IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Make sure you also understand the exact terms of what happens if the company goes under or gets acquired during your service period! I had a "forgivable loan" for my MBA that turned into a NIGHTMARE when my company was acquired and the new parent company didn't honor the original forgiveness terms. I ended up with both a huge tax bill AND had to repay part of the loan.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

That sounds terrible! Did you have any legal recourse? Was there anything in the contract that could have protected you?

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

Another important consideration is to get clarity on how the company handles tax withholdings during the forgiveness period. Some employers will "gross up" the forgiven amount to cover your tax liability (essentially giving you extra money to pay the taxes), while others leave you responsible for the full tax bill on your regular salary. For example, if $36k of your loan is forgiven in year one of employment, that's $36k of additional taxable income. Depending on your tax bracket, you might owe $8k-12k in taxes on that forgiven amount, but your regular paycheck won't have had those taxes withheld. This can create a nasty surprise at tax time or require you to make quarterly estimated payments. I'd strongly recommend asking your employer about their tax withholding policy for loan forgiveness before you sign. If they don't gross up or handle withholdings, make sure you're setting aside money throughout the year to cover the tax liability.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

I went through this exact same thing with Missouri last year! After weeks of "processing" status and no luck getting through on the phone, I discovered that Missouri DOR sometimes has issues with their automated systems not updating properly. What finally worked for me was filing a formal inquiry through their website - there's a "Contact Us" form specifically for refund issues that goes to a different department than the phone lines. I got a response within 3 business days explaining that my return had been flagged for a routine audit review (nothing wrong, just random selection) and they expedited it once I responded to their inquiry. Also, if you have direct deposit set up, double-check that your bank account info was entered correctly - a surprising number of delays are due to rejected deposits that bounce back to the state. Hope this helps and you get your refund soon!

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

This is super helpful! I didn't even know there was a separate contact form for refund issues. I've been trying to call for weeks with no luck. Going to try this approach right now - hopefully I get a response like you did. Thanks for sharing your experience!

0 coins

Sienna Gomez

•

I'm dealing with the exact same frustration with Missouri! Filed in late January, got my federal refund quickly, but Missouri is still showing "processing" with no timeline. It's ridiculous that we have to become detectives just to figure out what's happening with our own money. I've been checking the status online daily and it never changes. Reading through all these comments, it sounds like Missouri DOR is just chronically understaffed and slow. Going to try calling that 573-751-3505 number first thing tomorrow morning, and if that doesn't work I'll try the email route someone mentioned. It's frustrating that some people are having to pay for third-party services just to get basic information about their refunds. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - at least I know I'm not alone in this mess!

0 coins

Liam Brown

•

Has anyone used Sprintax for filing their Non-Resident Alien tax return? My university gives us free access to it, but I'm not sure if it handles these tax treaty situations correctly, especially if there were withholding mistakes during the year.

0 coins

Olivia Garcia

•

I used Sprintax last year and it handled my tax treaty exemption perfectly. It asks detailed questions about your visa status, treaty eligibility, and even walks you through Form 8233 issues if you had incorrect withholding. My university also provided it for free, and I got back all the federal taxes that were incorrectly withheld from my assistantship. One tip though - make sure you have all your documents ready before you start: all pay stubs, W-2, any 1042-S forms for treaty benefits already applied, and your passport/visa info. The system is pretty thorough about checking F1 Non-Resident Alien eligibility for tax treaty benefits.

0 coins

Natalie Wang

•

I went through this exact same situation last year as an F1 student from Canada! The key thing that helped me was understanding that even though you filled out the W-8BEN, your university's payroll system might not be properly configured to apply the tax treaty exemption automatically. Here's what worked for me: I had to go to the payroll office with a printed copy of the specific tax treaty article (Article 20 for Canada, but yours will be different for Malaysia) and explicitly request that they update my withholding status. Sometimes they need to manually override their system to stop the automatic withholding. Also, keep detailed records of everything - all your pay stubs, the W-8BEN you submitted, and any correspondence with the payroll office. If they can't fix it immediately, you'll definitely be able to get a full refund when you file your tax return next year. The IRS is actually pretty good about honoring tax treaty exemptions for F1 students once you have all the proper documentation. Don't give up - this is a really common issue that gets resolved once the right people understand your situation!

0 coins

Has anyone mentioned the substantial contribution rules yet? If your LLC is making donations worth more than $5,000, you'll need a qualified appraisal for non-cash donations. And for donations over $500, you need to file Form 8283 with your tax return. Also, the rules are different depending on how your LLC is taxed. If it's a single-member LLC treated as a disregarded entity, the donation is treated as coming from you personally. If it's taxed as a partnership or S-corp, the deduction passes through to your personal return but with different limitations. This is definitely not a DIY situation - get a good tax professional who understands both business taxation and non-profit rules.

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

What about the contemporaneous written acknowledgment requirement? I think for donations over $250 you need proper documentation from the nonprofit at the time of donation, not just when you file taxes.

0 coins

You're absolutely correct about the contemporaneous written acknowledgment requirement. For any donation of $250 or more, you need a written acknowledgment from the qualified organization before you file your tax return. It must include the amount of cash and a description (but not value) of any property contributed, whether the organization provided any goods or services in return, and a description and good faith estimate of the value of any goods or services provided. This is especially important in the original poster's case since they control both entities. The IRS will look very closely at the documentation to ensure everything was properly handled at the time of donation, not retroactively created at tax time.

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

I've been following this discussion with great interest as someone who's navigated similar waters. One critical aspect I haven't seen fully addressed is the potential for excess benefit transactions under IRC Section 4958. When you're the founder/controller of both the LLC and the non-profit, the IRS may view you as a "disqualified person" under the intermediate sanctions rules. This means any transaction between your entities must provide no more than reasonable compensation or fair market value to avoid penalty taxes. The $120K in "donations" you're describing could be scrutinized not just as potentially inflated charitable deductions, but as excess benefits flowing to you indirectly through your non-profit. The IRS might argue that you're effectively paying yourself through the non-profit while claiming tax deductions through the LLC. A few key points to consider: - Document fair market value for any goods/services transferred - Ensure your non-profit's board (if you have independent members) formally approves accepting these contributions - Consider whether some of these expenses might be better classified as program-related investments rather than donations - Be prepared to demonstrate that the non-profit is serving a genuine charitable purpose beyond just providing you tax benefits Given the complexity and audit risk, I'd strongly recommend getting an opinion from a tax attorney who specializes in exempt organizations, not just a general CPA.

0 coins

Dylan Evans

•

This is exactly the kind of analysis I was hoping to see in this thread! The intermediate sanctions angle is crucial and often overlooked. As someone new to navigating the intersection of business and nonprofit taxation, I'm curious - how does one practically go about getting that fair market value documentation? For things like services or program materials, is it sufficient to get comparable quotes from other providers, or does the IRS expect more formal appraisals? Also, when you mention program-related investments, could you elaborate on how that might work in this scenario? I'm not familiar with that concept but it sounds like it could be relevant for situations where there's legitimate business overlap between the entities. The point about having an independent board approve contributions is really important too. I imagine the IRS would be much more skeptical if it's just a rubber-stamp board versus truly independent decision-makers.

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

Don't forget to also look into how this might affect financial aid! When my kid got a tuition benefit from my university job, it counted as a resource in financial aid calculations and reduced her eligibility for other university scholarships and grants. In our case, the tuition benefit wasn't taxable, but it did mean she couldn't get need-based aid from the university that she might have otherwise qualified for. We ended up slightly better off financially, but not as much as we initially thought. Also, if your daughter is applying early decision, make absolutely sure you understand how the benefit works beforehand. Once you commit through early decision, you're obligated to attend regardless of the financial package.

0 coins

This is such an important point. At our university, the tuition benefit for employees' children replaces ALL other university scholarships, even merit-based ones. So if your child would have qualified for merit scholarships that might have covered 50% of tuition anyway, you're only really benefiting from the other 50% the employee benefit covers.

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

As someone who went through this exact situation three years ago, I can confirm that the Section 117(d) qualified tuition reduction for undergraduate education is indeed tax-free with no dollar limit. My daughter's tuition was around $75K and we didn't pay a penny in taxes on that benefit. The key thing that helped me was getting everything in writing from HR before my daughter committed. I asked specifically for documentation that confirmed our benefit was structured as a "qualified tuition reduction under IRC Section 117(d)" rather than taxable compensation. This documentation was crucial when I filed our taxes - my tax preparer needed it to properly exclude the benefit from our income. One tip: ask your HR department for the specific tax code they use when reporting (or not reporting) this benefit. If they're treating it correctly as a Section 117(d) benefit, they shouldn't be issuing you any tax forms for it at all. If they mention Forms 1098-T or W-2 reporting, that might indicate they're treating it as taxable income, which would be wrong for undergraduate tuition benefits for employees' dependents. The early decision timeline does add pressure, but getting this clarity upfront will give you peace of mind. In my experience, most university HR departments understand these rules well once you use the specific tax code language - it's just that they're cautious about giving tax advice.

0 coins

Prev1...34623463346434653466...5643Next