IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Amara Okafor

โ€ข

Has anyone had experience with e-filing a deceased taxpayer's return as a Personal Representative? I'm trying to avoid paper filing if possible, but I'm not sure if the major tax software programs properly handle this situation.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

โ€ข

Yes, you can e-file a deceased taxpayer's return. Most major tax software (TurboTax, H&R Block, TaxAct) have options for filing deceased returns. There should be a question early in the process asking if the taxpayer is deceased, and then it will guide you through the proper steps. The software will prompt you to enter your information as the Personal Representative and will format the return correctly. You'll still need to keep a copy of the will or other authorization document in your records, but you typically don't need to mail those in with an e-filed return (unless there's a large refund requiring Form 1310).

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

โ€ข

I'm currently going through this same situation with my father's estate. One thing I want to emphasize that hasn't been fully covered - keep detailed records of EVERYTHING you do as Personal Representative. The IRS may request documentation later, and having organized files will save you major headaches. Also, consider getting an EIN (Employer Identification Number) for the estate if there are any ongoing income-generating assets or if you expect the estate to remain open for an extended period. This separates estate income from the final 1040 and helps with record-keeping. For the signature issue specifically, I found it helpful to practice writing "John Doe, Personal Representative for [Deceased's Name], Estate" a few times before signing the actual return. The IRS wants clarity about who is signing and in what capacity.

0 coins

This is excellent advice about record keeping! I'm just starting to navigate this process myself after my aunt passed last month. Can you clarify when you'd need an EIN for the estate versus just using the deceased person's SSN for the final return? I'm trying to understand if there's a specific threshold or situation that triggers the need for a separate EIN. Also, regarding that signature format you mentioned - should I include the estate's name if one hasn't been formally established through probate yet?

0 coins

Chloe Green

โ€ข

Did anyone mention the "tiebreaker rules" yet? If both parents provide support and live with the child, the IRS has specific rules to determine who gets to claim the child: 1. First, parents can decide between themselves (if both qualify) 2. If they can't agree, it goes to the parent with whom the child lived the longest during the year 3. If the child lived with both equally, it goes to the parent with the higher AGI 4. If neither is a parent, it goes to the person with the highest AGI Just don't both try to claim the same kid or file HOH based on the same qualifying person. That's a quick way to get matching CP87 notices and have to prove who's right!

0 coins

Lucas Adams

โ€ข

Doesn't this only apply if the parents live separately? The original post says they live together.

0 coins

Ella Russell

โ€ข

I see a lot of good advice here, but let me add one important point that might help with your decision-making process. Since you mentioned the potential $1,500 difference vs. having to pay $250, you should definitely run the calculations both ways to see your combined household benefit. However, I want to stress what others have mentioned about the separation issue - checking that box when you actually live together is considered tax fraud, not just a "gray area." The IRS defines separated as living apart with the intention of divorce or separation. Living together while unmarried doesn't qualify, regardless of your relationship status. For unmarried parents living in the same household, the general rule is that you can mutually agree who claims the child, but only that person gets to file Head of Household and claim all the child-related credits. The other parent must file Single. Make sure whoever has the better overall tax situation (considering income levels, other deductions, eligibility for credits like EITC) is the one claiming your daughter. If you're unsure about the calculations, consider using tax software that lets you model different scenarios, or consult with a tax professional who can run the numbers both ways safely and legally.

0 coins

Grace Durand

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar situation with my partner and we've been going back and forth on who should claim our son. The point about running calculations both ways makes a lot of sense - I hadn't thought about how the EITC might come into play differently based on our income levels. One thing I'm curious about - when you say "mutually agree," does that need to be documented anywhere officially, or is it just between the parents? Also, if we choose to have the lower-income parent claim the child this year, can we switch it next year if our financial situation changes, or does the IRS expect consistency? Thanks for emphasizing the fraud risk too - definitely not worth the potential consequences for what might seem like a harmless checkbox.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

โ€ข

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a very similar situation with Form 2210 and had no idea that using actual quarterly withholding amounts instead of dividing by 4 could make such a big difference in the penalty calculation. I work in retail management and picked up a second job doing seasonal tax prep work, so my income was definitely uneven throughout the year. Most of my tax prep income (and the associated withholding) happened in Q1 and Q4, while my retail job stayed pretty consistent. Based on what everyone has shared here, it sounds like I should definitely be using the annualized income method (Box C) and calculating my actual quarterly withholding amounts for line 1b. The spreadsheet approach makes total sense - I'll organize all my pay stubs by quarter and create totals for each period. One thing I want to confirm though: when you're saying "actual quarterly amounts," are we talking about calendar quarters (Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, etc.) or the IRS payment due date periods? I want to make sure I'm organizing my data correctly before I start the calculations. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance that's missing from the official IRS instructions!

0 coins

Great question about the quarterly periods! For Form 2210, you'll want to use the IRS payment due date periods, not calendar quarters. Here's how they break down: โ€ข 1st period: January 1 - March 31 (due April 15) โ€ข 2nd period: April 1 - May 31 (due June 15) โ€ข 3rd period: June 1 - August 31 (due September 15) โ€ข 4th period: September 1 - December 31 (due January 15) Notice that the periods aren't equal - the second period is only 2 months while the fourth period is 4 months. This is really important when you're organizing your pay stubs and calculating withholding totals. Your situation with retail plus seasonal tax prep work sounds perfect for the annualized income method! Since most tax prep income happens in Q1 (January-March) and Q4 (September-December), using actual withholding dates should definitely work in your favor compared to spreading everything evenly. When you create your spreadsheet, I'd recommend having columns for pay date, which IRS period it falls into, and the withholding amount. That way you can easily sum up the totals for each period and catch any dates that might be close to period boundaries.

0 coins

As someone who's been through this exact scenario with Form 2210 and inconsistent income from multiple jobs, I can confirm that federal withholding from your paychecks absolutely counts for line 1b! The key thing to understand is that you have a choice in how to treat your withholding for penalty calculation purposes. Since you're using the annualized income installment method (Box C), you'll want to use your actual quarterly withholding amounts rather than dividing your total withholding by 4. This is especially beneficial when your income and withholding varied significantly throughout the year. Here's what I recommend: gather all your pay stubs from both jobs and organize them by the IRS payment periods (not calendar quarters). Then create a simple spreadsheet showing the federal withholding for each period. The timing of when those withholdings actually occurred can make a real difference in your penalty calculation. Since your second job had inconsistent hours, there's a good chance most of your withholding from that job happened during specific periods when you worked more hours. By matching those actual withholding dates to the periods when you had higher income, you'll likely reduce your underpayment penalty compared to the default equal quarterly method. Keep your pay stubs organized by period in case the IRS has questions later, but you don't need to submit them with your return. The extra time spent on this calculation is usually worth it for people in your situation!

0 coins

Grace Patel

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to dealing with Form 2210 and had no idea that the timing of withholdings could make such a difference in penalty calculations. I have a similar situation where I had a main job plus some freelance work that was really inconsistent - some months I made almost nothing from freelancing, other months it was substantial. It sounds like using the actual withholding dates instead of spreading them evenly could really help my situation too. One thing I'm wondering about - when you say "organize by IRS payment periods," do you mean I should look at when the taxes were actually withheld from my paychecks, or when my employer remitted those taxes to the IRS? I'm assuming it's when they were withheld from my pay, but want to make sure I'm tracking the right dates. Also, did you find any good resources or tools to help double-check your quarterly calculations? I'm worried about making an error that could cause problems later.

0 coins

Tyler Lefleur

โ€ข

You should track when the taxes were actually withheld from your paychecks - that's the date that matters for Form 2210 purposes. The date your employer remitted the taxes to the IRS isn't relevant for your penalty calculation. For double-checking your calculations, I'd recommend creating a simple verification step: make sure your quarterly withholding totals add up to the federal withholding shown in Box 2 of all your W-2s combined. This catches most common errors like accidentally including state taxes or missing a pay period. Another good check is to compare your calculated penalty using actual quarterly amounts versus the equal quarterly method (total withholding รท 4). If you have uneven income like you described, the actual quarterly method should result in a lower penalty. If it doesn't, you might want to double-check your period assignments. The IRS Publication 505 has some good examples of these calculations if you want additional reference material, though it can be pretty dense to work through.

0 coins

Daniel Rogers

โ€ข

Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like USO definitely won't qualify for the K-3 waiver. I'm in a similar situation with commodity investments and was hoping to avoid the extra complexity, but it makes sense that anything dealing with global markets would have foreign activity. One question though - if USO sends out the K-3, do we need to report everything on it or just the parts that actually apply to our tax situation? Some of the international stuff might not be relevant to my particular circumstances, but I don't want to miss anything important that could trigger an audit later. Also, does anyone know roughly when these K-3s typically get sent out? I'm trying to plan my tax filing timeline and don't want to file early only to get the K-3 later and have to amend.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

โ€ข

Good questions! Regarding what to report from the K-3 - you need to report all applicable items that flow through to your personal return, but not everything on the K-3 will necessarily apply to you. The K-3 shows your proportionate share of the partnership's foreign activities, but some sections might be zero or not relevant to your specific tax situation. For timing, most partnerships including USO typically send K-3s along with the K-1s, which usually arrive by mid-March (partnerships have until March 15 to file and provide schedules to partners). I'd definitely wait until you receive all partnership documents before filing, especially since the K-3 information can affect multiple parts of your return like foreign tax credits or PFIC reporting. The key is to review each section of the K-3 and see if it requires corresponding entries on your 1040 or related forms. When in doubt, it's better to include the information rather than risk an IRS notice later asking why certain foreign items weren't reported.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

โ€ข

For anyone still wondering about timing, I just received my 2024 K-1 and K-3 from USO yesterday (March 10th), so they're starting to go out. As expected, they confirmed in their cover letter that they don't qualify for the K-3 waiver due to foreign transactions from their oil futures activities. Looking at my K-3, there's definitely foreign-source income reported that needs to go on my return. The foreign tax credit alone makes it worth having this information rather than trying to guess. For those waiting to file, I'd recommend holding off until mid-March to make sure you get all your partnership documents - trying to amend later for missing K-3 information is way more hassle than just waiting a few extra weeks to file. One tip: the K-3 has a lot more detail than the K-1, so don't panic if it looks overwhelming at first. Focus on the sections that have actual dollar amounts - many sections will be blank or zero for your specific allocation.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

โ€ข

Thanks for the update on USO's K-3 timing! This is really helpful since I'm also waiting for mine. Quick question - when you say there's foreign-source income that needs to go on your return, are you talking about a significant amount or just small allocations? I'm trying to figure out if this is going to materially impact my tax situation or if it's more of a compliance formality. Also, did your tax software automatically handle the K-3 information or did you have to manually enter everything? I'm using TurboTax and wondering if I need to upgrade to a higher tier to properly handle the partnership international reporting.

0 coins

Jean Claude

โ€ข

I switched to Direct Pay about 3 years ago after being hesitant for similar reasons, and it's been completely smooth. The biggest game-changer for me was eliminating that constant worry about whether my check would arrive on time - especially during busy mail periods around tax deadlines. The verification process is actually quite robust and made me feel more secure about using the system. They require specific information from your prior year tax return that wouldn't be easily accessible to someone else. I always keep my prior year return handy for the first payment of each tax year, though subsequent payments are much quicker since it remembers most of your information. My routine now is pretty simple: I submit payments about a week before the deadline (even though confirmation is immediate), screenshot the confirmation page, save the email confirmation they send, and check my bank account a few days later to verify the withdrawal. I've never had any issues with payments not being properly credited. One tip that really helped ease my initial concerns was starting with a smaller test payment to get comfortable with the system before doing my full quarterly amounts. The interface walks you through everything step by step, and honestly the time savings from not dealing with forms, checks, stamps, and post office trips has been significant. After 12+ successful payments, I can't imagine going back to the paper check method. The immediate peace of mind from knowing your payment was received is worth making the switch alone.

0 coins

Ryan Andre

โ€ข

This is really encouraging to hear from someone with 3 years of experience using Direct Pay! Your approach of starting with a smaller test payment to get comfortable with the system is brilliant - I wouldn't have thought of that but it makes perfect sense for someone nervous about making the switch. The fact that you've had 12+ successful payments with zero issues is very reassuring. I especially appreciate your point about the robust verification process actually making the system feel more secure rather than being a hassle. After reading all these positive experiences in this thread, I think I'm finally ready to stop being a paper check holdout and try Direct Pay for my next quarterly payment. The immediate confirmation eliminating that "mail anxiety" sounds like it would be such a relief! Thanks for sharing such detailed and practical advice.

0 coins

Hannah White

โ€ข

I've been using Direct Pay for about 18 months now and it's been incredibly reliable. Like you, I was really nervous about switching from paper checks after doing it that way for years - there's something about tax payments that feels scarier than regular online bill paying. What finally pushed me over the edge was realizing I was spending more mental energy worrying about whether my checks would arrive on time than it would take to just learn the electronic system. I had one particularly stressful quarter where my check got delayed during a postal holiday and I was checking tracking obsessively. The system is actually pretty straightforward once you go through it the first time. You'll need your SSN, bank info, and your prior year tax return for identity verification on the first payment. The verification process using specific details from your return actually made me feel more secure about the whole thing - it's not just basic info anyone could access. I always submit my payments 3-4 days before the deadline (even though you get immediate confirmation), screenshot the confirmation page, and save the email they send. Having those electronic records has made tax season organization so much easier than trying to hunt down old cancelled checks. My biggest regret is waiting so long to make the switch. The peace of mind from immediate confirmation and eliminating all the mail-related stress has been worth it alone. I'd say just try it for one payment - you can always go back to checks if you don't like it, but I think you'll find it much less anxiety-inducing than the paper system.

0 coins

Prev1...547548549550551...5643Next