IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Is the "Hybrid Tax System" a realistic proposal for source-based taxation?

I've been studying different tax systems for a potential research paper, and came across an interesting proposal for reforming our current tax setup. The "Hybrid Tax System" concept aims to combine destination-based and source-based elements to improve use tax compliance while supporting local economies. The proposal suggests leveraging existing mechanisms like the South Dakota v. Wayfair decision, marketplace facilitator laws, and interstate compacts to shift tax collection from consumers to sellers. It would implement automated compliance tools and create a revenue-sharing model where producing states receive a portion of the tax. What caught my attention was the suggestion for states to share use tax revenue - with approximately 20% going back to the state where goods were produced. This seems like it could incentivize local manufacturing while also addressing the poor compliance rates with the current self-reported use tax system. The plan also suggests expanding marketplace facilitator roles to include use tax collection on high-value items, creating local purchase incentives, and implementing digital compliance tools for businesses. Does anyone think this kind of hybrid approach could actually work in practice? Would states with high consumption rates ever agree to share revenue with producer states? I'm particularly interested in whether the proposed pilot programs (focusing on vehicles/machinery, small business compliance tools, and local incentives) seem realistic from a policy perspective.

The revenue sharing aspect is the most interesting part of this proposal to me. I've worked in economic development for a manufacturing state, and we've always struggled with the fact that we produce goods but the tax revenue goes to the states where consumers live. 20% seems like a reasonable starting point, though I imagine high-consumption states with no sales tax (like NH) or minimal manufacturing (like FL) would strongly resist. The real challenge would be creating the administrative framework for this revenue sharing. This system could actually reduce some of the tax incentive battles between states trying to lure manufacturers. If production states automatically get a revenue share, there's less pressure to offer massive tax breaks.

0 coins

Wouldn't this system potentially hurt consumers though? If retailers have to implement complex new compliance systems, those costs will just get passed along to buyers. Plus, I imagine the definition of "production state" could get messy - what if components come from multiple states?

0 coins

That's a legitimate concern about costs, but the proposal actually addresses this by building on existing systems rather than creating entirely new ones. Many retailers already use automated systems for multi-state sales tax compliance post-Wayfair. Extending these to include origin data isn't as big a leap as starting from scratch. Regarding the multi-state production issue, you're right that it complicates things. A workable approach might be to use the final assembly location or implement a proportional system based on value-add at each production stage. The automobile industry already tracks this kind of data for regulatory compliance, so there are existing models to follow.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Has anyone else noticed that the South Dakota v. Wayfair decision has completely changed the compliance landscape for small businesses? Before 2018, I only had to worry about collecting tax in my home state. Now I'm tracking economic nexus thresholds across 45+ states. If this hybrid system adds another layer to track (origin-based calculations), it could push more sellers to marketplace platforms like Amazon who handle tax compliance. That would actually strengthen the role of marketplace facilitators, which aligns with part of the proposal.

0 coins

This is exactly why I moved all my sales to Amazon last year. The compliance burden post-Wayfair was just too much for my small operation. I was spending more time on tax research than actually running my business. The irony is that marketplace facilitator laws were supposed to level the playing field, but they've pushed more of us smaller sellers onto the big platforms. If this hybrid system gets implemented, I bet even more sellers will decide it's not worth the hassle of compliance.

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

Has anyone had experience with cap gains calculations when you don't have the original purchase price? My uncle passed away and I inherited some stocks but have no idea what he paid for them originally. Trying to figure out how to calculate the gains when I eventually sell.

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

Oh that's a huge relief! I was stressing about trying to track down decades-old purchase records. So I just need to document what the value was on the date he passed away? That's much easier since it was only last year and I can look up the historical prices online. Do I need any special documentation to prove that value in case of an audit? Or is just having the date of death and the corresponding stock values enough?

0 coins

Salim Nasir

•

Yes, just document the closing price on the date of death. For additional protection, I suggest taking screenshots or printing the historical price information from a reputable financial website and keeping that with your tax records. If the estate was large enough to file an estate tax return (Form 706), that document would also have the valuation information and would be excellent documentation. But for most people, good records of the date of death values from reliable sources are sufficient for audit protection.

0 coins

Myles Regis

•

Anybody know how long the IRS keeps transcripts available? I need to go back to 2016 but the website only shows more recent years for me.

0 coins

Brian Downey

•

The IRS generally keeps transcripts available for the current tax year and the prior three years through their online system. But they actually maintain records for much longer - typically 7-10 years. For 2016 records, you'll probably need to complete Form 4506-T and mail or fax it to request older transcripts. Or call them directly. There's usually no fee for transcripts (unlike actual tax return copies which cost $50 each).

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

A factor nobody's mentioned yet: if you file separately, you're both responsible only for your own tax returns. If you file jointly, you're both liable for the entire thing. This might matter if you're concerned about audit risk or if there are any questionable deductions on your spouse's side. In my case, my ex-husband had some "creative" business deductions, and I wish I had filed separately! Not saying that's your situation, but worth considering the liability angle.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

Isn't there something called "innocent spouse relief" that protects you in situations like that? I thought the IRS had procedures for when one spouse didn't know about the other's tax shenanigans?

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Yes, there is innocent spouse relief, but it can be extremely difficult to qualify for and prove. You have to demonstrate that you had no reason to know about the underreporting or false deductions, which is a high bar to clear especially for married couples who live together. The process is lengthy and stressful, often requiring professional help. In my experience, it's much easier to just file separately from the start if you have ANY concerns about your spouse's tax situation. Prevention is better than trying to fix things after the fact with the IRS.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

One thing nobody mentioned - if you're on income-based student loan repayment plans, filing separately can sometimes dramatically lower your monthly payments because they only count your income and not your spouse's. It saved me about $300/month on my payments even though we paid slightly more in taxes.

0 coins

PixelPioneer

•

Wow this is really good to know! I'm on IBR for my loans and didn't even think about how filing status would affect that. Does this work for all income-based repayment plans?

0 coins

Is it possible someone stole your identity and was trading under your name/SSN? If you're sure you didn't make these trades, could be worth checking your credit report and putting a freeze on your credit while you sort this out.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

I honestly hadn't considered identity theft! I did trade on the platform, but definitely not enough to generate $29,800 in proceeds. Is there a way to check if someone else accessed my account? I'm going to download my credit reports right now just to be safe.

0 coins

Most trading platforms have login histories you can request that show IP addresses, devices, and timestamps of account access. Contact WealthSurge's security team specifically and ask for this information - explain your situation and they should provide it. Also, when you get your trading records, look carefully for any transactions you don't recognize or that happened after you thought you stopped using the platform. If you do find evidence of unauthorized access, file a police report immediately - you'll need it to dispute the tax bill on grounds of identity theft.

0 coins

Daniel White

•

Make sure you respond to the IRS letter ASAP even if you don't have all your documentation yet! I ignored a letter like this thinking I'd deal with it after I had all my paperwork in order, and they put a lien on my bank account. Just send something in writing acknowledging the letter and stating that you're gathering information to dispute the amount.

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

What's the best way to respond? Should you call or send a letter? And does it have to be certified mail or anything specific?

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

Have you checked if your employer is applying the correct filing status in the payroll system? I had an issue where HR had me in the system as "Married Filing Jointly" even though my W-4 clearly said "Head of Household." That caused major underwithholding. Another thing to check - did your employer apply a "tax exempt" status by mistake when transitioning systems? That would explain zero withholding. Also, you might want to file a Form 843 (Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement) with the IRS if you end up with penalties. I did this when my employer's error caused me to be underwithheld, and the IRS waived my penalties since it wasn't my fault. Just make sure you document everything!

0 coins

I checked with HR specifically about the filing status and they confirmed it shows HOH in the system. But the tax exempt thing is interesting - I hadn't thought of that! I'll definitely ask if something got checked wrong during the transition. Thanks for the Form 843 tip. I'm definitely keeping copies of all my emails with HR and the responses from the payroll companies as documentation. Did you need any specific documentation from your employer when you filed that form?

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

For the Form 843, I included copies of my W-4 showing the correct information, emails with HR where they acknowledged the error, and a short statement explaining the situation. The key is proving it was the employer's error, not yours. The most helpful document was a letter from my HR department acknowledging the mistake in their system. If your employer is cooperative, ask for something similar - a simple statement confirming there was a system error in the payroll transition that affected your withholding despite your W-4 being filled out correctly. That carries a lot of weight with the IRS.

0 coins

Don't freak out too much about owing a lot - with HOH status and one dependent, your tax liability might not be as high as you think. I earn about $57k and usually owe around $3,500 total for federal taxes after the standard deduction and child tax credit. You might also qualify for the Earned Income Credit depending on your dependent's age. Check the IRS withholding calculator at irs.gov to get a more accurate estimate of what you'll owe based on your specific situation. Have you thought about making estimated tax payments directly to the IRS to catch up? You can do it online through IRS Direct Pay. That way you don't have to wait for your employer to fix their systems.

0 coins

Raul Neal

•

The Earned Income Credit suggestion is good, but be careful - at $59k for HOH, you're probably over the income limit unless your dependent is qualifying for the child tax credit. For 2024 taxes (filing in 2025), the EITC income limit for HOH with one qualifying child is around $53k.

0 coins

Thank you! I hadn't thought about making estimated payments directly - that's a great idea to handle this myself rather than relying on the employer fix. I'm going to check out the IRS calculator today to see exactly where I stand. And yeah, I'm probably just over the limit for EITC based on what the other commenter said, but I should still get the child tax credit which will help. My daughter is 12 so she definitely qualifies.

0 coins

Prev1...46684669467046714672...5643Next