


Ask the community...
2 But what about the Monaco-US tax treaty? Doesn't that change how much they have to pay on US tournament winnings? I think there might be a lower rate for residents of countries with tax treaties.
3 Monaco doesn't actually have a tax treaty with the US. This means Monaco residents earning US income are generally subject to the full US tax rates without treaty benefits. Some tennis players deliberately establish residency in countries that do have favorable tax treaties with the US and other nations where they compete. For instance, Switzerland (where Federer lived) does have a US tax treaty that can provide certain benefits, though they'd still pay US taxes on US-sourced income. The tax planning behind where professional athletes choose to live can be incredibly strategic!
This is such a fascinating topic! I had no idea about the "jock tax" situation where athletes get taxed by every state they compete in. That must make tax season an absolute nightmare for these players. It's interesting how Monaco's lack of a tax treaty with the US actually works against athletes living there - they don't get any of the benefits that residents of countries like Switzerland might get. Makes you wonder if some of these players might actually be better off tax-wise living somewhere else with better treaty arrangements. The duty days calculation for endorsement income is mind-blowing too. Imagine having to track every single day of work and which state/country you were in. No wonder these athletes need armies of accountants and tax specialists!
Exactly! And what really gets me is how this affects up-and-coming players who might not have the resources for those armies of accountants yet. They're probably getting hit with surprise tax bills they never saw coming. I wonder if there's a threshold where it becomes worth it to hire specialized tax help versus just accepting you're going to overpay. Like, at what point in prize money earnings does it make financial sense to get those expensive international tax specialists? Some of these lower-ranked players might be losing a huge chunk of their already modest winnings just to compliance costs and penalties for getting it wrong.
Another option to get your AGI: If you used tax software last year, just log back into your account. Most of the major ones (TurboTax, H&R Block, TaxAct, etc.) keep your returns on file. I just logged into mine from last year and found my AGI in like 2 minutes. For your specific calculation question - your AGI is basically: Total income (wages + any other income) minus certain "above-the-line" deductions. Those specific college expenses might qualify for the American Opportunity Credit or Lifetime Learning Credit rather than direct AGI reduction.
I actually used a different software last year and can't access the account anymore (email changed, password issues, it's a whole mess). Is there any other way to estimate it if I can't get the exact number?
If you absolutely can't get your exact AGI from last year, you can try entering "$0" as your prior year AGI when e-filing. Some tax software allows this as a workaround for first-time filers or people who can't access their previous AGI. Alternatively, you can file a paper return which doesn't require prior year AGI verification. It's slower to process but works if you're in a bind. If you have your W-2s and documentation from last year, you could also recalculate it manually or have a tax preparer help you reconstruct last year's return.
Quick tip that helped me: if ur trying to e-file and need last years AGI, some tax software lets u answer "0" or "Did not file" depending on ur situation. Worked 4 me when I couldn't remember my exact AGI! If u need the exact calculation process, AGI is basically: total income - adjustments. The adjustments are specific things like student loan interest, self-employment tax, health insurance if self-employed, etc.
This "$0" trick doesn't always work though. I tried it last year and my return got rejected. Had to file paper in the end which took FOREVER to process. Better to get the actual number if possible.
Just to add a practical tip - when my wife and I were in a similar situation (I make $150k, she makes $60k), we found that using tax software to run a "what-if" scenario in January helped us make adjustments early in the year. We took our previous year's return, updated the expected income for the current year, and then looked at the projected result. It showed us we'd be short about $3,200 in withholding, so I updated my W-4 to withhold an extra $275 per month. Worked perfectly - we got a small refund instead of owing money.
Great question! I went through this exact same situation last year when my spouse and I had a similar income gap ($140k vs $75k). One thing that really helped us was understanding the "marriage penalty" concept - when both spouses work, the combined income can push you into higher tax brackets than either would face individually. This is especially true with your income levels. For your W-4 forms, definitely choose "married filing jointly" as others have mentioned. However, I'd strongly recommend using the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator mid-year to check if you're on track. We discovered we were under-withholding by about $2,800 and were able to adjust before it became a problem. Also consider having the higher earner (you at $145k) make the withholding adjustments rather than splitting it between both W-4s. It's often simpler administratively and gives you more control over the process. You can always adjust quarterly if needed. The key is being proactive about it rather than getting surprised at tax time!
This is really helpful advice! I'm new to dealing with taxes as a married couple and the "marriage penalty" concept is something I hadn't heard of before. When you mention having the higher earner make the withholding adjustments, did you just add extra withholding in Step 4(c) of the W-4? And how did you figure out the right amount to add? I want to make sure I understand the process correctly before making changes to our forms.
Yes, exactly! I added the extra withholding in Step 4(c) of my W-4 form. To figure out the right amount, I used the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator (you can find it on irs.gov) around mid-year when I had a good sense of our actual income for the year. The estimator takes your year-to-date withholding from both paychecks, estimates your total tax liability, and tells you if you need to adjust. In our case, it recommended I add about $250 per month in additional withholding for the rest of the year to avoid owing money. The nice thing about putting it all on the higher earner's W-4 is that it's easier to track and adjust if needed. Plus, since the higher earner typically has more withholding room before hitting weird payroll system limits, it's usually more straightforward administratively. Just make sure to re-run the estimator if either of your incomes changes significantly during the year - bonuses, raises, job changes, etc. can all throw off your projections!
Don't forget that if your mother was married, her spouse might have special filing options. They can file jointly for the year of death if they haven't remarried before the end of the tax year. This often results in a lower overall tax burden.
She was widowed several years ago, so filing status will be single. Thanks for mentioning it though - I didn't realize a surviving spouse had that option to file jointly in the year of death.
I went through this exact situation with my father last year and want to emphasize a few important points that might help: First, don't stress too much about the "Personal Representative" signature issue while probate is pending. The IRS is generally understanding about this timing gap, and you can always file an amended return later if needed once you're officially appointed. Second, regarding the estimated payment with your extension - err on the side of caution and pay a bit more rather than less. The IRS charges penalties and interest on underpayments, but they'll refund any overpayment when you file the actual return. Given your mom's history of owing $11k in 2021, I'd estimate conservatively high for 2022. One thing I wish someone had told me: keep meticulous records of everything you pay on behalf of the estate, including any tax payments. You can reimburse yourself from estate funds later, and good documentation makes the probate process much smoother. Also, consider whether your state has any specific requirements for deceased taxpayer filings - some states have different rules than the federal process. You're doing the right thing by being proactive with the extension. Better to file late with an extension than miss the deadline entirely.
TechNinja
Just to add another perspective on legitimate AMT reduction strategies - charitable donations through a Donor Advised Fund (DAF) can be extremely effective. By bunching multiple years of donations into a single tax year, you can potentially push yourself over the standard deduction threshold and get more tax benefit while still distributing the actual donations over time. This works well with AMT planning because charitable contributions are fully deductible under both regular tax and AMT systems. Combined with careful timing of income recognition, this has saved me significant AMT exposure over the last few years.
0 coins
Keisha Thompson
ā¢But doesn't AMT recapture some of the benefit from these charitable deductions? I thought I read somewhere that large charitable donations can still trigger AMT in certain income brackets. Is there an optimal amount to contribute to maximize the benefit?
0 coins
TechNinja
ā¢You're confusing two different concepts. Charitable deductions are treated the same under both regular tax and AMT calculations - they're fully deductible in both systems. What you might be thinking of is that some other deductions (like state taxes) get added back for AMT purposes, which can push you into AMT territory despite having large charitable donations. The optimal strategy depends on your specific situation, but generally, bunching donations in years where you have higher income can be more effective. For instance, if you know you'll have a high-income year due to a bonus or investment sale, that's when maximizing charitable giving through a DAF can provide the greatest benefit by offsetting income that might otherwise be subject to AMT.
0 coins
Paolo Bianchi
One thing nobody has mentioned yet regarding AMT is the impact of timing your income recognition for incentive stock options (ISOs). If you exercise ISOs but don't sell the shares in the same year, you can create a HUGE AMT liability because the bargain element (difference between exercise price and fair market value) is included in AMT income but not regular taxable income. I learned this the hard way and ended up with a $45k AMT bill I wasn't expecting. If you have ISOs as part of your compensation, make sure you understand how they interact with AMT before exercising!
0 coins
Yara Assad
ā¢This happened to me too! I had no idea about this AMT trap with ISOs until after I exercised. Do you know if there's any way to recover that AMT payment in future years? I've heard something about AMT credits but don't fully understand how they work.
0 coins
Benjamin Johnson
ā¢Yes, you can recover that AMT payment through AMT credits! When you pay AMT due to ISO exercises, you generate AMT credits equal to the amount of AMT you paid. These credits can be used in future years when your regular tax exceeds your AMT. The key is that AMT credits can only offset regular tax down to your AMT level - they can't create a refund below that threshold. So if you have years where you don't trigger AMT (maybe due to lower income or fewer preference items), you can use those credits to reduce your regular tax liability. The credits carry forward indefinitely until used, so you don't lose them. Just make sure your tax preparer tracks them properly on Form 8801. Many people miss claiming these credits because they don't realize they have them from prior ISO exercises.
0 coins