


Ask the community...
If you're interested in ETFs, look into tax-managed index funds or ETFs specifically designed for tax efficiency. Vanguard's VIG (dividend appreciation) might be worth checking out - it focuses on companies that grow their dividends rather than just high current yield, which can be more tax-efficient. VWELX (Wellington) is another one that tries to balance income with tax efficiency.
Given your high tax bracket ($275K income), I'd strongly recommend prioritizing tax-efficient growth over income-producing assets in taxable accounts. Here's what's worked for me in a similar situation: 1. **Broad market index ETFs with low dividend yields** - Something like VTI or ITOT focuses on total return rather than dividends, letting you control when you realize gains through strategic selling. 2. **Tax-loss harvesting** - This becomes incredibly valuable at your income level. You can harvest up to $3K in losses annually against ordinary income, plus carry forward any excess. 3. **Asset location strategy** - Keep your bond/REIT investments in tax-advantaged accounts (401k/IRA) and growth investments in taxable accounts. This maximizes the tax benefits of each account type. 4. **Consider Roth conversions** - If you have traditional IRA funds, strategic Roth conversions during lower income years could make sense long-term. For that $180K, I'd personally move most of it into a broad market ETF with minimal distributions (like VTI with ~1.3% dividend yield vs your savings account generating taxable interest). The qualified dividends will be taxed at capital gains rates (likely 15% for you) rather than your marginal rate of 32-35%. Don't completely avoid income - just be strategic about the type and timing.
I had this exact same thing happen to me about 2 weeks ago! The verification request appeared overnight just like yours did. I was super worried at first, but it turned out to be totally normal - just part of their increased security measures for 2024. The whole process took about 30 minutes through ID.me and my refund processed normally after that. Don't stress too much about it, but definitely don't ignore it either since it can delay your refund if you wait too long. Good luck!
This verification request is becoming really common this year - you're definitely not alone! I went through the same thing about a month ago and it was nerve-wracking at first. The key thing is that you're seeing it in your legitimate IRS account on the official website, which is a good sign. When I did my verification, it was pretty straightforward - just had to confirm my identity through ID.me with a driver's license photo and a quick video selfie. The whole thing took maybe 15-20 minutes. My refund came through about a week later with no issues. One thing I'd recommend is to tackle it sooner rather than later. I've heard from others that waiting can sometimes cause longer delays in processing. Also, make sure you have good lighting and a clear background when you do the ID.me verification - it can be picky about photo quality!
Don't stress too much about the audit risk. The IRS expects new businesses to have losses in the beginning. I've had losses for my pottery business for 2 years and finally turned a profit in year 3. Never got audited. Just make sure your expenses are actually business-related and reasonable. Like don't try claiming a full spa day for yourself as "research" lol. That's the kind of thing that raises flags.
Great question! I'm also a service-based business owner (freelance graphic design) and went through this exact same situation in my first year. You definitely need to file Schedule C even with a loss - but like others mentioned, that loss actually works in your favor by reducing your overall tax burden from your W-2 income. One thing I learned the hard way is to make sure you're categorizing your startup costs correctly. Some of those certification courses and equipment purchases might need to be depreciated over multiple years rather than fully deducted in year one, depending on the amounts. The IRS has specific rules about startup expenses over $5,000. Also, since you're doing both employee work and self-employment, you'll still owe self-employment tax on your $11,400 of business income (even though you had a net loss after expenses). It's about 15.3% on that income, but you can deduct half of that SE tax as an adjustment to income. Keep those detailed records you mentioned - they're your best protection. The "hobby loss rule" only becomes an issue if you show losses for multiple consecutive years without demonstrating you're genuinely trying to make a profit. One year of losses is totally normal and expected for a new business!
Don't forget to track ALL your business expenses as a contractor! I do photography on the side with my regular job and the deductions make a huge difference. You can write off a portion of your home for office space, equipment, software, mileage for business travel, professional development, health insurance premiums, and retirement contributions.
Is it worth itemizing all these deductions though? I heard the standard deduction is so high now that most people don't benefit from tracking everything.
Actually, business deductions for self-employment are completely separate from the standard deduction decision! Even if you take the standard deduction on your personal taxes, you still get to deduct all your legitimate business expenses on Schedule C against your 1099 income. So tracking your business expenses is definitely worth it - things like your design software subscriptions, computer equipment, portion of your home office, professional courses, etc. These reduce your self-employment income before calculating both income tax and self-employment tax, which can save you quite a bit. The key is keeping good records and making sure expenses are legitimately for your graphic design business. I use a simple spreadsheet to track everything monthly - takes maybe 30 minutes but usually saves me hundreds or even thousands come tax time.
This is super helpful! I had no idea business deductions were separate from the standard deduction. As someone just starting out with contractor work, what would you say are the most important expenses to track right from the beginning? I want to make sure I'm not missing obvious deductions but also don't want to overcomplicate things while I'm still learning the ropes.
Asher Levin
I'm actually more concerned about the attempt to serve papers at an address where you don't permanently live. From my understanding (not a lawyer), proper service usually requires delivering documents to your actual residence. If you're officially residing in Mexico, there are international protocols for serving US legal papers to someone in Mexico. It sounds like they're trying to serve you at a US address of convenience, which might not constitute proper service. You might want to research the "Hague Service Convention" which covers international service of process between the US and Mexico.
0 coins
Serene Snow
ā¢That's a really good point. I had a similar situation when I was living in Germany but still had a US mailing address. A creditor tried to serve me at my US address, but my lawyer successfully argued improper service since my actual residence was abroad. The court ended up requiring them to follow proper international service procedures, which bought me several more months to negotiate a settlement.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
The international service of process angle is crucial here, but I want to clarify something - you mentioned you're in Peru, not Mexico. The Hague Service Convention does apply between the US and Peru, so if you're truly residing there permanently, any US legal action would need to follow proper international service procedures. However, there's an important distinction to consider. If you've been using your cousin's address as your official address for taxes, banking, and other legal purposes, courts might consider that your legal domicile for service purposes, even if you physically reside abroad. This is called "substituted service" and many jurisdictions allow it when the defendant has designated an address for official correspondence. Given that you mentioned maintaining US residency status and using the cousin's address for "all official mail," you might have inadvertently created a situation where service at that address could be considered proper. I'd recommend consulting with an attorney who handles international service issues before assuming you have protection under improper service rules. The key question is whether you've been filing taxes as a US resident (using that address) or as a US citizen abroad. This designation could significantly impact how courts view proper service in your case.
0 coins