


Ask the community...
Something nobody's mentioned yet is the business-use percentage. If you're using this van even 10% for personal use, that affects everything. You can only claim the business portion of either method. With standard mileage, you just count business miles. With actual expenses/179, you have to calculate the business-use percentage and can only deduct that portion of expenses and depreciation. IRS is super picky about this during audits!
Do you have to track personal miles separately? Or just know the total miles driven in a year and subtract business miles from that?
You need to track both. The IRS wants to see your total miles for the year (odometer readings) and your business miles specifically. The difference is your personal miles. They want documentation showing how you tracked this. Most audits of vehicle deductions focus on inadequate mileage logs. I recommend using a mileage tracking app that automatically logs your trips - much easier than trying to reconstruct it later.
I'm in construction and use a similar vehicle. My accountant told me to really think about future years. If you plan to put this many miles on the vehicle consistently (40k+ per year), the standard mileage rate often wins in the long run, especially with gas prices these days. Section 179 gives you a big deduction now but smaller ones later. Standard mileage keeps giving if you drive a lot.
Thanks for sharing your experience. I do expect to maintain high mileage (40-45k) annually for at least the next 3-4 years based on my current clients and service area. I'm leaning toward the standard mileage based on everyone's advice, especially since it seems to provide more flexibility if my situation changes.
Don't forget to check if your home country has a tax treaty with the US! This can significantly impact how your LLC income is taxed. I'm from the UK with a similar setup, and certain types of business income are taxed differently because of the US-UK tax treaty. Also, make sure you're tracking your physical presence in the US carefully - the substantial presence test is based on a weighted formula (all days in current year + 1/3 of days in previous year + 1/6 of days from year before that). This determines whether you file as a resident (1040) or non-resident (1040NR).
Thanks for this reminder about the tax treaty! I'm from Singapore and I believe there is a tax treaty. Do you know if I need to file any special forms to claim tax treaty benefits? And how exactly do I track my physical presence - is there an official way to document this?
You would need to file Form 8833 to claim tax treaty benefits. This form reports treaty-based positions that affect your tax liability. For Singapore specifically, the treaty has provisions covering business profits, but you need to determine if your income qualifies under the permanent establishment rules. For tracking physical presence, I recommend keeping a detailed log of all your international travel. Save boarding passes, entry/exit stamps in your passport, and any other travel documentation. The IRS doesn't provide an official tracking method, but during an audit, they may ask for proof of your whereabouts. Some people use apps like TravelTracker or Taxday to help with this. The important thing is to have documentation of every day you were outside the US.
Another thing to consider - your Texas LLC might not have state income tax, but you might still have filing requirements depending on your business activities! Don't forget about franchise tax or public information reports that might be required even without income tax. Also, does your home country recognize the US LLC structure? Some countries will treat it as a corporation instead of a pass-through entity, which could create mismatched taxation. I learned this the hard way!
This is a really important point. I have a Delaware LLC but live in California, and I got hit with a surprise $800 minimum franchise tax my first year because I didn't understand the state requirements were different. OP should definitely check Texas requirements even though they don't have state income tax.
Just wanted to add my experience - I ran into this exact excess Social Security tax issue with H&R Block last year. For 2023 taxes, I switched to using FreeTaxUSA and the problem didn't happen again. Their software handled my multiple W-2s correctly and didn't mistakenly claim excess SS tax on Schedule 3. The worst part about H&R Block's error was that the "review" step never flagged it as a potential issue, so I had no way of knowing until the IRS adjusted my refund. Something to consider for next year's filing if you want to avoid this happening again.
Does FreeTaxUSA handle other complex situations well? I've got multiple W-2s, 1099s, and some investment income. Been hesitant to switch from H&R Block despite these issues.
In my experience, FreeTaxUSA handles complex returns surprisingly well. I have W-2 income, several 1099-NECs from freelance work, investment income from multiple brokerages, and even some foreign income. It walked me through everything clearly and let me review the actual forms before filing. The biggest difference I noticed is that FreeTaxUSA seems to calculate things more accurately when you have multiple income sources. The Schedule 3 excess Social Security tax was calculated correctly, and it even caught a credit H&R Block missed the year before. The interface isn't as pretty as H&R Block, but the calculations seem more reliable, especially for situations like yours with multiple income sources.
Has anyone actually received an official IRS adjustment letter for this specific excess Social Security tax error? My return was accepted 4 weeks ago with what I suspect is this same issue, and it's still "processing" with no updates. I'm worried they're just going to reject it entirely.
I got an adjustment letter about 6 weeks after filing. They reduced my refund by the exact amount that was incorrectly claimed as excess Social Security tax on Schedule 3, line 15. The letter was pretty clear about what they changed and why. Return was processed normally after that, just with the smaller refund amount.
To add to the distinction between CPAs and tax lawyers - it's also about when you bring them in. CPAs are great for ongoing tax compliance and planning BEFORE you file. Tax lawyers are often brought in AFTER there's a problem or for complex planning. My family learned this the hard way when my father tried to handle a complex real estate exchange himself with just TurboTax. Ended up with an audit and potential penalties. The tax attorney saved us thousands by properly structuring an argument based on tax case law that a CPA wouldn't have been familiar with. For your inheritance situation, a CPA is probably sufficient unless there are legal disputes about the inheritance or particularly complex assets involved.
What about for tax planning for the future? I've got a small business that's starting to do well, and I'm wondering if I should be talking to someone about the best way to structure things for tax purposes before it gets bigger.
For forward-looking tax planning with a growing business, I'd actually recommend starting with a CPA who specializes in small businesses. They can help with immediate tax optimization strategies and basic business structure advice. As your business grows more complex or if you're considering significant changes like bringing on investors or expanding internationally, that's when adding a tax attorney to your advisory team makes sense. The attorney can help with more sophisticated legal structures and contracts that have tax implications while ensuring you're protected legally in other ways too.
One thing nobody has mentioned is that many professionals are BOTH CPAs and tax attorneys. My tax guy has both credentials and it's super helpful because he can handle everything from preparing my returns to helping with tax court issues when my ex-wife messed up our joint return from years ago. Cost-wise, CPAs are generally cheaper (like $150-300/hr in my area) while tax attorneys can run $350-600/hr depending on their experience and location. But sometimes paying for the attorney saves money in the long run if you have serious tax issues.
That's really good to know! I hadn't considered someone might have both credentials. Do you find that having someone with both qualifications costs more than just a regular CPA for standard tax prep?
For standard tax prep, professionals with both credentials do tend to charge more than a typical CPA - I pay about 25% more than friends who use regular CPAs. However, I don't think it's necessary to pay that premium for straightforward tax preparation. Where I've found the dual credential valuable is for ongoing tax planning throughout the year. My situation includes a small business, rental properties, and some international income, so having someone who understands both the accounting and legal implications has helped me make better strategic decisions and avoid costly mistakes. For simpler situations, a good CPA alone is probably sufficient.
Carmen Ortiz
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is that you might be able to contribute to a SEP IRA for 2023 if you have any self-employment income. The deadline for establishing and contributing to a SEP IRA is your tax filing deadline (including extensions), so potentially as late as October 15, 2024 for the 2023 tax year. The contribution limit is pretty generous too - up to 25% of your net self-employment income, with a maximum of $66,000 for 2023. Even a small side gig could let you shelter some income.
0 coins
Zara Malik
โขThat's really interesting! I do have a small side business doing web design that brought in about $12,000 last year. Would I qualify for this SEP IRA option? And can I open one if I also have access to my employer's 401k from my main job?
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
โขYes, you absolutely can set up a SEP IRA for your self-employment income, even while having access to an employer 401k! The two are independent of each other. The calculation gets a bit tricky though - it's not simply 25% of your gross $12,000. For self-employment income, you first need to deduct the self-employment tax deduction, then calculate 25% of that reduced amount. With $12,000 in net business income, you could probably contribute around $2,200-2,500 to a SEP IRA. That would directly reduce your taxable income for 2023 if you establish and fund the account before filing your taxes. Many brokerages like Vanguard, Fidelity, or Schwab offer SEP IRAs that you can open online pretty quickly.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
Just one more option to consider - if you made any student loan payments in 2023, you might be able to claim the student loan interest deduction of up to $2,500. It's an "above the line" deduction so you don't need to itemize to claim it. Also, review your 2023 expenses for things like work-related educational expenses, moving expenses for active military, or health insurance premiums if you're self-employed. These are also above-the-line deductions that might help reduce your taxable income.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
โขThe work-related educational expenses deduction was suspended until 2025, so that's unfortunately not an option for 2023 taxes. The moving expense deduction is indeed only for active duty military now too. But good call on the self-employed health insurance premiums! If OP has self-employment income as mentioned above, they might be able to deduct health insurance premiums paid.
0 coins