


Ask the community...
One thing I learned the hard way - make absolutely sure you specify the correct tax year when requesting the removal! My provider had a confusing form that made me think I was requesting removal for the correct year, but they processed it for the wrong year. Also, double check that the 1099-SA you receive next January actually shows distribution code "2" for excess contributions. Mine initially came with code "1" (normal distribution), which would have messed up my taxes completely. I had to request a corrected 1099-SA.
Great question about getting corrected 1099-SA forms! I had to call my HSA provider's customer service and explain that the distribution code was incorrect. They initially pushed back saying their system was right, but I had to escalate to a supervisor. The key was having documentation - I kept copies of my original excess contribution removal request form that clearly stated it was for excess contributions. I also referenced the specific IRS guidelines about distribution codes (Publication 969). Once I showed them the written request and cited the IRS rules, they agreed to issue a corrected 1099-SA. It took about 3 weeks to get the corrected form, so definitely don't wait until tax season to check this! I'd recommend reviewing your 1099-SA as soon as you receive it in January and calling immediately if the code is wrong. Also, for anyone dealing with this - save EVERYTHING related to your excess contribution removal request. Having that paper trail made all the difference when I needed to prove what I had actually requested.
Just wanted to share my experience this tax season with the whole TurboTax/TPG/Santa Barbara Bank & Trust situation. I e-filed through TurboTax on February 10th and opted to have my fees taken out of my refund. My return was accepted the same day, and the IRS 'Where's My Refund' tool showed approved on February 22nd with a direct deposit date of February 27th. Here's where things got interesting. The money didn't hit my account on the 27th. I remembered from previous years that when you choose to have fees taken out, your refund actually goes through TPG (Tax Products Group) which is handled by Santa Barbara Bank & Trust first before coming to you. I checked the TPG website (https://taxpayer.sbtpg.com/) and saw my refund was received from the IRS but was still showing as "pending" for almost 3 days after the IRS deposit date. Last year, it only took them about 24 hours to process and send to my bank. Anyone else experiencing delays with TPG this year? I'm wondering if this is normal for the 2024 tax season or if I should be concerned. The house payment is due next week, and I was counting on this refund to cover part of it.
For anyone trying to check their refund status through TPG: β’ Go to https://taxpayer.sbtpg.com/ β’ You'll need your SSN, filing status, and refund amount β’ The "Payment Status" section shows where your money is in their process β’ "Pending" means they received it but haven't processed it yet β’ "Funded" means they've sent it to your bank Also, be aware that some banks hold deposits for 24-48 hours after receiving them, so there could be additional delay on your bank's end too.
Thanks for sharing your experience, Rita! I'm dealing with the exact same situation right now. Filed on February 8th, accepted same day, IRS approved on February 25th with a deposit date of March 3rd. It's now March 9th and still showing "pending" on the TPG site. What's really annoying is that nowhere during the TurboTax filing process do they clearly explain that choosing to pay fees from your refund means your money goes through this third-party processor first. They make it sound like a simple convenience fee, not a potential week+ delay in getting your money. I called my bank to make sure it wasn't an issue on their end, and they confirmed they haven't received anything yet. So it's definitely stuck in TPG limbo. Really hoping it processes this week because like you, I have bills coming up that I was counting on this refund for. The stress of not knowing when it'll actually arrive is the worst part!
Try calling early in the morning right when they open - like 7:01am eastern. That's when I finally got through after weeks of trying. Found out they were just waiting on verification of my self-employment income. Never would have known without actually speaking to someone.
Good luck with that π I tried calling at opening time for 2 weeks straight and never got through. The system is completely broken.
I finally gave up on calling directly and used claimyr.com - got through to an agent who actually knew what they were talking about. Talking to an agent got my refund released so fast after months of waiting.
I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation! Filed in early March, got the CP05 letter in June, and have been seeing the 810 freeze code on my transcript since then. It's so frustrating not knowing what's actually happening or how much longer this will take. From what I've gathered reading through all these comments, it sounds like the freeze could be related to income verification or credit verification (I also claimed the Child Tax Credit for the first time this year). I'm torn between waiting it out like the CP05 letter says or being proactive and trying to call. Has anyone had success getting specific information about what exactly triggered their review when they called? I don't want to waste hours on hold if the agents can't tell me anything more than "keep waiting.
Has anyone noticed that even if the UBTI is under $1000, you still get a K-1 with all these weird boxes filled out? my brokerage never explained any of this when i bought EPD in my ira. now every year i get a massive k1 package and have no idea what to do with it.
You should keep those K-1s even if they don't trigger a 990-T filing. If you ever get audited, the IRS might want to see them to verify the UBTI was indeed under the threshold. Also, if you have multiple MLPs, the UBTI from all of them is combined, so individually they might be under $1000 but together they could exceed it.
This is exactly why I tell people to think twice before putting MLPs in retirement accounts! I made the same mistake years ago with Kinder Morgan Partners in my traditional IRA. The UBTI calculation can be tricky because it's not just about whether your investment is profitable overall - it's about the underlying business income the MLP generates. Even if your shares are down, the pipeline or energy infrastructure might still be generating taxable business income that gets passed through to you. One thing I learned: if you do decide to keep MLPs in retirement accounts, try to consolidate them with one custodian. Having multiple brokerages each handling different MLP positions makes tracking that $1000 UBTI threshold much more complicated since you have to aggregate everything yourself. Also, don't forget that UBTI isn't just from capital gains when you sell - it's ongoing income from the MLP's operations. So even holding underwater positions can still generate tax obligations if the partnership is profitable.
Zane Gray
3 Does anyone know if tax-loss harvesting would help in this situation? I have some underwater investments I could sell to generate losses. Would those offset the capital gains before determining what rate applies?
0 coins
Zane Gray
β’14 Tax-loss harvesting is a great strategy here! Capital losses first offset capital gains of the same type (short-term losses against short-term gains, long-term losses against long-term gains). If you have excess in one category, they can offset the other category. The key thing for your question: losses reduce your total gains BEFORE the tax rate is applied. So if you have $380K in gains but harvest $80K in losses, only $300K would be subject to the capital gains tax rates. This would absolutely help reduce your overall tax bill by reducing the amount subject to the 15% rate. Just remember the wash-sale rule - don't buy back substantially identical investments within 30 days before or after selling for a loss.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
Great discussion everyone! One thing I'd add is the importance of considering the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) when planning large capital gains realizations. If your modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 (single filer), you'll pay an additional 3.8% tax on investment income including capital gains. With the scenario described ($42K regular income + $380K gains + $63K dividends), you'd definitely hit this threshold and pay NIIT on the investment income portion. This effectively makes your capital gains rate 18.8% instead of 15% on most of those gains. It's another reason why spreading the sales across multiple years could be beneficial - you might be able to stay under the NIIT threshold in some years. Also worth noting that if you're subject to NIIT, it applies to the lesser of: (1) your net investment income, or (2) the amount by which your MAGI exceeds the threshold. So careful planning around that $200K line can make a real difference.
0 coins