


Ask the community...
Just a heads up on the AMT credit recovery strategy - if your income fluctuates year to year, you might want to time when you claim these credits. In years when your income is higher, your regular tax is more likely to exceed your AMT, allowing you to recover more of those credits. I've been carrying forward AMT credits from ISOs for 3 years now and have recovered about 70% by being strategic about timing. Don't forget Form 8801 needs to be filed every year until your credits are used up, even in years when you don't recover any portion of them.
Any recommendations on what income level typically makes it worth claiming? I'm in a similar situation with about $12k in AMT credits but not sure if my $110k salary will trigger enough regular tax to recover anything.
At $110k, you'll likely recover some of your credits, but it depends on your deductions, filing status, and other factors. If you're single with standard deduction, you'd probably begin to recover credits at that income level. Generally, I've found that married couples often need $150k+ combined income before recovering significant AMT credits, while singles can start seeing benefits around $90-100k. Consider consulting with a tax pro for a year-by-year projection based on your specific situation.
Has anyone here done a disqualifying disposition of ISO shares after paying AMT? I'm in a similar situation but thinking about selling my shares within a year of exercise. Trying to understand the tax implications.
If you do a disqualifying disposition (selling before meeting holding requirements), it gets even more complex. The good news is you'll generally receive an AMT income adjustment that can help recover some of your AMT in the year of sale. The bad news is you'll pay ordinary income rates on the spread instead of capital gains rates.
The same thing happened to me and my wife! We owed $3,200 filing jointly but would've gotten about $900 each filing separately. We talked to our accountant and she said it was because: 1) Our withholding wasn't enough for our combined income 2) We both had selected "married" on our W-4s which assumes one main income 3) We had some investment income that pushed us into a higher bracket She suggested we adjust our withholding using the IRS calculator and possibly make quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid the same issue next year.
Can you actually switch from MFJ to MFS after you've already filed? I'm in the same boat and wondering if I should amend.
Yes, you can switch from married filing jointly to married filing separately by filing an amended return (Form 1040-X), but only until the filing deadline for that tax year. After the deadline passes, you can't switch from joint to separate. However, my accountant actually advised against switching in our case. While it looked like we'd get refunds filing separately based on a simple calculation, we would have lost several valuable credits and deductions that are only available to joint filers. The separate filing calculation also has some special limitations that aren't obvious when you just run a basic comparison. Make sure you're looking at the complete picture before making that decision.
The software you used to calculate your taxes separately might not be showing you the full picture. When filing separately, there are several disadvantages: - You can't claim Earned Income Credit - You can't claim education credits like the American Opportunity or Lifetime Learning Credits - You can't exclude interest from savings bonds used for education - If one spouse itemizes, both must itemize even if the standard deduction would be better for one - IRA contribution deductions might be reduced or eliminated - Child and dependent care credit is usually reduced Try running the full calculation with these limitations and see if separate filing still looks better. Software sometimes doesn't apply all these restrictions when you're just exploring options.
Is this still true with the new tax law? I thought they changed some of this stuff.
Former tax preparer here - one thing nobody's mentioned yet is that you should also check your state requirements. If you're in Louisiana (as you mentioned), they typically follow the federal extension deadline but you might need to file a separate state extension form. Also, if you have access to your prior year's tax return, one simple approach is to estimate based on last year's numbers plus add 20-30% for your crypto activities. This gives you a reasonable starting point that the IRS would consider a good faith effort.
Thanks, that's a good point about state requirements. My situation is actually a bit different from last year since I had a big job change plus the crypto stuff, so I'm not sure if last year's return would be helpful as a baseline. What other approaches would you suggest for estimating?
Since your situation changed significantly with both a job change and crypto, you're right that last year's return might not be as helpful. In that case, I'd suggest doing a quick calculation of your W-2 income and estimated tax liability from that (you can find tax tables online), then add an additional amount for crypto. For the crypto portion, even a rough estimate based on your trading volume would help. If you traded $10,000 in crypto with an average gain of 20%, you might set aside roughly 25-30% of those gains ($500-600) for taxes as a starting point. It's not perfect, but it shows good faith effort.
Just FYI - I messed up my extension last year by leaving the estimated tax blank thinking I would figure it out later. Bad move! Ended up with over $700 in penalties and interest even though I paid the full amount when I actually filed. The IRS doesn't play around with this stuff.
Same happened to my brother! He trades crypto too and just put $0 on his extension form thinking it was just a time extension. He ended up owing about $4k in taxes plus another $800 in penalties and interest. Definitely better to overestimate.
Sounds like they're confusing a W-9 with a 1099. As a bookkeeper for small businesses, I see this mix-up ALL THE TIME. Here's what's probably happening: 1. They need your W-9 form (which you fill out with your name, address, and tax ID) 2. They use that W-9 info to create your 1099 3. They send the 1099 to you AND to the IRS If they're a small company or new to hiring contractors, they might have the terminology wrong. Just send them a completed W-9 and gently explain that they'll use that to create your 1099 at the end of the year.
Thanks for breaking it down so clearly! I've never filled out a W-9 before. Is there anything tricky about it that I should watch out for?
The W-9 is actually pretty straightforward. The main things to be careful about: Make sure you're using the current version of the form from IRS.gov - it's occasionally updated. Fill in your legal name (as shown on your tax return), not a business name unless you have one registered. For most independent contractors, you'll check the "Individual/sole proprietor" box. The trickiest part is deciding whether to provide your SSN or an EIN (Employer Identification Number). If you're just working as yourself, your SSN is fine. If you've set up a formal business structure, you might have an EIN to use instead.
lol this happens ALL the time. half these companies dont even know the proper tax procedures. I've been a freelancer for 5 years and at least once a year someone asks me to "send them my 1099" when what they mean is "send us your W-9" so they can MAKE a 1099. When companies pay independent contractors $600+, THEY have to send 1099s to both the contractor AND the IRS. You literally CAN'T send them a 1099 because you didn't pay them - they paid you!
This is why I use QuickBooks Self-Employed - it explains all this stuff and tells you what forms you need vs what forms others should give you. Helped me avoid so many headaches with clients who dont understand contractor taxes.
LongPeri
Don't forget that if you're filing Schedule C for the business (which you probably are with a single-member LLC), you'll also need to complete Schedule SE for self-employment tax. The withholding payments from the payroll company for the owner are actually estimated tax payments, not traditional withholding like you'd see on a W-2. Make sure you're separating the business owner's draws/payments from the employee payroll. Only the employees should have traditional withholding.
0 coins
Oscar O'Neil
ā¢Is this still true if the LLC owner is on payroll too? Like if they're getting a W-2 from their own company?
0 coins
LongPeri
ā¢No, that changes things significantly. If the LLC owner is receiving a W-2 from the business (putting themselves on payroll), then they're treating the LLC as an S-Corp for tax purposes, not a single-member LLC with pass-through taxation. In that case, the owner's W-2 would have withholding just like any employee, and those withholdings would be credited automatically when you enter the W-2 in TurboTax. The business would still file its own return (typically Form 1120-S for an S-Corp), and the owner would receive a K-1 for their share of profits beyond their salary.
0 coins
Sara Hellquiem
If your husband is the only owner of the LLC, did you elect S-corp taxation? Because that would completely change how this all works. With S-corp status, he should be on payroll like a regular employee with withholding that would show up on a W-2 that gets entered directly into TurboTax.
0 coins
Charlee Coleman
ā¢Not the OP but our accountant recommended we switch to S-corp status once our profits hit about $40k annually. The savings on self-employment tax were worth the extra paperwork.
0 coins