


Ask the community...
One thing to consider - if you used that retirement money for qualified education expenses, you might be exempt from the 10% early withdrawal penalty. Since you mentioned graduating college, it's possible some of the funds went toward that? When I took an early distribution from my IRA for my last semester, I still had to pay income tax on it, but I avoided the 10% penalty by filing Form 5329 and indicating the qualified education exception.
That's really interesting - I didn't realize education expenses could qualify for avoiding the penalty. About $6,000 of what I withdrew actually did go toward my final tuition payment. Would I need to file an amended return to claim this exception, or can I just dispute the CP49 notice directly?
You can address it directly in your response to the CP49 notice. You'll need to complete Form 5329 for the tax year in question, entering the distribution amount on line 1, then the amount used for qualified education expenses on line 2 of the "Exceptions" section. I'd also include proof of payment to your educational institution from that year. The IRS will recalculate your liability based on this information. Since it's been a few years, gather as much documentation as possible - receipts, account statements, anything showing you used those funds for education.
Did you check to see if any taxes were already withheld from the distribution? Usually retirement plan administrators automatically withhold 20% for federal taxes when you take early distributions. If they did that, it should be credited against what you owe.
Just want to add something important no one has mentioned yet. Your father should also consider how his Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) might factor into this if he has any traditional IRAs or 401ks. At 73, he's required to take those distributions which adds to his taxable income. Also, if he doesn't want to have withholding taken from the pension directly, he could make quarterly estimated tax payments instead. Some people prefer this method because it gives them more control over the timing of payments.
Thank you for mentioning this! I completely forgot about his IRA. He does have a small one with about $42,000 in it. I guess that means he'll need to take distributions from that too? Does that change how much he should withhold from the pension?
Yes, at 73 he definitely needs to take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from his IRA. For his age, it's roughly 4% of the balance, so that's about $1,680 for the year based on the $42,000 balance you mentioned. This additional income should factor into his total tax picture. While it's not a huge amount, it does push his total income higher. I would probably increase the pension withholding slightly to account for this - maybe closer to 15-18% rather than the 12-15% others suggested. Alternatively, he could have taxes withheld directly from the IRA distributions when they're taken, which many people find simpler.
Careful with that W-4P form! The 2021 version is different from newer versions. On the 2021 form, if you don't want any additional withholding beyond the standard calculation, you should check the box in Step 1c that says "I do not want any federal income tax withheld from my pension." This seems contradictory, but it's actually correct! If you DO want additional withholding beyond the standard amount, then don't check that box and fill out the other sections instead.
No, that's not right. If you check that box, they won't withhold ANY taxes. That's definitely not what OP's father wants based on his situation.
You're right, I should have been clearer. Checking that box means NO withholding at all. I was thinking of a different scenario. For OP's father, he should NOT check that box, and instead complete Step 2 to indicate his filing status and Step 4c to specify any additional withholding he wants beyond the standard calculation. Most pension administrators will calculate a base withholding amount, and Step 4c lets you add more if needed. Thanks for the correction!
Here's a practical tip for those caught in this hobby/business dilemma: keep DETAILED records regardless of which path you choose. I sell handmade jewelry occasionally and decided to establish it as a legitimate business even though sales are minimal. The key is showing your "profit motive" - document your efforts to make the activity profitable over time. Take photos of your workspace, keep receipts organized (I use QuickBooks Self-Employed), maintain a separate bank account, create a simple business plan, and market your creations consistently. Even if you don't show a profit immediately, these efforts demonstrate you're treating it as a business, not a hobby. This has worked for me for 3 tax cycles without issues.
Do you think having a separate business banking account is absolutely necessary? I sell crocheted items on Etsy (maybe $1200/year) but just use my personal account and track everything in a spreadsheet. Would the IRS have an issue with that?
Having a separate business account isn't absolutely required by law, but it's one of the strongest indicators that you're treating your activity as a business rather than a hobby. It shows clear separation between personal and business finances, which is important if you're ever questioned. For a small Etsy operation like yours, a detailed spreadsheet is better than nothing, but I'd strongly recommend at least opening a free business checking account. Many banks offer them with no minimum balance. This simple step adds significant credibility to your business classification and makes tracking expenses much easier come tax time.
An important point nobody's mentioned yet: If you're selling handmade items, you might also need to check your local laws about business licenses, sales tax collection, etc. Even if the fed gov considers you a "hobby," your state or local gov might still classify you as a business if you're making sales! I found this out the hard way with my stained glass hobby - my state requires me to collect sales tax even on occasional sales. Complete nightmare trying to fix this after the fact!
I just went through this same nightmare with about 700 NFT transactions. If you're in a time crunch, another approach is to use the summary method on Form 8949. Basically, instead of listing each transaction separately, you can attach a statement that summarizes transactions of the same type. You'd want to group them by short-term vs long-term, and by whether they were reported on a 1099-B. Then you can just put "See attached statement" on Form 8949 and include the totals from your detailed list. Remember though - you still need to maintain records of every individual transaction in case of an audit. The summary is just for filing purposes.
Thanks for this advice! Can you clarify what "same type" means in this context? Like could I group all my NBA TopShot NFTs together even if purchased/sold on different dates? Or does "same type" mean they need to have the same dates and cost basis percentage?
By "same type," the IRS generally means transactions that share the same characteristics for tax purposes. Grouping should maintain separate categories for: short-term vs long-term holdings (more/less than 1 year), whether they were reported on a 1099-B, and whether you have any adjustments to the basis or proceeds. You couldn't group all NBA TopShot NFTs together just because they're from the same platform if they have different holding periods or acquisition dates. The summary should still separate short-term from long-term gains and maintain the integrity of your actual tax position. The goal is to simplify the paperwork while still accurately reporting your total capital gains and losses. Your detailed transaction records should include the specific dates, cost basis, and sale price for each NFT in case you're ever asked to substantiate your summary.
I'm going through this exact NFT tax hell right now. One option nobody's mentioned is using Like-Kind Exchange rules. Before 2018, some crypto traders used Section 1031 to defer taxes on crypto-to-crypto trades. Although the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act limited 1031 exchanges to real estate after 2017, I've heard some tax pros argue NFT-to-NFT trades might qualify as collectibles exchanges rather than digital asset trades. Has anyone tried this approach? Seems like it could simplify reporting enormously.
This is actually incorrect and potentially dangerous advice. The IRS has been very clear that Like-Kind Exchange treatment (Section 1031) does NOT apply to cryptocurrency or NFT transactions after 2017. This position has been stated multiple times in IRS guidance. Every NFT trade is considered a taxable event - when you trade one NFT for another, you're technically selling the first one for its fair market value and using those proceeds to buy the second one. Both transactions need to be reported. Trying to claim NFTs as collectibles for Like-Kind treatment would likely trigger an audit and potentially penalties for incorrect filing. NFTs are treated as digital assets under current IRS guidance.
Alberto Souchard
Just want to add some practical advice from someone who's worked as a tax preparer. When you're filing back taxes: 1. Start with the most recent year (2024) and work backward, since the most recent year is most important to get current. 2. If you're owed refunds, you only have 3 years to claim them, so file 2022-2024 ASAP. 3. File all years separately - don't combine multiple years on one return. 4. Be prepared for paper filing for older years as electronic filing is only available for the current and previous two tax years. 5. It's often worth paying a professional for at least a consultation to make sure you're not missing anything. Also, the penalty for failing to file is usually worse than failing to pay, so getting those returns filed, even if you can't pay right away, is crucial!
0 coins
Katherine Shultz
ā¢Is there a statute of limitations on back taxes? Like, if they haven't contacted me about unfiled taxes from 10 years ago, am I in the clear?
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
ā¢There's no statute of limitations for unfiled tax returns - the IRS can come after you at any time for returns that were never filed. However, once you do file, the general statute of limitations is 3 years for the IRS to audit or assess additional taxes (this extends to 6 years if you underreported your income by more than 25%). For refunds, you only have 3 years from the original due date to claim them. After that time passes, you lose the refund forever, even if you were owed money. That's why it's important to file, even years later - at minimum to start the statute of limitations clock and potentially claim refunds that aren't yet time-barred.
0 coins
Marcus Marsh
Has anyone used a paid tax preparer to file back taxes? I'm wondering if it's worth the cost or if I should just use tax software. I'm in a similar boat (3 unfiled years) but my situation is complicated because I had some 1099 income and worked in two different states.
0 coins
Hailey O'Leary
ā¢I used H&R Block for 4 years of back taxes and it was SO expensive - like $350 per year! In retrospect I should've just used software. Especially since they made a mistake on one of my returns that I had to fix anyway. Just make sure whatever you use has the right forms for your situation.
0 coins