


Ask the community...
For anyone dealing with backdoor Roth issues in TurboTax, here's exactly what you need to do: 1. Enter your non-deductible traditional IRA contribution first 2. Make sure to specify it's NON-DEDUCTIBLE 3. Complete the Form 8606 section entirely 4. Only THEN enter your Roth conversion information 5. Verify the basis amount carries over to the conversion screen I do this every year and it works perfectly. If you do these steps out of order, TurboTax gets confused and can't track your basis correctly.
Do you know if this same process works in H&R Block's software? I'm having the same issue there and their support has been useless.
I haven't personally used H&R Block's software recently, but the general principle is the same. You need to make sure you've entered your non-deductible contribution information and completed the equivalent of Form 8606 before you enter the conversion information. The specific navigation and screens will be different, but the sequence is what matters. Most tax software struggles with backdoor Roth conversions if you don't follow the correct order of operations. Try looking specifically for the Form 8606 section in H&R Block's software and complete that first before handling the conversion.
something nobody mentioned yet - if you have ANY other traditional IRA money with pre-tax dollars (like old 401k rollovers), the pro-rata rule is gonna mess up your backdoor roth!! the entire conversion isnt tax free even if this specific contribution was non-deductible. turbo tax should handle this if you enter all your ira balances correctly but a lot of ppl forget this part.
Hey everyone, I'm a tax preparer (not a CPA) and I see this Form 8863 issue all the time. Another thing to check is if you received any scholarships or grants. Those reduce your qualified education expenses for the Lifetime Learning Credit calculation. For example, if you paid $5000 in tuition but received a $4000 scholarship, you can only use $1000 as your qualified education expense. That might be why you're ending up with zero, especially if your education expenses weren't that high after considering scholarships. Also, make sure you're eligible for the credit based on your income. The Lifetime Learning Credit phases out at higher income levels (starts phasing out at $80,000 for single filers and $160,000 for joint filers for 2024 returns).
That's a great point! I didn't even think about my scholarship reducing my eligible expenses. I received about $3,500 in scholarships last year. So if my tuition was $5,000, I would only be able to claim $1,500 for the Lifetime Learning Credit?
That's exactly right! You would only be able to claim $1,500 as your qualified education expenses in that scenario. And remember, the Lifetime Learning Credit is calculated as 20% of your qualified expenses, so your potential credit would be $300 ($1,500 Ć 20%). Then, that potential credit amount gets compared to your remaining tax liability on the Credit Limit Worksheet. If your remaining tax liability is less than $300 (or zero), that's why you'd end up with zero or a reduced credit amount on line 19 of Form 8863.
Has anyone tried using a different tax software? I was using FreeTaxUSA and had the exact same issue with Form 8863 and the Lifetime Learning Credit. Switched to TaxSlayer and somehow it calculated a credit for me. Not sure if it's correct but it definitely gave me a different result.
I used both TurboTax and H&R Block and got the same zero result with the Lifetime Learning Credit. I think different software might do the calculations slightly differently, but the end result should be the same if you're entering the same information. Might be worth double-checking that you input everything identically in both programs.
One thing nobody mentioned yet - if you can show reasonable cause for the late payment, you might get the penalties removed entirely. But "I don't have the money" usually doesn't count as reasonable cause. Better options would be: - Set up an IRS payment plan today for the full amount - Pay by credit card (their fee is usually less than the penalties) - Borrow from family for 24 hours Not having all the money today is a common problem, but the IRS has heard every excuse. The payment plan might be your best bet if you really can't pay the full amount.
Thanks for mentioning the payment plan option! Do you know if setting up a payment plan today (even if I plan to pay it off tomorrow) would help me avoid the penalties completely? Or would I still get hit with the 0.5% for the unpaid portion?
Setting up an installment agreement (payment plan) doesn't eliminate penalties completely, but it reduces the late payment penalty from 0.5% to 0.25% per month. You'd still owe interest on the unpaid balance too. If you're literally only going to be one day late, it might not be worth the hassle of setting up a formal payment plan, especially since there's a fee to establish one ($31 for online setup with automatic payments). For a one-day delay on $6k, you're looking at around $30 in penalties without a plan versus maybe $15 with a plan, but then you'd pay the $31 setup fee. The math doesn't work in your favor for such a short delay.
Just as a data point - I paid about 3 days late last year (around $8,000 unpaid) and my total penalties and interest came to $42. They did charge the full month's penalty rate even though it was only 3 days late. I called and asked for abatement since I've never been late before, and they approved it immediately. Took like 5 minutes on the phone once I finally got through.
Was the abatement automatically applied or did you have to wait for them to send you something? I'm in a similar situation but hate waiting for mail from the IRS.
For a tax paper that will really stand out, look at the intersection of tax law and another field you're interested in. I did mine on the taxation of digital assets in video games and NFTs and my professor loved the unique angle. Some other cross-disciplinary ideas: - Environmental taxation and climate incentives - Tax policy effects on wealth inequality - Healthcare taxation and the ACA - Tax implications of remote work across state lines - Taxation of emerging technologies - Illinois cannabis taxation and social equity programs Pick something you're genuinely curious about - makes the research way more enjoyable!
I'm actually really into sports - are there any good tax topics related to sports that would work for a research paper?
Absolutely! Sports and taxation have several fascinating intersections that would make for an excellent paper. You could explore the "jock tax" where athletes pay taxes in each state they play games in - this raises interesting questions about income sourcing and multi-state taxation. Another great angle would be the tax implications of NIL (name, image, likeness) deals for college athletes - this is relatively new territory with evolving tax guidance. You could also look at how major sports franchises use tax incentives for stadium construction, or the tax treatment of sports gambling following recent legalization in many states including Illinois. These topics combine sports interest with substantive tax policy questions.
Don't overthink this assignment. I did mine on the SALT (State And Local Tax) deduction cap from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and how it specifically impacts high-tax states like Illinois. Got an A and didn't kill myself with something super complicated. Whatever topic you pick, make sure there are RECENT sources (last 2-3 years). My friend did an awesome paper on a topic where all the sources were from 2017 or earlier and got marked down for not having current perspectives.
The SALT deduction cap topic sounds interesting. Did you find it had enough material for 20 pages? And did you focus more on the federal aspects or the Illinois impact?
Giovanni Colombo
Just an FYI - I work at a tax prep office and we're seeing lots of clients in this exact situation. The distinction between Zelle and other payment apps is important. Zelle operates differently because it's owned by banks, not a separate payment processor. Zelle claims they don't issue 1099-Ks at all because they're just facilitating direct bank-to-bank transfers, not actually processing payments themselves. But that doesn't mean you're off the hook! If you're getting regularly scheduled payments of the same amount, that looks exactly like income to the IRS. If you get audited, they'll ask for bank statements and those Zelle deposits will be right there. Better to report it all now than pay penalties and interest later.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
ā¢Thanks for this info! So even if Zelle doesn't report it, I should still be reporting this income? Would I just add it as "miscellaneous income" or would I need to file as self-employed with a Schedule C?
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
ā¢You should definitely report the income regardless of whether Zelle issues a 1099-K. Since you're receiving regular payments for work performed, this would be considered self-employment income, not miscellaneous income. You'll need to file Schedule C to report your business income and expenses, and Schedule SE to calculate your self-employment tax. This is actually better for you in many ways because with Schedule C, you can deduct legitimate business expenses that reduce your taxable income. If you have a home office, use your phone for work, or have any other expenses related to this work, those can potentially be deductible.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Is anyone else noticing that the payment apps are super inconsistent with reporting? I get payments through CashApp, Venmo AND Zelle for my small business and last year only PayPal sent me a 1099-K even though I made over $10k on each platform.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
ā¢Same experience here. I got a 1099-K from PayPal but nothing from Venmo despite making similar amounts on both. I reported everything anyway because I don't want headaches with the IRS, but the inconsistency is frustrating. I think different platforms are interpreting the requirements differently.
0 coins