IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

My MIL withdrew wife's Coverdell ESA as disbursement for son's 529 - now hit with 1099-Q tax bill. Help!

So we're in a bit of a mess with an education account situation. My wife's parents had set up a Coverdell ESA for her years ago that never got used during her college years. It just sat there accumulating funds - ended up with around $17,000 in it. We recently had our first child and started looking into college savings options. I remembered reading that Coverdell ESAs can be transferred to other family members tax-free, specifically descendants of the original beneficiary. Perfect solution for our son, right? I suggested to my mother-in-law that we could transfer the funds directly to our son's 529 plan we had just set up. She claimed she talked to both her account servicer and a CPA who told her the only option was to take a full disbursement to herself first. This sounded completely wrong to me. I kept asking about direct transfers, rollovers, or trustee-to-trustee options - basically any term I could think of that would avoid taxes. I tried explaining this multiple times. When I realized I wasn't getting anywhere, I specifically asked her to hold back about $4,000 from the $17,000 to cover the inevitable taxes. She ignored this advice completely, took the full distribution, and deposited all of it into our son's 529 plan. Now we've received a 1099-Q with my wife's SSN on it, addressed to my mother-in-law with "FBO" (for benefit of) my wife. I'm assuming we're on the hook for taxes on the earnings portion of this distribution since it wasn't handled as a proper transfer. Anyone dealt with something similar or know how bad this tax hit might be? Are there any options to fix this mess?

Yara Sayegh

•

Wait, I'm confused about something. Does the $17k contribution to the 529 count against the annual gift tax exclusion? I thought there were limits to how much you can put in these accounts each year without filing gift tax forms.

0 coins

Normally yes, 529 contributions are subject to gift tax limits (currently $17,000 per donor per recipient annually without filing a gift tax return). However, qualified rollovers from one education account to another are exempt from these limits. Since this was a rollover from a Coverdell ESA to a 529 for a qualifying family member, it doesn't count against the annual gift tax exclusion - it's treated as a transfer of an already-existing education benefit rather than a new gift. That's one of the many advantages of doing a proper rollover rather than taking a distribution and making a new contribution.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

The issue might be even simpler than everyone's making it. The 1099-Q doesn't automatically mean you owe taxes. Box 1 shows the gross distribution, Box 2 shows the earnings portion, and Box 3 shows the basis (original contributions). Only the earnings portion is potentially taxable, and only if not used for qualified education expenses. Since you rolled it into another qualified education account (the 529) within 60 days, you shouldn't owe taxes on any of it. When you file your taxes, you'll need to report the distribution, but you'll also report that the entire amount was used for qualified education purposes (the rollover to another education account counts as qualified). This zeroes out any potential tax liability. Common tax software like TurboTax and H&R Block have specific sections for handling education distributions - just make sure you indicate that 100% was used for qualified expenses.

0 coins

I'm curious - why not just formalize the partnership and make it official? Even with an undocumented partner, you can have a legit partnership with an ITIN holder. You'd both be protected that way.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

Creating a formal partnership with an undocumented person doesn't magically solve immigration issues. There are complicated legal implications beyond just taxes. Some business structures could create bigger problems.

0 coins

Honestly, this whole situation sounds really risky. The undocumented partner could end up with serious problems if this isn't handled right. I'd suggest talking to an immigration attorney BEFORE a tax professional.

0 coins

Not really helpful. People in mixed-status partnerships still need to handle their taxes properly. Tax compliance is separate from immigration issues, and staying tax compliant is actually important regardless of status.

0 coins

You're right, my comment wasn't very helpful. I was coming from a place of concern but didn't express it well. Tax compliance is definitely important and separate from immigration matters. The IRS has specifically created systems like ITINs to ensure everyone can meet their tax obligations regardless of status.

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

Something that hasn't been mentioned yet - you might want to consider adjusting your W-4s quarterly, especially if you have variable income like bonuses. What I do is: 1. January: Set W-4s based on expected annual income 2. April: After filing taxes, adjust based on Q1 actual earnings 3. July: Mid-year check-in, adjust again 4. October: Final adjustment for year-end This approach has kept me from owing or getting large refunds for the past 3 years. The key is tracking your actual tax liability vs what's being withheld. I use a simple spreadsheet where I record each paycheck's withholding and calculate my estimated tax bracket based on YTD earnings.

0 coins

Oliver Weber

•

Do you have a template for that spreadsheet you could share? I've been trying to figure out a good way to track this stuff. Also, when you adjust quarterly, do you have to submit a new W-4 to your employer each time? Is there a limit to how often you can change it?

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

I don't have a shareable template, but it's pretty straightforward. I just have columns for pay date, gross pay, federal withholding, state withholding, and running totals for the year. Then I use the tax brackets to estimate what I should owe based on current earnings. There's no limit to how many times you can submit a new W-4. Employers are required to implement your new withholding by the start of the first payroll period ending on or after the 30th day after you submit it. Some companies let you update it through their HR portal which makes it much easier. I just go to my payroll department quarterly with a new form - they're used to it now.

0 coins

I'm surprised nobody's mentioned this, but could you check if you qualify for the safe harbor rule? If you withhold 100% of last year's tax liability (or 110% if your AGI was over $150,000), you won't face underpayment penalties even if you end up owing at tax time. Given your income levels, you might be better off just making sure you hit that safe harbor threshold through withholding, then saving the rest in a high-yield account until tax time rather than giving the government an interest-free loan.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

That's an interesting approach I hadn't considered! So if we owed $9,000 total last year, as long as we withhold at least that amount throughout this year, we wouldn't face penalties even if we actually owe more come tax time? That could definitely help with the cash flow issue while ensuring we're compliant. Would the 110% rule apply to us since our combined income is over $150k?

0 coins

Yes, that's exactly right. Since your combined income is over $150,000, you'd need to withhold at least 110% of last year's tax liability to qualify for the safe harbor. So if you owed $9,000 last year, you'd need to withhold at least $9,900 this year. The advantage is that you can distribute this more evenly across your jobs instead of having one job withhold a huge amount. You can calculate exactly how much extra to withhold per paycheck to hit that target. Then any additional amount you might owe, you can save up yourself and earn interest on it until tax day instead of giving it to the IRS early.

0 coins

Joy Olmedo

•

Another option to consider is using a checkbook IRA LLC structure. I set this up for my real estate investments and it provides some additional flexibility. The IRA owns the LLC, and the LLC owns the property. You still need to be careful about UBIT, but the structure can sometimes make management easier. For what it's worth, my CPA advised that modest improvements to raw land that prepare it for its intended investment purpose might not trigger UBIT, but extensive development likely would. The line between improvement and development isn't always clear, which is what makes this complicated.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

I've heard about the checkbook IRA LLC approach but wasn't sure if it actually helps with the UBIT issue or just makes property management easier. Does the LLC structure actually change how the IRS views development activities for UBIT purposes?

0 coins

Joy Olmedo

•

The LLC structure by itself doesn't eliminate UBIT concerns. The IRS looks through the LLC to the underlying activity. The main advantage is operational flexibility - you can manage the property without going through the custodian for every transaction. Regarding UBIT specifically, the LLC doesn't change the fundamental rules about what constitutes a business activity versus an investment. What it can do is give you more control over how activities are structured and documented, which might help in borderline cases. For example, you can more easily document the investment purpose of improvements if you're managing the books directly.

0 coins

Isaiah Cross

•

You might want to consider using a prohibited transaction to get the property out of your IRA before you develop it. I know that sounds crazy, but hear me out. If you intentionally cause a prohibited transaction with your IRA (like personally using the property briefly), the IRS will consider the entire IRA distributed to you. You'll pay taxes on the full value plus penalties if you're under 59½, but then the property is yours personally, and future development won't trigger UBIT. This is obviously an extreme approach that only makes sense in specific circumstances, but I've seen people use it strategically when the tax hit now would be less than potential UBIT issues later.

0 coins

Kiara Greene

•

That's playing with fire! Intentional prohibited transactions can have consequences beyond just the taxes and penalties. The IRS doesn't look kindly on deliberate end-runs around the rules. I'd be super cautious about this approach.

0 coins

Don't forget to think about state-level estate taxes too! I learned this the hard way. My family's trust was all set up to handle federal estate taxes but completely ignored the state-level taxes in our state which has a much lower exemption. Cost us over $150k in taxes we could have avoided with better planning. Make sure your uncle's attorney is considering both federal AND state taxes in whatever trust strategy they use.

0 coins

I hadn't even thought about state taxes - we're in Washington state. Do different states have their own separate estate tax systems? Is there a way to look this up?

0 coins

Yes, Washington state definitely has its own estate tax, and the exemption amount is much lower than the federal one - around $2.2 million last I checked. This is exactly the kind of situation where your uncle needs good planning! Washington's estate tax rates are progressive, ranging from about 10% to 20% for larger estates. There are some planning strategies that work specifically for Washington state taxes. You can find the basics on the Washington Department of Revenue website, but this is absolutely something your uncle's estate attorney should be addressing specifically.

0 coins

Ethan Brown

•

Quick question for anyone who knows - if I'm named as a trustee on someone's trust, does that create any tax implications for me personally? Like do I have to report anything on my own taxes? I'm in a similar situation as the original poster.

0 coins

Being a trustee doesn't generally create personal tax implications for you. The trust is its own tax entity with its own tax ID number. As trustee, you'll be responsible for ensuring the trust tax returns are filed, but you don't report trust income on your personal return unless you're also a beneficiary receiving distributions.

0 coins

Prev1...37883789379037913792...5643Next