


Ask the community...
Has anyone successfully used TurboTax for handling RSUs? I've been getting different answers each year and I'm not sure if it's calculating everything correctly.
TurboTax Premium can handle RSUs, but you need to be careful with how you enter the information. When entering your W-2, pay attention to any amounts in Box 14 labeled as RSU or ESPP. Then when entering your 1099-B, you'll likely need to adjust the cost basis if your brokerage doesn't report it correctly. The most important thing is understanding what you're entering rather than just blindly following the software prompts. I recommend reading through TurboTax's guide on RSUs before you start - they actually have a pretty detailed walkthrough.
This is such a common problem with RSU taxation! I went through the exact same issue and found that many companies struggle with properly reporting RSU withholding on W-2s, especially when vesting happens near year-end. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet tracking each vesting event throughout the year. For each vest, I recorded: the vesting date, number of shares that vested, FMV per share on that date, number of shares withheld for taxes, and the dollar value of those withheld shares. At year-end, I could easily calculate the total tax withholding that should appear in Box 2 of my W-2. Also, don't overlook Box 12 on your W-2 - sometimes companies report additional information about RSU withholding there with codes like "V" or other employer-specific codes. And definitely check if your company provides a supplemental RSU tax statement - mine sends one each January that breaks down all the vesting events and associated tax implications for the year. The fact that you've had consistent tax bills for 3 years strongly suggests there's a systematic reporting issue. I'd recommend documenting everything before approaching HR so you can present them with specific numbers rather than just a general concern.
This is really helpful advice! I especially like the idea of creating a tracking spreadsheet. I've been relying on my employer's systems but clearly that's not working out. Quick question about Box 12 - I just checked my W-2 and there's a code "DD" with an amount that's much larger than what I'd expect for health insurance. Could this be related to RSU reporting? I've never paid attention to Box 12 before. Also, when you say "supplemental RSU tax statement," is this something all companies provide or just some? My company has never sent me anything like that, but maybe I should specifically ask for it.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm facing a similar situation with a K-1 showing losses across 8 states, and like many others here, I was initially panicking about the potential filing costs. After reading through everyone's experiences, I think the key takeaway is that there's no universal answer - it really depends on your specific circumstances and the states involved. The approach of researching each state's individual requirements rather than just accepting the "file everywhere" default from tax software makes a lot of sense. I'm particularly interested in the suggestion to check state websites directly for nonresident filing thresholds. Has anyone found certain states to be consistently more lenient with pass-through loss situations? I'm seeing mentions of states like Oregon having specific exemptions, but I'd love to hear if there are other states known for reasonable thresholds. Also, for those who've taken the selective filing approach, do you typically err on the side of caution for borderline situations, or have you found that states are generally reasonable when there's genuinely no tax liability involved? I'm leaning toward doing the research upfront and making informed decisions state by state, but I want to make sure I'm not missing any important considerations before I commit to that approach.
@e4ab10ded1fe Based on my experience dealing with multi-state K-1s, I can share some insights about state-specific approaches. You're right that Oregon tends to be more reasonable - they have clear guidance about nonresident pass-through losses under certain thresholds. I've also found that states like Nevada, Texas, and Florida obviously don't have this issue since they don't have state income taxes. For states that do have income taxes, I've generally found that smaller states (like Delaware, Rhode Island, Vermont) tend to have higher practical thresholds before they pursue nonresident filings, simply due to resource constraints. Meanwhile, high-tax states like California, New York, and New Jersey tend to be more aggressive about any nexus, even with losses. Regarding borderline situations, I typically err on the side of caution if the potential penalty risk outweighs the filing cost savings. For example, if it's a $30 state filing fee to avoid potential penalties and interest down the road, I'll usually just file. But if it's a $75+ fee for a minimal loss allocation in a state with clear threshold exemptions, I'll skip it with proper documentation. One thing I've learned is that keeping detailed records of your decision-making process (screenshots of state requirements, dates of research, etc.) provides good reasonable cause protection if questions arise later. The IRS and states generally respect taxpayers who made good faith efforts to comply based on available guidance.
I've been following this discussion with great interest as someone who just received my first multi-state K-1 showing losses in 5 states. The range of approaches and experiences shared here is really eye-opening! What strikes me most is how the "default to file everywhere" advice from most tax software seems to be more about legal protection for the software companies than actual necessity. The fact that so many experienced members here have successfully used selective filing approaches based on state-specific research gives me confidence that this isn't just about paying unnecessary fees. I'm planning to take the hybrid approach that seems to be emerging from this thread: research each state's specific requirements first, document my findings, and then make informed decisions state by state. For the 2-3 states where the rules are unclear or borderline, I'll probably err on the side of filing to avoid any future headaches. One question I haven't seen addressed much: for those who have partnerships that fluctuate between profits and losses year to year, how do you handle the consistency aspect? Do you establish filing in all relevant states during profitable years and then continue filing during loss years, or do you adjust your approach based on each year's specific situation? Thanks to everyone who's shared their real-world experiences - this has been far more helpful than any generic tax advice I've found elsewhere!
@2c955c74f81d You raise an excellent point about consistency across profitable vs. loss years! I've actually dealt with this exact scenario with a real estate partnership that swings between profits and losses depending on property sales timing. My approach has been to establish filing in states where I have "material presence" during profitable years (usually anything over $1,000 in income allocation), and then maintain consistency by filing in those same states during loss years, even if the loss amounts are small. This creates a clean paper trail and avoids the awkward situation of starting to file again after skipping years. However, for states where I only had minimal allocations during profitable years (like under $500), I've stopped filing during subsequent loss years if they fall below the state's thresholds. I keep documentation showing the year-over-year amounts and the state-specific rules that support not filing. One thing I learned the hard way: if you skip filing in a state during loss years and then the partnership has a big profitable year, some states will ask why you didn't file previously. Having clear documentation of your decision-making process (state thresholds, loss amounts, etc.) has been crucial when answering those questions. The key is being intentional and documented about your approach rather than just winging it year by year. Consistency where it makes sense, flexibility where the rules clearly support it.
Hey Ashley! I just went through this exact situation a few weeks ago. Had the 846 code with my DDD, then boom - Tax Topic 203 showed up the next day. Super stressful! In my case, the 898 code didn't appear on my until 3 days after my original DDD, but when it did, it showed exactly how much was taken and for what debt. Since student loans are paused until May, it's almost certainly that NY Labor debt that's going to get collected. One thing that helped me was calling the Bureau of Fiscal Service at 855-868-0151 - they can tell you ahead of time if there's an coming and from which agency. Way better than just waiting and wondering! The whole process took about a week total for me, but I did get the remaining after the was taken. Hope this helps ease some of the anxiety - I know how nerve-wracking it is when you're expecting that refund! π
Thanks for sharing your experience Sean! That Bureau of Fiscal Service number is a game changer - I had no idea you could call ahead to find out about offsets. Definitely going to save that number for future reference. It's crazy how the systems can be so inconsistent with timing, but at least knowing what to expect makes the whole process less stressful. Really appreciate you taking the time to share the details of your situation! π
I've been dealing with similar confusion lately! From what I've learned through this whole process, the 846 code with followed by Tax Topic 203 is unfortunately a pretty clear sign that an is coming. The updates can be really inconsistent - sometimes the 898 code shows up the same day, other times it takes several days after your DDD. Since student loans are still paused until May, that NY Labor debt is most likely what's triggering the offset. Even though they didn't take it last year doesn't mean they won't this year - state agencies can be pretty unpredictable about when they decide to collect. I'd recommend calling the Treasury Program at 1-800-304-3107 to get the exact details on what debt is being and for how much. That way you'll know exactly what to expect instead of just waiting and wondering. The uncertainty is honestly the worst part of this whole situation! Keep checking your daily for that 898 code - once it posts you'll have all the details about the amount and your remaining refund. Hang in there, this whole process is super stressful but you'll get through it! πͺ
I'm surprised nobody mentioned quarterly estimated taxes yet! If you're making money from self-employment, you might need to make quarterly tax payments to avoid penalties. The IRS expects you to pay taxes throughout the year, not just at filing time.
Quarterly taxes for a 16yo mowing lawns seems excessive. IRS isn't going after kids for missing quarterly payments on small amounts. In my experience, filing annually is fine for teen side jobs unless they're making serious money (like $10k+).
As someone who went through this exact situation a few years ago, I can share what worked for me. First, yes you do need to report this income since you're over the $400 threshold for self-employment. But don't stress too much about the bank deposits - for amounts under $10k, they typically won't question where the cash came from. Here's what I wish someone had told me: start keeping better records NOW. Create a simple spreadsheet with dates, jobs, and payments. Also track your expenses like gas, equipment, supplies - these deductions can significantly reduce what you owe. I ended up saving about $400 in taxes just by deducting my lawn mower, gas, and maintenance costs. For filing, you'll use Schedule C and Schedule SE along with Form 1040. The self-employment tax is about 15.3%, but you might not owe income tax depending on your total income. Since your parents claim you as a dependent, you still need to file your own return. Consider it good practice for adult life! Most tax software can handle this situation, or you might want to have your parents help you through it the first time.
This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar situation but only made about $2,800 doing dog walking and pet sitting. Do the same rules apply even if I'm under the $5,200 amount mentioned in the original post? And how detailed do my records need to be - like do I need to write down every single walk or can I just track weekly totals?
Liam O'Reilly
Great question! I was in a similar situation a few years ago and can confirm what others have said - the math is $48,350 (0% LTCG bracket) + $15,950 (standard deduction) = $64,300 total you can realize tax-free as a single filer with no other income. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned much - be really careful about the timing of any sales if you're close to that limit. Since you're unemployed now, this is actually the perfect time to do this strategy. But if you think you might get a job later this year, remember that even a few months of employment income could push you over the 0% bracket. Also, don't forget to keep good records of your cost basis and purchase dates. The IRS has been cracking down on people who can't properly document their long-term holding periods. I learned this the hard way when I had to dig through old brokerage statements during an audit. The strategy you're considering is completely legitimate and can save you thousands in taxes - just make sure you execute it carefully!
0 coins
Zara Khan
β’This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your experience! I'm definitely taking notes on the record-keeping aspect. Quick question: when you mention keeping records of cost basis and purchase dates, do you recommend any particular system or just saving all the brokerage statements? I've been pretty disorganized with my paperwork and want to make sure I'm prepared if I need to prove the long-term holding period. Also, you mentioned being audited - was that related to the capital gains sales specifically, or just bad luck? I want to make sure I'm not doing anything that would raise red flags with the IRS.
0 coins
Isabella Brown
β’For record-keeping, I'd strongly recommend keeping digital copies of all your brokerage statements, but also consider using a spreadsheet or tool like GnuCash to track your cost basis and purchase dates. Most modern brokerages like Fidelity, Schwab, etc. will actually maintain this information for you, but having your own backup is crucial. The audit wasn't specifically related to capital gains - it was actually triggered by some freelance income reporting issues. But during the audit, they questioned everything, including my capital gains calculations from the previous year. Having organized records made that part much smoother. As for red flags, honestly, realizing $60k+ in capital gains while showing little to no other income might look unusual to the IRS, but it's completely legal. Just make sure you can document that these were legitimate long-term investments and not some kind of day-trading activity that should be classified differently. The key is being able to prove the holding period and having clean records of your transactions. @dc08b98faee1 can probably share more specifics about what the IRS focused on during his audit process if that would be helpful for your planning.
0 coins
Mei Chen
This is exactly the kind of strategic tax planning that can make a huge difference during unemployment! One additional consideration I'd mention is to be mindful of any estimated tax payments you might need to make if you do realize significant gains. Even though your federal tax liability might be zero, if you have substantial capital gains (like the $60k+ range being discussed), you might still need to make estimated payments to avoid underpayment penalties - especially if you had tax liability in prior years. The IRS safe harbor rules can be tricky to navigate when your income profile changes dramatically. Also, since you're job hunting, consider the timing of when you might start earning employment income again. If you land a job in Q4 of this year, even a few months of salary could push some of your capital gains into the 15% bracket. You might want to front-load your investment sales earlier in the year while you're certain about your income situation. The unemployment period is actually a unique opportunity for this type of tax optimization that many people don't think to take advantage of. Just make sure you're not selling investments you might need to buy back soon - you don't want to trigger wash sale rules if you're planning to reinvest the proceeds.
0 coins
JaylinCharles
β’This is really smart advice about the estimated tax payments! I hadn't even thought about that aspect. Since I'm new to having significant capital gains, could you clarify how the safe harbor rules work when your income drops dramatically due to unemployment? If I had a $80k salary last year but zero employment income this year, would I still need to make estimated payments based on last year's tax liability even if my actual tax this year might be zero? I'm trying to avoid any surprise penalties while also not overpaying if I don't need to. The timing point about front-loading sales is brilliant too - I'm definitely going to prioritize selling my positions earlier in the year before I hopefully land something. Better safe than sorry when it comes to staying in that 0% bracket!
0 coins