


Ask the community...
One thing to consider that I haven't seen mentioned - if you and your spouse both make similar amounts, you might want to check box 2(c) on both your W-4s, which is the "Multiple Jobs" checkbox. This automatically adjusts your withholding for two-income households. I found this easier than calculating an extra dollar amount. Just checking that box solved our underwithholding problem last year.
Thanks for mentioning this! I didn't realize there was a checkbox specifically for multiple jobs. Do you know if checking that box results in the same withholding as calculating the extra amount manually? I'm wondering if one method withholds more accurately than the other.
The checkbox generally works well if both jobs have similar pay levels. It essentially tells your employer to withhold taxes as if you're single (which is higher) rather than married, which compensates for having two incomes. If there's a big difference between your incomes, or if you have other income sources like investments or rental properties, the manual calculation might be more accurate. The checkbox is basically a simpler but slightly less precise approach. I chose it because I didn't want to recalculate every time we got raises or bonuses - the checkbox automatically adjusts when your income changes.
Has anyone actually compared their expected refund/amount owed from the calculator to what they actually ended up with when filing? I've used the IRS calculator twice and both times it was WAY off.
I've used it for three years straight and it's been pretty accurate for me. Last year it predicted a $720 refund and we got back $678. The year before it was within about $200. You have to make sure you're including ALL income sources though. If you have investments, side gigs, or anything that doesn't have withholding, that could explain why your results were off.
Thanks for sharing your experience. Maybe I need to check my inputs more carefully this time. I think part of the problem might have been that I got a bonus halfway through the year that messed up the calculations, and I also had some stock sales I didn't account for properly. I'll try the calculator again and make sure I'm including everything. It's reassuring to hear it can actually be accurate when used correctly!
Just to add a data point - I also received a 1099-INT from the IRS last year for about $125. It was because my refund was delayed by almost 4 months. I reported it on line 2b of my 1040 and everything went smoothly. Don't overthink this one - it's just interest they paid you for holding your money too long, and yes, it's taxable income. TurboTax has a specific section for entering 1099-INT information that makes it pretty straightforward.
Can you claim any penalties or extra interest if your refund was delayed because of an IRS error? My refund was delayed for 6 months last year because they incorrectly flagged my return!
Unfortunately, no. The standard interest they pay for delayed refunds is the only compensation you'll receive, regardless of why the delay occurred. The IRS pays interest on delayed refunds if they're issued more than 45 days after the return due date or the date you filed, whichever is later. Even if the delay was caused by an IRS error, there's no additional penalty or interest payment beyond what they automatically calculate. It's frustrating, but the 1099-INT interest payment is all you'll get. The interest rate they pay is set by law and adjusts quarterly based on federal short-term rates.
I'm sorta confused why the IRS would send a 1099-INT in the first place? Like, they're the ones who process our tax returns, so can't they just automatically account for this interest they paid us?
lol welcome to government efficiency! they literally could just adjust your taxes automatically but instead they send you a form to tell you to tell them about money they paid you. peak bureaucracy right there
I work in accounting (not a CPA though) and can share some insight. Many companies require W-9s for ALL payments they make to individuals, regardless of whether they'll issue a 1099. It's just standard procedure for their accounting systems. Here's what's likely happening: The builder's accounts payable system won't let them cut a check without a vendor in their system, and they need a W-9 to set you up as a vendor. This doesn't automatically mean they'll issue you a 1099-MISC at the end of the year. That said, I'd include a clear note stating this is an expense reimbursement (not service payment) when you return the W-9, and maybe follow up with an email to their accounting department to ensure they code it properly in their system.
Thanks for the accounting perspective! Would it be worth asking them directly if they plan to issue a 1099 for this reimbursement? Or is there specific language I should use when I submit the W9 to make it clear this shouldn't be treated as income?
Yes, it would definitely be worth asking them directly if they plan to issue a 1099 for the reimbursement. A simple email saying "I'm submitting the W-9 as requested, but want to confirm you won't be issuing a 1099 for this payment since it's a reimbursement for expenses I incurred due to construction issues, not income" should do the trick. As for specific language when submitting the W-9, I'd attach a brief cover letter stating: "This W-9 is being provided solely for your vendor setup requirements. The $750 payment represents reimbursement for mold testing expenses I incurred as a result of construction defects, not payment for services or taxable income. Please ensure this is properly coded in your accounting system as an expense reimbursement to prevent incorrect 1099 reporting." That clearly documents your position if there are any questions later.
Wouldn't it be easier to just not give your SSN and instead just call it a reimbursement? If you give them your w9 your gonna have to deal with the 1099 and the whole back and forth with the IRS. Seems like more trouble than its worth for $600.
Just wanted to add something important about cost basis that nobody mentioned yet. If you reinvested dividends over time (like in a mutual fund), those reinvestments increase your cost basis! I missed this for years and was essentially paying double tax on my dividend reinvestments. Make sure all your reinvested dividends are included in that cost basis number or you could be overpaying.
Wait, really? I've been investing for 5 years and never knew this. So if my dividends automatically buy more shares, I need to add those amounts to my original investment when calculating gains/losses?
Exactly! When dividends are automatically reinvested to buy more shares, you've already paid income tax on those dividends in the year you received them. Those reinvested amounts become part of your cost basis. If you don't add them to your cost basis, you'll end up paying tax twice - once when you received the dividend, and again when you sell the shares (because your gain would appear larger than it actually was). This is especially significant for long-term holdings where years of reinvested dividends can substantially increase your true cost basis.
Has anyone found a good tax software that handles stock sales well? I tried one of the free ones last year and it kept getting confused when I entered multiple stock sales.
Mei Zhang
Something important that nobody's mentioned yet - if your scholarships/grants ARE partially taxable, the school often doesn't withhold any taxes on that amount! This can leave you with a surprise tax bill at filing time if you're not prepared. I learned this the hard way last year when I owed nearly $900 because of my taxable scholarship portion. You might want to consider making estimated tax payments throughout the year to avoid a big bill (and potential penalties) at tax time. Form 1040-ES is what you'd use for that.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
ā¢Thank you for bringing this up - I hadn't even thought about withholding! Does the school typically report scholarship/grant info to the IRS? Or would they only know if I report it? And how would I even calculate how much I should pay in estimated taxes?
0 coins
Mei Zhang
ā¢Yes, schools report your scholarship and grant information to the IRS using Form 1098-T, which shows your tuition and related expenses as well as scholarships/grants received. So the IRS does know how much you received, even if you don't report it. This is why people sometimes get letters from the IRS later asking about unreported income. For calculating estimated taxes, you'd need to figure out approximately how much of your scholarship/grant money will be used for non-qualified expenses (the taxable portion), then calculate the tax on that amount based on your tax bracket. The IRS has worksheets in the Form 1040-ES instructions to help with this. Since you're a dependent, your tax situation might be affected by the kiddie tax rules depending on your total income.
0 coins
Liam McConnell
I've seen a lot of students just ignore the taxable portion of scholarships and grants, thinking the IRS won't notice because they're students. This is a HUGE mistake! The IRS computer systems automatically flag mismatches between what your school reports on Form 1098-T and what you report on your tax return. It's way better to properly report everything now than deal with an IRS notice, potential penalties, and interest later on. Especially since this could be happening for multiple years in your case, which could add up significantly.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
ā¢Is there a specific form we need to use for reporting scholarship income? I don't see anything specific about this on the 1040.
0 coins