IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

NebulaNinja

•

Just a quick tip from experience: make sure to get a qualified appraisal of your property value at the time of conversion from rental to personal use. I didn't do this when I converted my rental in 2018, and it became a major headache during my 2022 sale. The IRS questioned my stated value during an audit, and I had nothing concrete to back it up. I ended up having to hire a real estate expert to retroactively analyze what the property would have been worth, which cost me over $2,000 plus a lot of stress. Even with that, I still had to compromise on the value with the IRS auditor. Document everything at the time of conversion!

0 coins

Is there a specific form for documenting the fair market value at conversion? Or is it just something you keep in your records in case of audit?

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

There's no specific IRS form for documenting the FMV at conversion. The key is having strong substantiation in your records. Ideally, you'd get a formal appraisal at the time of conversion and keep that with your tax records. If you didn't get an appraisal, gather whatever evidence you can - comparable sales listings from around your conversion date, property tax assessments, insurance valuations, or even photos showing the condition of the property. The goal is having documentation created at or near the time of conversion, not something produced years later when you're selling.

0 coins

Has anyone dealt with reporting unallowed passive activity losses that span multiple years? I've got about $29k in passive losses from my rental property spread across 6 different tax years. When selling, do I lump them all together on one form or need to itemize by year?

0 coins

You'll report the total accumulated unallowed passive losses on Form 8582 in the year of sale. You don't need to itemize by individual years on your tax forms. However, you should have worksheets from your prior year returns that tracked these losses year by year. Keep those in your records in case of audit.

0 coins

My MIL withdrew wife's Coverdell ESA as disbursement for son's 529 - now hit with 1099-Q tax bill. Help!

So we're in a bit of a mess with an education account situation. My wife's parents had set up a Coverdell ESA for her years ago that never got used during her college years. It just sat there accumulating funds - ended up with around $17,000 in it. We recently had our first child and started looking into college savings options. I remembered reading that Coverdell ESAs can be transferred to other family members tax-free, specifically descendants of the original beneficiary. Perfect solution for our son, right? I suggested to my mother-in-law that we could transfer the funds directly to our son's 529 plan we had just set up. She claimed she talked to both her account servicer and a CPA who told her the only option was to take a full disbursement to herself first. This sounded completely wrong to me. I kept asking about direct transfers, rollovers, or trustee-to-trustee options - basically any term I could think of that would avoid taxes. I tried explaining this multiple times. When I realized I wasn't getting anywhere, I specifically asked her to hold back about $4,000 from the $17,000 to cover the inevitable taxes. She ignored this advice completely, took the full distribution, and deposited all of it into our son's 529 plan. Now we've received a 1099-Q with my wife's SSN on it, addressed to my mother-in-law with "FBO" (for benefit of) my wife. I'm assuming we're on the hook for taxes on the earnings portion of this distribution since it wasn't handled as a proper transfer. Anyone dealt with something similar or know how bad this tax hit might be? Are there any options to fix this mess?

Yara Sayegh

•

Wait, I'm confused about something. Does the $17k contribution to the 529 count against the annual gift tax exclusion? I thought there were limits to how much you can put in these accounts each year without filing gift tax forms.

0 coins

Normally yes, 529 contributions are subject to gift tax limits (currently $17,000 per donor per recipient annually without filing a gift tax return). However, qualified rollovers from one education account to another are exempt from these limits. Since this was a rollover from a Coverdell ESA to a 529 for a qualifying family member, it doesn't count against the annual gift tax exclusion - it's treated as a transfer of an already-existing education benefit rather than a new gift. That's one of the many advantages of doing a proper rollover rather than taking a distribution and making a new contribution.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

The issue might be even simpler than everyone's making it. The 1099-Q doesn't automatically mean you owe taxes. Box 1 shows the gross distribution, Box 2 shows the earnings portion, and Box 3 shows the basis (original contributions). Only the earnings portion is potentially taxable, and only if not used for qualified education expenses. Since you rolled it into another qualified education account (the 529) within 60 days, you shouldn't owe taxes on any of it. When you file your taxes, you'll need to report the distribution, but you'll also report that the entire amount was used for qualified education purposes (the rollover to another education account counts as qualified). This zeroes out any potential tax liability. Common tax software like TurboTax and H&R Block have specific sections for handling education distributions - just make sure you indicate that 100% was used for qualified expenses.

0 coins

Avery Flores

•

Don't overlook the non-tax benefits of different states too! I went with a Nevada trust not just for tax reasons but also because they have stronger asset protection laws and longer perpetuities periods (basically how long the trust can last). Delaware has excellent trust laws but still has some state taxes in certain situations. South Dakota combines zero state income tax with excellent asset protection. Alaska allows self-settled asset protection trusts if that's important to you. Really depends what's most important for your situation - tax savings, creditor protection, privacy, or flexibility for future generations.

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

Are there any gotchas with these out-of-state trusts? Like do you need to visit that state regularly or have some connection to it? Just trying to understand if there are hidden downsides.

0 coins

Avery Flores

•

Yes, there are definitely some potential "gotchas" to be aware of. First, you'll need some legitimate connection to the state - typically this means having a trustee (individual or corporate) who resides in or has a significant presence in that state. Simply naming a friend who lives there isn't usually sufficient. The second big consideration is ongoing administration costs. Out-of-state trusts often require hiring a professional trustee or trust company in that state, which can cost anywhere from $2,500-$8,000 annually depending on the complexity and trust assets. For smaller trusts, these fees might outweigh the tax benefits.

0 coins

Zoe Gonzalez

•

Has anyone compared the costs of setting up trusts in different states? I got a quote from my attorney for a basic revocable living trust in my home state (Illinois) for $2,800, but when I asked about creating it in Nevada, the price jumped to $4,500 plus ongoing fees for a Nevada trustee.

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

I did some shopping around for a South Dakota trust last year. Initial setup with a decent trust attorney was about $5k, then annual trustee fees with a SD trust company were $3k. But I was putting significant assets in it ($3M+) so the math worked out in the long run. Probably not worth it for smaller estates.

0 coins

I'm curious - why not just formalize the partnership and make it official? Even with an undocumented partner, you can have a legit partnership with an ITIN holder. You'd both be protected that way.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

Creating a formal partnership with an undocumented person doesn't magically solve immigration issues. There are complicated legal implications beyond just taxes. Some business structures could create bigger problems.

0 coins

Honestly, this whole situation sounds really risky. The undocumented partner could end up with serious problems if this isn't handled right. I'd suggest talking to an immigration attorney BEFORE a tax professional.

0 coins

Not really helpful. People in mixed-status partnerships still need to handle their taxes properly. Tax compliance is separate from immigration issues, and staying tax compliant is actually important regardless of status.

0 coins

You're right, my comment wasn't very helpful. I was coming from a place of concern but didn't express it well. Tax compliance is definitely important and separate from immigration matters. The IRS has specifically created systems like ITINs to ensure everyone can meet their tax obligations regardless of status.

0 coins

Joy Olmedo

•

Another option to consider is using a checkbook IRA LLC structure. I set this up for my real estate investments and it provides some additional flexibility. The IRA owns the LLC, and the LLC owns the property. You still need to be careful about UBIT, but the structure can sometimes make management easier. For what it's worth, my CPA advised that modest improvements to raw land that prepare it for its intended investment purpose might not trigger UBIT, but extensive development likely would. The line between improvement and development isn't always clear, which is what makes this complicated.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

I've heard about the checkbook IRA LLC approach but wasn't sure if it actually helps with the UBIT issue or just makes property management easier. Does the LLC structure actually change how the IRS views development activities for UBIT purposes?

0 coins

Joy Olmedo

•

The LLC structure by itself doesn't eliminate UBIT concerns. The IRS looks through the LLC to the underlying activity. The main advantage is operational flexibility - you can manage the property without going through the custodian for every transaction. Regarding UBIT specifically, the LLC doesn't change the fundamental rules about what constitutes a business activity versus an investment. What it can do is give you more control over how activities are structured and documented, which might help in borderline cases. For example, you can more easily document the investment purpose of improvements if you're managing the books directly.

0 coins

Isaiah Cross

•

You might want to consider using a prohibited transaction to get the property out of your IRA before you develop it. I know that sounds crazy, but hear me out. If you intentionally cause a prohibited transaction with your IRA (like personally using the property briefly), the IRS will consider the entire IRA distributed to you. You'll pay taxes on the full value plus penalties if you're under 59½, but then the property is yours personally, and future development won't trigger UBIT. This is obviously an extreme approach that only makes sense in specific circumstances, but I've seen people use it strategically when the tax hit now would be less than potential UBIT issues later.

0 coins

Kiara Greene

•

That's playing with fire! Intentional prohibited transactions can have consequences beyond just the taxes and penalties. The IRS doesn't look kindly on deliberate end-runs around the rules. I'd be super cautious about this approach.

0 coins

Prev1...40284029403040314032...5643Next