


Ask the community...
I'm a tax pro and I handle these Premium Tax Credit verification requests pretty regularly. Here's what you need to know: 1) Since you're not listed as the preparer, the IRS won't discuss anything with you without a Form 2848 (Power of Attorney). 2) However, your fiancΓ©e can simply sign the letter herself and include copies of all requested documents. No POA needed if she's the one submitting it. 3) Make sure you include the EXACT letter they sent her with your response. 4) If there's a reply envelope, use it. Otherwise clearly write her SSN and tax year on everything you send. 5) Keep copies of EVERYTHING and send it certified mail so you have proof of when it was delivered. The Premium Tax Credit verification is pretty routine - just include the 1095-A, Form 8962, and any other supporting docs they asked for. No need to overcomplicate it!
Thanks for this detailed response! Do you think there's any advantage to having me listed as her representative with a Form 2848 for potential follow-up questions? Or is it better to keep it simple and just have her sign everything directly?
If you anticipate ongoing issues or follow-up questions, then yes, filing Form 2848 would be beneficial as it allows you to speak directly with the IRS on her behalf. This can be especially helpful if they need additional clarification or if something is still unclear after your initial response. However, if the documentation you're providing is straightforward and addresses all their concerns, keeping it simple with just her signature is probably sufficient. The key is ensuring all requested information is provided completely and accurately the first time to avoid delays.
I dealt with this exact situation last year with my wife's return and Premium Tax Credit! The issue was that the 1095-A from the marketplace didn't match what we reported on Form 8962. Since you already have a PTIN, definitely file the 2848. Here's why: If there are any follow-up questions (which happened in our case), you can call the IRS directly instead of having to relay messages through your fiancΓ©e. Just make sure on the 2848 you specifically list "Form 1040" and the specific tax year, and also mention "Premium Tax Credit" in the description section. Being specific helps avoid any confusion about what you're authorized to discuss.
Don't forget that even after you file your corrected returns, you might still qualify for a payment plan or even an Offer in Compromise if you can't pay the full amount. The IRS Fresh Start program has made it easier to settle tax debts for less than the full amount if you can prove financial hardship. I was in a similar situation with about $22K in tax debt after SFRs were filed. After submitting my own returns, it dropped to around $14K, but I still couldn't pay it all. I qualified for an Offer in Compromise and settled the entire debt for about $4,800 paid over 24 months.
How hard was it to get approved for the Offer in Compromise? I've heard they reject most applications. Did you need to hire someone to help with that process?
It's definitely not automatic, but it's not as impossible as some people claim. The key is proving that you genuinely cannot pay the full amount without causing significant financial hardship. You need to document all your income, expenses, assets, and liabilities very thoroughly. I did it myself using the IRS's pre-qualifier tool first to see if I might qualify. The paperwork is extensive - Form 656 and Form 433-A mainly - and you need to include a lot of documentation. It took about 7 months from submission to acceptance. They did counter my initial offer with a slightly higher amount, which I accepted. You don't necessarily need to hire someone, but you do need to be very organized and thorough with your financial documentation.
Make sure you check if the statute of limitations for collections has expired on any of your tax debts! The IRS generally has 10 years from the date of assessment to collect taxes. If they filed substitutes for returns from 2001-2007, some of those might be approaching or past the collection statute expiration date.
But doesn't filing your own return reset that 10-year clock? I heard that submitting anything to the IRS about old tax years can restart the collection period.
Just a pro tip on the Failure to File penalty - if your brother-in-law has a clean tax history for the past 3 years (filed and paid on time), he might qualify for First Time Penalty Abatement. The IRS doesn't advertise this much, but it's an administrative waiver they can grant. I had a similar situation in 2020 where I completely missed the filing deadline because of some family emergencies. Called the IRS, explained my situation, mentioned I had a clean record for the previous years, and they removed about $1,200 in penalties on the spot. Definitely worth asking about!
Does this work if you were late two years in a row? I was late filing in 2021 and 2022, but was always on time before that.
Unfortunately, it probably won't work for consecutive years. First Time Penalty Abatement typically requires a clean compliance history for the three tax years prior to the year you're requesting abatement for. Since you were late in 2021, you likely wouldn't qualify for abatement of the 2022 penalties. However, you might have qualified for abatement of the 2021 penalties if you were compliant for 2018-2020. If you haven't already requested that, it might be worth exploring. For 2022, you'd need to look at other grounds for abatement like reasonable cause (serious illness, natural disaster, etc.) rather than the first-time administrative waiver.
One important clarification - the Failure to File penalty is calculated as 5% per month of the UNPAID tax. If he paid most of what he owed and only had a small balance due, the penalties would be much smaller than if he paid nothing. For example, if he owed $10,000 but paid $9,000 with his late extension, the 5% penalty would only apply to the remaining $1,000 (so $50 per month rather than $500 per month if he paid nothing).
Has anyone compared the current fees between the different processors? Last year I used ACI Payments and their fee was ridiculous - almost 2.2% for my Visa. If the fees are actually dropping I might consider using my credit card again this year.
I just checked a few days ago! The fees have definitely come down. ACI Payments is around 1.98% now for credit cards, and Pay1040 is showing 1.87% for most credit cards. Debit card fees are still flat rate (around $2.50-$3.95 per transaction depending on processor). One thing to watch for - sometimes the different processors have special deals with specific card types. Like Pay1040 has a lower rate for Mastercard than Visa right now.
Thanks for the current info! That's actually a decent drop from last year. With my 2% cashback card, I might actually break even or come out slightly ahead using Pay1040. Going to run the numbers before my next estimated payment. Just to confirm - the 2 payment limit is still per processor, right? So technically I could do 2 payments with Pay1040 and 2 more with ACI if I needed to split up a large amount?
Does anyone know if the IRS will actually start accepting direct credit card payments in 2025? That would be amazing! The current system with these third-party processors is so annoying.
I've heard rumors about this from some colleagues, but nothing official from the IRS yet. They've been modernizing their payment systems gradually, but direct credit card acceptance would require significant infrastructure changes on their end. The main challenge is regulatory - currently, federal agencies can't directly absorb credit card processing fees or pass them on to taxpayers without specific authorization. There was some language in the IRS funding bills about payment modernization, but no explicit timeline for direct credit card acceptance. I'd be surprised if it happened as soon as 2025, but it's definitely on their roadmap for future improvements. The current third-party processor system is clunky for everyone involved.
Luca Bianchi
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is that having an S-Corp adds a whole layer of complexity beyond just regular business taxes. I learned this the hard way. I started with a regular tax preparer, got audited, switched to a CPA, and still had issues with how my self-employment income vs S-Corp distributions were being handled. Only when I finally consulted with a tax attorney did I learn that my operating agreement had serious flaws that were causing tax problems. For me, the ideal setup has been using a tax attorney to set up the proper legal structure and documentation, then having a CPA handle the regular filings and planning. The attorney costs more but only needed occasional consultation, while the CPA handles the ongoing work.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
β’What specifically did the tax attorney find wrong with your operating agreement? I'm wondering if I should have mine reviewed now.
0 coins
Nia Harris
Honestly depends on your asset size. If your company is making under $1M annually, a good CPA is more than enough. As you grow beyond that, especially if you're acquiring other businesses or have complicated ownership structures, a tax attorney becomes more valuable. Starting with a highly qualified CPA with S-Corp specialization is the most cost-effective approach. If they start saying things like "this is beyond my expertise" or "you might want a legal opinion on this," that's when you bring in a tax attorney for those specific issues. Don't waste money on attorney fees for routine matters a CPA can handle perfectly well. Just make sure you have a CPA who primarily works with businesses, not one who mostly does individual returns and occasionally handles business clients.
0 coins