IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Nia Watson

•

Pro tip: if it was a smaller home daycare, sometimes they use their Social Security Number instead of an EIN. In that case, you would need to put their SSN on Form 2441 instead. Did they ever mention if they were a registered business or just an individual provider?

0 coins

This is important! My sister runs a home daycare and uses her SSN. Lot of smaller providers do this. You'd use their SSN in the same place on form 2441 where you'd normally put an EIN.

0 coins

If nothing else works, just file for an extension to buy yourself more time to track down the EIN. That's what I did when my kids' afterschool program director took off to Belize with no warning! Finally found another parent who had last year's form with the EIN on it. The extension gave me an extra 6 months to sort everything out without penalties.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

Extensions only give you more time to file though, not more time to pay if you owe. Just something to keep in mind. You should still estimate and pay what you think you'll owe by the regular deadline to avoid potential penalties and interest.

0 coins

How can my family's C-Corporation investment company avoid Personal Holding Company (PHC) tax and Accumulated Earnings Tax (AET) legally?

Title: How can my family's C-Corporation investment company avoid Personal Holding Company (PHC) tax and Accumulated Earnings Tax (AET) legally? 1 Our family office recently restructured as a C-Corporation to manage our investments, but I'm concerned about triggering Personal Holding Company (PHC) tax and Accumulated Earnings Tax (AET). My grandfather built a successful manufacturing business that we sold five years ago, and now we're primarily focused on managing that capital through various investment vehicles. The CPA who handles our family's personal returns warned me that our current structure might create tax issues since most of our corporate income comes from dividends, interest, and capital gains. Apparently, if more than 60% of our adjusted ordinary gross income is from these passive sources, and five or fewer individuals own more than 50% of the value of the corporation's stock (which is definitely our case), we could trigger PHC tax. Similarly, we're retaining significant earnings within the corporation (around $9.2 million currently) for future investment opportunities, which could trigger AET issues. I'm trying to understand what legitimate strategies we can implement to avoid these additional tax burdens while maintaining the protection and structure of a C-Corporation. We're not looking for aggressive tax schemes, just practical solutions that other family offices or UHNW individuals might use to navigate these particular tax challenges.

Oliver Cheng

•

5 Has anyone explored using a "brother-sister" corporate structure to address these issues? We're considering creating two separate entities - one holding the passive investments and another providing legitimate business services. I'm wondering about the practical considerations of implementing this approach while maintaining family control.

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

•

19 We actually implemented this structure last year. The key is ensuring the service business entity has genuine economic substance - real clients beyond your family, market-rate compensation, proper documentation, etc. The IRS will scrutinize transactions between related entities, so you need solid transfer pricing documentation for any inter-company services. We maintain separate boards with some overlapping and some independent directors to strengthen the case that these are truly separate businesses. The structure works well but requires significant compliance overhead.

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

•

5 That's really helpful insight. Did you encounter any unexpected challenges with the structure? I'm particularly concerned about whether this might trigger other tax complications we haven't considered yet.

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

•

11 Our tax attorney recommended we establish a detailed shareholder agreement that requires minimum distributions of a certain percentage of earnings each year. This has helped address potential AET issues by demonstrating we're not unreasonably accumulating earnings. Has anyone else implemented something similar or found other governance approaches that help with these tax issues?

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

•

18 We implemented a formal dividend policy that requires distributing at least 30% of annual net income unless the board specifically votes to retain additional earnings for documented business purposes. Our tax attorney suggested documenting the business justification for any retained earnings above that threshold in detailed board minutes. This approach has worked well for us because it creates a presumption that we're not hoarding cash without legitimate business needs. Our accountant said this kind of formal policy demonstrates good corporate governance and makes it easier to defend against potential AET challenges.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Just wanted to add that you should be careful about taxable income from canceled debt. When a lender forgives a debt (which is what a charge-off essentially is), the IRS considers that forgiven amount as income you received. So you DO need to report it on your taxes even if you never get a 1099-C. You can use Form 982 if you qualify for certain exclusions like insolvency (meaning your total debts exceeded your total assets when the debt was forgiven). I learned this the hard way a few years ago and got hit with a huge tax bill plus penalties because I didn't report a charged-off credit card debt. You're much better off being proactive about this!

0 coins

That's really helpful to know about Form 982! I think I might actually qualify for the insolvency exclusion because I was basically underwater on everything when this happened. Is the form complicated to fill out? Do I need to gather a lot of documentation to prove I was insolvent?

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Form 982 isn't terribly complicated, but you do need to calculate your assets and liabilities at the time the debt was canceled to prove insolvency. Make a list of everything you owned (house, car, retirement accounts, checking/savings, etc.) and all your debts (mortgage, car loans, credit cards, student loans, etc.) at that specific time. You'll need to be able to document these values if you're audited, so gather bank statements, loan statements, property assessments, etc. from that period. Keep all this documentation with your tax records. If your total debts exceeded your assets, you can exclude the canceled debt from your income up to the amount you were insolvent.

0 coins

Anyone know if there's a time limit for lenders to issue 1099-Cs? My car loan was charged off in 2018 but I never received anything. Is it too late now?

0 coins

Generally, creditors must issue a 1099-C in the year that they actually cancel the debt (not when you stop paying). Sometimes they hold charged-off debt for years before officially canceling it. They're required to issue the form by January 31 of the year following cancellation. For a 2018 charge-off, they might have actually canceled it in a later year or might still be holding it as an asset. Check your credit report - if the debt still shows as outstanding, they might not have officially canceled it yet. If it shows as "canceled" or "settled," then they should have issued a 1099-C.

0 coins

Sophia Russo

•

Friendly reminder to double-check your filing status and dependents before submitting! I filed right after getting my W-2 last year and completely spaced on updating my filing status after getting married. Had to amend and it delayed my refund by months.

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

•

Did changing your filing status to married filing jointly end up getting you a bigger refund? I got married last October and I'm trying to figure out if we should file separately or together.

0 coins

Sophia Russo

•

In my case, filing jointly definitely resulted in a larger refund. We saved about $2,100 compared to what we would have paid filing separately. The benefits really depend on your specific income situations though. Generally, filing jointly benefits couples where one person earns significantly more than the other. If you both have similar incomes in higher tax brackets, sometimes filing separately works out better. Tax software can usually help you compare both scenarios to see which gives you the better outcome.

0 coins

Does anyone know how long IRS Direct Deposit refunds are taking this year? Got my W-2 yesterday and planning to file this weekend.

0 coins

I filed on February 2nd last year and got my direct deposit exactly 9 days later. The IRS says 21 days is the standard, but direct deposits are usually much faster if you e-file and there are no issues with your return.

0 coins

I'm surprised nobody mentioned this yet - but your ex can still claim your son by filing a paper return instead of electronically. Then you'll BOTH get letters from the IRS asking for documentation to prove who has the right to claim him. The IRS will apply their tiebreaker rules: 1. They look at which parent the child lived with more nights during the year 2. If equal, then they give it to the parent with higher AGI 3. If neither of you are the parent, it goes to the person with the highest AGI So if your ex has documentation showing they were supposed to claim your son this year, you'll end up having to pay it back anyway plus potential penalties. Better to fix it now.

0 coins

Wait, so even with our divorce agreement stating we each claim one kid per year, the IRS might still give both kids to whoever they lived with more? Our custody is 50/50 on paper, but they probably stayed with me slightly more nights because my ex travels for work sometimes.

0 coins

The divorce agreement is a legal document between you and your ex, but the IRS follows their own rules when there's a dispute. So yes, if you had the kids more nights, the IRS might side with you and allow your claims - but that doesn't mean you're not violating your legal agreement with your ex. If you win with the IRS but your claim violates your divorce agreement, your ex can take you to family court for enforcement. The court could order you to pay your ex the difference in tax benefit or could find you in contempt. Some judges take these violations very seriously. That's why it's generally better to follow your agreement even if IRS rules might let you claim both children.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

Something to consider - have you talked to your ex about this situation? I know you mentioned you don't communicate well, but maybe explain your financial hardship and offer to make it up next year by letting them claim both kids? Or perhaps work out some other arrangement to compensate them? I had a somewhat similar situation with my ex, and we managed to work out a deal where I claimed both kids one year when I really needed it, and then he got to claim both the following year. We put it in writing just to be safe. Sometimes being upfront is better than dealing with the fallout later.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

This is actually really good advice. Even if you and your ex don't get along, a direct conversation might avoid a much bigger problem. Courts don't look kindly on violations of divorce agreements, especially financial ones.

0 coins

Prev1...37943795379637973798...5643Next