IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Everett Tutum

โ€ข

Have you checked out the IRS Direct File program? It's new this year and completely free. I think it's limited to certain states for now, but worth checking if yours is included. It handles basic investment income including Schedule B without charging.

0 coins

I just looked it up and unfortunately my state isn't included in the Direct File pilot program yet. Seems like it could be a good option in the future though! I'll probably go with one of the free alternatives mentioned here instead of paying for TurboTax.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

โ€ข

I've been using FreeTaxUSA for years and it handles Schedule B no problem. Federal is completely free regardless of which forms you need. They only charge like $15 for state filing. Way cheaper than TurboTax or H&R Block's "upgrades.

0 coins

Hugh Intensity

โ€ข

Is FreeTaxUSA actually reliable? I'm always worried about using less well-known tax software. Do they have good support if you have questions?

0 coins

Mei Zhang

โ€ข

Just want to add - I'm a delivery driver too and I track all my car expenses with the Stride app. Even if you can't deduct the insurance directly, you could just take the standard mileage deduction instead (65.5 cents per mile for 2023). That covers gas, insurance, depreciation, everything. Way easier than tracking actual expenses and you don't need to worry about whose name is on what.

0 coins

Liam McGuire

โ€ข

Does the standard mileage rate usually work out better than tracking actual expenses? My car is pretty old and fuel efficient but I'm driving a TON for deliveries.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

โ€ข

In my experience, standard mileage usually works out better for newer cars or fuel-efficient vehicles. I drive about 25,000 miles a year for deliveries in a 2018 Corolla, and the standard deduction gives me around $16,000+ in deductions which is way more than I'd get itemizing. For older vehicles that might need more repairs or gas guzzlers, tracking actual expenses could potentially be better. The key is to try calculating both ways for a month and see which gives you the bigger deduction. Just remember if you choose actual expenses in the first year, you're generally stuck with that method for the life of that vehicle.

0 coins

Amara Eze

โ€ข

Wait, I'm confused on one thing - are you saying you personally drive the car, but the insurance is in your brother's name? Or is it his car too? Because if it's your car but just his insurance policy, that seems like a major insurance problem regardless of taxes. Insurance follows the car AND driver, and if you're the primary driver but not listed, they might deny claims anyway.

0 coins

Giovanni Ricci

โ€ข

This is actually a really good point. I worked in insurance for years and this arrangement could potentially void the insurance coverage entirely. Most policies require that the regular drivers be listed, and if there's a claim and they discover misrepresentation, they can deny everything.

0 coins

One thing to consider that I didn't see mentioned yet - if you're in a community property state, this gets even more complicated. My spouse and I were in a similar student loan situation, and we had to figure out who could claim our son while dealing with Arizona's community property laws. In community property states (AZ, CA, ID, LA, NV, NM, TX, WA, WI), income and deductions may need to be split 50/50 regardless of who earned what. This creates another layer of complexity for the married filing separately strategy.

0 coins

StardustSeeker

โ€ข

Thanks for bringing this up! We're in Pennsylvania, which isn't a community property state. Do you know if there are any specific state-level considerations for non-community property states that might affect our decision?

0 coins

For non-community property states like Pennsylvania, you generally report income and deductions based on which spouse actually earned the income or paid the expense, which is much simpler. The main state-level consideration would be your state tax rules around dependent exemptions or credits. Some states have their own child tax credits or dependent exemptions that might have different phase-out thresholds than the federal ones. Pennsylvania specifically has a relatively simple income tax system with a flat rate, but you should check if there are any dependent-related benefits at the state level that might influence your decision about who claims your daughter.

0 coins

Ravi Patel

โ€ข

I'm surprised nobody mentioned the earned income tax credit. If the lower-earning spouse (husband in this case) claims the child, they might qualify for EITC, which you can't get if you file MFS. Might be worth running the numbers on filing separately vs jointly just to see the full picture.

0 coins

Freya Andersen

โ€ข

The Earned Income Tax Credit isn't available for married filing separately status - it's one of the credits you give up when you choose MFS. They'd need to file jointly to claim it, which defeats the purpose of keeping the student loan payments lower.

0 coins

Don't forget about Section 179! Depending on how you structure things and how much you use the vehicle for business, you might be able to take advantage of that rather than regular depreciation. We did this for our company truck that has our logo plastered all over it. BUT - and this is a BIG but - the vehicle has to be used for business purposes more than 50% of the time.

0 coins

Aiden O'Connor

โ€ข

Does Section 179 still apply with the luxury auto limits though? I thought those kicked in regardless of whether you use 179 or regular depreciation.

0 coins

You're absolutely right about the luxury auto limits - they do still apply even with Section 179 deductions. So there's a cap on how much you can deduct each year regardless of which method you choose. What's important to note is that with Section 179, you can deduct a larger amount in the first year rather than spreading it out over several years with regular depreciation. But as you mentioned, there are still annual limits for passenger vehicles regardless of which method you use. For 2025, those limits are pretty restrictive for higher-end vehicles, which is something to seriously consider when making this purchase.

0 coins

One thing no one's mentioned yet is insurance implications. When I started using my personal car for business advertising, my insurance company required me to get a different policy that was more expensive. Make sure you factor that into your calculations when deciding if this is worth it!

0 coins

Jamal Brown

โ€ข

This is really good advice. My brother put his lawn care company logo on his truck and then got into a minor fender bender. Insurance company gave him trouble because he hadn't disclosed it was being used for business purposes. Cost him a ton in the end.

0 coins

Tax Planning for ISO vs NSO Options Exercise - Need Strategic Advice

I recently left a startup I joined about 7 years ago. Started when they were just getting seed funding, and now they've completed Series D. Still probably a couple years from any IPO/exit, but who knows in this market. Over my time there, I accumulated several option grants: - First grant: completely vested NSO options (wasn't brought on as regular employee initially) - Grants 2-4: partially vested ISO options I haven't exercised any options during my employment. The company has a generous 4-year post-departure exercise window (thank goodness), but there's a catch - all my ISOs will automatically convert to NSOs in 3 months due to IRS regulations. The math is giving me a headache. When I calculated exercising, I discovered the NSO package (my largest since it's fully vested) would trigger serious tax withholding requirements, almost equal to what I'd pay for the actual exercise. That makes it really expensive right now. I understand exercising ISOs affects AMT calculation, but I'm pretty sure I'm well below the AMT threshold currently (just regular W2 income, no other significant revenue sources or assets). Assuming my understanding is correct (please tell me if I'm missing something), here are my options: 1. Exercise just the ISOs now, leave the NSOs for later (either at exit or before the 4-year window closes) 2. Do nothing now, let ISOs convert to NSOs, then exercise everything only if/when exit happens or near the 4-year deadline 3. Exercise everything now despite the cost (dip into savings to cover the tax withholding, with the logic that future funding rounds will increase valuation/FMV and create even larger tax bills later) 4. Some hybrid approach What's the smartest tax strategy here? Am I thinking about this correctly?

Mateo Martinez

โ€ข

Have you considered doing a cashless exercise for the NSOs? Some companies allow this where they'll essentially loan you the exercise cost and tax withholding then immediately sell enough shares to cover those costs. Means you don't need cash upfront and can still keep most of the shares. For the ISOs, if you're sure you're under the AMT threshold, I'd definitely exercise before they convert. Once they become NSOs, you lose the potential for long-term capital gains treatment on the spread.

0 coins

QuantumQueen

โ€ข

Careful with the cashless exercise suggestion - that only works if the company is publicly traded or has some kind of secondary market for the shares. Sounds like OP's company is still private with no immediate IPO plans.

0 coins

Mateo Martinez

โ€ข

Good point about the cashless exercise - I was assuming there might be a secondary market since it's a Series D company, but you're right that it's not guaranteed. Another option to consider is a net exercise if the company allows it. With a net exercise, you surrender some of your options to cover the exercise cost, so you get fewer shares but don't have to put up any cash. Won't help with the tax withholding for NSOs though.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

โ€ข

Anyone recommend a good tax professional who specializes in equity compensation? My accountant seems completely lost when it comes to ISO/NSO rules and AMT implications.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

โ€ข

I've had good luck with The Startup CPA (thinkthis.com). Not cheap but they actually understand equity compensation and saved me a ton on AMT planning. Worth the fee considering how much is at stake with these decisions.

0 coins

Prev1...39483949395039513952...5643Next