Do you know which other states besides California might still allow these deductions? I'm in New York and wondering if I might be able to at least get some benefit on my state return.

New York does still allow miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor, including unreimbursed employee business expenses! So while you can't take these deductions on your federal return, you can still claim them on your New York state return. Minnesota and Arkansas also didn't fully conform to the TCJA changes regarding these deductions. Several other states have their own versions of itemized deductions that might help, but the rules vary significantly. Just make sure you're keeping detailed records - date, starting location, ending location, mileage, and business purpose for each trip.

I appreciate this suggestion! Do you happen to know if there are any red flags this might raise with the IRS? And roughly what percentage of my work would need to fall under the S-Corp for this to make sense financially?

This approach definitely needs careful consideration as the IRS does scrutinize arrangements where someone works as both an employee and contractor for related entities. The work performed under each arrangement must be legitimately different to justify the separate classification. Generally, CPAs recommend at least 15-20% of your total income should come through the S-Corp for the setup and maintenance costs to make sense. Remember there are additional expenses with an S-Corp including separate accounting, potentially additional insurance, and compliance requirements. The miles between locations would only be deductible for travel related to your S-Corp work, not your W2 employment.

Thats a really good point I hadn't considered. Did you end up getting special business insurance for your vehicle or is there some kind of rider they add to a personal policy?

I ended up getting what they call a "business use endorsement" added to my personal auto policy. It increased my premium by about 15%, but it properly covers me when I'm driving for business purposes. Some insurance companies offer specific business auto policies, but those are usually more appropriate for companies with multiple vehicles or employees driving for the business. For a sole proprietor like me who uses the same vehicle for both business and personal use, the endorsement was the more cost-effective option. Definitely worth calling your insurance agent to discuss your specific situation.

Is it better then to start using it for business immediately after purchase? Or does that create other issues? My accountant has me totally confused about this whole topic.

That's really helpful. We have 3 people on our tax team right now, but we're planning to grow. Would you recommend starting with something simpler and migrating later, or just jumping into OneSource to avoid multiple transitions?

With a team of 3, I'd probably recommend starting with something simpler unless your corporate structure is already quite complex. The licensing and implementation costs for OneSource are substantial, and you won't utilize many of the advanced features right away. If you're definitely planning to grow significantly in the next 1-2 years, it might make sense to start with OneSource to avoid multiple transitions. But if growth will be more gradual, you could save considerably by using a mid-tier solution for now and migrating when you have 5+ tax specialists.

I've used both extensively. Thomson OneSource is stronger for corporate tax work, especially complex multi-entity structures. CCH Axcess has better workflow management and is more intuitive for new users. If you're primarily focused on corporate income tax with multi-state filings, Thomson has the edge. For a balanced practice with both individual and corporate clients, CCH might be better. Thomson's document management isn't as seamless as CCH's, but their calculation engine is more robust for complex scenarios.

Thank you for mentioning state taxes! I completely forgot about that aspect. Do you know if most states follow the same $400 self-employment threshold as federal, or does it vary a lot by state?

State tax requirements vary quite a bit. Some states like Florida, Texas, and Nevada don't have any income tax at all, so you wouldn't need to file a state return there. Other states have their own thresholds that might be different from the federal $400 self-employment threshold. For example, California requires filing if you have any income tax withheld or if your income exceeds certain thresholds based on filing status and age. Some states also have special rules for self-employment income specifically.

This is so important! When I first started freelancing, I didn't track expenses properly and ended up paying way more in self-employment tax than I needed to. Now I keep receipts for everything business-related.

That's a really good point I hadn't considered! My personal laptop is already showing signs of wear after 2 years of full-time work use. Before, I could use some of that monthly stipend toward eventually replacing it, but now that would just come from my regular (taxed) salary. Did your company require any specific documentation when you brought this up to them? I'd like to approach my manager about this but want to be prepared.

I simply put together a basic spreadsheet showing the average lifespan of a decent laptop (3-4 years), the cost of a business-grade laptop ($1200-1500), and calculated the monthly depreciation. I also included estimates for printer replacement, external monitors, and other peripherals. When presented with the actual numbers, they saw it made more sense to establish a separate equipment refresh program rather than expecting employees to handle it from regular salary. They now offer a $1500 tech stipend every 3 years that doesn't affect our regular compensation.

Were there any other benefits affected by this change? When our company did this, we discovered that because our base salary was higher, our 401k match increased slightly (since it was a percentage of salary). That helped offset a tiny bit of the tax hit.