


Ask the community...
I just completed this process a few weeks ago as a first-time trustee for my uncle's irrevocable trust, so your confusion is totally understandable! The SS-4 form definitely doesn't make it clear what information trustees need to provide. The biggest thing that helped me was realizing that I needed to fill out the form from TWO perspectives simultaneously: **For the trust entity (Lines 1-6):** - Use the exact legal name from the trust document - don't shorten or paraphrase it - The trust's "business address" can be your home address as trustee (totally normal) - Include the date the trust was legally created (signed), not when it was funded **For yourself as responsible party (Line 7b):** - Your full name and SSN go here since you control the trust assets - This is NOT your aunt and uncle's information, even though they're the grantors **Additional tips:** - Line 9a: Check "Trust" - Line 10: Select "Started new business" since irrevocable trusts are separate tax entities - The online application at irs.gov is much faster than mail - you get the EIN immediately One thing I wish someone had told me: start gathering bank documentation requirements NOW. Most banks need specific trust document excerpts, your trustee identification, and sometimes a "Certificate of Trust" summary. Calling your intended bank to get their complete checklist can save you multiple trips later. The learning curve is steep at first, but once you get the EIN sorted out, the rest of the trust administration becomes much more manageable. You've got this!
This breakdown is exactly what I needed to see! The "two perspectives" approach makes so much sense - I was getting confused because I kept thinking I needed to choose between representing the trust OR representing myself, when actually it's both at the same time on different parts of the form. Your point about using the legal creation date (when signed) versus funding date is particularly helpful. Our trust document was signed in late March but my aunt and uncle are still in the process of transferring assets into it. I was worried I might be applying too early, but it sounds like the signing date is what matters for the EIN application. I'm definitely going to use the online application based on everyone's recommendations here. One follow-up question - when you mention getting a "Certificate of Trust" for banking purposes, is that something the original attorney typically provides, or do I need to create that document myself? I want to have everything ready before I start the bank account process. Thanks for sharing your recent experience - it's really reassuring to hear from someone who just went through this successfully!
I went through this exact situation about 18 months ago when my parents established their irrevocable trust and named me as trustee. The SS-4 form was definitely confusing at first, but once I understood the key concepts, it became much clearer. Here's what I learned that might help you: **Critical Understanding:** You're filling out the form as TWO entities - the trust itself AND you as the person responsible for it. This dual role is what makes the form confusing initially. **Specific guidance for key lines:** - Line 1: Exact legal name from your trust document (don't abbreviate anything) - Lines 2-6: Trust's information (you can use your address as trustee) - Line 7b: YOUR name and SSN as the "responsible party" - this is crucial - Line 9a: Check "Trust" - Line 10: "Started new business" (since irrevocable trusts are separate tax entities) **Important timing note:** Make sure the trust is actually irrevocable before applying. Some trust documents have waiting periods or other conditions that must be met first. I highly recommend using the online application at irs.gov instead of mailing the paper form. It's much faster (you get the EIN immediately) and the system guides you through trust-specific questions once you select "Trust" as the entity type. One thing I wish I'd known earlier: start preparing for bank account opening now. Most banks require specific documentation beyond just the EIN - portions of the trust document, your ID as trustee, and often a "Certificate of Trust." Call your intended bank ahead of time to get their complete requirements list. The first time doing this is always overwhelming, but you're asking the right questions. Once you get the EIN, the rest of the trust administration process becomes much more straightforward!
Anyone know if Form 8396 applies when you do a cash-out refinance? I did one last year and now my tax software is asking me about it too. I'm pretty sure I never got any kind of certificate but now I'm wondering if I should have asked for one?
Form 8396 only applies if you had a Mortgage Credit Certificate on your original loan. A cash-out refinance, like any refinance, can affect an existing MCC - but if you never had one to begin with, doing a cash-out refinance doesn't suddenly make you eligible. MCCs are something you specifically apply for through a state housing agency program, usually when you first purchase a home. They're not automatically offered during refinancing regardless of whether you take cash out or not.
Ah that makes sense! No one ever mentioned anything about a certificate when I bought my house originally so I guess that's why I don't have one. Thanks for clearing that up - I'll just select "no" in the software and move on.
I went through the exact same confusion last year after refinancing! The software suddenly asking about Form 8396 really threw me off too. Like others have mentioned, this form is specifically for people who have a Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) from a state or local housing program. Since you mentioned you've been filing for 4-5 years without seeing this question, it's almost certainly because the tax software is responding to you entering information about your refinance. The software is just being thorough and checking if your refinance might have affected an existing MCC. If you never received any paperwork specifically called a "Mortgage Credit Certificate" when you originally bought your home, you can confidently answer "no" to this question. These certificates are pretty uncommon and are usually only available through specific state housing finance agency programs for qualifying first-time buyers or buyers in certain areas. Don't worry - you didn't mess up anything in previous years or in your current tax prep. This is just the software doing its job by asking about potential credits that could be affected by major mortgage events like refinancing.
This explanation really helps clarify things! I was getting worried that I had somehow overlooked something important in my previous tax filings. It's reassuring to know that the software asking about Form 8396 after a refinance is normal behavior, even if you don't actually have an MCC. I think what confused me the most was that this question never came up before, but now I understand it's because I never had a major mortgage event like refinancing trigger those questions. The software is just being extra cautious, which I guess is better than missing something important. Thanks for confirming that answering "no" is the right move when you don't have the actual certificate!
I went through this exact same situation last quarter and completely understand the anxiety! Three weeks is definitely longer than usual, but not necessarily cause for panic yet. A few things that helped me when I was in your shoes: First, check your bank account online to see if there are any pending transactions - sometimes the IRS processes the check but it doesn't show as cleared for a day or two. Second, if you have online banking, you can usually see images of cleared checks, which will show you exactly when it was processed. The 4-5 week timeframe that others mentioned is spot on for this time of year. April is absolutely their busiest month with both regular returns and Q1 estimated payments flooding in simultaneously. I've seen people wait 6+ weeks during peak season and still have everything work out fine. One thing that gave me peace of mind was calling my bank to put a note on the check in case it got lost - they can flag it to contact you before paying it if it shows up months later. Most banks will do this for free. If you do end up needing to contact the IRS and the wait times are brutal, just remember that as long as your payment was postmarked by April 15th, you're protected from penalties even if they don't process it until much later. Keep that postmark documentation handy!
This is really helpful advice, thank you! I hadn't thought about checking for pending transactions - I just looked and there's nothing showing yet, but I'll keep monitoring. The idea about putting a note with my bank is brilliant. I'm definitely going to do that tomorrow just for extra peace of mind. It's reassuring to hear that 6+ weeks isn't unheard of during peak season, even though it feels like forever when you're waiting. I did keep my certified mail receipt showing the April 14th postmark, so at least I have that documentation. Thanks for the reminder about being protected from penalties as long as it was postmarked on time - that's the part I was most worried about!
I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now - sent my Q1 estimated payment on April 12th and it's been almost a month with no sign of the check clearing. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly reassuring! I think I'm going to try the EFTPS route for my June payment since so many people recommend it. The idea of never having to worry about mail delays again sounds amazing. For anyone else in this boat, one thing I learned from my accountant is that you can also make estimated payments through your tax software if you e-file. Most of the major programs (TurboTax, H&R Block, etc.) allow you to schedule quarterly payments when you file your return. It's another electronic option that might be easier than setting up EFTPS for some people. The key thing seems to be keeping that postmark documentation. I sent mine certified mail specifically because of issues like this, and having that receipt showing the April 12th date gives me confidence that I won't face penalties even if the IRS takes their sweet time processing it. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it's nice to know this level of delay isn't unusual during tax season!
Thanks for mentioning the tax software payment option! I had no idea you could schedule quarterly payments through TurboTax when filing. That actually sounds like it might be even easier than EFTPS since I'm already familiar with the interface. Do you know if there are any fees for making estimated payments through tax software, or is it typically free like EFTPS? I'm trying to decide between the two options for my remaining quarterly payments this year. It's definitely reassuring to see so many people in the same situation. I was starting to think I was the only one still waiting for a check to clear after a month!
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm going through almost the exact same situation right now - took an IRA distribution for a home purchase that fell through and managed to get the money back in within the 60-day window. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is to double-check that your financial institution coded the redeposit correctly as a rollover contribution on the 5498. Mine initially coded it as a regular contribution, which would have created contribution limit issues. I had to call them to get it corrected to show as a "rollover contribution" instead of a "regular contribution." Also, for anyone using TaxAct, the process is similar - when you enter the 1099-R, there's a section that asks "Did you roll over any of this distribution?" Make sure to answer yes and enter the full amount. The software will then show $0 taxable income from the distribution. Thanks especially to @KylieRose and @Klaus Schmidt for the detailed explanations about how this all works. It's reassuring to know that as long as you properly report both the distribution and the rollover, you won't owe taxes on money you returned!
@Romeo Barrett - excellent point about checking how the redeposit was coded on the 5498! I almost missed that detail when I was dealing with my rollover situation last year. My credit union initially coded mine wrong too, and it would have caused all sorts of confusion with contribution limits if I hadn t'caught it. For anyone else reading this, when you get your 5498, look for the specific box that shows rollover "contributions versus" regular "IRA contributions. If" it s'in the wrong box, definitely call your financial institution to get it corrected before filing your taxes. This whole thread is a great example of why these IRA rollover situations are so tricky - there are multiple forms involved 1099-R (and 5498 ,)multiple deadlines to track the (60-day window ,)and multiple potential coding errors that can mess things up. But as everyone has confirmed, as long as you report it correctly as a rollover, you won t'owe taxes on money you properly returned to your IRA.
One additional tip that might help others in this situation - if you're still within the 60-day window and haven't redeposited yet, consider doing a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer instead of a personal rollover if possible. What I mean is, if you still have the distributed funds and can work with your IRA custodian, sometimes they can facilitate putting the money back as a direct transfer rather than you personally depositing it. This can sometimes avoid confusion with the 1099-R/5498 reporting altogether. Obviously this doesn't help @Aaliyah Jackson since she already completed her rollover (and did it correctly!), but for anyone else reading this thread who finds themselves in a similar situation, it's worth asking your financial institution about this option. Some custodians are more flexible about this than others. That said, the personal rollover route that Aaliyah took is perfectly valid and very common. The key is just making sure to properly report it as everyone has explained - report the 1099-R but indicate it was rolled over so it doesn't get taxed.
Ezra Bates
Is anyone else confused by how the basis adjustment works with insurance reimbursement? My accountant said I need to reduce my basis by the full insurance proceeds PLUS the deductible amount I couldn't claim, which seems like double-counting the loss.
0 coins
Victoria Stark
ā¢Your accountant is actually correct about this. When you have casualty damage to a rental property, you need to reduce your basis by the entire amount of the damage - which includes both what insurance paid AND your out-of-pocket loss. This prevents you from getting a double tax benefit. Think of it this way: The damaged portion no longer exists, so your basis should be reduced by its entire value. The fact that insurance reimbursed you for part of it and you had a deductible for another part doesn't change the fact that portion of the property is gone.
0 coins
Cedric Chung
This is exactly the kind of situation where the tax code feels particularly harsh. You're absolutely right that it seems unfair to face a taxable gain when you're already out $2,500 from the deductible. One thing to consider is whether you can argue that some of the work was actually restoration/repair rather than replacement. If the roofing work simply restored the damaged section to its previous condition using similar materials, you might be able to treat part of it as a deductible repair expense on Schedule E instead of a casualty loss. Also, make sure you're only calculating depreciation recapture on the specific damaged portion of the roof, not the entire roof structure. The recapture should be limited to the depreciation you've taken on just that damaged section over the years. If this was storm damage, check whether your area received a federal disaster declaration. That could open up additional options for deferring the gain recognition if you reinvest in repairs within the required timeframe. The tax treatment definitely feels punitive when you're already bearing real financial costs, but unfortunately the IRS logic is that you received tax benefits through depreciation deductions in prior years on that portion of the property.
0 coins
Dmitry Ivanov
ā¢This is really helpful context! I hadn't thought about the repair vs. replacement distinction. The roofing contractor did use similar materials and the work was really just restoring that damaged section back to how it was before the storm - no upgrades or improvements. Do you know what kind of documentation I'd need to support treating it as a repair rather than a casualty loss? I have the insurance adjuster's report and the contractor's invoice, but I'm not sure if that's enough to make the case to the IRS that this should be Schedule E treatment instead of Form 4797. Also, how do I figure out the depreciation that's specifically attributable to just that damaged roof section? My depreciation schedule just shows the entire building as one asset.
0 coins