


Ask the community...
Just wanted to throw out there that I've been using TaxAct Professional for my small tax business (about 30 clients) for the last three years. It's significantly cheaper than the big names but has worked perfectly fine for my needs. Their basic package is affordable, and you can add state modules as needed without buying everything upfront. The interface isn't as fancy as some of the premium options, but it gets the job done reliably. Their support has been responsive when I've needed help. The biggest benefit for a small practice is that the learning curve isn't steep, and the pricing scales reasonably as you grow.
Do you have any issues with more complex returns in TaxAct Pro? I've got mostly simple returns but a couple clients with rental properties and small businesses. Can it handle K-1 forms?
I haven't run into any significant limitations with more complex returns. It handles Schedule E for rental properties very well, and I have several clients with small businesses filing Schedule C without issues. For K-1 forms, it processes them fine - I have a few clients with partnership and S-corp income. The only area where I've found it slightly less robust is with very complex investment situations or extremely complicated business returns with lots of unusual deductions. But for the typical small business owner, rental property investor, or individual with some investment income, it works perfectly well. The value for the price is excellent for a small practice.
Has anyone used free options like FreeTaxUSA's professional version? I'm wondering if free software can work for a small practice or if there are major limitations that make it impractical.
FreeTaxUSA doesn't have a professional version that allows you to prepare multiple client returns under a practitioner account. It's really designed for individuals doing their own taxes, not professionals preparing returns for clients. You'd need software specifically designed for tax professionals that includes features like client management, e-filing capabilities under your EFIN, and professional liability protections.
For those struggling with stock gains and quarterly payments, I've been using a simple approach that's worked well for me. After each quarter where I have significant realized gains, I calculate roughly what I'll owe (using my marginal tax rate) and make a payment for just that quarter's activity. It's not perfect, but it keeps me from falling too far behind. I use the IRS Direct Pay website and it's pretty painless once you get used to it.
Do you ever find yourself overpaying with this method? I'm worried about giving the IRS an interest-free loan if I calculate too conservatively.
I do sometimes end up overpaying slightly, but I personally prefer that to underpaying and facing penalties. In years when I've overpaid, I just apply the refund to next year's estimated payments. If you're concerned about overpaying, you might want to be more precise in your calculations. I typically use a rough estimate of my marginal rate plus state taxes (about 35% in my case), but you could use tax software to run a more accurate projection after each significant trade to get closer to the exact amount.
Does anyone know if you can adjust your quarterly payments throughout the year? Like if I make a huge gain in Q3 but nothing in Q1 and Q2, do I have to somehow go back and fix earlier quarters or can I just make a larger payment for Q3?
The quarterly tax system is technically "pay as you go," so each payment should reflect your income for that quarter. If you have minimal gains in early quarters and then a big gain later, you would make a larger payment for the quarter when you had the gain. You don't need to retroactively adjust earlier quarters.
Another option to consider for your situation is setting up an IRS Online Account if you haven't already. I did this last year and it's been super helpful. You can: 1. View all payments you've made regardless of method (check, Direct Pay, etc.) 2. See if payments have been correctly applied to your account 3. Make payments directly through the account interface 4. Check if you have any unexpected penalties It takes a bit to verify your identity when setting it up (you'll need ID and possibly a credit card for verification), but it's worth it for the peace of mind of seeing everything in one place.
I tried setting up an IRS online account but got stuck at the ID verification part. It kept rejecting my driver's license photo. Any tips on getting past that?
I had the same issue with the ID verification initially. Make sure you're taking the photo in good lighting with no glare on your ID. Also, they're really strict about the photo quality - I had to use a different device with a better camera. If that still doesn't work, they offer an alternative verification process through ID.me that some people find easier. You can also request a mail verification code if the digital methods aren't working. It takes longer but it's more reliable if you're having technical issues with the photo verification.
Just want to clarify something that hasn't been mentioned - if you decide to pay everything at once through Direct Pay instead of doing quarterly payments, make sure you check if you'll still owe estimated taxes for next year too! If you're paying a lot this year, you might be required to make estimated payments next year as well. The IRS generally expects you to pay taxes as you earn income, not just once a year. I learned this the hard way - paid my entire tax bill in one go, then got hit with an underpayment penalty the next year because I didn't realize I needed to make quarterly estimated payments going forward.
This is a really important point. How do you know if you need to make estimated payments for next year? Is there some threshold?
Getting back to the original question about tax code changes - I'd eliminate the married filing separately status entirely. It's almost always worse than filing jointly, and in the rare cases where it's beneficial, it creates massive complexity. Just have single, married, and head of household. Also, can we PLEASE standardize the definition of "child" across all tax provisions? The different age requirements for dependents vs. child tax credit vs. EIC vs. head of household status make my brain hurt.
The married filing separately thing is interesting! I've rarely seen cases where it's beneficial. But what about separated couples who aren't legally divorced yet? Would you have some exception for them?
Good point about separated couples! I'd create a simple "legally separated" status that would essentially treat them as single filers. The current system with MFS is just too punitive with all its limitations and phase-outs. The problem is that MFS was designed to prevent gaming the system, but it's become so restrictive that it actually creates unfair outcomes for people in difficult situations, like those separating or dealing with a spouse who won't cooperate on taxes. A better-designed single status for separated individuals would be much more straightforward.
What about simplifying capital gains? I have to track basis for every stock purchase separately and it's a nightmare. Why not just let me use average cost basis for everything? And why do we have to track wash sales manually? The brokerages already report everything to the IRS anyway!
Carmen Flores
For future reference, the safe harbor provisions might help you avoid penalties even if you miss some quarterly payments. You can avoid underpayment penalties if you: 1) Pay at least 90% of the tax for the current year, OR 2) Pay 100% of the tax shown on your return for the prior year (110% if you're a higher income taxpayer) Since this is your first year with self-employment income, option 2 might not help much, but it's good to know for next year.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
ā¢Does the safe harbor rule apply even if you had zero tax liability the previous year? I was a student last year with almost no income.
0 coins
Carmen Flores
ā¢Yes, the safe harbor rule still applies if you had zero tax liability the previous year. In fact, that's the best case scenario! If you had no tax liability last year, then 100% of your previous year's tax is zero, which means you technically don't need to make estimated payments this year to meet the safe harbor provision. However, this only protects you from underpayment penalties - you'll still owe the full tax amount when you file. So it's usually better to make the quarterly payments anyway to avoid a big tax bill all at once. This zero-liability exception only works for one year, so plan accordingly for next year's payments.
0 coins
CyberSamurai
Quick question - does anyone know if payment processors like PayPal or Stripe send income information directly to the IRS? I'm in a similar situation where I started freelancing mid-year.
0 coins
Zoe Alexopoulos
ā¢Yes, payment processors like PayPal, Stripe, and Venmo are required to report to the IRS if you receive more than $600 in payments for goods and services in a year. They'll send you a 1099-K form that you'll need to include when filing your taxes.
0 coins