you mentioned through NAEA. How did you find those? I'm in San Diego and it would be great to connect with others going through the same process. Did you find the group study approach more effective than studying solo? Also, when you say you supplemented Gleim with additional practice questions, what other sources did you find most valuable? I want to make sure I'm as prepared as possible before diving into this.

0 coins

Mia Alvarez

•

I'll echo what many others have said here - go straight for the EA! I made the mistake of getting my CRTP first thinking it would be an easier stepping stone, and honestly it just delayed my progress by about 18 months. The CRTP gave me false confidence because the exam was relatively straightforward, but when I finally tackled the EA exam, I realized how much deeper and more comprehensive it was. I basically had to relearn everything at a much higher level. If I could do it over again, I would have just invested that initial CRTP study time directly into EA prep. From a business perspective, the difference is night and day. With just my CRTP, I was competing with H&R Block and other chain preparers on price. As an EA, I'm now positioning myself as a tax professional who can handle complex situations and represent clients. My average client value has more than doubled. Given your timeline of potentially moving to Oregon in a couple years, definitely go EA. You'll have portable credentials and won't need to research new state requirements or take additional exams. Plus, the representation authority that comes with EA status is invaluable - even if you never plan to handle audits, clients feel more confident knowing you legally can if needed. The exam is definitely challenging but very manageable with consistent study. Your bookkeeping background will definitely help with the foundational concepts. Just commit to the process and don't look back!

0 coins

I'm a tax professional and see this issue frequently. The "A/0" code is definitely irregular - standard federal withholding codes are M (Married), S (Single), or H (Head of Household). The "A" designation varies by payroll system but often indicates "Allowances method" or can be a data entry error. Your concern about the $190 withholding is absolutely valid. At $16/hour full-time (approximately $33,280 annually), your federal withholding should be around $2,500-$3,500 depending on your filing status and allowances. This suggests either you were marked as exempt from federal withholding or there's a significant payroll error. I strongly recommend: 1) Request your actual W-4 form from HR to verify what's on file, 2) Submit a new W-4 immediately to correct any errors, 3) Calculate your likely tax liability - you'll probably owe $2,000+ more than withheld, 4) Consider making estimated tax payments to avoid underpayment penalties. The IRS holds taxpayers responsible for underpayment regardless of employer errors, so addressing this quickly is crucial. If your employer won't cooperate, you may need to file Form 4852 (substitute W-2) with your tax return and report the discrepancy to your state's Department of Labor.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

This is incredibly thorough advice, thank you! As someone new to dealing with tax issues, I really appreciate the step-by-step breakdown. The Form 4852 option is something I'd never heard of before - it's good to know there's a backup plan if our employer continues to insist everything is correct when it clearly isn't. The estimated payment amount you mentioned ($2,000+) is pretty scary but at least now I know what we're potentially looking at. Would you recommend trying to handle the estimated payments ourselves or is this complicated enough that we should work with a tax professional for the whole situation? Also, just to clarify - when you say "allowances method," does that mean the payroll system was treating me as if I claimed allowances on an old W-4 form instead of using the newer step-by-step method? Our company did switch payroll systems mid-year so that could explain the confusion.

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

Given the complexity of your situation with the payroll system error and potential underpayment penalties, I'd strongly recommend working with a tax professional for this year at least. They can help calculate exactly how much you owe, set up the estimated payments correctly, and handle any IRS correspondence if penalties do apply. Regarding the "allowances method" - yes, exactly! When payroll systems transition from the old W-4 (with allowances) to the new W-4 (step-by-step method), there can be conversion errors. The "A" likely indicates your withholding is still being calculated using the old allowances system rather than the new method. This is particularly common when companies switch payroll providers mid-year and have to migrate employee data between different systems. The fact that your company switched systems mid-year definitely explains the timing and nature of this error. The old and new W-4 methods calculate withholding very differently, so if your information got miscoded during the migration, it could easily result in the dramatically low withholding you're seeing.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

As someone who works in HR, I can confirm that the "A/0" designation is definitely not standard federal withholding notation. Most payroll systems use M (Married), S (Single), or H (Head of Household) followed by the number of allowances or dependents. The extremely low federal withholding of $190 on what appears to be around $33,000 in annual income is a major red flag. For comparison, someone earning that amount should typically have $2,000-$4,000 in federal taxes withheld throughout the year, depending on their filing status and deductions. My guess is that during your company's payroll system transition, your federal withholding information got corrupted or miscoded. The fact that your state withholding shows the correct M/0 status suggests this is specifically a federal processing error. I'd recommend requesting a copy of your W-4 form from your HR department immediately. If they claim they can't provide it, remind them that employees have the legal right to review documents in their personnel files. Once you see what's actually on file, submit a brand new W-4 form to ensure clean data entry going forward. Also, start preparing for a potential tax bill. With that level of under-withholding, you'll likely owe significant taxes when you file. Consider consulting a tax professional about making estimated payments to avoid underpayment penalties.

0 coins

This is really helpful coming from someone in HR! I've been reading through all these responses and it's becoming clear that this is definitely a payroll system error, not something we did wrong. The timing with our company's mid-year payroll system switch makes so much sense now. I'm planning to go to HR first thing Monday morning with a clear action plan: request my W-4 copy, submit a new form regardless of what the current one shows, and start working with a tax professional to handle the estimated payments. It's frustrating that we have to deal with the financial consequences of their system error, but at least I understand what's happening now. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise - this community has been incredibly helpful for someone who was completely lost on tax codes and withholding issues!

0 coins

Can I claim my mom with dementia as a dependent if I'm the annuity owner but she's the annuitant?

I made a serious mistake last year that's coming back to haunt me tax-wise. My mother has dementia and I've been managing her finances. She receives monthly payments from a fixed annuity that continues until her death. In December 2022, I called the annuity company to get access to her account, and they suggested I could transfer ownership to myself while keeping her as the annuitant who receives the payments. Fast forward to now, and I've received a 1099-R showing all the annuity income as MY taxable income, even though every payment goes directly into her bank account! She has virtually no tax liability while I'm in a much higher bracket, so this means I'm looking at paying thousands in additional taxes. I'm obviously transferring ownership back to her, but the company says there's nothing that can be done about 2023 - I'll have to pay taxes on this income. Since these payments are appearing as my income, I'm wondering if I can count it as support I'm providing for her care? Beyond the annuity, I pay a significant portion of her monthly expenses to keep her in her home. She receives Medicaid with an aide for part of the day, but I still cover some of her rent and other costs even after her Social Security and this annuity income. If I can include the annuity as support I'm providing, the total might be enough to claim her as a dependent. Is there anything else I could do to reduce this unexpected tax burden? I'm currently looking for a good tax professional since I've always handled my taxes myself, but this situation is beyond what I'm comfortable figuring out on my own.

Nia Wilson

•

Don't forget about the Medical Expense deduction! If you're itemizing deductions and paying medical expenses for someone who qualifies as your dependent (which sounds like your mom would), you can deduct those expenses that exceed 7.5% of your AGI. This could include portions of her assisted living costs that are for medical care, prescription medications, medical equipment, etc.

0 coins

This is huge. My mother-in-law was in memory care last year and we were able to deduct about 60% of the facility costs as medical expenses based on documentation from the facility. Made a big difference on our taxes.

0 coins

I went through something very similar with my grandmother's annuity last year. One additional strategy you might consider is making estimated tax payments for Q4 2024 if you haven't already transferred the annuity back to your mom yet. This can help reduce any underpayment penalties and spread out the tax burden. Also, when you do transfer ownership back to her, make sure you get proper documentation from the annuity company about the effective date of the transfer. This will be crucial for determining which tax year the income should be reported in going forward. Since you're looking for a tax professional, I'd specifically seek out an Enrolled Agent (EA) rather than just a regular tax preparer. EAs are federally licensed and have more specialized training in complex situations like this. They can also represent you before the IRS if any questions come up about your dependency claim or the annuity reporting. The dependency exemption combined with potentially qualifying for the Child and Dependent Care Credit that others mentioned could significantly offset your unexpected tax liability. Document everything carefully - keep records of all payments you make for her care, the annuity statements showing payments going to her account, and any medical expenses you pay on her behalf.

0 coins

Prev1...595596597598599...5643Next