


Ask the community...
Just to add some practical advice - I've helped several workers apply for ITINs in the past. One thing that makes a huge difference is preparing a detailed letter from the employer that: 1) Confirms the employment relationship 2) Specifies the amount paid during the tax year 3) Explains why formal documentation wasn't previously provided 4) States the intention to properly report all future payments This letter, attached to the tax return and W-7 application, helps establish the legitimacy of the income being reported. It's not technically required, but I've found it speeds up processing and reduces questions from the IRS.
How does the letter need to be formatted? Does it need to be notarized or anything?
The letter doesn't need to be notarized, but it should be on company letterhead if possible and signed by the owner or appropriate manager. Keep the format professional but straightforward - date, proper greeting, clear explanation of the facts, and formal closing with signature. Make sure it includes specific information like the worker's full legal name, approximate dates of employment, total compensation paid, and the reason for requesting the ITIN. I also recommend including the employer's EIN and contact information for verification purposes. While not strictly required, this level of detail helps demonstrate the legitimacy of the request and can smooth the process considerably.
Has anyone actually gone through this recently? I'm wondering what the current processing time is for ITIN applications. The IRS website says 7 weeks but I'm skeptical given all their backlogs.
I think the Forbes article might have been technically correct but just explained it poorly. The 15.3% is Social Security (12.4%) + Medicare (2.9%). The Social Security part only applies up to the wage base (which changes yearly). The Medicare 2.9% applies to all SE income. The ADDITIONAL 0.9% Medicare tax (which brings it to 3.8% total) kicks in at higher income levels ($200k/$250k). The article maybe just didn't mention this additional tax? Either way, I agree that tax info is confusing. I always double check the IRS website and cross-reference with Publication 15 and Publication 334.
But that's still wrong - the total isn't 3.8%. The Additional Medicare Tax is 0.9%, which when added to the 2.9% regular Medicare tax equals 3.8%. Is that what you meant?
Yes, that's exactly what I meant. The base Medicare tax is 2.9% on all SE income. Then the Additional Medicare Tax of 0.9% kicks in at those higher income thresholds, bringing the total Medicare portion to 3.8% (2.9% + 0.9%). I should have been clearer in my wording. Thanks for pointing that out. This conversation perfectly illustrates how even small differences in how tax concepts are explained can lead to confusion!
Has anyone else noticed that the wage base for Social Security taxes increases every year? In 2023 it was $160,200, up from $147,000 in 2022. For 2025 it's expected to be around $168,600. This is why old articles can be misleading - tax numbers change annually but articles rarely get updated!
The wage base is tied to the National Average Wage Index so it automatically increases with inflation. It's gone up dramatically in recent years because wages have been rising so quickly. You can always find the current wage base on SSA.gov rather than relying on articles that might be using outdated numbers.
One tip I haven't seen mentioned - if you're filing for the first time, make sure you check whether someone else can claim you as a dependent (like your parents). This makes a HUGE difference in how you file and what credits you can claim. Made this mistake my first time and had to file an amended return which was a total nightmare!!!
Omg I didn't even think of that - my parents have always claimed me as a dependent but I moved out last May and have been supporting myself since then. How do I know if they can still claim me or not for 2024 taxes?
There are specific tests the IRS uses to determine if someone can be claimed as a dependent. The main ones are the support test (did you provide more than half of your own financial support for the year?) and the residency test (did you live with your parents for more than half the year?). Since you moved out in May, you lived with them for less than half of 2024, but the support test is the bigger factor. You need to calculate all your living expenses (rent, food, utilities, medical, education, etc.) for the entire year and determine if you provided more than 50% of that total yourself. If you did, your parents can't claim you. If they provided more than 50% (including while you lived with them), they can still claim you even though you moved out.
just a heads up since ur in texas - we don't have state income tax here so u only need to worry about federal. saved me some confusion my first time!
This is correct but keep in mind you might still need to file a state return if you earned any money in another state during the year (like if you had a summer job somewhere else). The tax software will ask you questions to determine this.
Something nobody's mentioned yet - if your partner gets any per diem or allowance from the union for these travel expenses, that changes things. My union provides a travel stipend for jobs beyond a certain distance, and that needs to be reported differently on taxes. If they're getting any kind of travel allowance or per diem that isn't included on their W-2, that needs to be handled carefully. Also worth checking if your partner's collective bargaining agreement has any provisions about travel reimbursement they might not be taking advantage of.
They don't currently get any stipend or per diem for the travel unfortunately. That's why we're trying to figure out if there's any tax relief available. The union does have some provisions for travel pay, but only for jobs beyond a certain distance (I think it's 75 miles), and most of their assignments fall just under that threshold. Do you know if there's a standard mileage rate they could use instead of tracking actual gas costs?
Yes, using the standard mileage rate is usually much easier than tracking actual gas expenses. For 2024, the standard mileage rate for business travel is 67 cents per mile. This covers gas, wear and tear, depreciation, and insurance. If your partner qualifies to deduct these expenses (based on the temporary work location rules others mentioned), using the standard rate is typically much simpler than keeping all gas receipts. Just make sure they keep a detailed log of dates, locations, business purpose, and miles driven. There are several good mileage tracker apps that can help with this too.
I'm an electrician with similar situation. One important thing - if your partner gets a W-2 (rather than 1099), these deductions got much harder after the 2018 tax law changes. Employee business expenses used to be deductible on Schedule A, but now they're basically eliminated for W-2 workers until 2025 when the law changes again. If they're truly an employee (W-2), they might be out of luck unless their employer is willing to set up an accountable plan to reimburse these expenses tax-free. If they're considered self-employed (getting 1099-NEC), then they can deduct these business expenses on Schedule C.
This is the correct answer that everyone else missed. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor from 2018 through 2025. This includes unreimbursed employee business expenses like mileage to job sites. If they're a W-2 employee, these expenses aren't deductible at the federal level right now. Some states still allow these deductions on state returns though, so check your state tax laws!
Amina Toure
This isn't just unemployment fraud, it's also tax fraud. When filing your taxes next year, the timing of your unemployment benefits will align perfectly with your new dependent. IRS systems are designed to catch inconsistencies like this. I worked in payroll for 10 years and saw an employee attempt something similar. They ended up having to repay all unemployment benefits plus a 30% penalty, and their employer faced significant fines for encouraging the fraud. If your employer wants to help you, there are legitimate options like offering a paid leave policy, allowing remote work, or setting up a temporary part-time arrangement. If they truly value you, they should be willing to find a legal solution rather than putting you at risk.
0 coins
Ava Garcia
ā¢Thank you for explaining the tax implications. I hadn't even thought about how this might trigger an IRS review. Do you know if there are any legal options for small businesses to help employees with maternity leave? My employer seems to think unemployment is their only option.
0 coins
Amina Toure
ā¢Small businesses actually have several legal options to support employees during maternity leave. They can offer paid time off from their own funds (which is tax-deductible as a business expense), set up short-term disability insurance (which is relatively inexpensive), or establish a temporary flexible/remote work arrangement. Some states also have paid family leave programs that small businesses can participate in, where both employers and employees contribute small amounts throughout the year. And depending on how your employer structures your compensation, you might qualify for state disability benefits in some locations, which is completely separate from unemployment.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
As someone who processes unemployment claims, I can tell you we ABSOLUTELY look for this pattern and it's an automatic flag in our system. When someone files for unemployment then returns to the same employer shortly after having a baby, it triggers a mandatory review. Your employer is asking you to commit a federal offense that could result in: - Repaying all benefits with penalties - Being barred from receiving legitimate unemployment in the future - Potential criminal charges in severe cases - Tax complications with the IRS Plus, your employer could face significant fines for instructing you to commit fraud. If they're willing to do this, I'd be concerned about what other corners they're cutting that might affect you.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
ā¢Is there any kind of whistleblower protection if someone reports their employer for suggesting this kind of fraud? asking for a friend...
0 coins