


Ask the community...
Something important to add here - make sure the work is AGE APPROPRIATE!!! I got audited because I claimed my 12yo was doing "consulting" for my business. The IRS agent basically laughed at the idea a 12yo could provide consulting services. Stick to tasks that make sense for their age like filing, cleaning, simple computer work, etc.
Would helping with social media count as age appropriate for a 15 year old? My daughter is WAY better at TikTok and Instagram than I am and could actually help my business a lot with that stuff.
Social media assistance would absolutely be considered age-appropriate for a 15-year-old in most cases. Teenagers are often very skilled with social platforms, and many businesses legitimately hire teens for this exact purpose. Just make sure you're keeping good records of the work she's doing - screenshots of posts she creates, a log of hours worked, and documentation of how her work helps your business. Pay her a reasonable rate comparable to what you'd pay someone else for the same work. The key is making sure it's a legitimate working arrangement and not just shuffling money around.
Quick tip from someone who's been doing this for years: open a Roth IRA for your kids with their earned income! Since they likely won't owe taxes on the income (if under the standard deduction), they're essentially getting tax-free money going in AND tax-free growth and withdrawal later. It's one of the best financial head starts you can give them.
Can you really open a Roth IRA for a minor? Don't they have to be 18 to have investment accounts?
I've been dealing with S-Corp revocation delays myself and wanted to share a resource that might help. The IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) can intervene in cases where you've experienced significant hardship due to IRS processing delays. Given that your client has been waiting since June 2023 with no meaningful response until recently, this could qualify for TAS assistance. You can submit Form 911 (Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance) to initiate the process. TAS has the authority to expedite processing and can sometimes secure retroactive relief that might be difficult to obtain through normal channels. They're particularly effective when there's been a clear breakdown in IRS communication or processing, which seems to be the case here. The key advantage is that TAS works directly with IRS departments to resolve issues and can often cut through bureaucratic delays. Since your client operated consistently as a C-Corp based on their reasonable belief that the revocation was effective, this strengthens your case for TAS intervention. I've seen them successfully resolve similar S-Corp election issues in 60-90 days when the normal process was stalled for years.
This is excellent advice about the Taxpayer Advocate Service! I hadn't considered TAS for this type of situation, but you're absolutely right that the processing delay and lack of meaningful response could qualify for hardship assistance. One question - when filing Form 911, should we wait to see if our reasonable cause request gets processed first, or is it better to pursue both avenues simultaneously? I'm wondering if having an active TAS case might actually help expedite the reasonable cause determination, or if it could create confusion with multiple departments handling the same issue. Also, do you know if TAS intervention typically results in better outcomes than standard reasonable cause requests? Given the strong facts here (18+ month delay, consistent C-Corp operation), I'm trying to determine the most effective approach for getting retroactive relief back to the original requested date.
I'd recommend pursuing both avenues simultaneously - the reasonable cause request and TAS intervention can actually complement each other rather than create confusion. When you file Form 911, you can reference the pending reasonable cause request and explain that the normal processing channels have failed to provide relief after an unreasonable delay. TAS intervention often results in better outcomes because they have direct access to decision-makers and can coordinate between departments. They can also ensure your reasonable cause request gets proper attention rather than sitting in a backlog. In my experience, cases that qualify for TAS assistance typically see faster resolution and more favorable determinations. Given your 18+ month delay and consistent C-Corp operation, I'd file the Form 911 now while your reasonable cause request is pending. Include all your documentation (original revocation letter, IRS's inadequate response, evidence of C-Corp operation) and emphasize the economic hardship caused by the uncertainty. TAS is particularly responsive when taxpayers can demonstrate they've been operating in good faith but are stuck due to IRS processing failures.
This thread has been incredibly helpful - thank you all for sharing your experiences and strategies! I'm dealing with a similar S-Corp revocation delay situation with one of my clients, and seeing the different approaches people have taken gives me much more confidence in how to proceed. Based on what I'm reading here, it sounds like the combination approach might be most effective: filing a detailed reasonable cause request with Form 1120 for the affected years, while simultaneously pursuing TAS intervention through Form 911. The key seems to be documenting everything thoroughly and emphasizing both the client's good faith reliance on the original submission and the IRS's processing failure. One thing I'm curious about - for those who successfully obtained retroactive relief, how detailed did you get in documenting that your clients weren't operating as S-Corps during the delay period? I'm thinking specifically about things like board resolutions, meeting minutes, or other corporate governance documents that might support the narrative that they genuinely believed the revocation was effective. Also, has anyone had success with including a timeline document that clearly shows the sequence of events and IRS response delays? It seems like creating a clear chronology might help the reviewing agent understand just how unreasonable the processing delays were.
I've helped several family members navigate this exact situation. The key thing to understand is that IRS refund checks are Treasury checks, which have much stricter handling rules than regular personal or business checks. Your best bet is definitely the Walmart route - $8 to cash a government check is incredibly reasonable, and they're experienced with tax refunds so there shouldn't be any hassles as long as your mom has valid ID. If she's concerned about carrying cash, she could also ask them to load it onto a prepaid card right there. Many Walmart locations can do this on the spot. The "pay to the order of" endorsement technically violates Treasury check rules and could get both of you flagged, even if some people have gotten away with it. It's just not worth the risk when there are legitimate alternatives available. One other option - if your mom is open to it, she could call the IRS and request that future refunds be issued as direct deposit to a prepaid card account. Many prepaid cards now offer routing/account numbers that work with government payments.
This is really solid advice about the Treasury check rules - I didn't realize they had stricter handling requirements than regular checks. The prepaid card loading option at Walmart sounds perfect for my mom's situation since she's always worried about carrying large amounts of cash. Quick question though - do you know if there's a limit on how much they can load onto a prepaid card at once? Her refund is around $2,800, so I want to make sure that's not going to be an issue. Also, is the prepaid card option available at all Walmart locations or just certain ones? Thanks for mentioning the future direct deposit option too - that would definitely solve this problem going forward!
Great question about the prepaid card limits! Most Walmart locations can load up to $2,999 per day onto a MoneyCard, so your mom's $2,800 refund should be fine. However, I'd recommend calling ahead to the specific Walmart location to confirm they offer the card loading service - while most do, some smaller locations might not have it available. The MoneyCard option is really convenient because she can use it like a regular debit card for purchases, bill payments, or ATM withdrawals. Just be aware there might be small monthly fees (usually around $5) and ATM fees if she uses out-of-network machines, but for a one-time solution it's still much better than high check-cashing fees. For the future direct deposit setup, she can call the IRS or use one of those callback services people mentioned earlier to get connected faster. Having a prepaid card with routing/account numbers will make tax season much easier next year!
I went through this exact situation with my elderly father last year. After researching all the options, here's what worked best for us: We ended up going the Walmart route - $8 fee to cash his $3,200 refund check, and they loaded it directly onto a MoneyCard for him. The whole process took about 10 minutes, and he felt much safer having it on a card rather than carrying that much cash. What really helped was calling ahead to confirm the specific Walmart location offered both check cashing AND the card loading service - not all locations do the card loading, so it's worth verifying first. The other thing that surprised me was how easy it was to set up direct deposit for his next year's refund using the MoneyCard's routing and account numbers. We called the IRS (took forever to get through, but it was worth it) and updated his payment info so this won't be an issue again. One tip: bring two forms of ID to Walmart. They're pretty strict about it for government checks, but once you have everything they need, the process is smooth. Way better than the $75 fee the local check cashing place wanted!
This is incredibly helpful! I really appreciate you sharing the step-by-step process you went through with your father. The tip about calling ahead to confirm both services are available is brilliant - I definitely would have assumed all Walmarts offer the same services. Quick follow-up question: when you set up the direct deposit with the MoneyCard routing numbers, did the IRS representative give you any pushback about using a prepaid card instead of a traditional bank account? I've heard mixed things about whether they accept all types of accounts for direct deposit. Also, did you have to wait until the next tax season to update the info, or were you able to change it for future refunds right away? Thanks again for taking the time to share your experience - this gives me a lot more confidence about helping my mom navigate this situation!
I've been following this discussion closely since I'm dealing with a similar pension plan termination at my company. One aspect that hasn't been fully explored is the impact of state taxes on your decision. Since you mentioned HR was vague about the penalty, I'd suggest getting the specific plan document language about early distribution penalties. Sometimes pension plans have slightly different rules than traditional 401k plans, especially around plan terminations. The "involuntary distribution due to plan termination" might have different treatment than a voluntary early withdrawal. Also, consider your overall tax situation for this year. If you've had other major income events (like selling investments, receiving bonuses, etc.), adding $18,500 in taxable income could push you into a higher bracket, making the rollover even more attractive. Conversely, if this has been a lower-income year for you, the tax hit might not be as severe. Have you considered splitting the difference? Some plans allow you to take a smaller amount as cash (maybe $5,000 for any immediate needs) and roll the remainder ($13,500) into an IRA. This gives you some liquidity while preserving most of the tax-advantaged growth potential.
This is a really thoughtful analysis, especially the point about state taxes and how your overall income situation this year affects the decision. I hadn't considered that the "involuntary distribution due to plan termination" might have different penalty treatment than regular early withdrawals - that's definitely worth investigating further. Your suggestion about the partial distribution is smart too. Taking just enough cash to cover immediate needs while rolling over the bulk makes a lot of sense. It's kind of a middle ground that gives you some flexibility without taking the full tax hit on the entire amount. I'm curious though - when you mention getting the specific plan document language, did you find that your HR department was helpful in providing those details, or did you have to go directly to the plan administrator? I'm getting similar vague responses from my HR team and wondering if I need to escalate this request to get the detailed information I need to make an informed decision.
I'm facing a very similar situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! One thing I wanted to add that might be relevant - have you checked if your pension plan has any special provisions for "hardship distributions" that might avoid the 10% penalty? Some defined benefit plans include hardship exceptions that are broader than the standard IRA/401k rules, especially during plan terminations. These might include things like unexpected medical expenses, home repairs, or even job loss-related expenses that wouldn't normally qualify for penalty relief. Also, regarding the timing question that came up earlier - if your company is doing layoffs or offering voluntary separation packages alongside the pension termination, you might want to coordinate the timing of these events. Sometimes taking a separation package in the same tax year as the pension distribution can create additional deductions that help offset the tax impact. I'd definitely echo what others have said about getting the actual plan documents rather than relying on HR summaries. In my experience, HR departments often don't fully understand the tax implications and focus more on the administrative process. The plan administrator or the company that's handling the termination usually has much more detailed knowledge about the specific tax treatment and available options.
This is a really excellent point about hardship distributions! I hadn't thought about the possibility that defined benefit plans might have broader hardship exceptions during terminations. That could be a game-changer for people who are facing unexpected expenses around the same time as their plan termination. Your suggestion about coordinating with separation packages is brilliant too. If someone is taking a voluntary buyout or severance, the additional deductions from job search expenses, COBRA payments, or even relocation costs could help offset some of the tax burden from the pension distribution. It's definitely worth running the numbers on different timing scenarios. I'm curious though - when you mention getting information from the company handling the termination rather than HR, are you talking about a third-party administrator? And have you found them to be more knowledgeable about the specific tax implications? I feel like I'm getting the runaround from multiple departments and want to make sure I'm talking to the right people who actually understand these rules.
Liam McGuire
Thanks for all the detailed discussion here! As someone who's been going back and forth between desktop and online filing for years, this really clarifies things. The key insight about data persistence vs. transmission risk is super helpful. One thing I'd add - if you do go the desktop route, make sure you're downloading the software directly from the official company website. I've seen people accidentally download fake tax software from sketchy sites, which is probably worse than any legitimate online service security-wise. Also worth noting that some desktop versions now automatically back up your files to the cloud anyway, so you might want to check those settings if local-only storage is your goal.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
β’Great point about downloading from official websites! I learned this the hard way when I almost fell for a fake "TurboTax Free" site that was actually malware. The URL was slightly different but looked legitimate at first glance. Your comment about desktop software auto-backing to cloud is really important too - I had no idea some desktop versions do this by default. Do you know which ones specifically do this? I'd like to check my current software settings to make sure I'm not accidentally storing data in the cloud when I think it's only local. This whole thread has been eye-opening. I'm definitely going to be more careful about both my software choice and settings going forward.
0 coins
Amina Sy
This is such a timely discussion! I've been using TurboTax online for the past few years without really thinking about the security implications. After reading through all these insights, I'm seriously considering switching to desktop software for next year's filing. The point about data persistence vs. temporary transmission really resonates with me. I had no idea that desktop software only sends data temporarily during e-filing while online versions keep everything stored on their servers. That's a significant difference I never considered. I'm also intrigued by some of the tools mentioned here like taxr.ai for analyzing security practices. Has anyone else tried similar services to evaluate their tax software's security? I'd love to hear more experiences before making the switch. One question for the cybersecurity expert who commented - do you think the security landscape for tax software will change significantly in the coming years, or are we likely to see the same basic tradeoffs between convenience and data control?
0 coins
Nia Thompson
β’I'm glad this discussion is helping people think more critically about their tax software choices! As someone new to this community, I've been following along and learning a lot. From what I've gathered reading through everyone's experiences, it seems like the desktop vs. online decision really comes down to your personal risk tolerance and technical comfort level. The cybersecurity expert's point about professional security teams managing online platforms vs. individual computer security is particularly interesting - I hadn't considered that my own computer might actually be the weak link. I'm curious about something though - for those who've switched from online to desktop (or vice versa), was the transition difficult? I'm thinking about making a change but wondering about things like importing previous year data or learning a new interface. Any insights would be appreciated! Also, has anyone looked into whether there are any IRS resources that explain the security requirements for authorized e-file providers? It might be helpful to understand the baseline standards all these companies have to meet.
0 coins