


Ask the community...
I'm a tax preparer (not CPA) and November is absolutely not too early to book for tax season. We start booking returning clients in October and new clients in November. By January, we're usually booked through mid-March. One suggestion - ask if they offer a pre-tax season planning meeting in December. Many CPAs offer this service where they can review the situation and give advice before year-end. This is especially useful with real estate since there might be things your in-laws can do before December 31st to optimize their tax situation.
What's the difference between a tax preparer and a CPA? Would a regular tax preparer be able to handle real estate investments from another country or is that something only a CPA should handle?
A CPA has more extensive education, passed the CPA exam, and maintains specific continuing education requirements. Tax preparers like me have various levels of certification (I'm an Enrolled Agent which means I'm licensed by the IRS). For international real estate investments, I would strongly recommend a CPA with specific experience in that area. While some experienced EAs could handle it, CPAs typically have more training with complex international tax issues. Foreign real estate can involve foreign tax credits, FBAR filings, and other complex reporting requirements that go beyond basic tax preparation. This is definitely a situation where expertise matters more than price.
I would recommend calling now but expecting to book for February. January is when most people are still waiting for documents to arrive. Most W-2s and 1099s don't even come until late January or early February, so unless your in-laws have everything ready super early, a February appointment makes more sense.
This depends entirely on the complexity. For simple returns, sure. But for real estate investments, especially with foreign ownership, earlier meetings can be crucial for gathering all the required documentation. Sometimes these returns require information that takes weeks to track down.
Current landlord here (5 properties). One strategy that worked well for me was creating an LLC for my rental properties and electing S-Corp taxation. This allowed me to pay myself a reasonable salary with proper withholding while also taking distributions. It's definitely more complicated than just increasing your W-4 withholding, but it can potentially save you on self-employment taxes depending on your situation. Just something to consider if your rental business grows.
Doesn't creating an LLC and doing the S-Corp election cost a lot in administrative fees? I've heard you need to run payroll and everything. Is it really worth it for just one property?
You're right that it doesn't make financial sense for just one property. The administrative costs (state filing fees, payroll service, possibly a CPA) would likely outweigh the tax benefits until you have multiple properties generating significant income. For a single property, increasing your W-4 withholding or making quarterly estimated payments is definitely more cost-effective. I'd say the S-Corp approach usually starts making sense around 3-5 properties or when rental income exceeds about $40,000 annually. Until then, the simpler approaches others have mentioned are your best bet.
dont forget about depreciation! it will offset some of ur rental income. my first year as landlord i was worried about owing but the depreciation deduction was huge and actually cancelled out most of my rental profits for tax purposes. talk to a tax person about this.
This is really important. Depreciation is actually required by the IRS even if you don't claim it. And they'll hit you with depreciation recapture taxes when you sell regardless. So definitely claim it!
One important thing to note that hasn't been mentioned - if your Solo 401k has BOTH traditional and Roth components, you'll need to report the total values separately on the form. This confused me last year. Line 7a is for the total of all plan assets, but there's also a section where you'll need to break out the pre-tax (traditional) and post-tax (Roth) portions separately if you have both. Don't just lump the total value together or you'll get a notice asking for clarification.
Where exactly do you report the Roth vs traditional breakdown? I have both in my solo 401k but can't seem to find where this goes on the 5500-SF. Is it in Part III?
You'll need to complete Part VI of Form 5500-SF if you have both Roth and traditional components. Look specifically at line 11a and 11b where it asks about pre-tax and designated Roth contributions. The total combined value goes on line 7 of Part III, but the breakdown between traditional and Roth gets reported in Part VI. It's easy to miss because most of the solo 401k guidance focuses on the asset reporting and not this specific detail.
Has anybody actually been audited on these 5500 forms for a one-person plan? I'm late filing mine and freaking out a bit about penalties. What's the realistic chance the IRS actually cares about a small solo 401k form being filed a few weeks late?
I was about 3 months late filing mine last year and did get a notice with a proposed penalty. I called and explained that as a small business owner I wasn't aware of the requirement, and they actually waived the penalty completely. I think first-time abatement is pretty common. Just don't ignore it!
That's a relief to hear! Did you have to submit anything in writing or was the phone call enough to get the penalty waived? I'm about 6 weeks late at this point.
Just to add another data point - I actually did exactly what you're describing about 2 years ago. I had approximately $215k in my Roth 401k (about $120k contributions) and rolled it to my existing Roth IRA which had about $35k (with $25k being contributions). After the rollover, my contribution basis was properly tracked as $145k total. I needed money for a medical emergency about 3 months later and was able to withdraw $52k without any tax consequences or penalties. The key is making sure your 401k plan administrator correctly reports the contribution portion of your rollover. My plan provided a statement breaking down the contributions vs. earnings portions, which I kept for my records. When I filed my taxes the following year, everything worked as expected - no issues.
That's really helpful to hear a real-world example! Did you have to do anything special on your tax return to document the rollover and subsequent withdrawal? And did your 401k plan administrator automatically provide that contribution/earnings breakdown, or did you have to specifically request it?
You'll receive a 1099-R from your 401k provider showing the total distribution, and you'll need to report the rollover on your tax return. For the withdrawal, you'll get a 1099-R from your IRA custodian the following year. I didn't need to file any special forms since my withdrawal was less than my total contributions, but I did keep detailed records of my basis. My plan administrator provided the contribution/earnings breakdown automatically as part of the distribution paperwork. If yours doesn't, definitely request it - you need this documentation to establish your basis. Some administrators have this readily available, while others might require you to specifically ask for a "distribution statement showing contribution and earnings portions.
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - while the ordering rules do work as everyone's described (contributions come out first), be careful about one detail: the timing! If you roll over your Roth 401k to a NEW Roth IRA (rather than one you've had for 5+ years), you might still face the 5-year rule on qualified distributions of EARNINGS. Contributions can still come out anytime, but if you're trying to access earnings within 5 years of establishing your FIRST Roth IRA, those earnings would be subject to tax/penalty even if you're over 59.5. The 5-year clock for earnings starts when you open your first Roth IRA, not when you do the rollover. This trips up a lot of people who wait until retirement to open their first Roth account.
Wait I'm confused. So if I open my first ever Roth IRA today at age 55, then immediately roll over my Roth 401k that I've had for 20 years, I still have to wait until age 60 to access the earnings tax-free even though I'll be past 59.5?
That's exactly right. The 5-year rule for Roth IRA earnings requires that your first Roth IRA was established at least 5 tax years ago AND you're 59½ or meet another exception (disability, first-time home purchase, etc.). So in your example, if you open your first Roth IRA at 55 and roll over your 20-year Roth 401k, you could access all the contribution portions immediately without tax or penalty. However, for the earnings to come out tax-free, you'd need to wait until both: 1) you're 59½ (which you already are), and 2) it's been 5 tax years since you established your first Roth IRA - so that would be at age 60.
CosmicCaptain
Just FYI on the H&R Block Tax Pro Go service - I used it last year. The upfront pricing was accurate for me ($199), but I think that's because I was super detailed in the questionnaire. My tax pro was knowledgeable and found some deductions I would've missed. The only annoying part was that after I got my return, they kept sending me emails about audit protection services for an additional fee. Felt a bit pushy. Overall though, the actual tax preparation was good and saved me time.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
ā¢Was the process of uploading documents easy? And did they contact you with questions or just handle everything behind the scenes? Thanks for sharing your experience!
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
ā¢The document upload process was pretty straightforward - they have a secure portal where you can drag and drop files or take pictures with your phone. They categorize everything for you. My tax pro did contact me twice with questions. Once about some business expenses that needed clarification and another time about my home office deduction. The communication was all through their messaging system in the portal. After I answered those questions, they completed everything within about 3 days. Then they sent a draft for me to review before filing. I appreciated that they didn't just make assumptions and actually took the time to verify things they were unsure about.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
Has anyone compared H&R Block Tax Pro Go to the similar TurboTax Live Full Service? Trying to decide between them and the pricing seems similar.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
ā¢I've used both. TurboTax Live Full Service was slightly more expensive ($229 vs $199 for H&R Block) but I found their interface more user-friendly. The tax pros seemed about the same level of expertise at both places. Main difference was TurboTax had more available time slots for video reviews where you could actually see/talk to your preparer.
0 coins