IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Liam McGuire

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar partnership property distribution situation and had no idea about Form 8308 requirements or the Section 754 election implications. One additional consideration I'd mention - make sure you review your partnership agreement's language around distributions before proceeding. Some agreements have specific valuation methods or approval processes that must be followed, even for distributions at book value. We discovered our agreement required unanimous consent for any property distributions, which we had overlooked initially. Also, regarding the K-1 footnotes, I found it helpful to include a brief description of the property being distributed (e.g., "Distribution of Unit 2A, 1-bedroom apartment") in addition to all the financial details everyone has mentioned. This makes it crystal clear what specific asset was distributed, which can be important if the IRS has questions later or if the partner needs to reference the distribution for future tax purposes. The documentation suggestions about getting an appraisal are spot-on. Even though it's an additional expense, it's much cheaper than dealing with an IRS challenge down the road if they question your valuation.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

This is such valuable advice about checking the partnership agreement requirements! I'm just starting to learn about partnership taxation and had never considered that the agreement itself might have specific procedures that override general tax rules. The point about including a property description in the K-1 footnotes is really smart too. I can see how that would make everything much clearer for both the partner receiving the distribution and any future reviewers. One question - when you mention unanimous consent requirements, what happens if a partner refuses to consent to a distribution that's otherwise fair and at book value? Are there legal remedies available, or does it effectively give each partner veto power over distributions? I'm wondering how common these unanimous consent clauses are and whether they create practical problems in real-world situations.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of situation where having a solid understanding of partnership tax law becomes critical. I went through a similar property distribution two years ago with our 5-partner real estate LLC, and there are a few additional considerations that haven't been fully addressed yet. First, regarding the Section 734 adjustment that @KylieRose mentioned - even if you don't have a Section 754 election in place, you should seriously consider whether making it now makes sense. The election applies to the tax year it's made, so you could still benefit from basis adjustments on this distribution. With 15% appreciation, the math might work in your favor, especially if you have other depreciable assets in the partnership. Second, don't overlook the potential for "hot assets" in your distribution. Even though you're distributing real property, if there are any Section 1245 or 1250 recapture amounts, or if the property generates ordinary income, there could be complications. Make sure your tax professional reviews whether any portion of the distribution could be treated as ordinary income rather than capital. Finally, consider the timing of this distribution relative to your partnership's tax year end. If you're distributing near year-end, you'll want to make sure all the depreciation allocations are properly calculated through the distribution date. This affects both the partnership's final depreciation deduction and the basis of the distributed property. The K-1 reporting everyone has discussed is spot-on, but I'd add that you should also consider providing the departing partner with a detailed statement showing exactly how their final capital account was calculated. This becomes invaluable documentation if there are ever questions about the transaction.

0 coins

This is incredibly thorough analysis @Tristan Carpenter! As someone new to partnership taxation, I really appreciate you breaking down these advanced concepts. The point about "hot assets" is particularly interesting - I hadn't realized that even real property distributions could potentially trigger ordinary income treatment in certain situations. Your timing consideration about year-end distributions is really smart too. I can see how getting the depreciation allocations wrong could create problems for both the partnership and the departing partner when they're trying to establish their basis in the distributed property. One follow-up question on the Section 754 election - you mentioned it could apply to the tax year it's made. Does this mean @DeShawn Washington could make the election on their current year return and get the basis step-up benefits immediately? Or does it only apply to distributions that occur after the election is made? I m'trying to understand the timing mechanics of how this election works in practice. Also, regarding the detailed capital account statement you suggest providing - are there any specific IRS requirements for what this needs to include, or is it more about creating good documentation for everyone involved?

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

One thing to be aware of - the 50% limitation on business meal deductions temporarily changed for 2021 and 2022. Restaurant meals were 100% deductible during those years as part of COVID relief. But for 2025 tax filing, we're back to the standard 50% deduction for business meals. Just wanted to mention this because I've seen some outdated articles still circulating that mention the 100% deduction.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

As someone who's been through an IRS audit specifically related to business meal deductions, I can't stress enough how important contemporaneous documentation is. The auditor told me that receipts alone are never enough - they need to see evidence that you recorded the business purpose and attendees at the time of the meal, not months or years later. What saved me was that I had developed a habit of writing brief notes on the back of receipts immediately after meals. Things like "Lunch with Sarah Chen, potential web design client - discussed project timeline and budget requirements." The auditor was satisfied with this simple approach. One tip that might help others: if you're uncomfortable writing business details on receipts in public, just jot down initials or a code word that will remind you later, then expand on it when you get back to your car or office. The key is creating that paper trail showing you documented things in real-time, not reconstructed them during tax prep.

0 coins

This is incredibly valuable advice from someone who's actually been through the process! I'm curious - during your audit, did the IRS auditor give you any insight into what specific red flags trigger them to look more closely at business meal deductions? I've always wondered if there are certain patterns or amounts that automatically get flagged for review. Also, when you mention writing notes on receipts immediately, do you think using a smartphone to quickly type notes into a memo app would be considered equally valid "contemporaneous" documentation? Sometimes it's hard to write legibly on small receipt paper, especially in dimly lit restaurants.

0 coins

Has anybody calculated whether it's still worth adding your partner to your insurance after all these extra taxes? I'm doing the math and it seems like separate marketplace insurance might be cheaper once you factor in the tax hit.

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

Depends entirely on your tax bracket and what kind of plan your partner could get elsewhere. For us, even with the extra tax burden, my employer plan was still about $1700 cheaper annually than what my partner would pay on the marketplace for similar coverage.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Great breakdown from everyone! Just want to add that timing matters too - if you're adding your partner mid-year, the imputed income will be prorated for the months they're covered. So if you add them in July, you'd only have 6 months of imputed income added to your W-2. Also, don't forget that the imputed income affects more than just your federal taxes. It also increases your Social Security and Medicare tax liability since those are calculated on your total taxable income. In the original example with $630/month extra employer contribution, that's an additional $580 per year in FICA taxes (7.65% of $7,560). One last tip - if your company offers an HSA with your health plan, the increased coverage cost might make you eligible for higher HSA contribution limits since you'd be switching from self-only to family coverage. The extra tax-deductible HSA contributions could help offset some of the tax impact from the imputed income.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

This is really helpful info about the timing and FICA taxes - I hadn't thought about those extra costs! Quick question about the HSA piece though - if I switch from individual to family coverage, does that automatically make me eligible for the higher HSA contribution limit, or do I need to have actual tax dependents to qualify for the family HSA limit? My partner wouldn't be my tax dependent since they have their own income.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

This is such a comprehensive discussion - really helpful for anyone dealing with precious metals taxation! I just wanted to add one more consideration that might be relevant for your situation. Since you mentioned the coin has appreciated nicely over the past several years, you might want to think about whether this sale fits into any broader investment or financial planning strategy. While the tax implications are important (and everyone here has covered those thoroughly), sometimes the timing of when to realize gains depends on your overall financial picture. For example, if you're planning any major purchases or have other financial goals coming up, the after-tax proceeds from this sale might be useful. On the other hand, if you don't need the cash immediately and believe gold might continue appreciating, the 28% collectibles rate is pretty steep compared to other investment options. Also, since you've been holding it for several years and clearly know how to store and maintain precious metals properly, you might consider whether this is a one-time sale or if you're thinking about adjusting your overall allocation to precious metals. The tax treatment will be the same for any future gold coin sales, so understanding the process now (which you clearly do based on all the great advice here) will serve you well. Either way, you seem very well prepared with documentation and understanding of the tax implications. Good luck with whatever you decide!

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

This is such great advice about looking at the bigger financial picture! You're absolutely right that the 28% collectibles rate is pretty steep compared to other investment options. I've been thinking about this sale in isolation, but your point about broader investment strategy really resonates. I don't actually need the cash immediately, so maybe I should consider whether there are better ways to diversify or rebalance my portfolio that don't trigger such a high tax rate. The fact that I've successfully stored and maintained this coin for several years does suggest I could continue holding precious metals if that makes sense strategically. Maybe instead of selling this coin, I should look at trimming some of my stock positions that would qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rates? Thanks for bringing up these strategic considerations - it's easy to get focused on the tax mechanics and lose sight of the overall financial planning aspect!

0 coins

I've been following this discussion and wanted to share something that might be helpful for anyone dealing with precious metals taxation questions. While everyone has covered the tax implications really well (yes, you need to report even a single coin sale, and yes, it's subject to the 28% collectibles rate), I wanted to mention that if you're looking for personalized guidance on your specific situation, there are some good resources available. I recently used a service called TaxGPT (https://taxgpt.com) when I had questions about selling some inherited silver coins. What I liked about it was that it could analyze my specific situation - including the inheritance aspect, basis calculation, and state tax implications - and give me clear, personalized guidance rather than just general information. The tool walked me through exactly how to handle the inherited basis (stepped-up to fair market value at date of death), what forms I needed to file, and even helped me understand the record-keeping requirements. It was especially helpful because inherited precious metals have some unique considerations that general tax advice doesn't always cover well. For your situation with a straightforward purchase and sale, you probably have all the information you need from this discussion. But if you want to double-check your approach or get confirmation that you're handling everything correctly, it might be worth looking into specialized tax guidance tools that can account for the nuances of precious metals transactions. Either way, you're clearly well-prepared with your documentation and understanding of the process!

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

I went through this exact same situation last year with my 14-year-old daughter who had about $18 in capital gains from a stock split cash payment. After researching extensively and consulting with my CPA, here's what I learned: The IRS Publication 929 does provide some flexibility for "incidental" capital gains when using Form 8814. While the form doesn't explicitly mention regular capital gains, there's guidance that allows including small amounts that don't materially affect the tax calculation. For your $22 gain, I'd recommend including it on Form 8814 line 1a with your daughter's other unearned income. The key factors that support this approach: 1. The amount is less than 1% of her total income 2. It won't change her tax liability in any meaningful way 3. Filing a separate return would create unnecessary administrative burden Just make sure to keep good records showing the 1099-B and your reasoning for including it on Form 8814. In the unlikely event of any questions later, you can demonstrate that you made a reasonable interpretation based on the circumstances. The practical reality is that the IRS isn't going to scrutinize a $22 capital gain on a child's return, especially when it's clearly reported and the family is making a good faith effort to comply with the tax laws.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of real-world guidance I was hoping to find! Your experience with a similar situation and the reference to Publication 929 is really reassuring. I've been going back and forth on this for days, worried about making the wrong choice. The point about it being less than 1% of total income really puts it in perspective - $22 out of $2400 is truly incidental. And you're right that the administrative burden of filing a separate return seems way out of proportion to the potential benefit. I'm going to follow your approach and include it on Form 8814 line 1a, making sure to document everything clearly. Thanks for sharing the specific factors you considered - that gives me a solid framework for making this decision confidently.

0 coins

I just wanted to chime in as someone who's been through this exact scenario multiple times with my three kids over the years. The $22 capital gain from fractional shares is such a common situation now with so many brokerages handling stock splits this way. Here's my take after dealing with this probably 6-7 times: include it on Form 8814. I've never had any issues doing this, and I think the reasoning others have shared here is sound. The IRS has bigger fish to fry than a $22 capital gain on a child's return, especially when you're clearly trying to report everything properly. What I do is keep a simple spreadsheet each year documenting these decisions. For example: "2024 - Daughter Sarah - $22 LT capital gain from XYZ Corp fractional shares included on Form 8814 line 1a due to de minimis amount (0.9% of total unearned income)." Takes 30 seconds and gives you documentation if you ever need it. The key is being consistent and reasonable. If next year she has $500 in capital gains, then I'd file separately. But for these tiny amounts from fractional share payouts? Form 8814 all the way.

0 coins

This is such practical advice, thank you! I love the idea of keeping a simple spreadsheet to document these decisions. That's the kind of organized approach that makes total sense but I never would have thought of on my own. Your point about consistency is really important too - having a clear threshold in mind (like your example of $500 being worth a separate return) takes the guesswork out of future years. And you're absolutely right that fractional share payouts are becoming so common now with stock splits. I'm definitely going to start that documentation spreadsheet approach. It seems like such a small thing but could be really valuable if there are ever any questions down the road. Thanks for sharing your multi-year experience with this - it's reassuring to hear from someone who's navigated this successfully multiple times!

0 coins

Prev1...662663664665666...5643Next