Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I think everyone is overlooking something important here. If your mother is still alive, why not just deed the property back to her and let HER sell it directly? Then she could distribute the money however she wants without you being in the middle. This would eliminate your tax liability completely since you wouldn't be the seller. I had to do something similar with my grandfather's property a few years ago - we realized the tax implications of the gift to me were bad, so we reversed it before selling.
That would have been a good option, but it's too late now - I already sold the property about 6 months ago. I was just hoping there might be a way to avoid getting stuck with a big tax bill since I was basically just following my mom's instructions and didn't keep any of the profits.
That's unfortunate timing. For future reference (or for anyone else reading this thread), always consult with a tax professional BEFORE making property transfers between family members. These transactions are complex and can have significant tax consequences. Since the sale has already happened, your best option now is probably to gather all documentation showing that you were acting on your mother's behalf. While this doesn't eliminate your tax liability, good documentation might help if there's ever an audit. Make sure you have the quitclaim deed, documentation of the original basis (purchase price plus improvements), the sales contract, and proof that you transferred the proceeds to your mother and other family members.
Couldn't the OP potentially argue this was a "step transaction" where they were essentially just acting as an agent for their mother? Since the mother is still alive and OP immediately gave all the money back to her and the other family members per her instructions, maybe the IRS would consider the mother the true seller?
The step transaction doctrine actually might work against OP in this case. The IRS could view the series of transactions (mother gifts to OP, OP sells and distributes money) as an attempt to avoid proper tax treatment. Since the legal ownership was transferred to OP before the sale, OP is technically the seller for tax purposes. The subsequent distribution of funds is considered separate. This arrangement actually creates more tax complications than if the mother had sold it directly and then gifted portions of the proceeds. What might help OP's case is documenting that they were acting under a power of attorney or as a fiduciary for their mother, but that would need to have been established properly before these transactions occurred.
Join the conversation
In my experience as someone who's worked in tax prep before, I can tell you that many tax preparers at the chain locations are seasonal employees who've taken a basic tax course. They're trained to handle common scenarios but often miss specialized rules like the married filing separately Roth IRA limitation. If you're dealing with something like retirement account contribution issues, you really need either a CPA or an Enrolled Agent who specializes in that area. The difference in knowledge and expertise is huge. For fixing your previous years, I'd recommend: 1) Determine which tax years you need to address (generally the last 3 years can be amended) 2) Calculate the excess contributions for each year 3) Contact your IRA custodian about removing excess contributions 4) File Form 5329 for each year to report the excess contributions 5) Consider whether filing amended returns to change from MFS to MFJ makes sense
This is really helpful, thank you! Do you think it's better to amend the returns to married filing jointly or just remove the excess contributions? We've been filing separately because my spouse has an income-based student loan repayment plan, so filing jointly would increase those payments. But maybe the Roth IRA penalties would be worse?
Whether to amend to MFJ or remove excess contributions depends on your complete financial picture. You need to calculate both scenarios to see which costs less overall. For the student loan consideration, calculate how much the income-based payments would increase if filing jointly versus the cost of Roth IRA penalties (6% per year on excess contributions) plus any potential tax benefits lost by filing separately. Sometimes it's cheaper to pay higher student loan payments for a year than pay IRS penalties and miss out on tax credits only available to joint filers. This is definitely a situation where running the numbers both ways is essential before deciding.
Has anyone actually received a penalty notice from the IRS specifically for excess Roth contributions while married filing separately? I've been doing this for 3 years not knowing about the limit, and now I'm worried but haven't received any notices.
Yes, I got hit with this exact situation last year. The IRS sent me a CP2000 notice about unreported income, and during that review, they flagged my Roth contributions while I was MFS with income over $10k. Ended up with penalties for 3 years of contributions plus interest. It was a mess to clean up, so I recommend being proactive before they find it.
Join the conversation
22 A lot of insurance agents don't fully understand the tax implications of their products. When I surrendered my policy, the agent told me "you might have to pay taxes on it" but couldn't explain how much would be taxable. Quick rule of thumb: you pay taxes on (what you get) minus (what you put in). The insurance company should send you a 1099-R form that will show the taxable amount, but it's good to understand how it's calculated so you can verify it's correct. Sometimes insurance companies make mistakes too.
10 Is there any way to reduce the tax hit? I'm thinking about surrendering a policy but worried about having to pay a lot in taxes. Can I roll it over into something else tax-free?
22 Yes, you have a couple options to potentially reduce or defer the tax impact. If your policy qualifies, you could do what's called a 1035 exchange into an annuity or another life insurance policy. This allows you to transfer the cash value without triggering immediate taxation. Another option is to see if your policy allows for partial surrenders over multiple tax years instead of taking all the money at once. This can spread the tax liability across different years and potentially keep you in a lower tax bracket. Just be aware that each partial surrender can affect your overall basis calculation in complex ways.
15 Has anyone ever dealt with surrender fees when cancelling a whole life policy? I'm in a similar situation but my policy shows I'll lose about 12% of the value to surrender charges. Wondering if those fees are tax deductible since they reduce what I actually receive.
9 Unfortunately, surrender fees typically aren't tax deductible. They're just considered a reduction in your proceeds. So if your surrender value is $5,000 but you only get $4,400 after surrender charges, you'll only pay taxes on the gain based on the $4,400 you actually receive (minus your basis).
Join the conversation
One option nobody's mentioned is to just redesignate that transfer retroactively. I'm also an S-Corp owner and my accountant told me I can document that initial transfer as a "shareholder advance" that will be counted toward my reasonable salary when I run payroll. Basically, you're pre-paying yourself, and when you run payroll, you just need to account for taxes and issue yourself a smaller net paycheck since you've already received most of the money. Just make sure your payroll service knows how to handle this correctly, and you'll need good documentation. I do this regularly - take money when I need it, then formalize it through payroll later.
Is this really legit though? Don't you have to run actual payroll with proper tax withholdings at the time you take the money? I've been stressing about making sure everything is by-the-book with my new S-Corp.
This is absolutely legitimate as long as you properly document and account for everything. When you run payroll, you'll calculate the full gross salary amount, withhold all required taxes, and then reduce the net check by the amount you already advanced yourself. For example, if your reasonable salary is $5,000 monthly and you already took $3,000 as an advance, when you run payroll, you'll still calculate taxes on the full $5,000, but the net check would only be around $2,000 (minus the taxes on the full amount). This ensures all proper employment taxes are paid on your full reasonable compensation. Just make sure your payroll system can handle this "adjustment" or "reimbursement" properly.
My CPA told me this isn't actually as big a deal as people make it out to be for a new S-Corp with only a few months of operation. As long as you establish a reasonable salary before the end of the tax year and properly document everything, minor sequence mistakes in your first year typically won't trigger an audit. The reasonable compensation test is primarily looking at the entire tax year picture, not whether you took a specific distribution a few weeks before establishing payroll. Just don't make it a habit going forward!
Agreed! I did something similar my first year and my accountant just had me document everything carefully. The important thing is the year-end picture looks right. S-Corps get in trouble when they take massive distributions and tiny salaries over the course of entire years, not when they make minor timing errors while learning the ropes.
Dmitry Petrov
Don't forget that to qualify for Head of Household, your child must be a "qualifying person" which generally means they need to be your child by birth, adoption, or they lived with you for more than half the year. And you need to provide more than half their support. But it sounds like with an 8 year old daughter you're all good! Just make sure you're not married filing jointly - that's an automatic disqualification for HoH status.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Thank you for mentioning that! Yes, she's my biological daughter and lives with me full-time (her mom isn't in the picture). I'm definitely not married - been single for years now. I pay for everything related to her care and our home. Sounds like I'm on the right track then? This is such a relief!
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•Yes, you're definitely on the right track! With your daughter living with you full-time and you providing all her support, you're a textbook case for Head of Household filing status. And don't worry too much about making small mistakes - the IRS generally focuses on major issues like unreported income or fraudulent claims. An honest mistake about a dependent's income being $0 when it should be a few dollars of interest wouldn't trigger anything serious. Just answer the questions truthfully as you go through your tax software.
0 coins
StarSurfer
Make sure u keep receipts for household expenses in case u get audited! My sister got audited 2 yrs ago for her Head of Household claim and they wanted proof she paid more than half the home expenses. She had to scramble to find old utility bills, rent receipts, grocery receipts etc. Better safe than sorry!!
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•How far back should you keep those records? I've been filing HoH for 3 years now but haven't kept great documentation.
0 coins