Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Welcome to the community! I've been dealing with similar family farm tax situations for years, and your confusion is completely understandable - these transactions can be tricky to classify correctly. From what you've described, this really sounds like it should be treated as a gift rather than taxable income. The key factors supporting this are: you have no documented ownership in the farm or cattle, no formal employment relationship, and your parents explicitly characterized this as a "thank you" for past help rather than compensation for specific services. Your CPA's questions about "basis" and "capital gains" make perfect sense - they were checking whether you might have had some ownership interest that would require capital gains treatment when the cattle were sold. Since you clearly didn't own the cattle, those concepts don't apply here. The most important next step is coordinating with your parents about how they're handling this $4,300 on their Schedule F farm return. If they're treating it as a non-deductible personal expense (which would be correct for a gift), then you definitely shouldn't report it as income. The IRS expects consistency between related parties on these types of transactions. Since you already filed with this as miscellaneous income, you might want to discuss with your CPA whether an amended return makes sense to correct the classification. At $4,300, you're well under the 2025 annual gift exclusion of $19,000 per person, so there are no gift tax implications for anyone involved.
This is really helpful guidance, Ethan! As someone who's brand new to this community and trying to understand agricultural tax issues for the first time, your explanation really clarifies the key factors I should be considering. The coordination point with my parents' Schedule F reporting is something I definitely overlooked initially. I was so focused on figuring out my own tax treatment that I didn't think about how their side of the transaction should align with mine. If they're treating the $4,300 as a personal gift rather than a deductible business expense, then reporting it as income on my end would create exactly the kind of inconsistency the IRS flags. I'm planning to have that conversation with my parents this week to understand how they handled it, and then work with my CPA on whether we need to amend my return. The reassurance about being well under the gift exclusion threshold is also helpful - it confirms we're in safe territory from a gift tax perspective. Thanks for explaining why my CPA was asking about basis and capital gains. It makes much more sense now that they were just being thorough and checking all the possible classifications before landing on the right one. Really appreciate the clear breakdown of the key factors!
Welcome to the community! As someone who's dealt with similar family farm situations, I can definitely understand your confusion about how to classify this payment. Based on your description, this really sounds like it should be treated as a gift rather than taxable income. The key factors that support this classification are: 1) You have no documented ownership stake in the farm or cattle 2) There's no formal employment relationship or business arrangement 3) Your parents explicitly characterized this as a "thank you" for past help 4) This appears to be a one-time payment rather than ongoing compensation 5) At $4,300, you're well under the 2025 annual gift exclusion of $19,000 per person Your CPA was asking about "basis" and "capital gains" because they were trying to determine if you had any ownership interest in the cattle that would require different tax treatment. Since you clearly didn't own the animals, those concepts don't apply to your situation. The most critical step now is coordinating with your parents about how they're handling this payment on their Schedule F farm return. If they're treating the $4,300 as a non-deductible personal expense (which would be correct for a gift), then you definitely shouldn't report it as income either. The IRS expects consistency between related parties on these transactions. Since you already filed reporting this as miscellaneous income, you should discuss with your CPA whether an amended return makes sense to correct the classification. It's better to get it right now than potentially face questions later about the inconsistency between how you and your parents are treating the same transaction.
Join the conversation
I dealt with this exact situation last year with my HSA through Bank of America. The key thing that helped me was creating a detailed spreadsheet tracking my contributions by date and the corresponding investment performance for each batch. What I did was go back through my HSA statements and identify exactly when I made the excess contribution (let's say it was my last $500 contribution in November). Then I tracked how my investments performed from that date forward until I discovered the issue. The pro-rata method others mentioned is correct, but I found it helpful to also document everything step-by-step in case the IRS ever questions it. I kept screenshots of my account balances, contribution dates, and the final calculation. One tip: when you call your HSA provider, specifically use the phrase "return of excess contributions with net income attributable" - this is the exact terminology they need to hear to process it correctly for tax reporting purposes. Don't let them just process it as a regular distribution or you'll get hit with taxes and penalties you shouldn't owe. The whole process took about 3 weeks from calculation to getting the money back, but it was worth doing it right to avoid tax headaches later.
This is super helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and hadn't thought about creating a detailed spreadsheet to track everything. The tip about using the specific phrase "return of excess contributions with net income attributable" is gold - I bet that's why I keep getting transferred around when I call my provider. Quick question - did you have to provide Bank of America with your own calculations or did they do the pro-rata calculation themselves once you used the right terminology? I'm worried about getting the math wrong and then having issues down the road.
Bank of America actually did the calculation themselves once I used that specific phrase! I provided my own calculations as backup documentation, but their HSA specialist walked through the pro-rata method with me on the phone to verify we got the same numbers. The key was getting to someone who actually understood HSA excess contribution rules. The first two reps I talked to had no clue what I was asking for, but once I got transferred to their HSA department and used that exact terminology, the specialist knew immediately what needed to be done. I'd still recommend doing your own calculation first so you can double-check their math, but having them do the official calculation gives you more confidence that it's being processed correctly for tax purposes. Plus they handle all the proper reporting codes automatically.
I just went through this nightmare with my HSA provider a few months ago! The key is to be very persistent and document everything. Here's what worked for me: First, calculate the pro-rata earnings yourself using the method Paolo described above - it's actually not that complicated once you understand it. Write down your calculation with dates and amounts. Then when you call your HSA provider, don't accept "we can't help you" as an answer. Ask to speak to a supervisor or HSA specialist. I had to call three times before getting someone who actually knew how to process excess contribution returns properly. Most importantly, get everything in writing! Ask them to email you confirmation of the withdrawal amount and that it's being coded as a "return of excess contributions" rather than a regular distribution. This is crucial for tax reporting. One thing to watch out for - some providers will try to just process a regular withdrawal and tell you to "sort it out with taxes later." Don't accept this! It needs to be coded correctly from the start or you'll have major headaches come tax time. The whole process is frustrating but totally doable if you stay organized and persistent. Good luck!
This is exactly the kind of detailed advice I needed! I'm dealing with this situation right now and my HSA provider keeps giving me the runaround. The tip about getting everything in writing is especially important - I made the mistake of just accepting a verbal confirmation on my first attempt and then had to start all over again when nothing was processed correctly. One question - when you say "return of excess contributions" needs to be the specific coding, does that show up differently on your tax forms? I want to make sure I understand what to look for when I get my 1099 next year to verify they did it right. Also, did you end up having to file any additional forms with the IRS beyond your regular tax return, or does the proper coding from the HSA provider handle all the reporting automatically?
Join the conversation
One often overlooked issue with PTPs is how suspended losses affect your situation when selling. If you've received K-1s with losses that were suspended due to passive activity or at-risk rules, those suspended losses become deductible when you completely dispose of your interest. But for your scenario #2 (sell and rebuy), you technically haven't fully disposed of your interest for tax purposes if you rebuy within the same year. This means those suspended losses remain suspended despite the sale transaction. For the UBTI reporting on line 20V, death transfers can be especially confusing. Technically, the UBTI character passes through to the heir, but the step-up in basis can reduce future UBTI by giving you a higher basis to offset against UBTI income.
I thought suspended losses were released when you sell regardless of whether you rebuy later. Like each transaction stands on its own? My accountant told me this was one advantage of partnership interests over S-Corps.
You're partially right, but it depends on the specific type of suspended losses. For passive activity losses, you generally do get to deduct them when you completely dispose of your entire interest in the activity. However, if you sell and then rebuy the same partnership within the same tax year, the IRS might view this as not being a complete disposition, especially if it appears to be part of a planned series of transactions. At-risk limitations work differently - those suspended losses are released when you dispose of your interest, but they're calculated based on your at-risk amount at the time of disposition. The timing of a rebuy within the same year could affect this calculation. Your accountant is right that partnership interests generally have more favorable suspended loss rules compared to S-Corp stock, but the sell/rebuy scenario creates some gray areas that aren't always clear-cut. The key is whether the IRS views your transactions as a genuine disposition or just a temporary restructuring of the same economic interest.
The relationship between capital accounts and UBTI/income allocation you mentioned is spot-on, and there's actually a specific reason for this. Partnerships are required to allocate items in accordance with partners' interests in the partnership, which is primarily determined by capital account balances under Section 704(b) regulations. When your capital account becomes more negative (through distributions exceeding your basis), your economic interest in future partnership income decreases proportionally. This is why you see lower per-unit income and UBTI when capital accounts are more negative - you're essentially getting a smaller slice of the same pie. For your death scenario question, there's an important distinction many people miss: while the step-up in basis applies to the fair market value of the PTP units, it doesn't directly reset your capital account with the partnership. The partnership maintains its own records of your capital account, which continues to reflect the cumulative income, losses, and distributions. However, for tax purposes, your new stepped-up basis can significantly reduce or eliminate the taxable gain when the inherited PTPs are eventually sold. One practical tip: if you're actively trading PTPs, keep detailed records of your holding periods and corresponding K-1 amounts. The partnerships' quarterly ownership snapshots mean your K-1 might not perfectly match your actual trading activity, and you'll need to be able to support any adjustments on your return.
This is really helpful context about the Section 704(b) regulations and how capital accounts drive the allocation mechanics. I'm curious though - when you mention that the step-up in basis doesn't reset the partnership's capital account records, does this create ongoing complications for heirs? For example, if someone inherits PTP units with a large negative capital account but gets stepped-up basis, would they still be subject to the same proportionally lower income/UBTI allocations going forward? Or does the partnership eventually adjust their capital account tracking to reflect the new economic reality after the step-up? I'm trying to understand if there's a disconnect between what the partnership shows on future K-1s versus the heir's actual tax basis for calculating gains/losses on eventual sale.
Join the conversation
I'm going through the exact same situation! Filed my Michigan state return in early April and I'm currently at 7 weeks stuck in review with absolutely no communication from them. Like so many others here, my federal refund came through in under 3 weeks with no problems, but Michigan just shows that same frustrating "under review" message every time I check. What's really getting to me is the complete lack of transparency - no explanation of what's being reviewed, no timeline estimates, nothing. I've been religiously checking my mail thinking I might have missed a notice, but there's been total silence from Michigan Treasury. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been both eye-opening and honestly pretty depressing. It's clear that 8-12+ weeks has unfortunately become the "new normal" this year, which is completely unacceptable. We shouldn't have to wait months for our own money while they provide zero accountability! I'm definitely going to try the secure messaging through Michigan Treasury Online that so many people have recommended since the phone system sounds like a complete waste of time. It's ridiculous that we have to become detective-researchers just to figure out how to get our own refunds from the state. Thanks Emma for starting this thread - it's both comforting and infuriating to see how many of us are dealing with Michigan's broken system. At least we know we're not alone in this mess, even though none of us should have to endure it. Hoping we all get our money soon! 🤞
I'm going through the exact same thing! Filed my Michigan state return in late April and I'm currently at 5 weeks in review status with zero explanation. Like everyone else here, my federal refund came through quickly but Michigan just keeps showing that generic "under review" message. What's really frustrating is the complete lack of communication - no letter, no timeline, nothing. I've been checking my mail constantly but haven't received anything requesting additional documentation. After reading through all these experiences, it seems like 8-12+ weeks has become the unfortunate norm this year, which is absolutely ridiculous. We shouldn't have to wait months for our own money! I'm definitely going to try the secure messaging through Michigan Treasury Online that so many people have mentioned since calling seems pointless. It's crazy that we have to crowdsource solutions just to get our own refunds. Thanks for posting this Emma - it's both reassuring and maddening to see how many of us are stuck in Michigan's broken system. Hopefully we all get our money soon! 🤞
Victoria Charity
This has been such an eye-opening thread! I'm a tax preparer and I see this exact situation all the time - people automatically buying premium tax software when they don't need it. You're absolutely right to question whether Deluxe is worth it for your situation. Based on what you've described, TurboTax Free Edition should handle everything you need. With married filing jointly taking the standard deduction ($25,900 for 2023), your mortgage interest and charitable donations won't provide any tax benefit since they won't exceed that threshold when itemized. The Free Edition covers W-2 income, standard deduction, child tax credits, and limited interest income (which covers regular savings and CD interest). The main things you'd be "missing" from Deluxe are itemized deduction guidance and forms - but since you're taking the standard deduction, those features are irrelevant to your situation. Definitely check out the IRS Free File program first as others have mentioned - if your AGI is under $73,000, you can get the full premium TurboTax experience completely free through the IRS partnership. Just make sure to start at irs.gov/freefile to access it properly. One professional tip: keep records of your mortgage interest and donations anyway for future years, as your situation might change (pay down mortgage = less interest, income changes affecting standard deduction amounts, etc.). But for this year, you're likely overthinking it - free should work perfectly fine!
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Thank you so much for the professional perspective! It's really reassuring to hear from an actual tax preparer that confirms what everyone else has been saying. I feel much more confident about switching to the free version now. Your point about keeping records for future years is really smart - I hadn't thought about how things might change as we pay down our mortgage or if our income situation changes. Even though the records won't help us this year with the standard deduction, it's good practice to maintain them. The IRS Free File program really does seem like the best option based on everyone's feedback. I'm definitely going to start there first and see how it goes. Thanks for taking the time to share your professional insights - it's really helpful to get validation from someone who deals with these situations regularly!
0 coins
Morgan Washington
I've been following this thread and wanted to share my experience as someone who made the switch from Deluxe to free options last year. Like many of you, I was on autopilot buying Deluxe every year for a situation very similar to the original poster's. The math really is straightforward once you break it down: if your itemized deductions (mortgage interest, donations, etc.) don't exceed the standard deduction ($25,900 for married filing jointly in 2023), then there's zero tax benefit to itemizing. I was paying $60+ annually for features I literally couldn't benefit from. I ended up using the IRS Free File program and it was genuinely identical to the Deluxe experience - same interface, same guidance, same forms available - but completely free since our AGI qualified. The key is absolutely starting through irs.gov/freefile rather than going to TurboTax directly. For anyone still hesitant: you can always start with the free version and upgrade later if needed, but based on everyone's descriptions here, upgrading would be unnecessary. The standard deduction exists specifically for situations like ours where itemizing doesn't make financial sense. One last tip: TurboTax will try multiple times during the process to convince you to upgrade with warnings about "missing deductions," but stay strong - if you're taking the standard deduction, those warnings don't apply to your situation.
0 coins