That's a great point about documentation - I hadn't considered how much more scrutiny a luxury vehicle might get. Do you think it matters if I use actual expenses vs. standard mileage rate when it comes to audit risk? And were there specific record-keeping issues the IRS focused on during your audit?

In my experience, using actual expenses (like you'd need to do for depreciation) definitely increased the scrutiny compared to standard mileage rate. The IRS agent specifically told me that luxury vehicles using actual expense method are flagged more frequently. During the audit, they focused heavily on three things: 1) Contemporaneous mileage logs (they wanted to see that I recorded trips when they happened, not recreated later), 2) Documentation of business purpose for each trip, and 3) Evidence that I had another vehicle for personal use. They were very skeptical of my claim that the Mercedes was 100% business when I didn't have another car in my name. My advice: keep a dedicated app or logbook in the car, document every single business trip with purpose and mileage, take periodic odometer photos, and keep all maintenance records showing the mileage progression. If you're claiming 100% business use, they'll want to see how you handle personal transportation.

Those limits seem low - is that for all vehicles or just luxury ones? I thought there were special rules for trucks and SUVs that let you deduct a lot more.

Does this apply even if you use one of those tax relief companies that advertise on radio? They always claim they can settle for "pennies on the dollar" but I assume that's just marketing hype?

Those "pennies on the dollar" claims are extremely misleading. What those companies are referring to is the IRS Offer in Compromise program, which is only available in very specific hardship situations where you genuinely cannot pay your tax debt. You have to prove significant financial hardship, and most people who apply get rejected. Those companies charge thousands in fees for something you can do yourself, and they often make promises they can't keep. They can't get any better deal from the IRS than you can get yourself. And yes, even with an accepted Offer in Compromise, the IRS will still apply interest to your original tax debt before determining your settlement amount.

Did you have to fill out any special forms for the penalty abatement? Or was it just handled over the phone?

Could you in theory have a VPN set to a different time zone and claim that's where you were? Or does the IRS have ways to verify your physical location when you made trades? Just curious - not planning to try anything sketchy!

Using a VPN wouldn't change your physical location - it would only mask your IP address. The tax rule is based on where you are physically located, not where your internet connection appears to be coming from. If you were audited, the IRS could request evidence of your location like travel records, receipts, cell phone GPS data, etc. While it's technically possible to gain some tax advantages by being in a different time zone during the year transition, the logistics and travel costs typically outweigh any potential tax benefits for most people. Plus, intentionally misrepresenting your location would constitute tax fraud, which carries serious penalties including potential criminal charges.

I've never been audited specifically about time zones, but I did have the IRS question some of my crypto transactions from 2022. They were more concerned with making sure I reported all transactions rather than the exact timing of them. But if you had a really large gain or loss right at year end, I could see them being pickier about exactly which year it belongs in.

Thanks for sharing your experience. That's kind of what I figured - they're probably more focused on making sure all transactions are reported rather than nitpicking about exactly which tax year a midnight transaction falls into. Still, I think I'll be more careful with my record-keeping this year just to be safe.

Good point! In NY we have that stupid S-corp franchise tax that adds up. What's the California situation like?

In California, S-corporations pay a 1.5% tax on net income with a minimum tax of $800, while C-corporations pay a flat 8.84% tax rate. For larger businesses with significant profits, this difference can be substantial - though you need to factor in the additional personal income tax on passed-through S-corp profits. The analysis really depends on how much profit you're retaining in the business versus distributing to shareholders. In my experience, the math favors S-corps for businesses with high distribution rates but can swing toward C-corps when reinvesting heavily.

Our accountant mentioned this too! Also something about being able to establish a medical reimbursement plan as a C-corp that you cant do with an S? Not 100% on the details tho.

For donor-advised funds, is there a minimum amount that makes sense to start with? And do you recommend any particular providers?

Most major investment firms like Fidelity, Vanguard, and Schwab offer donor-advised funds with minimums around $5,000 to open and $500-1,000 for additional contributions. I personally use Fidelity Charitable because their platform is user-friendly and their fees are reasonable. The amount that "makes sense" depends on your tax situation, but generally, it's most beneficial when you're bunching multiple years of charitable contributions into a single tax year to exceed the standard deduction threshold. For someone at your income level, contributing $10,000+ would typically provide meaningful tax benefits, especially if you're already itemizing deductions.

I'm a physician who went the real estate route. The tax benefits are real - depreciation, mortgage interest, and expense deductions. But be cautious about passive losses - at your income level, you may not be able to deduct those against your W2 income unless you qualify as a real estate professional (which is tough with a full-time medical career). Consider syndications or REITs if you want the benefits without active management. Just do your due diligence - there are many questionable deals out there.

Thanks for the insight! I was worried about the time commitment. REITs sound more my speed since I barely have time for hobbies as it is. Any particular types of REITs you'd recommend looking into first?