


Ask the community...
Has anyone tried just submitting the original W2 with the right SSN manually written in? I did this once years ago and the IRS accepted it. Just crossed out the wrong SSN and wrote in the correct one, then included a note explaining. Saved me from the whole W2C nightmare.
I wouldn't recommend this approach. While it might have worked for you, the IRS has gotten much stricter about document alterations. They generally reject hand-modified tax documents now and could potentially flag your return for review, which would delay processing even further.
If all else fails, you can also file Form 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2) along with your amended return. This form lets you report your wage and withholding information when you can't get a correct W-2 from your employer. You'll need to provide as much supporting documentation as possible (paystubs, etc.) to verify the amounts. It's not ideal, but it's an option if Stanford continues to be difficult.
You should check if both programs are including the same business income in the QBID calculation. I had a similar issue and discovered TurboTax was missing some 1099-NEC income in the QBID calculation but including it in my total income. Make sure all your Schedule C businesses are being included properly in both software. Also, did you indicate different business types between the two software? That can affect the QBID calculation too.
Thanks for the suggestion! I double-checked and both programs have the same 1099-NEC income included, but I noticed TurboTax has my photography business categorized as "Arts & Entertainment" while TaxAct has it as "Professional Services." Could that make such a big difference?
Yep, that could absolutely cause the difference! The business classification can significantly impact how the software calculates your QBID. "Professional Services" might be triggering TaxAct to apply different limitations or calculations than the "Arts & Entertainment" category in TurboTax. Try changing the classification to match in both software and see if that resolves the discrepancy. Based on IRS guidelines, photography would typically fall under "Arts & Entertainment" rather than "Professional Services" unless you're doing commercial/corporate work specifically.
Has anyone done a side-by-side accuracy comparison between TurboTax and TaxAct? I've been using TurboTax for years but the price keeps going up and I'm thinking of switching.
I've used both for the last three years. TaxAct is significantly cheaper but I've found TurboTax catches more deductions, especially for business owners. That said, TaxAct has gotten much better with their interface recently. If your taxes are relatively straightforward, TaxAct is probably fine and will save you money.
My stepdad was in a similar situation and he just decided to liquidate everything without checking the basis issues first. Ended up owing way more in taxes than expected because there was no step-up and he had to use the original basis from like 40 years ago. Don't make that mistake! Get a proper analysis before you sell anything. Either use one of the services mentioned above or talk to a CPA who specializes in trust taxation. The rules around irrevocable grantor trusts are really specific and depend on how the trust was structured.
Can confirm this happens a lot! I'm an estate paralegal and see people make this mistake all the time. The basis rules for irrevocable trusts are completely different than for assets inherited directly. One detail can make all the difference.
Another option to consider if the stocks have declined in value and you're concerned about taxes - you could distribute the stocks to the trust beneficiaries first, then they could sell them individually. Depending on the beneficiaries' tax situations, this might provide better overall tax treatment, especially if any of them are in lower tax brackets. But this would depend entirely on the terms of the trust and whether distributions of stock (rather than cash) are permitted. Worth discussing with your trust attorney if that's an option.
The revenue sharing aspect is the most interesting part of this proposal to me. I've worked in economic development for a manufacturing state, and we've always struggled with the fact that we produce goods but the tax revenue goes to the states where consumers live. 20% seems like a reasonable starting point, though I imagine high-consumption states with no sales tax (like NH) or minimal manufacturing (like FL) would strongly resist. The real challenge would be creating the administrative framework for this revenue sharing. This system could actually reduce some of the tax incentive battles between states trying to lure manufacturers. If production states automatically get a revenue share, there's less pressure to offer massive tax breaks.
Wouldn't this system potentially hurt consumers though? If retailers have to implement complex new compliance systems, those costs will just get passed along to buyers. Plus, I imagine the definition of "production state" could get messy - what if components come from multiple states?
That's a legitimate concern about costs, but the proposal actually addresses this by building on existing systems rather than creating entirely new ones. Many retailers already use automated systems for multi-state sales tax compliance post-Wayfair. Extending these to include origin data isn't as big a leap as starting from scratch. Regarding the multi-state production issue, you're right that it complicates things. A workable approach might be to use the final assembly location or implement a proportional system based on value-add at each production stage. The automobile industry already tracks this kind of data for regulatory compliance, so there are existing models to follow.
Has anyone else noticed that the South Dakota v. Wayfair decision has completely changed the compliance landscape for small businesses? Before 2018, I only had to worry about collecting tax in my home state. Now I'm tracking economic nexus thresholds across 45+ states. If this hybrid system adds another layer to track (origin-based calculations), it could push more sellers to marketplace platforms like Amazon who handle tax compliance. That would actually strengthen the role of marketplace facilitators, which aligns with part of the proposal.
This is exactly why I moved all my sales to Amazon last year. The compliance burden post-Wayfair was just too much for my small operation. I was spending more time on tax research than actually running my business. The irony is that marketplace facilitator laws were supposed to level the playing field, but they've pushed more of us smaller sellers onto the big platforms. If this hybrid system gets implemented, I bet even more sellers will decide it's not worth the hassle of compliance.
GalacticGuru
Random but important - don't forget that if you're issuing 1099s, the deadline is January 31st to both send them to recipients AND file with the IRS. They changed this a few years back, and it's no longer like the old days where you had extra time to file with the government. Also, if you miss the deadline or file incorrectly, the penalties can be pretty steep - starting at $50 per form if you're less than 30 days late, and going up from there. With a $74k commission, the IRS will definitely expect to see that 1099 filed.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
ā¢Is there any way to get an extension on the January 31st deadline? I'm dealing with a backlog of paperwork from several properties and might need extra time.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
ā¢There's no extension available for furnishing 1099s to recipients - that January 31st deadline is firm. However, you can request a 30-day extension for filing with the IRS by submitting Form 8809 (Application for Extension of Time to File Information Returns). The catch is that the extension only applies to filing with the IRS, not to giving the forms to your recipients. So you'd still need to get the 1099s to the brokerages and contractors by January 31st, even if you get extra time to submit to the government. And the Form 8809 needs to be filed BEFORE the original due date - you can't request it after you've already missed the deadline.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
Quick tip - if you're filing just one or a few 1099-NECs, the IRS actually has a free online filing portal called the FIRE system (Filing Information Returns Electronically). You don't need fancy software if you only have a few to do. You'll need to register for an account first, which takes a little time to set up, but once you have it, filing is pretty straightforward. For real estate commissions specifically, I've done this several times without issues.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
ā¢I tried FIRE last year and it was NOT user-friendly at all. Felt like I was using software from 1995. I ended up going with TaxAct's 1099 filing service instead - cost me about $15 but saved hours of frustration.
0 coins