


Ask the community...
I'm also going through this exact situation right now! My refund check appeared in Informed Delivery on March 25th and it's been 4 days with no delivery yet. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a huge relief - I was starting to panic thinking my check had been stolen. It's incredible how many people are dealing with nearly identical timelines and delays. The postal worker's explanation about the multi-step processing and additional security handling for IRS checks really helps me understand what's happening. I had no idea that Informed Delivery scans happen at regional facilities that could be days away from our local post offices! Based on all the shared experiences here, it seems like waiting 8-10 days from the Informed Delivery notification is the reasonable approach before taking action. For your sister's situation with the March 22nd notification, I'd definitely follow the advice about waiting until around March 31st before visiting the post office. This thread has been so valuable - it's reassuring to know that these delays are systemic USPS issues rather than theft in most cases. The stress of waiting for your refund money when you can see it was already processed is real, but hearing everyone's similar stories gives me confidence that our checks are just stuck in the postal pipeline. Thanks for starting this discussion - it's helping so many of us who are in the same boat!
I'm so glad I found this thread! I'm a newcomer to this community and dealing with the exact same issue. My refund check showed up in Informed Delivery on March 26th and it's been 3 days now. I was getting really anxious about potential mail theft, but reading everyone's experiences has been incredibly reassuring. It's amazing how many people are going through nearly identical situations with very similar timelines. The postal worker's detailed explanation about the multi-step processing really opened my eyes - I had no idea there were so many stages between the Informed Delivery scan and actual delivery. Your March 25th date is just one day before mine, so we're basically in the same timeline. Based on all the advice here, I'm going to wait until around April 4th (giving it about 9 days total) before getting concerned. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences - this community has been so helpful for a newcomer like me who was starting to panic unnecessarily!
I'm a newcomer to this community and I'm dealing with this exact same situation! My tax refund check appeared in Informed Delivery on March 27th and it's been 2 days now. I was starting to get really worried about mail theft, but reading through all these responses has been incredibly reassuring. It's amazing to see how many community members are experiencing nearly identical delays with very similar timelines. The explanation from the postal worker about the multi-step processing and additional security handling for IRS checks really helps explain what's happening behind the scenes. I had no idea that Informed Delivery scans occur at regional facilities that could be days away from our local post offices! Based on everyone's shared experiences, it seems like 7-12 day delays are unfortunately normal this tax season. For your sister's March 22nd situation, following the advice about waiting until March 31st (9 days from Informed Delivery) before taking action sounds very reasonable. This thread has been such a lifesaver for someone new like me who was starting to panic unnecessarily. The stress of seeing your refund check processed but not delivered is real, but hearing from so many people with similar experiences gives me confidence that these are just USPS processing delays rather than theft. Thanks to everyone for creating such a helpful discussion!
Welcome to the community! I'm new here too and so relieved to find this thread. My refund check showed up in Informed Delivery on March 28th, so I'm just one day behind you with only 1 day of waiting so far. Reading everyone's experiences has been incredibly helpful - I was already starting to worry after just one day! It's reassuring to see that delays of 7-12 days seem to be completely normal this tax season. The postal worker's explanation about regional processing facilities and security handling really put things in perspective for me. Based on all the shared timelines here, I'm going to wait until around April 6th before getting concerned (that would be about 9 days from my Informed Delivery notification). Thanks for sharing your experience and helping newcomers like us understand that these delays are systemic USPS issues rather than theft. This community has been so valuable for easing anxiety about what seems to be a very common situation!
This is exactly what happened to me two years ago! The CP81 notice is actually a good thing - it means the IRS has legitimate withholdings or credits on file for you, they just can't match them to a processed return. In my case, the issue was that my e-filed return had a small formatting error that caused an automatic rejection, but the rejection notice got buried in my email spam folder. Meanwhile, my employer had already submitted my W-2 to the IRS showing tax withholdings, which created the credit balance. Here's my advice: First, log into your IRS online account at IRS.gov and pull your "Wage and Income Transcript" for 2021. This will show you exactly what income documents (W-2s, 1099s, etc.) the IRS has received about you. Compare that to what you filed - if they match, then you likely just need to refile your return. When you refile, make sure to write "SUPERSEDING RETURN" at the top if filing by paper, or use the same process through TurboTax if electronic filing is still open for 2021 returns. The $4,177 is real money that belongs to you - don't let it sit there unclaimed! One last tip: if you do need to call the IRS, try calling exactly at 7 AM when they open. The wait times are much shorter in the early morning before everyone else starts calling.
This is such great advice, especially about checking the Wage and Income Transcript! I had no idea the IRS received W-2s separately from our actual tax returns - that explains so much about why they'd have a credit amount but claim they don't have our return. The "SUPERSEDING RETURN" tip is really helpful too since I was worried about filing twice and causing more confusion. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly - it's making me feel much more confident about resolving this situation!
I'm going through the exact same thing right now! Got my CP81 notice yesterday showing a $3,892 credit but claiming they never received my 2021 return. Like you, I definitely e-filed through TurboTax and got all the confirmation emails. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - it sounds like this is way more common than I thought. The explanation about the IRS having our W-2 information separately from our actual returns makes so much sense now. I never realized employers submit that data directly to the IRS. I'm going to try the 7 AM calling strategy tomorrow morning, and I'll definitely check my IRS online account first to see what transcripts they have on file. It's reassuring to know that credit amount is legitimate money and not some kind of error or scam. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this thread has been a lifesaver for understanding what's actually going on with these notices!
Does anyone know if there are different tax rules for classic or collector cars? I sold an old Mustang last year and actually made a profit (bought it in rough shape years ago and restored it). Is that different than a regular car?
Yes! Collector cars can be treated as capital assets, and if you sold it for more than you paid (including restoration costs), you'd report it as a capital gain. If you owned it more than a year, it would be a long-term capital gain which is taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income. Make sure you document all the restoration expenses as they increase your cost basis. So if you bought it for $5k, put $10k into restoration, your basis would be $15k. If you sold for $25k, your taxable gain would be $10k.
One thing to keep in mind is that even though you don't need to report the loss on your personal vehicle sale, if you had any outstanding loan balance when you sold it, that doesn't change the tax treatment. The IRS looks at the economic substance - you bought for $35k, sold for $17.5k, so you had a $17.5k loss regardless of loan status. Also, since you sold through Carvana, they should have provided you with documentation of the sale price. Keep that along with your original purchase paperwork as Kayla mentioned. Even though it's not reportable, having clean records makes everything easier if questions ever come up. The confusion about "profit" vs "cash received" is totally understandable - a lot of people think getting cash means profit, but from a tax perspective it's all about the difference between what you paid and what you received, not your loan balance.
This is really helpful clarification! I think a lot of people get confused about the loan aspect because psychologically it feels like "profit" when you walk away with cash after paying off debt. But you're absolutely right - the tax calculation is purely purchase price minus sale price, regardless of financing. One follow-up question though - does it matter if some of the original $35k purchase price included taxes, fees, or extended warranties? Or is it just the vehicle price itself that counts as the cost basis?
Has anyone used the actual expense method vs. standard mileage rate for a leased vehicle? I've heard conflicting advice about which is better.
I've done both over the years. For leasing, I found the actual expense method usually works out better, especially if you have a more expensive vehicle. Here's why: with leasing, you're paying for the car's depreciation in your lease payment, plus you have insurance, maintenance, fuel, etc. The standard mileage rate might not fully cover all these costs.
Just wanted to share my experience as someone who made this exact decision last year. I'm also a sole proprietor with about 55% business use on my vehicle. After going through all the calculations (and talking to my CPA), I ended up purchasing instead of leasing, primarily because of the Section 179 deduction and bonus depreciation opportunities. For 2024, you can still deduct the full purchase price in year one for many vehicles under Section 179 (up to $1,220,000 limit), which created a significant immediate tax benefit for my business cash flow. One thing that really helped was keeping meticulous records from day one. I use a simple app to log every trip with the business purpose, and I photograph my odometer reading at the beginning and end of each tax year. The IRS loves detailed contemporaneous records if you ever get audited. Also, don't forget about the state tax implications - some states have different rules for vehicle deductions that might influence your decision. In my state, the sales tax on the purchase was also partially deductible as a business expense. The key is running the numbers for YOUR specific situation rather than relying on general advice. Vehicle cost, expected mileage, business use percentage, and your current tax bracket all factor into what's optimal.
Lena Kowalski
Make sure you're considering the age factor in your conversion strategy. If you're under 59½ when you do the conversion and plan to access any of the converted funds within 5 years, you could face penalties on those withdrawals. Each conversion has its own 5-year clock for penalty-free access to the PRINCIPAL amount converted. This is separate from the 5-year rule for earnings.
0 coins
DeShawn Washington
ā¢I thought the 5-year rule only applied to earnings in a Roth, not to the converted amounts? So confused about Roth rules sometimes.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
ā¢Actually, there are two separate 5-year rules for Roth IRAs that often get confused: 1. The 5-year rule for earnings: You need to wait 5 years from your first Roth contribution before you can withdraw earnings penalty-free (if you're under 59½). 2. The 5-year rule for conversions: Each conversion has its own 5-year waiting period before you can withdraw the converted principal penalty-free if you're under 59½. So if you convert $270k this year and are under 59½, you'd need to wait 5 years before accessing that specific converted amount without the 10% early withdrawal penalty. This is true even if you already have a Roth IRA that's older than 5 years. @Natalie Khan - This is definitely something to factor into your 3-year conversion timeline if you re'planning to access any of these funds before age 59½!
0 coins
Landon Flounder
One additional consideration for your multi-year conversion strategy - don't forget about the impact on your Medicare premiums if you're approaching age 65 or already enrolled. The additional taxable income from your Roth conversions could push you into higher IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) brackets, which would increase your Medicare Part B and Part D premiums. These surcharges are based on your modified adjusted gross income from two years prior, so a large conversion in 2025 would affect your 2027 Medicare premiums. You might want to model different conversion amounts to see how they impact not just your current tax brackets, but also your future Medicare costs. Sometimes spreading the conversions over 4-5 years instead of 3 can help you stay below the IRMAA thresholds while still achieving your goal of converting to Roth.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
ā¢This is such an important point that often gets overlooked! I'm 62 and planning to start Medicare in a few years, so this IRMAA consideration is really valuable. Do you know what the current income thresholds are for the different IRMAA brackets? I want to make sure I'm modeling this correctly alongside my conversion strategy. It seems like the Medicare premium increases could potentially offset some of the long-term benefits of the Roth conversion if not planned carefully. Also, is there any way to appeal or adjust these surcharges if your income changes significantly after the conversion years (like if you retire and have much lower income)?
0 coins