


Ask the community...
As someone who's been preparing financial statements for construction companies for over 8 years, I can tell you that your quotes are actually reasonable for the scope of work involved. Construction accounting adds significant complexity that many general practice CPAs aren't equipped to handle properly. The $2,800-$5,500 range you're seeing likely reflects different levels of service and the accountant's experience with construction-specific issues. Here's what should be included in a proper construction company financial statement preparation: 1. Proper revenue recognition using percentage of completion method for long-term contracts 2. Work-in-progress schedules showing costs incurred vs. billings 3. Proper classification of retention receivables and payables 4. Equipment and depreciation schedules 5. Job cost analysis and gross profit by project 6. Cash flow considerations for construction cycles Before choosing an accountant, ask them specifically about their experience with ASC 606 revenue recognition standards and how they handle over/under billings. A good construction accountant will immediately know what you're talking about and can explain how it affects your specific situation. Also, definitely get clarification from your bank about whether they'll accept compiled statements versus reviewed statements. For a $840K construction company, compiled statements with proper disclosures are often sufficient, which could save you $1,500-$2,000. Your current tax accountant's quote of $3,200 isn't unreasonable if they truly understand construction accounting. Sometimes the familiarity with your business is worth the slightly higher cost.
This is incredibly helpful - thank you for breaking down exactly what should be included! I'm definitely going to use this as a checklist when interviewing potential accountants. Quick question about the ASC 606 standards you mentioned - is this something that affects all construction companies or just larger ones? I'm wondering if my size ($840K revenue) means I might be exempt from some of these more complex requirements. Also, when you mention "proper disclosures" for compiled statements, what specific disclosures are typically required for construction companies that banks look for? I want to make sure I'm asking the right questions when I call my bank back.
ASC 606 applies to all construction companies regardless of size - it's been required since 2019 for private companies. However, the complexity of implementation depends on your contract types. For smaller contractors like yourself doing mostly short-term projects (under 12 months), the impact might be minimal since you can often recognize revenue when work is completed rather than over time. For compiled statements, banks typically want to see specific construction-related disclosures including: revenue recognition methods used, significant accounting policies for long-term contracts, details about retention practices, and any material contracts or change orders that could affect financial position. They also want to see work-in-progress presented correctly on the balance sheet. When you call your bank, specifically ask if they require "industry-specific disclosures for construction companies" and whether they need supplementary schedules showing contract details. Some banks are satisfied with basic compiled statements plus a simple WIP schedule, while others want more detailed project-level reporting. The good news is that at your revenue level, you're likely not subject to some of the more complex requirements that larger contractors face, but proper percentage of completion accounting is still essential if you have any multi-month projects.
I've been through this process twice now with my electrical contracting business, and I learned some hard lessons that might help you avoid costly mistakes. First, definitely confirm with your bank whether they'll accept compiled vs reviewed statements. Like others mentioned, many banks will accept compiled statements for businesses under $1M, but you need this in writing. I made the mistake of assuming and ended up paying for a review when compilation would have been fine. Second, since you're in construction, make absolutely sure your accountant understands job costing and percentage of completion accounting. I hired someone who claimed construction experience but didn't properly handle my work-in-progress, and the bank rejected the statements. Had to start over with a specialist. The $3,200 quote from your current tax accountant isn't bad if they truly know construction accounting. Ask them specifically about how they'll handle your ongoing projects and retention receivables. If they can't give you clear answers about WIP schedules and over/under billings, find someone else. One tip that saved me money: get your QuickBooks completely cleaned up first. Make sure all job costs are properly allocated, your accounts are reconciled, and you have backup documentation for any large transactions. This prep work can cut 3-4 hours off your accountant's time, which translates to real savings. Also, ask about payment terms. Some firms will let you pay in installments, especially if you're establishing an ongoing relationship for future years.
This is all really great advice! I'm new to this whole financial statement process and feeling pretty overwhelmed by all the different requirements and terminology. As someone just starting to navigate this, I'm curious - how do you typically find accountants who specialize in construction? Is there a certification or credential I should be looking for, or is it more about asking the right questions during interviews? Also, when you mention getting QuickBooks "completely cleaned up," could you give some specific examples of what that looks like? I think my books are in decent shape, but I want to make sure I'm not missing something obvious that could end up costing me more later. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who's been through this process multiple times!
Has anyone compared the capital gains tax calculators from Fidelity or Vanguard? I found they tend to be more accurate than general financial website calculators because they're designed specifically for investment scenarios. The public websites often oversimplify to appeal to a broader audience.
I've used Vanguard's calculator and it was pretty accurate for my situation. It asked for more detailed information about my other income sources and deductions, which I think helped produce a more realistic estimate. The big advantage was that it clearly showed how much of my gains fell into each tax bracket (0%, 15%, 20%).
I've run into this exact same issue before! The key difference is likely how each calculator handles the "stacking" of your income. Capital gains get added on top of your ordinary income to determine which tax bracket applies. With your $76,000 ordinary income and $97,500 capital gain, your total taxable income would be $173,500. This puts your entire capital gain in the 15% bracket for 2025 (assuming single filing status). So you'd owe approximately 15% of $97,500 = $14,625 in federal capital gains tax, which matches the Forbes calculator. The SmartAsset calculator showing $5,700 might be incorrectly applying a blended rate or not properly accounting for how capital gains push you into higher brackets. Always double-check that any calculator you use specifically asks for your total ordinary income and properly explains how it's calculating the bracket placement. For peace of mind with such a large transaction, I'd recommend getting a second opinion from a tax professional or using your brokerage's tax center tools, which tend to be more accurate for investment-specific calculations.
As someone who made the transition from Jackson Hewitt to a regional accounting firm, I can tell you that the experience absolutely can help your career - but success depends heavily on how you approach it. The reality is that JH will give you high-volume experience with basic returns, which teaches you efficiency and client interaction skills. However, the real value comes from what you do beyond their minimum requirements. I made it a point to: 1. Study every tax code section I encountered, even for simple issues 2. Research complex situations thoroughly rather than just following software prompts 3. Build relationships with more experienced preparers who could mentor me 4. Keep detailed notes on unusual scenarios for future reference When I interviewed at my current firm, I didn't hide that I worked at JH - I emphasized the problem-solving skills I developed and specific tax knowledge I gained. The managing partner actually said my practical client experience gave me an advantage over candidates who only had academic knowledge. One season is usually enough to gain credibility, but make sure you're learning something new every day. Start networking with local firms in March/April when they're planning for the next year. Focus your resume on tax concepts you've mastered rather than just the volume of returns you processed. The key is treating JH as tax school with a paycheck, not just a job. Good luck!
This is such valuable advice, thank you! I'm curious about your point on building relationships with more experienced preparers - how did you identify who the good mentors were at your JH location? And when you say you kept detailed notes on unusual scenarios, did you create like a personal reference guide that you could review later? I'm trying to figure out the best way to systematically capture everything I learn rather than just hoping I remember it all.
Great questions! For identifying good mentors, I looked for preparers who: 1) took time to explain things rather than just giving quick answers, 2) had been there multiple seasons and seemed genuinely knowledgeable about tax law (not just software), and 3) were willing to let me observe when they handled complex returns. Usually these were the people other preparers would go to with questions. For my notes system, I created a digital notebook organized by tax topics (Schedule C issues, rental property depreciation, etc.) with specific client scenarios I encountered. For each unusual situation, I'd write down: the facts, what research I did, what solution we used, and what I learned. This became invaluable during interviews - I could reference specific examples of tax problems I'd solved rather than speaking in generalities. I also kept a separate "questions to research later" list for things that came up during busy periods when I didn't have time to fully understand them in the moment. Reviewing and researching these during slower periods really deepened my knowledge beyond just getting returns filed correctly.
As someone who recently transitioned from Jackson Hewitt to a mid-size CPA firm after one season, I can definitely say the experience was worthwhile - but you need to be strategic about it. The training at JH is pretty basic, but what you'll get is real-world client experience that textbooks can't teach you. You'll learn how to handle difficult clients, explain tax concepts in plain English, and work efficiently under pressure during busy season. These soft skills are just as valuable as technical knowledge when interviewing at better firms. My biggest piece of advice: Don't just rely on their training materials. When you encounter something you don't fully understand, research it on your own time. I spent evenings reading IRS publications and tax court cases related to issues I saw during the day. This deeper knowledge really impressed interviewers later. Also, network while you're there! Many JH locations have preparers who previously worked at local CPA firms or have connections in the industry. I got my current job through a referral from someone I worked with at JH who had moved on to a regional firm. The experience will definitely help your career if you approach it as a learning opportunity rather than just a paycheck. One season of practical experience plus your master's degree should make you competitive for positions at smaller firms. Just make sure to emphasize the tax knowledge you gained and client skills you developed rather than focusing on the workplace itself.
This is exactly the kind of strategic thinking I needed to hear! I'm particularly interested in your point about networking within JH - I hadn't really considered that other preparers might have connections to better firms. How did you go about building those relationships without it seeming like you were just using people for connections? And when you say you researched IRS publications and tax court cases on your own time, did you focus on specific areas or just follow up on whatever you encountered each day? I'm trying to figure out how to structure my own learning plan alongside the JH training.
Had the exact same issue last year! The verification letters can get lost in mail or delayed. Here's what worked for me: I called the IRS Identity Protection Specialized Unit at 800-830-5084 early morning (around 7:15 AM EST) and got through after about 45 minutes on hold. They were able to verify my identity over the phone using personal info and tax details. Way faster than waiting for a letter to arrive. Also bring your prior year tax return, Social Security card, and a government-issued ID if you decide to go the in-person route. The phone verification saved me weeks of waiting!
Thanks for the detailed info! Just to clarify - when you called that number, did they ask for the 14-digit control number from the letter, or were they able to verify you without it? I'm in the same situation as the original poster where I never received any verification letter, so I'm wondering if the phone agents can bypass that requirement entirely.
They can verify you without the 14-digit control number! When I called, the agent said they have alternative verification methods for people who never received letters. They asked me questions about my prior year tax return (AGI amount, filing status, dependents), personal info (SSN, DOB, address history), and some security questions. The whole phone verification took about 20 minutes once I got through to an agent. Just make sure you have your previous tax return handy before calling.
I went through this exact situation a few months ago! The IRS verification system is frustrating when you never got the letter in the first place. Here's what I learned from my experience: 1. **Phone verification is your best bet** - Call 800-830-5084 (Identity Protection Specialized Unit) early in the morning. I called at 7:05 AM EST and waited about 30 minutes. They can absolutely verify you without the 14-digit control number using alternative methods. 2. **Have these documents ready**: Previous year's tax return (they'll ask for your prior year AGI), Social Security card, government ID, and W-2s from the tax year in question. 3. **The "resend letter" option** takes 2-3 weeks typically, but honestly the phone route is much faster if you can get through. 4. **In-person appointments** at Taxpayer Assistance Centers are also an option, but you need to schedule ahead and they're often booked out 2-3 weeks. The phone agents have different verification protocols than the online system - they can use your tax history, personal information, and other security questions to confirm your identity without needing that letter. Don't give up on the phone option even if it's busy - persistence pays off with early morning calls!
This is super helpful! Just wanted to add that when I called that number last month, they also asked me to verify some info from my credit report (like previous addresses and account details) as an additional security layer. So if you have access to your credit report, it might be worth reviewing it beforehand. Also, the agents were really understanding about the whole "never got the letter" situation - apparently it happens more often than you'd think due to mail delays and address issues with USPS.
Sean Matthews
Quick tip from someone who's done this for years - if you mess up printing, you can order replacement W-2 forms overnight from most office supply stores or Amazon. No need to panic if you waste a few forms getting the alignment right!
0 coins
Ali Anderson
ā¢Does it matter if the replacement forms are from a different company/brand than my original ones? I bought mine from Office Depot but the closest store to me is Staples.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
ā¢No, it doesn't matter at all! All W-2 forms sold by office supply stores are standardized to IRS specifications, so the box sizes and spacing are identical whether they're from Office Depot, Staples, Amazon, or anywhere else. The only thing that might vary slightly is paper thickness or quality, but that won't affect your printing alignment. I've mixed forms from different suppliers over the years and never had any issues.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
I went through this same headache last year! Here's what worked for me after trying several approaches: The IRS fillable PDF is definitely your best bet for accuracy and professional appearance. But here's the key trick nobody mentions - before you print on your actual W-2 forms, create a "test template" by placing a blank piece of paper over your W-2 form and tracing the box outlines with a pencil. Then print the IRS PDF on that traced paper first to check alignment. Also, make sure to set your printer to "actual size" (not "fit to page") and use the highest quality print setting. I learned the hard way that draft mode can shift things just enough to throw off the alignment. One more tip - if you have a local small business association or SCORE chapter, many of them offer free tax prep workshops in January that include hands-on help with W-2 preparation. Might be worth checking out for next year so you're not scrambling at the deadline!
0 coins
Ashley Simian
ā¢This is such helpful advice! The test template idea with tracing the boxes is genius - I never would have thought of that. I'm definitely going to try this approach since I'm terrified of wasting my forms. Quick question though - when you say "highest quality print setting," do you mean something specific in the printer settings? I have a basic HP inkjet and I'm not sure what setting would be best for this kind of precise alignment work. Also, the SCORE workshop idea is great for next year. Do you know if they typically cover state-specific requirements too, or is it mainly federal forms?
0 coins
Yara Nassar
ā¢For HP inkjet printers, you'll want to look for "Best" or "Maximum DPI" in your print quality settings - usually found under Print Properties or Preferences when you go to print. This ensures the sharpest, most precise printing which is crucial for alignment. Also make sure "Borderless" is turned OFF since you want exact margins. Regarding SCORE workshops, they typically cover both federal and state requirements, but it varies by location. When I attended one in Ohio, they had separate sessions for different states since we had people from Ohio, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania. I'd recommend calling your local SCORE chapter to ask specifically what they cover - they're usually very helpful about explaining what their workshops include. The workshops fill up fast though, so sign up early if you decide to go that route next year!
0 coins