IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Great question! You've identified a common source of confusion. The key insight is that these two limitation systems work sequentially, not independently, which prevents the "loophole" you're concerned about. Here's the step-by-step process: 1. **At-Risk Rules Apply First (Section 465)**: Your deductible loss from each activity is limited to your actual economic investment in that specific activity. This includes your cash investment plus qualified nonrecourse debt (for real estate). Importantly, this calculation is done separately for each activity - no aggregation allowed. 2. **Passive Activity Rules Apply Second (Section 469)**: Only after the at-risk limitations are applied do the passive activity loss rules kick in. These rules then limit your ability to use those losses against non-passive income. So in your $50,000 passive income example, even if you bought multiple properties with small down payments, each property's deductible losses would still be capped at your at-risk amount in that specific property. You couldn't generate unlimited "paper losses" because your losses are constrained by your actual economic exposure. Additionally, the IRS has substance-over-form doctrines and anti-abuse rules that target arrangements entered into primarily for tax avoidance without legitimate business purpose or reasonable profit expectation. Simply acquiring passive activities solely to generate tax losses could trigger scrutiny. The system is actually designed quite well to prevent exactly the scenario you're describing!

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

This is exactly the clarification I needed! I was definitely overthinking the interaction between these two sections. Your step-by-step breakdown makes it crystal clear that the at-risk rules act as the first filter on a per-activity basis, which would naturally prevent the unlimited loss generation scenario I was worried about. I think I was getting confused because I kept reading about passive activity aggregation rules and assumed that meant the at-risk calculations could also be aggregated. Now I understand they're completely separate - at-risk is always calculated individually for each activity, while only the passive activity loss limitations allow for certain grouping elections. The anti-abuse angle is also really important to understand. Even if someone found a technical way around these rules, the IRS could still challenge transactions that lack economic substance. Thanks for the thorough explanation!

0 coins

This is such a helpful discussion! I'm a newcomer to real estate investing and was getting completely overwhelmed by these rules. Reading through everyone's explanations, I'm starting to understand that I need to track three separate things for each property: 1. My tax basis (for depreciation and gain/loss calculations) 2. My at-risk amount (for loss deduction limitations) 3. Whether the activity is passive or non-passive (for the passive loss rules) What's still confusing me is the interaction with depreciation. If I buy a rental property for $200K with $40K down and take $8K in depreciation the first year, how does that affect my at-risk amount? Does the depreciation reduce my at-risk basis, or does it stay at the original $40K plus qualified debt amount? I'm trying to avoid the mistakes others have mentioned about not properly tracking these amounts year over year. Any guidance on the depreciation interaction would be really appreciated!

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

Great question about depreciation's impact on at-risk amounts! You're absolutely right to track those three separate items - that's the foundation of properly handling rental property tax accounting. Regarding depreciation: it does NOT reduce your at-risk amount. Your at-risk amount changes based on cash contributions, distributions, debt changes, and your share of income/losses for tax purposes, but depreciation is a non-cash deduction that doesn't affect your actual economic investment in the property. So in your example: $40K down payment + qualified nonrecourse debt ($160K) = $200K initial at-risk amount. The $8K depreciation reduces your tax basis but leaves your at-risk amount unchanged at $200K (assuming no other transactions). However, as you pay down the mortgage principal or take distributions, those will affect your at-risk amount. Also, if the property generates tax losses beyond depreciation (like negative cash flow), those losses will reduce your at-risk amount going forward. The key insight is that at-risk amounts track your actual economic exposure, while tax basis tracks your position for depreciation and gain/loss calculations. They move somewhat independently, which is why you need to track them separately each year!

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

Did you verify if your business expenses triggered any additional review? According to the IRS processing guidelines (https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/business-expenses), certain Schedule C deductions can trigger additional verification steps. Have you checked your Account Transcript to see if there were any TC 420 codes that might indicate a review was conducted before issuing your DDD?

0 coins

Congratulations on getting your DDD! As someone who's been through the small business filing process for a few years now, I can tell you that cycle code 0405 is actually pretty standard timing. The DDD is typically the date the funds will be available in your account, though some banks process government deposits earlier in the day. Since you mentioned this is your first time filing as a small business, you might want to start thinking about setting aside a portion of this refund for next year's quarterly estimated payments. The transition from W-2 employee to small business owner means shifting to a quarterly tax planning mindset. Also, keep good records of when your refund actually hits your account - it'll help you plan better for future years!

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact same problem for my consulting business! After reading through all these suggestions, I ended up going with the electronic filing route through QuickBooks Online's built-in system this year and it was honestly a game-changer. No more worrying about buying the right forms, alignment issues, or running out of supplies mid-process. For anyone still hesitant about going digital, the IRS actually encourages electronic filing and your employees can access their W-2s immediately instead of waiting for mail delivery. Plus you get automatic confirmation that everything was filed correctly with all the right agencies. The cost savings compared to buying forms, envelopes, and postage really adds up when you factor in your time too. If you absolutely need physical forms though, I second the suggestion about checking local print shops - they're usually much more flexible on quantities than the big office supply stores.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

This is really helpful to hear from someone who actually made the switch! I'm curious - when you say QuickBooks Online's built-in system, do you know if that same functionality exists in QuickBooks Desktop? I'm still using the desktop version and wondering if I need to upgrade to Online to get these electronic filing features, or if there's a way to do it through the desktop software too.

0 coins

@a72b2d1c1916 QuickBooks Desktop does have electronic filing capabilities, but they're more limited than the Online version. In Desktop, you can e-file W-2s through their Enhanced Payroll service, but it requires a subscription to that specific payroll module. If you're just using basic Desktop without the payroll subscription, you won't have access to the e-filing features. However, you can still export your payroll data from Desktop and use third-party services like the ones mentioned earlier (taxr.ai, track1099.com, etc.) to handle the electronic filing. That might actually be more cost-effective than upgrading to Enhanced Payroll if you only need it for W-2 season.

0 coins

I'm a small business owner who went through this same headache two years ago! Here's what I learned after trying several approaches: For immediate needs, Costco Business Center actually sells QuickBooks-compatible W-2 forms in smaller quantities (25-count packs) at a much better per-form price than office supply stores. They're usually in stock through February. But honestly, after dealing with alignment issues and wasted forms, I switched to electronic filing last year and wish I'd done it sooner. The key thing I discovered is that you don't need QuickBooks' expensive payroll subscription to e-file. You can export your employee data from any version of QuickBooks (even older Desktop versions) and use services like the ones mentioned here. One tip nobody mentioned: if you do go the electronic route, make sure to send your employees a heads-up email about when to expect their W-2s online. Some of my older employees were confused when they didn't get paper forms in the mail, so clear communication really helps with the transition. The time savings alone made it worth switching - no more trips to the store, no printer jams, no worrying about running out of forms at the last minute!

0 coins

I was in almost the exact same situation last year with Grubhub income I forgot to report! The stress is real but it's actually pretty manageable to fix. One thing that helped me was pulling up my Doordash driver app and taking screenshots of my 2023 earnings summary before I started the amendment process. This gave me the exact amount to report and also showed my delivery count which I used to estimate mileage deductions. Also, don't forget that you paid self-employment tax on that income, so you get to deduct half of that SE tax as an adjustment to income on your 1040. It's a small silver lining but every bit helps when you're already stressed about the situation. The whole amendment took me about 6 weeks to process electronically, and the final bill was way less scary than I anticipated. You've got this!

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

This is such a relief to read! I'm definitely going to screenshot my earnings summary from the Doordash app like you suggested. That's a smart way to have official documentation of the exact amount. I had no idea about being able to deduct half of the self-employment tax - that's actually really helpful to know! Every little bit does help when you're already looking at additional taxes you weren't expecting to pay. Six weeks for electronic processing sounds way better than the 16+ weeks someone mentioned for paper filing. Did you end up owing much in penalties, or were they pretty minimal since you came forward voluntarily? I'm trying to set my expectations for what this might cost me overall.

0 coins

Ally Tailer

•

I'm dealing with a similar situation where I forgot to report some freelance writing income from 2023. Reading through everyone's advice here has been incredibly helpful - especially the tip about being able to file amendments electronically now instead of waiting months for paper processing. One thing I wanted to add is that if you're still actively doing gig work, this is a great reminder to set up better record-keeping going forward. I started using a simple spreadsheet to track all my 1099 income sources after my mistake, and it's saved me so much stress during tax season this year. The consensus seems to be that acting quickly and voluntarily is key, which makes sense. Better to deal with small penalties now than potentially larger ones if the IRS catches the discrepancy on their own later. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it really helps to know others have been through this successfully!

0 coins

Amara Adeyemi

•

Don't forget about the Deason Rule if your clergy client has both ministerial income and housing allowance! This rule requires you to allocate expenses proportionally between taxable and tax-exempt income. For example, if 30% of the minister's income is tax-exempt housing allowance, then 30% of business expenses would not be deductible. It's a tricky calculation that many preparers miss, but the IRS definitely looks for it in clergy returns.

0 coins

I've never heard of this Deason Rule before - is this something new? I've done a few clergy returns and never had to adjust their business expenses.

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

The Deason Rule isn't new - it comes from a 1981 Tax Court case (Deason v. Commissioner). It's based on the general tax principle that you can't deduct expenses related to tax-exempt income. For clergy, this means if part of their compensation is the tax-exempt housing allowance, then a proportional amount of their ministerial business expenses (like professional development, books, travel for church business, etc.) becomes non-deductible. So if a minister receives $40k salary + $20k housing allowance (total $60k), then 1/3 of their income is tax-exempt. Therefore, 1/3 of their business expenses would be non-deductible. It's definitely something to watch for, especially with higher housing allowances relative to salary.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

As someone who's worked with several clergy clients over the years, I'd strongly recommend getting a copy of IRS Publication 517 (Social Security and Other Information for Members of the Clergy and Religious Workers) if you haven't already. It's the definitive guide for these situations. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you should also verify the housing allowance was properly designated in advance by the church's governing body. The IRS requires that housing allowances be officially designated before the tax year begins, not retroactively. If Pastor Mike's church didn't properly designate the $18,000 housing allowance in writing before 2024, it might not qualify for the exclusion. Also, since this is your first clergy client, you might want to ask Pastor Mike if he has any other ministerial income from weddings, funerals, or guest speaking that wasn't reported on his W-2. This additional income would also be subject to self-employment tax and needs to be reported on Schedule C or Schedule C-EZ. The dual tax status of clergy really trips up a lot of preparers initially, but once you understand the basic principle (employee for income tax, self-employed for SE tax), it becomes much more manageable.

0 coins

This is such valuable information, thank you! I hadn't even thought about the advance designation requirement - that could be a major issue if the church didn't handle it properly. Quick question about the additional ministerial income you mentioned - if Pastor Mike performed weddings or funerals but the payments went directly to the church (and he didn't receive them personally), would those still need to be reported as his income? Or does it only count if he personally received the fees? Also, should I be asking about any parsonage or church-provided housing? I assume that would be handled differently than a cash housing allowance, but I want to make sure I'm covering all the bases with this return.

0 coins

Prev1...428429430431432...5643Next