


Ask the community...
Has anyone considered that this might be due to the bank itself? Sometimes banks hold a portion of large government deposits for 1-2 business days as a fraud prevention measure. This happened to me last year where my pending deposit showed about $700 less than my actual refund amount, but the full amount posted after it cleared. Might be worth calling your bank to check their policy on large government deposits.
I hadn't thought of that! I'll call our bank today to check. That would be such a relief if it's just their standard procedure. Did your bank give you any trouble when you called about it?
No trouble at all when I called. The customer service rep explained it was standard procedure for deposits over a certain amount. They actually have an automated system that flags larger deposits for a brief review period. In my case, they said it was because the deposit was significantly larger than my usual direct deposits. The rep confirmed that the full amount would be available within 48 hours, and it was. Just be sure to speak with someone in their deposit operations department rather than a general customer service rep, as they'll have more specific information about how deposits are processed.
Double check if you had any tax prep fees taken out of your refund. I used TurboTax this year and opted to have the $89 fee taken from my refund rather than paying upfront. The transcript showed the full amount but my bank deposit was $89 less. Plus they charged an additional $40 "processing fee" for this service which I somehow missed in the fine print. So it was actually $129 less than my transcript showed.
This! The processing fees for refund transfers are ridiculous. I got hit with this last year - H&R Block charged me $35 for the basic prep fee plus a $40 "refund transfer fee" for the privilege of having the fee taken from my refund. It's basically a very expensive short-term loan when you think about it.
I dealt with almost this exact situation last year. One important thing to add to your response letter: be VERY clear about the timeline. The IRS is strict about the "before the tax filing deadline" requirement for returned contributions. Make sure you explicitly state: 1. When you made the original contributions 2. When you discovered they were ineligible 3. The exact date you withdrew the funds 4. The filing deadline that applied to you that year (including any extensions) In my case, I included a calendar with these dates highlighted and it seemed to help. Also, label all your supporting documents clearly (e.g., "Exhibit A: IRA Contribution Statement," "Exhibit B: Complete Distribution Statement") and reference them specifically in your letter. Makes it much easier for the IRS agent reviewing your case.
Should OP also mention that they paid the 10% early withdrawal penalty on the earnings? Seems like that might be another point in their favor showing they were following the rules correctly.
Yes, absolutely mention the 10% penalty payment! That's a great point. The fact that you correctly calculated and paid the 10% penalty on just the earnings portion demonstrates you understood and followed the rules. Actually, this detail is very important because it shows you were aware of the tax treatment difference between the returned contributions (not taxable) and the earnings (taxable with penalty). It helps establish that your reporting wasn't an oversight but a deliberate application of the correct tax rules.
Has anyone else noticed that the IRS seems to be sending out way more CP2000 notices the last few years? I've gotten two in the past three years for totally different issues, and both times they were wrong. I'm wondering if their automated matching system is just flagging more returns without human review first.
Yes! My tax preparer told me the IRS is relying more heavily on automated systems due to staffing shortages. Apparently their computers just match documents like 1099s to what's on your return, and if there's any discrepancy, they automatically generate a CP2000 without anyone checking if there might be a valid explanation. It's frustrating because then the burden is on us to explain situations like OP's that are actually completely legitimate.
Don't forget that even if you're the custodial parent and qualify for HOH, you can still give your ex the right to claim the children as dependents using Form 8332. My ex and I do this - I file as HOH since the kids live with me, but we alternate years for who claims them as dependents for the child tax credit. Helps keep the peace and feels fair since we both contribute financially.
That's really helpful, thanks! Do you still get any tax benefits in the years when your ex claims the kids? And did you have to update your W-4 at work to account for this arrangement?
You still get the benefit of filing as Head of Household even in years when your ex claims the kids as dependents. This gives you better tax rates and a higher standard deduction than filing as single. You can also still claim certain credits that are based on your expenses for the children, like the child care credit if you paid for daycare or after-school care. I did adjust my W-4 to account for this arrangement. On years when I don't claim the kids, I have a bit more tax withheld to avoid a surprise bill at tax time. It's definitely worth sitting down with the IRS withholding calculator each year to make sure your withholding aligns with your actual tax situation.
Has anyone used TurboTax to figure this out? I'm in a similar situation and wondering if the software helps determine head of household eligibility or if I need to go to an actual tax professional this year.
I used TurboTax last year after my divorce. It asks you a series of questions about custody arrangements and living situations to determine if you qualify for HOH. It was pretty thorough, but I still ended up talking to a tax pro to double-check since the penalties for filing incorrectly can be steep.
I work with a lot of foster-to-adopt families, and this situation comes up more than you'd think. Another important thing to consider is whether your son had any other income during those first 5 months. If he did, and it's above the filing threshold, he'll definitely need to file his own return regardless of his dependent status. Also, make sure you look into whether you qualify for the adoption tax credit. Even though he's over 18, if he was determined by a state to have "special needs" (which many former foster youth are), you might qualify for the full credit without having to document expenses.
He did have a part-time job for those first few months making about $4,800. So it sounds like he'll definitely need to file his own return then? And yes, we're looking into the adoption tax credit - he does have the special needs determination from the state.
Yes, with that income he'll need to file his own return. Since you're claiming him as a dependent, he'll check the box on his return indicating "Someone can claim you as a dependent." This will limit some deductions/credits he can claim, but he'll still reconcile his own premium tax credit for the months he was covered under the ACA plan. For the adoption tax credit, that's excellent news about the special needs determination. With that classification, you should qualify for the full credit amount (over $15,000 for 2025) without having to document your actual expenses. This is a non-refundable credit but it can carry forward for up to 5 years if you can't use it all in one year.
Has anyone dealt with changing marketplace coverage mid-year due to adoption? We got a notification that we needed to update our marketplace application, but we're not sure what happens if we do or don't.
Yes! This is super important. Once your family situation changes (like through adoption), you need to update your marketplace application right away. If you don't, and subsidies continue to be paid based on old information, you might have to repay them at tax time. For the original poster - if your son didn't update his marketplace coverage after being adopted, there might be an issue with subsidies paid after May. Those would potentially be subject to repayment since his household income calculation would include yours after the adoption.
Amina Diallo
Don't overlook retirement contributions! With your promotion, you might be in a higher tax bracket now. Maximizing your 401k will lower your taxable income. If you qualify for a Roth IRA, that's also worth considering for tax-free growth. And since you have freelance income, you could potentially open a SEP IRA or Solo 401k to shelter even more money from taxes.
0 coins
StarSeeker
ā¢Thanks for bringing this up! Do you know what the income limits are for Roth IRA contributions? Also, for the SEP IRA, can I contribute to that even if I have a 401k through my main employer?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
ā¢For 2025, you can fully contribute to a Roth IRA if your modified adjusted gross income is less than $146,000 (single) or $230,000 (married filing jointly). The contribution limit phases out above those amounts until it reaches zero. Yes, you absolutely can contribute to a SEP IRA even if you have a 401k through your employer. The SEP IRA contribution is based only on your self-employment income. The limit is 25% of your net self-employment earnings, up to $69,000 for 2025. It's a great way to reduce taxes on your freelance income while saving for retirement.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
Has anyone used a HSA as part of their tax strategy? I've heard it's like a "triple tax advantage" but I'm not sure if I qualify or how much it would help.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
ā¢HSAs are awesome! Triple tax advantage is right - money goes in tax-free, grows tax-free, and comes out tax-free for medical expenses. For 2025, you can contribute up to $4,150 for individual coverage or $8,300 for family coverage. But you need a qualifying high-deductible health plan to be eligible. Check if your plan is HSA-eligible - the deductible needs to be at least $1,500 for individuals or $3,000 for families.
0 coins