Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For a one cent discrepancy, I'd honestly just pay it through the IRS Direct Pay website and be done with it. Takes 5 minutes, no fee for using a bank account, and you'll get confirmation that your account is settled. I had something similar happen (mine was $0.37) and just paid it online. Haven't heard anything since, so I assume it's all good!
Carmen Diaz
ā¢Does the IRS payment system even accept payments as low as one cent? I'm wondering if there's a minimum amount you can pay through their online system.
Yes, the IRS Direct Pay system will accept payments of any amount, even just one cent. There's no minimum payment requirement. When you enter the payment amount, you can put in $0.01 and it will process it normally. The system might seem like it would have a minimum, but it's designed to handle any tax liability amount, no matter how small. Just make sure you select the correct tax year and form when making the payment so it gets applied correctly to your account.
Whatever you do, don't ignore it! Even though it's just a penny, it's still technically a tax debt that will stay in their system. I ignored a small adjustment once (it was around $3) thinking it was too small to matter, and a year later received a notice with interest and a $25 failure-to-pay penalty added. That $3 turned into almost $30! The IRS computers don't care about the amount - once you're flagged for owing money, the automated processes just keep running.
Really? They added penalties for such a small amount? That seems excessive and almost malicious on the IRS's part. Did you try calling to get the penalties removed?
Join the conversation
Just a heads up for anyone filing - if your income is over certain thresholds, the Child Tax Credit starts to phase out. For single filers, it starts reducing when your modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000. Could that possibly be affecting your amount? The credit reduces by $50 for each $1,000 above the threshold. Might be worth checking if your income jumped more than you realized.
Jibriel Kohn
ā¢Thanks for mentioning this! I double checked and my income is definitely well below that threshold (I wish I made that much lol). I'm making about $52,000 a year, so phaseout isn't the issue. Sounds like it's just the expiration of that temporary increase like others mentioned. Really hoping they bring back the higher amount!
Charlie Yang
Has anyone tried using different tax software to see if you get different results? Last year I switched from TurboTax to H&R Block online and somehow got an extra $420 back. Might be worth trying a different service to see if they calculate things differently or find additional credits.
Grace Patel
ā¢That's not how taxes work. If you got different results, one of them calculated something wrong. The tax laws are the same regardless of which software you use. You might have entered something differently between the two programs. Different software doesn't give you access to different credits - you either qualify or you don't.
Join the conversation
I attended a tax update webinar last week where they specifically addressed section 174. The speaker (from one of the Big 4 firms) said there's bipartisan support for changing the R&E capitalization rules, but legislative action is still uncertain. Their recommendation was to continue compliance with current capitalization requirements while monitoring for updates. They specifically mentioned that the definition of "research and experimental expenditures" hasn't changed - only the tax treatment. So activities qualifying as R&E before TCJA still qualify now, but instead of immediate expensing, they require capitalization and amortization.
Jacob Lewis
ā¢Did they give any timeline for potential changes? I'm wondering if I should delay some research initiatives to 2025 if there's a chance the rules might revert back to allowing immediate expensing.
They were very careful not to predict any specific timeline for legislative changes, noting that previous attempts to modify section 174 had stalled despite apparent bipartisan support. Their advice was to make business decisions based on current law rather than speculation about future changes. The speaker specifically cautioned against delaying legitimate business activities solely for tax purposes, pointing out that even if the law changes, there's no guarantee it would be retroactive or when exactly it would take effect. They emphasized that the business needs should drive research timing, with tax considerations being secondary.
Does anyone know how IRS is handling enforcement of section 174 capitalization? Are they actively auditing this area? My firm has always expensed R&D and im worried we might be targeted if we mess up the new capitalization requirements.
Liam Brown
ā¢The IRS has been gradually increasing enforcement in this area as the rules have been in effect for a few tax cycles now. Initially there was some leniency due to the significant change, but they're becoming more attentive to proper section 174 compliance.
Join the conversation
If you want something that will really engage people, do a presentation on tax subsidies for stadiums and sports venues. I did this for my tax policy class and it was a hit. You can cover: - How the tax-exempt municipal bond financing works - The economic studies showing these are usually bad investments for cities - The politics behind these deals (always juicy) - Case studies of successful vs. failed projects - Recent changes from the 2017 TCJA that limited some of these subsidies Tons of research available, and everybody has opinions about their local teams and whether taxpayers should subsidize billionaire owners. Great for generating discussion!
Did you find good quantitative sources for this? I'm interested in the topic but worried it might be too anecdotal without solid numbers to support the analysis.
Yes, there's excellent quantitative research available! The Brookings Institution has published several data-driven studies on stadium financing and economic impacts. There's also a comprehensive paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis that analyzes dozens of stadium projects with detailed financial metrics. For your presentation, I'd recommend using the Congressional Research Service report that breaks down the tax subsidy costs at the federal level - it has great charts showing the effective taxpayer contribution to various stadiums built in the last 20 years. These sources provide plenty of hard numbers to support the policy analysis.
For a law school presentation, I'd strongly recommend focusing on recent Treasury regulations implementing a major tax provision - like the TCJA's Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) provisions or the Qualified Business Income deduction.
Miguel Diaz
ā¢GILTI is interesting but might be too complex for a student presentation unless you're already familiar with international tax. QBI might be more accessible if you're not a tax specialist.
Amina Toure
Pro tip from someone who deals with this regularly: call your state tax agency directly rather than focusing on the IRS. The IRS just processes the offset - they don't actually have details about the underlying debt. When you call your state, ask specifically for the "offset resolution department" or "refund intercept team" - using those exact terms helps get you to the right people faster.
0 coins
Oliver Weber
ā¢This is great advice! I wasted so much time with the IRS when I had an offset. The state tax people were much more helpful and could actually make adjustments to the underlying debt.
0 coins
FireflyDreams
Just to add another perspective - check if your state has a Taxpayer Advocate Service. When we had an offset situation last year, our state advocate was able to put a temporary hold on collections while we worked out a payment plan. They even helped identify an error in the calculation that reduced our debt by almost $800!
0 coins