


Ask the community...
I went through something similar with deducting my real estate licensing courses from my rental income. The key question the IRS asked me during a review was whether I was already established in the business BEFORE taking the courses. Since I had owned and managed rental properties for 3 years before starting the courses, I was able to successfully argue that I was improving skills in my EXISTING business, not preparing for a new one. Make sure you have documentation showing you were already operating as a landlord before starting your MBA.
That's really helpful! I've been operating my rental properties for about 4 years now, so sounds like I'm in a similar situation to yours. How detailed did you have to get with your documentation? Did you keep syllabus info for each course to show relevance?
Yes, documentation was crucial. I kept copies of all course syllabi and highlighted specific modules that directly related to property management, tenant relations, and real estate finance. I also maintained a simple log noting when and how I applied specific concepts from my courses to my rental business. For example, when I redesigned my lease based on contract law principles from a course, I documented that change with dates and notes. The IRS didn't ultimately request all of this during my review, but having it ready demonstrated I was serious about the legitimate business purpose. Also keep records showing your rental business was established before starting courses - tax returns showing rental income, business licenses, property management records, etc.
Don't forget that if you're taking these courses to move into a different type of real estate business (like going from residential landlord to commercial property development), the IRS might consider this qualifying for a new trade or business, which would make the expenses non-deductible. Also, if your MBA would qualify you for a substantial promotion at a job unrelated to your rental properties, that could also disqualify the deduction. The "same general type of work" test is crucial here.
This is an important distinction. I tried deducting real estate courses a few years back and got audited because they determined I was using the education to expand into commercial real estate when I had only been managing residential properties before. The expansion was considered a new business category by the auditor.
Just want to add that you should consider if you have any eligible business expenses to deduct against that $2025 income. Did your husband travel to these conferences? Buy any books or materials specifically for these presentations? Use his laptop or home internet to prepare? Even a home office deduction if he prepared in a dedicated space? All of these can be legitimate business expenses that would reduce your taxable income AND reduce the self-employment tax. Just make sure you keep good records in case of an audit - receipts, calendar entries showing the business purpose, etc.
How exactly does the home office deduction work for something like this? Like if someone uses their home office for preparing presentations but it's not their main job, can they still claim it?
The home office deduction can apply even for part-time self-employment activities. The key requirements are that the space must be used exclusively and regularly for business purposes. "Exclusively" means the area is used only for business activities (not also as a guest bedroom or family TV room). "Regularly" means it's used on an ongoing basis for business, not just occasionally. For someone preparing presentations, if they have a dedicated desk or room where they exclusively work on these business activities, they could potentially claim the deduction. They would calculate the percentage of home used for business (square footage of office Γ· total home square footage) and apply that percentage to eligible home expenses (rent/mortgage interest, utilities, insurance, etc.) or use the simplified method ($5 per square foot up to 300 square feet).
Quick tip from someone who's been filing Schedule C for small amounts of side income for years - don't stress too much about the business code. I literally used the wrong code for 3 years straight (I picked something that sounded close enough) and the IRS never batted an eye. As long as your income and expenses are reported accurately, the code is more for statistical purposes than anything that will affect your tax liability.
This is actually really helpful to know! I've been stressing about picking the exact right business code for my freelance graphic design work.
FreeTaxUSA handles 1099-SA forms in their completely free version. I've been using them for years with my HSA and never paid a dime for federal filing. They only charge like $15 for state filing. TurboTax is notorious for making you upgrade for basically any form beyond a W-2.
Do they handle both the 5498-SA and 1099-SA forms? I have both because I contributed to my HSA and took distributions in the same year.
Yes, they handle both forms. The 5498-SA (which shows your contributions) and the 1099-SA (which shows distributions) are both covered in their free federal filing. They use Form 8889 to reconcile everything related to your HSA. You'll see a specific section for HSA accounts where you can enter both your contributions and distributions. Just make sure you have your 1099-SA handy to enter the distribution amount and the correct box number (usually Box 1 shows total distributions, and Box 2 shows earnings on excess contributions if applicable).
Just a warning - make sure all your HSA withdrawals were actually for qualified medical expenses! I learned the hard way last year that non-qualified HSA withdrawals are subject to income tax PLUS a 20% penalty if you're under 65. I used some HSA money for gym equipment thinking it was health-related and got hit with both taxes and the penalty.
19 Former tax preparer here. The reality with FBARs is that they're primarily an information reporting tool. The penalties are designed for people who deliberately hide foreign accounts, not for those making good faith efforts with minor errors. I've seen clients stress over tiny mistakes like yours, but in my experience, the IRS has never pursued penalties for the type of errors you're describing. The fact that you over-reported a balance actually works in your favor. And postal codes? That's just not material to what they're looking for.
7 Is there any downside to just filing an amendment anyway, even for these small issues? I always prefer to have everything 100% accurate, even if it's something minor.
19 There's no significant downside to filing an amendment if it gives you peace of mind. It's easy enough to do - just check the "amended" box on the form and explain the corrections in the comments section. That said, it's important to maintain perspective about what these forms are for. They're designed to track significant foreign assets, not to trap people over typos or minor administrative details. In my years of practice, I never saw the IRS pursue anyone for good-faith mistakes of the type you're describing. Your time might be better spent ensuring your current and future filings are accurate.
3 I made a similar mistake last year but with a bigger dollar amount (about $5k due to conversion issues). I called my accountant freaking out and she laughed and told me not to waste time on an amendment. She said as long as you're reporting the accounts and not deliberately hiding anything, the IRS generally doesn't care about small errors that are in their favor. Just make sure your future filings are accurate!
14 This seems like dangerous advice tbh. The penalties for FBAR violations can be insanely high. Isn't it better to be safe than sorry?
KylieRose
Don't forget that you also need to determine the building-to-land ratio since you can only depreciate the building portion! Many people miss this and try to depreciate the entire purchase price, which is incorrect. Check your property tax assessment - it usually has a breakdown of land vs. improvement (building) values. You can use that ratio as a reasonable method for your depreciation calculation.
0 coins
DeShawn Washington
β’Thanks for bringing this up! Do you know if I need any special documentation to prove the building-to-land ratio I use? And would it be better to use the ratio from when I purchased or from when I converted to a rental?
0 coins
KylieRose
β’You don't need special documentation, but you should keep records of how you determined the ratio. The property tax assessment is generally considered reasonable support if the IRS ever questions it. You should use the ratio that applies at the time of conversion to rental use, not the original purchase. The ratio could change over time as land and building values appreciate at different rates.
0 coins
Miguel HernΓ‘ndez
Has anyone used TurboTax for handling this situation? I'm trying to figure out if their software can properly handle the depreciation calculation for a converted property or if I need something more specialized.
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
β’I used TurboTax last year for my converted rental. It walks you through the process step by step and asks all the right questions about purchase price, FMV at conversion, and building/land allocation. Just make sure you have all your documentation ready before you start.
0 coins