


Ask the community...
As someone who works in payroll (not tax advice), here's what might be happening: Your employer may have changed their withholding tables or reclassified certain benefits from pre-tax to post-tax. This wouldn't be from the LLP structure directly, as that mainly affects how the partners/owners are taxed. Look at your pay stubs from before and after you noticed the change. Check specifically for: - Changes to health insurance premium treatment - 401k or retirement contribution differences - Shift in how bonuses are classified - Different withholding calculations Also, ask if they switched payroll providers. New payroll systems often calculate withholdings differently.
Thanks for the detailed response! I did notice our health insurance section on the paystub looks different than it did a few months ago. Do employers have to notify employees when they make these kinds of changes to how benefits are taxed?
Employers should notify employees about changes to benefit taxation, but the requirements vary by state and the type of benefit. For health insurance specifically, they should provide updated plan documents that explain the tax treatment. However, these notices are often buried in annual enrollment materials or benefit updates that employees might overlook. The best approach is to request documentation from HR about any recent changes to benefit tax treatment. Ask specifically about your health insurance premiums and whether they changed from pre-tax to post-tax deductions. If they made this change without proper notification, you might have recourse through your state's labor department depending on your location.
Hold up - we're all assuming the LLP is doing something sketch, but isn't it possible this is just about the tax law changes? I remember reading something about FICA cap increasing. Could that be what's hitting everyone's paychecks?
Good point. For 2025, the Social Security wage base (the FICA cap) increased to $168,600, up from $160,200 in 2023. This means employees earning above the previous threshold are now paying Social Security tax on a larger portion of their income.
Thanks for confirming! That makes sense. So higher earners would definitely see more coming out of their checks without any shady business practices being involved. Probably worth checking if all the affected coworkers are earning above that previous threshold.
You might also want to keep detailed notes about your interaction with this tax preparer going forward. Write down dates and times of all communications, save emails, etc. If the IRS does question your return, these records will help show that you acted in good faith. Don't let the tax preparer convince you this is normal or "everyone does it" - it's not and they don't. Reputable tax professionals stay within the bounds of what can be legally substantiated. Also, make sure you request a copy of everything they submitted on your behalf if you don't already have it. You need to know exactly what was claimed so you can properly correct it.
Thank you - that's really smart advice. Do you think I should communicate with them in writing about this issue so I have a paper trail? I'm worried if I call, they'll just deny everything.
Yes, absolutely communicate in writing - email is perfect for this. Clearly state what specific expenses you've identified as incorrect and ask for an explanation of where that information came from since you didn't provide it. Be professional but direct, and specifically request that they file a withdrawal of the incorrect return immediately. Keep it factual and avoid accusations or emotional language. Something like: "I've reviewed my tax return and found several business expenses listed that I did not incur and did not report to you. For example, [specific examples]. Please explain the source of this information and what steps you'll take to correct this immediately.
Has anyone used the IRS withdrawal process? Is it even possible to withdraw an efile once it's been submitted? I thought you had to file an amended return instead.
You're right - once an e-filed return has been accepted by the IRS, it can't be withdrawn. The proper procedure is filing an amended return (Form 1040-X). You can request a withdrawal only if the original return was rejected or is still in processing. Since OP mentioned their return was already e-filed, they'll need to go the amendment route. This is actually better in some ways because it creates a clear record of self-correction, which can help demonstrate good faith compliance.
For anyone else with this issue - make sure you're using the latest version of TaxAct. When I first logged in this season, it hadn't updated yet, but after I logged out and back in, it prompted me to update the software and then the 1099-NEC option appeared under Self-Employment income. Also worth noting that if you received both a 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC (like I did), you'll need to enter them separately!
Does anyone know if there's a way to import the 1099-NEC directly from providers? Last year my investment company had direct import for my 1099-MISC but I don't see the option for the NEC form.
Some providers do support direct import for 1099-NEC now, but it really depends on your specific broker or payment platform. In TaxAct, when you go to the import section, look for a list of supported providers - they've been expanding the list. My main client uses Gusto for payroll and their 1099-NEC imported automatically, but my smaller clients who use other services didn't have that option yet. If direct import isn't available, you'll just need to enter it manually - it's pretty straightforward once you find the right section.
I switched from TaxAct to FreeTaxUSA this year specifically because of the 1099-NEC issue. TaxAct was showing me a higher fee to file with a 1099-NEC than I paid last year with a 1099-MISC, which felt like a money grab. FreeTaxUSA handled my three 1099-NECs perfectly and cost way less. Just sharing in case others are frustrated too!
I've had good luck using tax software like TurboTax Self-Employed for filing 1099-NEC forms. Yes, it costs money upfront, but at least they're honest about the pricing. They have a 1099 wizard that walks you through the whole process. Just make sure you get the right version that includes business forms.
Doesn't TurboTax charge extra for each 1099 form though? I heard it's like $15 per form or something, which adds up quick if you have multiple contractors.
The base package includes 5 forms, and yes, they do charge for additional forms beyond that. It's about $12.99 per additional form last I checked. For a small number of contractors it's reasonable, but you're right that it can add up if you have many. The advantage is that everything integrates with your tax return if you're using TurboTax for that too.
Can someone tell me if there's a deadline for getting 1099-NEC forms to contractors vs submitting them to the IRS? I'm also dealing with this fillabletaxforms.com mess and now I'm worried about missing deadlines.
You need to provide 1099-NEC forms to your contractors by January 31, 2025. The same date applies for filing them with the IRS - both are due January 31st, regardless of whether you file electronically or by paper. Missing these deadlines can result in penalties ranging from $50 to $290 per form, depending on how late you file and whether it's considered intentional disregard.
Carmen Vega
Just to add another perspective - I was in a similar situation a couple years ago. The key is really whether you got the full benefit of your state tax deduction the previous year. Did you itemize in 2023? And if so, were you subject to the $10,000 SALT cap? If your total state/local taxes were over $10k but you could only deduct $10k due to the cap, then any refund of those taxes wouldn't be taxable since you never got a tax benefit from them.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
ā¢Yes, I did itemize in 2023 and my total SALT deduction was pretty close to the $10k limit. I think it was around $9,800. Does that mean I should be using Publication 525 instead of the worksheet?
0 coins
Carmen Vega
ā¢Since you itemized and your SALT deduction was close to but under the $10k limit, you should still check both methods. The worksheet is simpler but Publication 525 will give you the most accurate result if any of the special circumstances apply. Since your SALT was under the cap, the main thing to check would be how much your itemized deductions exceeded the standard deduction. If your itemized deductions were only slightly higher than your standard deduction, and your state refund is larger than that difference, then Publication 525 would likely show that not all of your refund is taxable.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
Did you have any other changes to your tax situation between 2023 and 2024? Sometimes things like taking the standard deduction one year and itemizing the next can affect whether you need to use Pub 525.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
ā¢Not OP but I had this exact problem. I itemized in 2022, then took standard deduction in 2023, and got confused about how to handle my state refund in 2024. Publication 525 saved me about $400 in taxes that the worksheet would have had me pay unnecessarily.
0 coins