


Ask the community...
Has anyone dealt with getting a fair market value determination for a property that's in a country where real estate records aren't as accessible as in the US? My mom left me her house in Vietnam, and I'm having a hard time establishing what it was worth when she passed.
I had this issue with property in rural Mexico. What worked for me was hiring a local real estate agent to provide a formal letter estimating the value based on their market knowledge. I also got statements from three neighbors who had sold similar properties around the same time. The IRS accepted these as reasonable evidence since I clearly made a good faith effort to establish fair value.
I'm dealing with a similar situation with property in the Philippines. What I found helpful was contacting the local tax assessor's office (if they have one) to get the assessed value from around the date of death. Even though assessed values are usually lower than market value, it provides an official baseline that the IRS recognizes. You can then use a reasonable multiplier based on local market conditions to estimate fair market value. Also try reaching out to local banks - they sometimes have appraisal data for mortgage purposes that can help establish market values for that time period.
I've been through a similar situation with inherited property in France, and one thing that really helped was documenting everything meticulously from the start. Since you mentioned the inheritance process took several years, make sure you keep records of all the legal fees, transfer taxes, and administrative costs you paid during that process - these can often be added to your basis, which could reduce any taxable gain or increase your deductible loss. Also, regarding the exchange rate fluctuations you mentioned - I learned the hard way that you need to be very consistent about which rates you use and when. For the initial basis calculation, use the exchange rate from the date of death (2021). For the sale proceeds, use the rate from when you actually received the sale proceeds in 2024. The IRS has specific guidance on this, and consistency is key if you ever get audited. One more tip: if you're claiming a loss (which sounds likely in your case), make sure you can clearly demonstrate that this was truly investment property and not personal use property. Since you inherited it and sold it immediately without using it personally, you should be fine, but it's worth documenting that timeline clearly.
This is really helpful advice about documenting everything! I'm curious about the legal fees and administrative costs you mentioned - can you clarify which specific costs can be added to basis? I paid quite a bit in legal fees during the inheritance process in Spain, plus some transfer taxes, but I wasn't sure if those counted since they were related to receiving the inheritance rather than the actual sale. Also, did you have to convert all those costs using the exchange rates from when you paid them, or did you use a different approach for basis adjustments?
Is anyone else confused by the term "ordinary income" the OP used? Sounds like they might have received dividends of $275.43 rather than proceeds from selling the stock. That would be a totally different tax situation.
@Jasmine Hancock - I think there might be some confusion in your original post. You mentioned the stocks "generated $275.43 in ordinary income" but then talked about selling them. Can you clarify what that $275.43 represents? If you actually sold the stocks and received $275.43 as the sale proceeds, then your capital loss would be $1,732.08 - $275.43 = $1,456.65 as others have calculated. However, if $275.43 was dividend income you received while still owning the stocks, that's completely separate from any sale transaction. Dividends are ordinary income and don't affect your cost basis. If you then sold the stocks for a different amount, you'd need that sale price to calculate your capital gain/loss. Could you double-check your brokerage statements to confirm what that $275.43 actually represents? This will make a big difference in how you report everything on your tax return.
This happened to me in March. My WMR never moved past the first bar, but my check arrived on March 15th. I filed on February 2nd, so it took exactly 41 days from filing to delivery. I had the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Credit on my return which always takes longer. The IRS is processing returns in batches this year, and many people in my situation are reporting the same experience - WMR not updating but checks arriving anyway.
I'm going through the exact same thing right now! Filed on February 8th and my WMR has been stuck on "Return Received" for over 3 weeks. It's so reassuring to hear that others have gotten their refunds even when WMR doesn't update - I was starting to think something was wrong with my return. I've been checking it multiple times a day like it's going to magically change! š I'm definitely going to try checking my transcript like some of the others suggested. Thanks for posting this - it's nice to know I'm not alone in this frustrating waiting game. Fingers crossed we both get our checks soon!
I'm in the exact same boat! Filed February 12th and my WMR has been frozen on that first bar for what feels like forever. Reading all these comments is actually making me feel so much better - I was convinced something was wrong with my return! The transcript checking idea sounds really smart, I'm definitely going to try that tomorrow. It's crazy how many of us are dealing with this same WMR issue but still getting our refunds. Thanks for sharing your experience, it's nice to know we're all in this together! š¤
I'm in the same boat! Just realized my PayPal hit about $2500 from selling old furniture and electronics. Quick question - what tax software are people using that handles 1099-K from personal sales well? I tried using FreeTaxUSA last year and it kept treating all my sales as business income.
I was in a very similar situation last year and want to share what I learned from my tax preparer. The key thing to understand is that the 1099-K is just an information document - it tells the IRS that you received payments, but it doesn't automatically mean all of that money is taxable income. For personal items sold at a loss (which is most household goods), you'll want to: 1. Keep a simple spreadsheet listing each item sold, what you estimate you originally paid, and what you sold it for 2. Report the 1099-K income on Schedule 1, Line 8z "Other Income" 3. Then subtract your cost basis (what you originally paid) right below it as a negative adjustment The IRS knows that people don't keep receipts for personal purchases from years ago. They accept reasonable estimates based on what similar items would have cost when new. Just be honest and conservative in your estimates. For your situation where you received $2,700 but estimate you originally paid $8,000, you'd show the $2,700 as income and then subtract $8,000 as cost basis, resulting in no additional tax owed since you sold everything at a loss. The important thing is to address the 1099-K on your return rather than ignoring it, since the IRS has a copy too.
This is really helpful, thank you! I'm curious about the "reasonable estimates" part - is there any guidance on how to estimate what you paid for items years ago? I'm worried about being too high or too low with my estimates and triggering questions from the IRS. Should I try to find similar items online to see what they would have cost back then, or is there a simpler approach?
AaliyahAli
Has anyone had experience with how refinancing affects this situation? I did seller financing 3 years ago, and now the buyer wants to refinance with a traditional bank. I'm trying to figure out if I'll get hit with a big tax bill and lose my healthcare subsidy all at once when they pay off the remaining balance.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
ā¢When your buyer refinances and pays off the remaining balance, you'll report all the remaining capital gain in that year. If it's a substantial amount, it could definitely push you over the subsidy cliff for that particular tax year. You might want to consider timing - if they can close the refinance in January of next year instead of December of this year, it could give you an extra year to plan.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
ā¢That's really helpful! I'll definitely talk to the buyer about potentially closing in January rather than December. Seems like such a small change but could make a huge difference for my tax situation. I guess I need to prepare for one year of higher premiums when this payout happens. At least it's just one year rather than an ongoing issue. Thanks for the insight!
0 coins
Sophie Footman
This is such a complex situation that intersects tax law and healthcare policy! I went through something similar when I sold my condo with owner financing last year. One thing I learned that might help is to consider the "subsidy cliff" at 400% of the Federal Poverty Level. If your installment payments push you just over that threshold, you lose ALL premium tax credits, which can be devastating. But if you're well under or well over that line, the incremental impact might be more manageable. I ended up working with a tax professional who specialized in ACA implications because the interaction between installment sale reporting and MAGI calculations is really tricky. They helped me model different payment structures to see how each would affect my healthcare costs over the life of the loan. Also worth noting - if you're close to retirement age, the timing becomes even more important since Medicare eligibility at 65 eliminates the ACA marketplace concerns entirely. Something to factor into your decision if you're in that age range. The key is running the numbers for your specific situation rather than trying to apply general rules, since everyone's income profile and subsidy eligibility is different.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
ā¢This is exactly the kind of comprehensive analysis I was hoping to find! The subsidy cliff at 400% FPL is something I hadn't fully considered - you're right that going from getting credits to getting nothing can be a huge shock. I'm 58, so the Medicare consideration is definitely relevant for my planning. It sounds like working with a specialist who understands both the tax and ACA implications is really the way to go here rather than trying to piece it together from different sources. Did your tax professional help you actually negotiate the payment structure with the buyer, or did they just analyze options you presented to them? I'm wondering how much flexibility buyers typically have when you come back with specific payment timing requests.
0 coins