


Ask the community...
Just wanted to add my two cents as someone who's been running a small town transportation business for 3 years. Go with the LLC 100%. I started as a partnership and switched after a passenger threatened to sue when they tripped getting out of my car (nothing came of it, but scared me straight). The tax filing is identical either way (Form 1065), but the peace of mind knowing my house isn't on the line is worth the $100 annual fee my state charges. Also, banks and insurance companies took me more seriously as an LLC - got better rates on commercial insurance too.
That's really helpful to hear from someone who's already doing something similar! Did you find it complicated to switch from partnership to LLC after you'd already started? I'm worried about setting up something and then having to change it later.
It wasn't too bad switching from partnership to LLC, but definitely created some extra paperwork I could have avoided by starting with the LLC. I had to formally dissolve the partnership, file new paperwork for the LLC, get a new EIN, open new business bank accounts, and update all my insurance policies and client contracts. The whole process took about a month and cost around $500 including state fees and having my accountant update everything. Would have been much simpler to just start with the LLC from day one. The annual maintenance is super easy though - just a simple form and fee in my state. Your state might be different, so check your secretary of state's website for the specific requirements.
Has anyone used QuickBooks Self-Employed for a small driving service like this? Trying to figure out if it's worth the subscription vs just using spreadsheets for tracking mileage and expenses.
I use it for my handyman business and it's great for tracking mileage automatically. The app uses GPS to track your trips and you just swipe business vs personal. At the end of the year it calculates all your mileage deductions automatically. Definitely worth it if you're driving a lot for business.
Don't sleep on OLT.com (OnLine Taxes). It's under $50 for federal + state, and handles investment sales, 1099s, etc. Interface isn't fancy but gets the job done. Been using it for 5 years with similar tax situation to yours.
Have you used it for reporting inherited stocks? That's the part that's tripping me up with my grandma's investments. Need to make sure I get the cost basis right.
Yes, I've used it for inherited stocks. It handles the stepped-up basis correctly - there's a specific section where you can indicate the shares were inherited and enter the fair market value on the date of death as your basis. It also has a surprisingly helpful help section that explains the inheritance rules clearly. Way better than some of the more expensive options I tried previously that made this unnecessarily complicated.
anybody have thoughts on TaxHawk? its basically freetaxusa with a different name... might work for you if youre having specific issues with the freetaxusa interface but still want the same basic system?
As someone who works in payroll, I can explain what's happening. Most payroll systems use one of two methods: the aggregate method or the per-period method. With the aggregate method, the system looks at year-to-date earnings and adjusts withholding accordingly. This works better for variable income. With the per-period method, each check is treated separately and "annualized" - so if you work one day, it still withholds as though that's your typical check, resulting in massive over-withholding. Ask your wife's employer which method they use. If it's per-period, she needs to complete a new W-4 that accounts for her ACTUAL expected annual income, not what one check multiplied by pay periods would suggest.
Thanks for the explanation! Do you know if there's any legal requirement for which method employers use? And would switching to a salaried position solve this problem, or would we still have issues if she took unpaid time off?
There's no legal requirement for which withholding calculation method employers use - it's usually determined by whatever payroll software they've implemented. Some systems allow changing the method, but many smaller employers are locked into whatever their provider offers. Switching to a salaried position would generally solve this problem since salary typically means consistent paychecks regardless of hours worked (within reason). Even with unpaid time off, most salary calculations are more consistent with withholding. However, part-time salaried positions are relatively uncommon in pharmacy settings. Another option is to ask if they can set up a "minimum withholding" arrangement where taxes never exceed a certain percentage of gross pay.
My advice - check your wife's paycheck carefully for other deductions. I had this same issue and found out they were also taking healthcare premiums, retirement contributions, and garnishments for student loans all out of one tiny check! I thought it was all taxes but it wasn't.
This is smart advice! My paycheck once went to zero and I assumed it was taxes, but it turned out they were taking uniform fees, health insurance for the whole month, and a retirement loan repayment all from one small check. Worth investigating all deductions!
One important thing to check is whether you became eligible for tax treaty benefits in 2021 that you weren't eligible for in 2020. For many J-1 visa holders, tax treaties have specific time limits and income thresholds. For example, with the US-India tax treaty, research scholars can exclude a certain amount of compensation, but there are specific rules about when this applies. You might have crossed into eligibility in your second year. Ask your university's international tax specialist (not regular payroll) specifically about "Article 22" of the US-India tax treaty and whether that's why you're receiving a 1042-S this year. That's frequently the relevant section for researchers.
That's super helpful! I just checked, and Article 22 does mention something about a "two-year period" for researchers. Could that be related to why I'm only getting the 1042-S in my second year? I'll definitely ask about this specifically.
Yes, that's exactly it! Article 22 of the US-India tax treaty allows for tax exemption on income received for teaching or research, but there are specific timing provisions. The exemption typically applies for a period not exceeding two years from the date of your first arrival. What likely happened is that your university initially treated all your income as taxable in the first year, but in your second year, they realized you qualified for the treaty benefit and are now properly splitting your income between fully taxable wages (W-2) and treaty-exempt income (1042-S). This is actually good news, as it likely means a portion of your income will be exempt from US taxation. But it does make your tax filing more complex since you'll need to properly report both the W-2 and 1042-S on your tax return.
I know this thread is about 1042-S, but does anyone have recommendations for good tax software that handles both W-2 and 1042-S for non-residents? I used to use Sprintax but found it expensive.
I've used both Sprintax and GlacierTax for my international student returns. Glacier tends to be a bit cheaper and handles 1042-S forms well. Many universities even have partnerships with them to give students/scholars discounts.
Sofia Torres
Something to be aware of: if the financial institution already reported the transaction to the IRS as a taxable event using a 1099-R, they are required to issue a corrected 1099-R (often called a 1099-R with the "CORRECTED" box checked). Simply changing their internal paperwork doesn't fix the issue with the IRS. Also, for future reference for anyone inheriting annuities: always be extremely clear about requesting a "direct trustee-to-trustee transfer" not a "rollover" when moving inherited annuity funds. Get confirmation in writing before the transaction processes, and if possible, have the receiving institution initiate the transfer rather than the sending institution.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
ā¢Is there a time limit on when a financial institution can issue a corrected 1099-R? My mom's situation happened almost 2 years ago and we're just now discovering the mistake.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
ā¢There's technically no specific time limit for a financial institution to issue a corrected 1099-R. They can (and should) correct erroneous information even years later. For your situation with your mom, you generally have 3 years from the original filing deadline to file an amended return to correct mistakes. So even at 2 years out, you still have time to get this fixed. The financial institution may be resistant since it creates extra work for them, but they are obligated to provide accurate tax reporting. Be persistent and escalate to management if needed.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
Has anyone successfully had the IRS waive penalties and interest in a situation like this? I got the financial institution to admit their error, but the IRS is still charging me penalties and interest on the "deficiency" even though they agree I don't owe the base tax anymore.
0 coins
Ava Rodriguez
ā¢Yes, I had success getting penalties (but not all interest) waived by requesting penalty abatement due to reasonable cause. I explained that the error was made by the financial institution, not me, and provided their admission letter. The IRS has discretion here and often waives penalties when you can prove the error wasn't your fault.
0 coins