


Ask the community...
My sister is a CPA and does remote consultations. She primarily works with small business owners and individuals with investment income. Very reasonable rates and super knowledgeable. DM me if you want her contact info!
Have you considered using a tax professional who isn't necessarily a CPA? Enrolled Agents (EAs) are also certified by the IRS to represent taxpayers, and they often specialize more in tax issues than CPAs who might focus more broadly on accounting. Sometimes they're more affordable too. I've been using an EA for years for my tax planning and she's been fantastic.
As someone who works with multiple tech companies on their taxes, I think the likelihood of a 2023 fix is about 50/50 at this point. The business community and many legislators from both parties want to restore immediate expensing, but finding the right legislative vehicle is challenging. The Joint Committee on Taxation scored the 5-year reversal at about $140 billion over 10 years, which makes it a significant budget item that needs offsets. Most likely scenario is it gets attached to a must-pass bill in Q4, possibly with some modifications. My advice? Don't make major R&D decisions based solely on potential tax changes. Focus on business value first, then optimize the tax treatment as much as possible under current law.
What about companies that are already cutting R&D specifically because of this tax change? I've seen several businesses in our industry reducing US-based research and moving more overseas because of this issue. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of encouraging innovation?
You're absolutely right that the tax change is having unintended consequences. I have clients who are shifting R&D to countries with more favorable tax treatment, like Canada and the UK, which offer refundable R&D tax credits on top of immediate expensing. This is exactly why there's bipartisan interest in fixing it. The original change was never about discouraging R&D - it was a revenue raiser to offset other tax cuts in the 2017 bill. Many legislators from both parties have expressed concern about the competitiveness impact. But tax policy often moves slowly, especially with divided government. Companies have to make decisions based on current law while advocating for changes. It's a challenging balance.
Does anyone know if state tax treatment of R&D expenses has also changed? Our company operates in California and Massachusetts, and I'm not sure if they follow the federal treatment or have their own rules for R&D amortization.
Great question - it varies by state. Many states use federal taxable income as their starting point, so they automatically adopt federal treatment unless they specifically decouple. California partially conforms to federal tax changes but has its own R&D credit that remains very favorable. Massachusetts has decoupled from this specific federal change, allowing immediate expensing of R&D for state tax purposes. Check with your specific states, but this is an area where you might get some relief at the state level even while the federal issue remains unresolved.
Just to add a data point here - I'm also Canadian and do occasional work in the US. For amounts under $500, I've had about half of organizations ask for Form 8233 and half accept just the W-8BEN. There's a lot of confusion on the US side about the right documentation for small payments to foreigners. If this is a one-time thing and you don't plan to work with them again, it might be worth just completing the form. It's annoying but not actually that difficult once you understand what they're looking for. The key parts are: 1. Article XVI of the US-Canada treaty 2. Statement that you're a Canadian resident 3. Explanation that you're only temporarily in the US 4. Mention that your US source income for the year is below the treaty threshold
Thanks so much for this breakdown! You're right, it's just a one-time workshop so probably easier to just fill it out. Do you know if I need to include my SIN number on the form? I'm always hesitant to share that with organizations outside Canada.
Yes, unfortunately you do need to include your SIN as your "foreign tax identifying number" on the form. I understand the hesitation, but it's a requirement for treaty benefits. If it helps ease your mind, legitimate US organizations (especially non-profits) are required to maintain confidentiality of tax identification numbers under IRS regulations. They need your SIN to properly report the payment to the IRS, so there's no way around providing it if you want the treaty benefits.
Just FYI for Canadians filling out Form 8233 - make sure to check if your specific profession might have different treaty provisions! I'm a university professor and there's actually a specific article in the treaty just for teachers and researchers that gives different exemptions than the general Article XVI provision.
Artists also have some special provisions in the US-Canada treaty. If you're selling artwork rather than providing a service like teaching a workshop, different rules might apply. The distinction matters for tax purposes.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is that you might qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit, especially as a single parent with a toddler. The income thresholds for EITC with a qualifying child are pretty generous and could offset some of your tax liability. Also, look into the Child Tax Credit. For 2025, it's worth up to $2,000 per qualifying child under 17. There's also the Child and Dependent Care Credit if you're paying for childcare while you work. These credits can make a huge difference for self-employed parents!
I had no idea I might qualify for those credits! Do they apply even if I'm self-employed? And how do they interact with the self-employment tax?
Yes, they absolutely apply to self-employed people! Self-employment income is earned income, so it counts for the EITC calculation. The Child Tax Credit and Child and Dependent Care Credit are available regardless of how you earn your income. These credits don't reduce your self-employment tax directly, but they reduce your overall tax bill. The EITC is even refundable, meaning you can get money back even if you don't owe income tax (though you'd still owe the SE tax).
Have you considered making S-Corp election? Once you get to around $40-50k in profit, it can save you thousands in SE tax. You'd pay yourself a reasonable salary subject to FICA, but take the rest as distributions which aren't subject to SE tax. It's more paperwork and you need to run payroll, but the tax savings can be substantial. Not worth it at your current income level probably, but something to consider if your business grows.
My accountant advised against S-Corp until hitting at least $80k in profit consistently because the added costs of payroll services and additional tax forms can eat up the savings at lower income levels. Worth getting professional advice on this one!
Chloe Anderson
Something similar happened to me last year. Turns out my identity had been stolen and the IRS automatically assigned me an IP PIN without clearly notifying me. Check your mom's IRS online account if she has one set up. Sometimes they post important notices there without sending physical mail. If she doesn't have an online account yet, she should create one at irs.gov. It might reveal notices or account flags that weren't mentioned during the phone call. Also double check that the IRS has her current mailing address - they might have sent the IP PIN to an old address.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
ā¢can tax professionals request ip pins for clients? my accountant mentioned something about that but im not sure if that applies to this situation
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
ā¢Tax professionals cannot request IP PINs specifically for clients - the IRS issues them directly to taxpayers either because they've been victims of identity theft or because they've voluntarily opted into the IP PIN program. However, tax professionals with proper authorization (Form 2848 Power of Attorney) can contact the IRS on behalf of clients to resolve account issues, including IP PIN problems. They have access to the Practitioner Priority Service, which often has shorter wait times than the regular taxpayer hotline. If your accountant suggested they could help, they probably meant using their professional channels to contact the IRS about your situation, not actually requesting a PIN themselves.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
Try calling the dedicated IRS Identity Theft hotline at 800-908-4490. Regular IRS customer service sometimes doesn't have full access to identity protection flags on accounts. I had a similar issue where my return was rejected for an IP PIN I never received. Turns out my info was compromised in a data breach and the IRS automatically put extra security on my account without sending proper notification. The identity theft department was able to see that a PIN had been generated and either resend it or remove the requirement so I could file. Good luck!
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
ā¢Thanks for this specific advice! Do you remember how long it took from when you called this special number until you were able to successfully file your return? I'm getting really worried about missing the deadline.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
ā¢It was pretty quick once I got through to the right department. I called on a Tuesday, they verified my identity and cleared the flag in their system during that call, and I was able to e-file successfully the next day. They also provided documentation showing I had been working to resolve the issue in case there were any questions about filing deadlines. If you're getting close to the deadline and still can't resolve it, make sure to file Form 4868 for an automatic extension. That will give you until October to file the actual return without late filing penalties. Just remember an extension to file isn't an extension to pay, so if your mom will owe anything, she should estimate and pay that amount when filing the extension.
0 coins