IRS

Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.

$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

GalacticGuru

โ€ข

Just wanted to add that my husband and I were in almost the exact same boat last year! We ended up filing jointly and saved about $1,300 compared to filing separately. One thing to consider - if either of you has any past tax debts or is behind on child support payments, filing separately might protect the other spouse from having their refund offset. Otherwise, joint is usually the way to go!

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

โ€ข

Thanks for sharing your experience! Neither of us has any tax debts or child support, so it sounds like joint is probably the way to go for us. Did you use any particular tax software that was helpful for comparing the two options?

0 coins

GalacticGuru

โ€ข

We used H&R Block's online software which made it pretty easy to compare. We entered all our info for a joint return first, noted the refund amount, then created a new return and selected married filing separately to see the difference. TaxAct also has a good comparison feature that's a bit more straightforward - it can show you both scenarios side by side after you enter all your information once.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

โ€ข

has anyone actually looked at the tax bracket cutoffs? sometimes if both spouses make similar incomes filing separately can be better because it keeps both of you in a lower bracket. my wife and i saved like $700 last year filing separately.

0 coins

That's actually a common misconception. The married filing separately brackets aren't the same as single brackets - they're exactly half of the married filing jointly brackets. So there's usually no tax bracket advantage to filing separately if both spouses have similar incomes. The only exception is if one spouse has significant itemized deductions that would be limited by the other spouse's income. But with the higher standard deduction now, that's rare for most people.

0 coins

Andre Rousseau

โ€ข

One option nobody's mentioned yet is checking if the vendor deposited your check. If they did, you might be able to get their banking information from your bank statement. Sometimes you can see the account number or at least the bank they use. With that info, you might be able to find more details about their business. Worth a shot if you're completely stuck.

0 coins

Zara Malik

โ€ข

That's a really smart idea I hadn't thought of! I just checked our business account online and can see the check was deposited at First National Bank, but I'm not seeing any account details. Is there something specific I should ask our bank for to get more information?

0 coins

Andre Rousseau

โ€ข

You'd want to contact your bank and ask for the "deposit information" from the cleared check. Sometimes they can provide the routing and account number where it was deposited. Not all banks will share this, but many business accounts give you access to this information. Once you have that, you still won't have their TIN, but you'll have more documentation to show the IRS that this was indeed a real vendor who received payment. The bank info combined with their name, email and phone gives you a stronger paper trail.

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

โ€ข

Have you tried being more direct with them? Sometimes I've had success by simply explaining that their request is illegal. You could send them something like: "I'm legally required to file a 1099 for the services you provided. Refusing to provide a W-9 is actually a violation of tax law and could subject you to penalties from the IRS. I'm not asking you to pay additional taxes - you're always responsible for your own tax obligations on income earned.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

โ€ข

This is good advice. Also mention that if they refuse to provide a W-9, you're required to do backup withholding at 24% of any FUTURE payments and report them to the IRS. Even though you can't do that for past payments, just knowing you're aware of the requirements might make them reconsider.

0 coins

Pedro Sawyer

โ€ข

Has anyone noticed they're getting interest paid on their super late refunds? I filed my 2020 return in early 2023 and got like an extra $200 in interest when my refund finally came through. The interest isn't taxable until the following year too, which is nice.

0 coins

Mae Bennett

โ€ข

Wait really? I didn't know the IRS pays interest! Do they just add it automatically or do you have to request it somehow? I'm still waiting on my 2021 refund too.

0 coins

Pedro Sawyer

โ€ข

They add it automatically! You don't have to do anything to request it. The interest starts accumulating from the original filing deadline for that tax year (so for 2021 returns, interest started accumulating from April 18, 2022). They'll keep adding interest until the day they issue your refund. Just be aware that the interest payment IS taxable income, but you'll report it on next year's return. They'll send you a Form 1099-INT in January 2026 for any interest paid during 2025. The current interest rate is pretty decent too - around 7% annually.

0 coins

Quick tip - if your return shows "still processing" that's actually better than "being processed." "Still processing" means your return is in the pipeline and moving along. "Being processed" can sometimes indicate it's been flagged for manual review. Also check your tax transcript online if you can access it - sometimes there are codes there that give more info than the refund tool.

0 coins

Rosie Harper

โ€ข

Thanks for this! I just created an account on the IRS website to check my transcript, but it says I need to wait for a verification code in the mail. Is that normal?

0 coins

Melina Haruko

โ€ข

Actually it's the opposite. "Being processed" is the normal status, while "still being processed" often indicates some sort of review or delay. The transcript is definitely the way to go for more info though!

0 coins

Aisha Abdullah

โ€ข

My experience with the IRS code 420 was that they were specifically looking at my home office deduction. They sent me a letter about 6 weeks after that code appeared on my transcript. In my case, I had claimed a pretty significant home office (about 25% of my home). I had to provide: - A floor plan with measurements - Photos of the space - Explanation of how the space was used exclusively for business - Utility bills and other expenses - Calendar showing business activities conducted in the space The good news is that I had everything documented and my deduction was ultimately approved. The whole process took about 3 months from the first letter to resolution.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

โ€ข

Thanks for sharing your experience! Did you respond to everything by mail or did you have the option to upload documents electronically? I'm curious about how the process actually works.

0 coins

Aisha Abdullah

โ€ข

They initially contacted me by mail with a request for the documentation, but I was able to create an account on their examination portal and upload all my documents electronically. It was actually pretty straightforward - I scanned everything, created a single PDF, and uploaded it with a cover letter explaining each item. They did have questions about two of my documents which required a follow-up phone call, but overall the process was less painful than I expected. Just make sure you respond within their deadlines and keep copies of absolutely everything you send them. The digital option definitely sped things up compared to mailing everything.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

โ€ข

Just wanted to mention that the NIIT adjustment could definitely trigger an audit. The same thing happened to me - the IRS adjusted my NIIT down by about $600 in 2021, and I got audited the following year. In my case, they determined I had correctly calculated it originally and I ended up having to pay back the extra refund plus a small penalty. What software did you use to prepare your taxes? Some of the popular ones have had glitches with NIIT calculations that can cause discrepancies.

0 coins

NeonNova

โ€ข

I had the exact opposite experience. IRS increased my NIIT by $1200 and when I got audited, they found they had made the mistake. Took forever to get resolved tho. Like 8 months of back and forth.

0 coins

IRC 334: Can parent corporations choose the cost basis treatment when liquidating a subsidiary?

I'm diving deep into a corporate tax issue regarding parent-subsidiary liquidations. Specifically, I'm looking at situations where a parent company completely liquidates a wholly owned subsidiary under IRC 332(b) and 1504(a)(2). My main confusion is about how the basis of property gets determined under IRC 334(b) when these assets transfer to the parent. From my research, it seems like when a parent corporation completely liquidates its subsidiary, there are two possible paths for handling the cost basis: 1. The subsidiary could recognize capital gains at distribution time for the increased cost basis of assets transferred to the parent. This gain would be calculated as the current fair market value minus the original cost basis of those assets. 2. Alternatively, the parent corporation could receive the subsidiary's assets completely tax-free, but would keep their original cost basis instead of using their current fair market value. This would make the asset transfer a non-taxable event for both companies, but the parent would accept the assets at their (potentially lower) original cost basis rather than FMV. What I really need clarity on is: 1. Is my understanding of IRC 334(b) actually correct? 2. Does the parent corporation genuinely have a CHOICE between these options? Or is one treatment mandatory in this scenario? Any insights from corporate tax specialists would be super helpful!

Emma Wilson

โ€ข

I think everyone's overcomplicating this. IRC 334(b)(1) is pretty clear - in a 332 liquidation, the basis of property received by the parent corporation is the same as it was in the hands of the distributing corporation. No choices, no elections, just a straightforward carryover basis rule. The parent might have choices about HOW to structure the transaction in the first place (like whether to qualify for 332 treatment), but once you're in 332 territory, the basis rules in 334(b) are fixed.

0 coins

Malik Davis

โ€ข

But what about Section 336(e)? Doesn't that election let you treat the liquidation differently for basis purposes? I thought that gave corporations some flexibility in how assets are valued during liquidation.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

โ€ข

Good question about 336(e). That election is different - it applies to certain stock dispositions, not to the liquidation itself. A 336(e) election can apply when a corporation sells stock of a subsidiary, and it essentially treats the transaction as an asset sale rather than a stock sale. But in a straight 332 liquidation where the parent is receiving assets directly from its subsidiary, 334(b)(1) controls and mandates carryover basis. The flexibility you're thinking about might relate to planning opportunities before the liquidation, but not to the basis determination once you're in a qualifying 332 liquidation.

0 coins

Isabella Santos

โ€ข

Speaking from experience, the original poster should be extremely careful about relying on forum advice for something this complex. I made that mistake with a similar corporate liquidation scenario last year. I recommend consulting a corporate tax specialist because these transactions have many moving parts beyond just the basic code provisions. Things like E&P, previously taxed income, loss disallowance rules, etc., can all affect the overall tax results even if the basic carryover basis rule is straightforward.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

โ€ข

Totally agree. My company did a subsidiary liquidation last year and we got caught by the built-in loss limitations we didn't know about. Cost us a fortune. Would have been worth paying a specialist!

0 coins

Prev1...46754676467746784679...5645Next