IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Diego Mendoza

•

7 One thing nobody's mentioned yet is that you should check if your foreign contractors might be considered "effectively connected" with a US trade or business. If they're working remotely but technically performing services in the US market (it's complicated), you might have different reporting requirements. I got caught on this when hiring some Canadian freelancers who occasionally came to the US to work on projects. The IRS considered some of their income as US-sourced even though they were Canadian residents.

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

1 That's interesting - can you explain what makes someone "effectively connected" with US business? None of my freelancers ever come to the US physically. Would making YouTube content primarily for US audiences count as connected to US business?

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

7 It's not about the audience being in the US - it's about where the work is physically performed. If your freelancers are never physically present in the US while doing the work, they wouldn't typically be considered to have income effectively connected with a US trade or business. The IRS looks at where the person is physically located when performing the services. Since your contractors are working entirely from their home countries, they should be treated as foreign contractors, requiring W-8BENs but not 1099-NECs. That said, digital services taxation is evolving, so it's worth checking with a tax professional for your specific situation.

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

5 Hey! Something nobody's mentioned - make sure your record-keeping is solid for PAYMENTS too, not just the tax forms. I audit small biz tax returns and see people get hit with penalties bcuz they cant prove how much they actually paid to overseas contractors when asked. PayPal histories can disappear or get limited after certain time periods.

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

22 Good point! What's the best way to maintain those records? Is saving PDFs of PayPal transactions enough, or should I be doing something more formal?

0 coins

GamerGirl99

•

PDF receipts are a good start, but I'd recommend creating a simple spreadsheet that tracks: contractor name, country, payment date, amount, PayPal transaction ID, and what project/service it was for. Export your PayPal data quarterly and back it up in multiple places. The IRS wants to see a clear business purpose for each payment, so having project details documented is crucial. Also keep copies of any invoices the contractors send you - that shows the business relationship clearly.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

One important thing nobody has mentioned - make sure you understand how the title is currently held. Is it joint tenancy? Tenants in common? The way the ownership is structured on the deed makes a huge difference in how the gift tax works. In joint tenancy, each person owns an equal share. With tenants in common, the ownership can be split in any proportion (like 70/30). This affects the gift calculation when someone is removed. I learned this the hard way with my own family property!

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

This is so true. My parents put me on their house title as "joint tenants with rights of survivorship" which had totally different tax implications than if it had been "tenants in common." When we later changed the deed, the specific wording on the original affected everything.

0 coins

Sarah Ali

•

This is definitely a complex situation that requires careful planning. One thing I'd strongly recommend is getting a professional appraisal of the property before any transfers happen. You'll need this to establish the fair market value for gift tax purposes. Also, consider the timing carefully. If your in-laws are older, there might be estate planning benefits to keeping them on the deed versus removing them now. Sometimes it's better from a tax perspective to inherit property rather than receive it as a gift because of the "stepped-up basis" rules. Before making any moves, I'd suggest consulting with both a tax professional and an estate planning attorney. The gift tax implications are just one piece of the puzzle - you also need to consider capital gains tax when you eventually sell, property tax reassessment in your state, and how this affects your in-laws' estate planning. The $375k value minus $220k mortgage leaves $155k in equity. If your in-laws own 50% of that equity, we're talking about a potential $77,500 gift per person, which would require gift tax reporting but likely no actual tax due given the lifetime exemption amounts.

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

This is really helpful advice about getting a professional appraisal! I hadn't thought about the stepped-up basis angle either. Could you explain more about how inheriting property vs receiving it as a gift affects the tax basis? My in-laws are in their late 60s, so this might be something worth considering in our decision-making process. Also, when you mention property tax reassessment - does removing owners from the deed typically trigger a reassessment in most states? We're in California if that makes a difference.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

Great question about the stepped-up basis! When you inherit property, your tax basis becomes the fair market value at the time of inheritance, essentially "stepping up" from what the original owner paid. So if your in-laws bought the house for $200k and it's worth $375k when you inherit it, your basis becomes $375k. If you receive it as a gift, you keep their original basis (around $200k), meaning much higher capital gains tax when you sell. For California specifically - yes, removing owners from a deed can trigger a property tax reassessment under Proposition 13, but there are some family transfer exemptions. The parent-to-child exclusion might not apply here since it's in-laws, but you should definitely check with the county assessor about potential exemptions before making any transfers. California's property tax increases can be substantial, so this could be a major factor in your decision. Given that your in-laws are in their late 60s, the inheritance vs gift decision becomes even more important to analyze with a professional.

0 coins

Eli Butler

•

The IRS website is straight šŸ—‘ļø fr fr... been trying since last week

0 coins

Ryan Kim

•

Have you tried using a different browser or clearing your cache/cookies? Sometimes the IRS site gets glitchy with stored data. Also, if you recently moved or had any address changes with USPS, there might be a mismatch in their system. You could try using your address exactly as it appears on your driver's license or voter registration - sometimes that format works better than the tax return format.

0 coins

Can W2 Employees with a Single Rental Property Still Qualify for Sec 199A QBI Deduction?

I've been wondering if my situation still qualifies for the Section 199A qualified business income deduction. My spouse and I are both W2 employees with one rental property we've owned since 2021. We've been taking the Sec 199A QBI deduction for the past couple years, but we didn't claim safe harbor last year. When this deduction first became available in 2018, it seemed like the general understanding was that W2 earners who own a single rental property would qualify for the QBI deduction. But lately, I've been reading about the safe harbor requirements that mention a 250 documented hour minimum threshold. We use a property management company to handle our rental, but they don't track or document which specific days/hours they're spending working on our particular property or dealing with our tenants. I imagine most property managers don't provide that level of detailed documentation. I still believe we meet the "regularity and continuity coupled with the requirement to have a profit motive" criteria for the rental property. What's everyone else doing in similar situations? Are other small rental owners (with just 1-2 properties) still claiming the standard 199A deduction without the safe harbor, or are people giving up on claiming it altogether? One other thing to note - with depreciation, we're not actually seeing any immediate tax benefits right now. The QBI loss has just been accumulating over time.

Natalie Wang

•

Has anyone had success claiming the Section 199A deduction with multiple properties under an LLC? I'm wondering if organizing my two rentals into an LLC would make qualifying any easier or provide better documentation for the "trade or business" requirement?

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

I have three properties in an LLC, and my tax guy said it makes no difference for 199A qualification. The LLC might help with liability protection, but the IRS looks at the nature of your activities, not the legal structure. You still need to demonstrate regular and continuous involvement with a profit motive, whether you have an LLC or not.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

I'm in a very similar situation - W2 employee with one rental property managed by a property management company. I've been claiming the 199A deduction for the past two years without safe harbor, and my tax preparer assured me it's legitimate as long as I can demonstrate business involvement. What I've been doing is keeping a simple spreadsheet tracking all my rental-related activities - reviewing monthly statements, approving repairs over certain amounts, annual lease renewals, researching local market rates, and even time spent learning about tax law changes that affect my rental business. It probably adds up to way more than 250 hours annually when you include all the decision-making and oversight activities. The key insight my CPA shared is that the safe harbor was created to provide certainty, not to be the exclusive path to qualification. Many established rental property owners were already qualifying under general business principles before the safe harbor even existed. I'd suggest documenting your ongoing involvement going forward - even if it's just a simple log of activities and time spent. The fact that you're actively researching these tax implications and making informed decisions about your rental business already demonstrates the kind of regular, continuous involvement the IRS is looking for.

0 coins

IRS Transcript Shows $5,695 Negative Balance After Code 291 Tax Reduction of $7,812 - What Does This Mean for My Refund?

My transcript is showing a balance of -$5,695.00 with a recent code 291 from November 4, 2024 that reduced my tax assessment by -$7,812.00. I'm confused about what this means for my refund status. Here's what my transcript shows: ACCOUNT BALANCE: -5,695.00 ACCRUED INTEREST: 0.00 AS OF: Nov. 04, 2024 ACCRUED PENALTY: 0.00 AS OF: Nov. 04, 2024 ACCOUNT BALANCE PLUS ACCRUALS (this is not a payoff amount): -5,695.00 INFORMATION FROM THE RETURN OR AS ADJUSTED: EXEMPTIONS: 02 FILING STATUS: Head of Household ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME: 19,171.00 TAXABLE INCOME: 0.00 TAX PER RETURN: 7,812.00 SE TAXABLE INCOME TAXPAYER: 24,329.00 SE TAXABLE INCOME SPOUSE: 0.00 TOTAL SELF EMPLOYMENT TAX: 3,723.00 RETURN DUE DATE OR RETURN RECEIVED DATE (WHICHEVER IS LATER) Apr. 15, 2023 PROCESSING DATE Mar. 18, 2024 TRANSACTIONS: CODE EXPLANATION OF TRANSACTION | CYCLE | DATE | AMOUNT 150 Tax return filed | 20240905 | 03-18-2024 | $7,812.00 76221-438-96765-3 806 W-2 or 1099 withholding | | 04-15-2023 | -$462.00 810 Refund freeze | | 02-16-2023 | $0.00 766 Credit to your account | | 04-15-2023 | -$9,417.00 766 Credit to your account | | 04-15-2023 | -$12,451.00 971 Amended tax return or claim forwarded for processing | | 03-05-2024 | $0.00 977 Amended return filed | | 03-05-2024 | $0.00 33277-471-00650-4 767 Reduced or removed credit to your account | | 04-15-2023 | $12,451.00 767 Reduced or removed credit to your account | | 04-15-2023 | $9,417.00 766 Credit to your account | | 04-15-2023 | -$1,500.00 764 Earned income credit | | 04-15-2023 | -$3,733.00 291 Reduced or removed prior tax assessed | | 11-04-2024 | -$7,812.00 19254-689-05216-4 I'm seeing a lot of back and forth with credits being added and removed on April 15, 2023. There were credits of -$9,417.00 and -$12,451.00 that were added but then later removed on the same day with code 767. I also see credits for earned income credit (code 764) of -$3,733.00 and another credit (code 766) of -$1,500.00. There's W-2/1099 withholding (code 806) of -$462.00 too. My original tax per return was $7,812.00, filed as Head of Household with 2 exemptions. My adjusted gross income was $19,171.00 with self-employment taxable income of $24,329.00 and total self-employment tax of $3,723.00. I filed an amended return (codes 971 and 977) on March 5, 2024, and there was a refund freeze (code 810) back on February 16, 2023. My current account balance shows -$5,695.00 with no accrued interest or penalties as of November 4, 2024. The most recent transaction is code 291 from November 4, 2024 that completely removed my prior tax assessment of $7,812.00. I'm not sure what this means - does this negative balance mean I'm getting a refund of $5,695.00? Can anyone help explain what these transaction codes mean, especially the recent 291 reduction, and what happens next with my account?

Lim Wong

•

Just used taxr.ai for mine and it was spot on about my refund date. Worth every penny tbh

0 coins

Dananyl Lear

•

How accurate was it? My transcripts looking similar

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

predicted my deposit date down to the day! It even caught some issues I didnt notice

0 coins

Ava Kim

•

Code 291 is actually great news for you! It means the IRS has completely reversed your original tax liability of $7,812. This typically happens when an amended return is processed and they determine you didn't actually owe that tax in the first place. Your negative balance of $5,695 does indeed mean you have a refund coming. Here's the breakdown: - Original tax owed: $7,812 - Credits applied: $5,695 (EIC + other credits + withholding) - After code 291 reversal: $0 tax owed - Refund due: $5,695 The refund freeze from 2023 appears to be cleared since there's recent activity. You should see your refund within 2-4 weeks of the November 4th adjustment, assuming no other holds exist on your account. Keep monitoring your transcript for any deposit codes (846) which will show when it's actually sent out.

0 coins

Prev1...37953796379737983799...5643Next