IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ezra Beard

•

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - if your wife is in construction, she should ABSOLUTELY be tracking any meals she buys when working at job sites far from her usual work area. Construction contractors can deduct 100% of those meals for 2023 (normally it would be 50% but there's a temporary COVID relief provision). Also, if she's buying any small tools under $2,500 each, look into "de minimis safe harbor election" which lets you deduct them immediately instead of depreciating them.

0 coins

Wait what? 100% of meals can be deducted? I thought that was only for actual businesses, not independent contractors? And what counts as "far from usual work area"? Like is that a specific mile range?

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

Independent contractors ARE businesses - that's the whole point of being a contractor instead of an employee. As long as your wife files a Schedule C, she's operating a business and qualifies for these deductions. For the "far from usual work area" definition, there's no specific mile requirement in the tax code, but the general rule is that it needs to be far enough that it wouldn't be reasonable to return home for meals. Most tax professionals consider anything requiring an overnight stay or sites more than 50 miles from your home base to clearly qualify, but even shorter distances can work if there's a business necessity to remain on-site.

0 coins

Hey one quick question about mileage deduction - my husband is also in construction and we've been tracking his mileage, but does driving from home to the first job site count? And from the last job site back home? Or only between job sites during the day?

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

I'm not a tax pro but I've been a contractor for 6 years. The drive from home to first job site and last job site to home are considered personal commuting miles and NOT deductible. Only the miles between job sites during the day count as business miles. EXCEPTION: If you have a qualifying home office that serves as your principal place of business, then drives from home to job sites CAN be deductible business miles.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

Just a practical tip from someone who went through tax court for a similar issue - request your cell phone records from 2021! They show your location data throughout the year and can be powerful evidence that you were in the same location as your children. Also, if you have a co-parenting app or calendar that tracks custody time, get a complete export of that data. Make sure to create a simple calendar visual that clearly shows the days your children were with you - judges appreciate easy-to-understand visuals rather than just stacks of documents. I created a color-coded calendar that made it immediately obvious I had the kids more than 6 months.

0 coins

That calendar visual idea is brilliant! Did you just use like a regular wall calendar and highlight days, or did you make something digital? I'm not very tech-savvy but could probably figure out a basic spreadsheet if that would look more professional.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

I actually did both! I created a digital calendar in Excel where I color-coded days (green for days with me, yellow for days with their mom), and then printed it out. I also made a simple count at the bottom showing the total days for each month and the running total for the year. The judge really appreciated having that visual. Even a hand-colored paper calendar would work fine - the key is making it easy for the judge to see at a glance that you met the six-month requirement. Just make sure you can back up each colored day with some form of evidence. I organized my evidence by month in a binder, so when the judge questioned a particular period, I could immediately turn to that section and show the supporting documentation.

0 coins

Don't forget about financial evidence! Bank statements showing regular purchases at grocery stores, children's clothing stores, and restaurants near your home can help establish a pattern consistent with having children living with you. Also, get a record of any child support payments you made or received - they help establish the formal custody arrangement. If your children participated in any activities (sports, music lessons, etc.), get attendance records and receipts for those as well. Did you claim your children on your health insurance? Get documentation from your insurance company showing they were covered under your plan in 2021.

0 coins

Payton Black

•

This is all good advice but keep in mind the IRS isn't just looking for evidence you SUPPORTED the kids financially - they specifically need proof the kids LIVED with you for more than half the year. I've seen people bring tons of payment receipts but still lose because they couldn't prove physical residency.

0 coins

Pregnant and my employer wants me to file for unemployment instead of maternity leave - is this legal?

I work for a small business with only about 12 employees. I'm currently pregnant with my second child, due in early December. My boss is suggesting that when I need to take time off for childbirth, I should file for unemployment and claim I was laid off rather than telling the truth about my pregnancy. This happened with my first pregnancy in 2023 too. Back then, my boss told me to file for unemployment "because they pay into it for a reason." When I was honest on my application and said I needed time off for a baby, I was denied benefits. Eventually my employer just paid me $400 a week for the 8 weeks I was out. Now with baby #2 coming, they're telling me to file for unemployment again, but this time to say I was laid off and not mention the pregnancy at all. They promise my job will be held for me (they genuinely can't afford to replace me) with a return date of February 1st. They said I "should get paid no problem" and won't have to report looking for work. They mentioned our company numbers are down from last year, so they have a "legitimate reason" to lay someone off if unemployment asks questions. When I asked some friends about this, they said it sounds like unemployment fraud. I also talked to my assistant manager who agreed it seems fishy and advised against it. My biggest worry is that when I file taxes, I'll have unemployment income during the exact dates I had a baby, whom I'll be claiming as a dependent on my taxes. I'm really stressed about this. My employer has been good to me in many ways, and I don't want to get them in trouble, but I also don't want to commit fraud. I do need some income while on maternity leave though. Is this legal? Should I go through with filing for unemployment as they suggest?

Hugo Kass

•

Is there any chance your employer qualifies for FMLA? The cutoff is 50 employees within 75 miles, but sometimes small businesses are actually part of larger corporate structures that might push them over the threshold. Also, have you looked into whether your state has any pregnancy accommodation laws? Some states have protections that kick in at lower employee counts than FMLA. Might be worth checking what your state offers specifically.

0 coins

I'm sure we don't qualify for FMLA - we're truly a small independent business with just 12 employees total. I did check into my state's laws and unfortunately we're in a state with minimal protections beyond the federal requirements. I'm going to look into the temporary disability option that a few people mentioned. I had no idea that might be available to me! And I'm definitely not going to file for unemployment fraudulently. After reading everyone's comments, I can see that's a terrible idea that could come back to haunt both me and my employer.

0 coins

Your employer might not understand that unemployment agencies often cross-check data with the IRS. When you claim a new dependent (your baby) with a birthdate that matches your "layoff" period, it creates an obvious red flag. I process payroll for a small business and this kind of stuff gets caught more often than people think.

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

This is so true. My sister works for our state's unemployment department and they absolutely compare birth records with unemployment claims. They also check social media sometimes. Someone at her office caught a claimant posting about their new baby on Facebook during the exact period they claimed to be "laid off" and actively seeking work.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

One thing that confused me about Form 8888 for bonds was the registration info. I wasn't sure what to put for the owner names and how to format them. Found out that for bonds, you need to enter the name exactly as you want it to appear on the bond in boxes 5a, 5b, etc. You can do: - Just yourself as sole owner - You with a co-owner (OR between names) - You with a beneficiary (POD between names) If you're buying them as gifts for others, you put their name first, then yours as second name with POD between.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

So if I want to buy bonds for my kids, how exactly would I format that? Would it be "Child Name POD My Name" or the other way around?

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

For buying bonds as gifts for your kids, you would format it as "Child's Name POD Your Name" in the registration box. This makes your child the primary owner with you as the beneficiary who can cash them if needed while they're minors. If your child is very young, this is usually the best approach since they can't manage the bonds themselves yet, but they're still considered the owner. Once they're older, they can cash them with proper ID. Just make sure to include their Social Security Number on the form too.

0 coins

Does anyone know if there's a limit to how much of your refund you can use for buying bonds with Form 8888? I'm getting back about $5,000 and thinking of putting a good chunk into bonds.

0 coins

There's a $5,000 annual limit per person for purchasing paper savings bonds. So if your refund is $5,000 and you're the only registrant, you could use the whole thing. If you're buying for multiple people (like kids), each person can have up to $5,000 in bonds purchased for them annually.

0 coins

Also remember bonds only come in $50 increments, so make sure your amounts are divisible by 50 on the form!

0 coins

Just a practical tip from someone who's been in your shoes - with your income levels and having a child, you might actually get a refund rather than owing money. The Child Tax Credit is currently $2,000 per qualifying child, which can significantly offset your tax liability. Instead of focusing on allowances (which aren't even used anymore), I'd recommend having a small additional amount withheld from each paycheck if you're worried. Even just $20 extra per paycheck between the two of you would give you a nice cushion against owing anything.

0 coins

Melody Miles

•

So does the Child Tax Credit mean you get $2,000 back regardless of what you owe? Like if I owed $500 in taxes would I still get $1,500 back? I'm confused about how credits work vs. deductions.

0 coins

The Child Tax Credit reduces your tax liability dollar-for-dollar, up to $2,000 per qualifying child. It's different from a deduction, which only reduces your taxable income. For example, if you would owe $3,000 in taxes without the credit, the Child Tax Credit would reduce that to $1,000. If you would only owe $1,500 in taxes, the credit would reduce your liability to zero, and you'd potentially get some of the remaining credit as a refund (up to $1,400 per child is refundable). The refundable portion means you can receive it even if you don't owe any tax.

0 coins

Has anyone else noticed that OP mentioned allowances but doesn't realize the W-4 form changed years ago? My company finally updated their system last year and it was so confusing to switch over.

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

•

Yeah but some payroll systems and local forms still use allowances terminology. My company's internal system still asks for "allowances" even though they translate it to the new system behind the scenes. Super confusing for everyone.

0 coins

Good point! I didn't consider that some employers might still be using the old terminology internally. That makes the situation much more confusing for employees trying to figure out their withholding. Seems like a lot of companies have outdated systems that don't match current tax forms.

0 coins

Prev1...47094710471147124713...5644Next