IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.

$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Can a Spouse Inherit an Already Inherited IRA (originally a 401K)? Help needed!

I'm dealing with a really stressful situation and hoping someone here can help me understand my options. Back in September 2023, my sister-in-law (41) died unexpectedly from a heart condition. My husband and I were devastated. Her parents (my in-laws) inherited one of her 401Ks (50% each) which they then converted to an IRA. They've been taking required withdrawals calculated over their lifetime expectancy. The situation has changed dramatically this month - my father-in-law just passed away suddenly at 72, and now my mother-in-law is wondering what happens to his portion of the already inherited IRA. Does it transfer to her as his spouse? Do different withdrawal rules apply now? Or does it have to go to a contingent beneficiary? I'm trying to help her figure all this out while she's grieving. The financial advisor who helped with the original conversion hasn't been very clear about the "inherited an inheritance" situation. Any insight would be so appreciated! We're worried about making a costly mistake with required distributions and taxes.

My sister went through something similar last year. The key thing to understand is that an already-inherited IRA has to stay in the original beneficiary's name with an additional "for benefit of" (FBO) designation for the successor beneficiary. So it would be something like "[Sister-in-law's name] IRA (deceased) FBO [Father-in-law's name] (deceased) FBO [Mother-in-law's name]." This gets super confusing for the custodians because they don't deal with it often. Make sure they don't mistakenly try to do a 60-day rollover (which isn't allowed for inherited IRAs) or reset the distribution schedule. Your mother-in-law has to continue on the same distribution schedule that was established when your father-in-law inherited it.

0 coins

Demi Hall

Author

Thank you so much for this - especially the naming convention! That's exactly what we've been confused about. The custodian kept talking about "reregistering" the account and we weren't sure if that was the right thing. Is there a specific form we should ask for to make this transfer happen correctly?

0 coins

You'll want to ask the custodian for their "Inherited IRA Successor Beneficiary" form or sometimes it's called a "Death of Beneficiary" form. Each institution has slightly different paperwork, but those terms should help them find the right forms. Your mother-in-law will need to provide a copy of your father-in-law's death certificate and possibly his original inherited IRA paperwork. Be very specific that this is a successor beneficiary situation for an already-inherited IRA, not a new inheritance. If the person you're speaking with seems confused, ask to talk with their inherited IRA specialist - most larger institutions have people who specifically handle these more complex scenarios.

0 coins

One important thing no one's mentioned - if your sister-in-law passed away BEFORE the SECURE Act implementation date (December 31, 2019), different rules might apply. The SECURE Act changed how inherited IRAs work pretty dramatically, but some inheritances were grandfathered under the old rules. Has anyone confirmed which distribution rules your father-in-law was following? Was he taking required minimum distributions based on his life expectancy, or was he subject to the 10-year rule?

0 coins

This is such an important point. My family got caught in this exact situation - my uncle passed in 2018 (pre-SECURE Act), then his beneficiary (my cousin) passed in 2022. The financial institution tried to apply the post-SECURE Act 10-year rule to the successor beneficiary, which was incorrect. The original inheritance date is what matters.

0 coins

Why are we owing so much more on taxes this year despite withholding changes?

My husband and I are completely baffled by our tax situation this year. Last year we owed $2,300, so we both adjusted our W-4 forms to increase our withholding. I thought that would fix the problem, but now we owe $5,400!!! My husband is totally freaking out. Here's a breakdown of our financial situation: Me: - Wages: $132,450 - Medicare wages/tips: $141,200 - Federal tax withheld: $15,300 - SS tax withheld: $8,750 - Medicare tax withheld: $2,050 - Group term life insurance: $170 - 401K contributions: $8,200 - Employer health coverage: $10,250 Husband: - Wages: $98,200 - Medicare wages/tips: $98,200 - Federal tax withheld: $10,700 - SS tax withheld: $6,090 - Medicare tax withheld: $1,425 - Group term life insurance: $65 - Roth 401K contributions: $6,000 - Employer health coverage: $11,500 He also had: - Interest income: $7 - Dividend income: $2,715 - Capital losses: -$1,670 We have a house but our itemized deductions only came to about $21K so we took the standard deduction. Our total tax came to $31,600 Income tax withheld: $26,000 Amount we owe: $5,400 Does anything look weird here? Should we consider filing separately? I'm wondering if his Roth 401K would be taxed at a lower bracket if he files alone. We're trying to find a CPA who can see us before the deadline, but if that doesn't work out I'm thinking we should just pay the $5,400 and file an extension to figure things out. The timing couldn't be worse - we have our first baby coming in a few months and my husband is stressing about this unexpected tax hit. We have enough in savings to cover it, but I'd love to find ways to reduce what we owe. I'm worried we just didn't withhold enough despite the W-4 changes. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Have you looked at whether you're hitting the Social Security tax cap? For 2025, the Social Security wage base limit is $168,600. If your combined incomes are higher than the cap, you might be overwithholding on Social Security at one job. It doesn't look like either of you individually is over the cap based on the numbers you shared, but something to consider for future planning. Also, consider adjusting your tax withholdings for the baby's arrival. You'll be eligible for the Child Tax Credit which could be worth up to $2,000, depending on your income. This could help offset some of your tax burden next year.

0 coins

That's good to know about the Social Security cap, though like you said we're both under it individually. I didn't realize the Child Tax Credit could be that significant! Would we need to adjust our W-4s again after the baby is born to account for the credit, or does that automatically reduce what we owe at tax time?

0 coins

You'd need to update your W-4s again after the baby is born to account for the Child Tax Credit. It doesn't happen automatically during the year - it would only reduce what you owe when you file your taxes otherwise. On your W-4, you would indicate the dependent in Step 3, which would then reduce your withholding throughout the remainder of the year. When you update your W-4s, you'll probably want to do it soon after the baby is born to maximize the withholding adjustment for the rest of the year. Just be aware that the Child Tax Credit begins to phase out at higher income levels (starts phasing out at $400,000 for married filing jointly), but based on your income you should still qualify for at least a partial credit.

0 coins

I'd strongly recommend switching to scheduled quarterly estimated tax payments rather than trying to get withholding perfect. My spouse and I have similar incomes to yours, and we always owed at tax time until we started doing this. We calculate approx 25% of our projected annual tax and make quarterly payments directly to the IRS (due April 15, June 15, Sept 15, and Jan 15). It's way easier than constantly adjusting W-4s, especially with a baby on the way which will change your tax situation again.

0 coins

I second this approach. With our W-2 income plus investment income, quarterly estimated payments have been a lifesaver. The peace of mind knowing we won't have a surprise tax bill is worth the extra effort. Just make sure you're paying at least 100% of last year's tax liability (or 110% if your AGI was over $150,000) to avoid underpayment penalties.

0 coins

Can I expense YouTube video production costs if not directly advertising my business?

I'm a professional who's been creating a YouTube series that discusses topics relevant to my field and showcases my expertise. I've been paying around $4,000 out of pocket to a video production company for each video. These aren't straight-up advertisements for my services, but they're definitely intended to attract potential clients by demonstrating my knowledge. I'm wondering if I can claim these video production costs as legitimate business expenses on my taxes? What are the rules and limitations around this kind of content marketing? Since they're not traditional ads (no "call now!" or direct pitches), I'm unsure how the IRS would view these expenses. Anyone have experience with content marketing deductions?

Worth noting here that while these expenses are deductible, you should be careful about how you categorize them on your tax forms. I entered mine under "Advertising" on Schedule C (line 8) rather than as "Other expenses" since that's what they essentially are - a modern form of advertising.

0 coins

Do you need to keep special documentation beyond the invoices from the production company? My accountant mentioned something about needing to document the "business purpose" but wasn't clear what that meant exactly.

0 coins

Beyond the invoices, I'd recommend keeping a simple log that documents the business purpose of each video. Nothing complicated - just a spreadsheet with video titles, publication dates, and a brief note about how each relates to your business (like "demonstrates expertise in X service" or "explains process relevant to potential clients"). This extra documentation isn't strictly required, but it's extremely helpful if you ever get audited. I learned this the hard way when I had to justify some marketing expenses during a review. Having a clear business purpose documented for each expense makes the process much smoother.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective - I've been deducting YouTube production costs for 3 years now ($3500-5000 per video) and never had an issue. My videos are educational about financial planning but obviously help me get clients. My tax software (TurboTax) specifically mentioned that content marketing is a legitimate advertising expense when I was entering the deductions.

0 coins

Which category in TurboTax did you use for this? I'm trying to enter similar expenses and getting confused about where they belong.

0 coins

Can't mark X in Q1 box on June 2022 revision of Form 941 - greyed out?

So I'm working on payroll tax stuff for our small business and I've hit a weird snag with the Form 941. I've been doing these for years without issues, but the June 2022 revision is giving me problems. The Q1 box is completely greyed out and I can't mark it with an X like I normally would. I've tried both electronically and printing it out, but no luck. I can mark the boxes on forms from previous years just fine, but something changed with this revision. Has anyone else encountered this? I'm worried about submitting it incorrectly and getting flagged for an error. The IRS instructions don't mention anything about this change. Any insights from fellow small business owners or tax folks?

I noticed this too and discovered that what's happening is the IRS is now pre-printing the quarter on each version of the 941. If you look at the current year forms, you'll see they have "941 for Quarter 1" or similar printed right on them. So no more checking boxes! Make sure you download the specific form for the quarter you're filing. If you're using tax software, it should automatically select the right one, but if you're downloading directly from IRS.gov, make sure to get the correct quarterly version.

0 coins

This tripped me up too! I didn't realize they changed it this way. Is this true for all the quarterly forms now or just the 941?

0 coins

This change is primarily for Form 941, but the IRS has been moving toward more form-specific versions for several reporting requirements. Form 941-X (the amended return) still requires you to check which quarter you're correcting. Some other quarterly forms still use the traditional checkbox method, but the IRS seems to be gradually transitioning more forms to the quarter-specific model. Always best to download the most current version directly from IRS.gov or use up-to-date tax software to be sure.

0 coins

Anyone know if they'll reject your form if you manage to bypass the greyed out section and put an X there anyway? I didn't realize this change and submitted one where I basically forced an X in that box. Now I'm worried.

0 coins

They won't reject it as long as you used the correct quarterly form. I did the same thing - printed it out and manually marked the box even though it was greyed out. The IRS agent I spoke with said it's fine because they can tell which quarter you're filing for based on the form version itself. They're just trying to phase out that manual selection to reduce errors. So you should be good!

0 coins

What are the tax implications of company-matched charity donations being split between coworkers?

My coworker wants to donate about $13k to a charity he really cares about. Our company has this benefit where they match charitable donations but only up to $6.5k per employee. He came up with this idea where he'd give me $6.5k, then we would each donate $6.5k to the charity. This way, both donations would get matched by the company, the charity gets more money, I get a tax deduction, and he gets to give the full amount he wanted. I'm wondering if this could potentially cause problems if the IRS audits me? Or is it just my company that would object since it would cost them more in matching funds? If it's only my company that would care (not the IRS), I might just go ahead with it since I don't think my company would ever investigate this arrangement.

Just want to add another angle here - if your company discovers this arrangement, it could be considered a violation of your corporate ethics policy. Many companies have specific provisions against circumventing policy limitations. I used to work in corporate compliance, and we would consider this a clear policy violation that could result in disciplinary action. Companies take matching gift programs seriously as they're part of their charitable budget and tax planning. The risk to your professional reputation might not be worth it.

0 coins

Do you think there's any legitimate way my coworker and I could structure this that wouldn't violate policies? What if he just gave me the money as a birthday gift with no strings attached, and then months later I happen to donate to that charity?

0 coins

Even with separation in time, the arrangement is still designed to circumvent company policy, which is problematic regardless of how it's structured. Most corporate ethics policies look at intent, not just technical compliance. A legitimate alternative would be for your coworker to donate their full intended amount directly to the charity, and you could separately donate to the same charity if you genuinely support their cause. This way, both donations would be legitimate, the company match would apply appropriately based on actual employee giving, and there would be no ethical concerns. The charity might receive slightly less overall, but without any risk to your employment or tax standing.

0 coins

Has anyone considered that the charity might have ways to handle this situation? Many larger charities have programs for corporate matching optimization and might have legitimate solutions. I would suggest your coworker contact the charity's development office directly. They deal with matching gift situations all the time and might have proper ways to maximize the donation without creating problems.

0 coins

Great point! When I worked in nonprofit development, we had several approaches for donors in this exact situation. Some options included spreading the donation across multiple tax years, involving family members who could make legitimate donations, or exploring donor-advised funds which sometimes have their own matching programs.

0 coins

Prev1...46464647464846494650...5645Next