IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I went through this exact same situation last year and it was incredibly stressful at first, but it does get resolved! Here's what worked for me: The first step is definitely talking to your parents - in my case, they had claimed me because they paid for my health insurance through their employer plan and assumed that meant they could still claim me as a dependent. They didn't realize that with my income level and the fact that I was covering all my other living expenses, I no longer qualified. Once we figured that out, my parents filed an amended return (Form 1040X) to remove me as their dependent. It took about 12 weeks for their amendment to process, but once it did, I was able to file my return electronically and got my refund within 3 weeks. The key thing to remember is that it's not about who pays for what specific expenses - it's about whether you provided more than half of your total support for the year. With your $38,000 income, you're almost certainly providing your own support unless someone else is covering your major expenses like rent and food. Keep all your documentation handy (pay stubs, rent payments, grocery receipts, etc.) in case you need to prove your case. And yes, definitely look into getting an IP PIN from the IRS - it's free and will prevent this from happening again in the future. Don't stress too much - this is way more common than you'd think, especially for recent grads!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience, Madison! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the same thing. I'm curious - during those 12 weeks while your parents' amended return was processing, were you able to do anything else tax-wise, or did you just have to wait it out? Also, did the IRS give you any updates during that time, or was it just radio silence until it was finally processed? I'm trying to figure out if I should expect any communication from them or if I'll just have to be patient and wait for the system to update.

0 coins

During those 12 weeks, it was pretty much just waiting it out, unfortunately. I couldn't file my return electronically because the system would still reject it with the same error code. The IRS doesn't really give you updates on amended return processing either - you can check the status online with their "Where's My Amended Return?" tool, but it just shows basic stages like "received," "processing," and "completed." The most frustrating part was that there's no way to expedite an amended return - it just takes as long as it takes. I did call the IRS once around week 8 to make sure everything was moving along, and they confirmed my parents' amendment was in process, but couldn't give me a specific timeline. Once their amended return finally processed though, it was like a switch flipped - I could immediately file electronically and everything went smoothly from there. Just had to be patient, which I know is easier said than done when you're waiting for your refund! The bright side is that once it's resolved, you shouldn't have this problem again, especially if you get that IP PIN.

0 coins

I'm so sorry you're dealing with this - it's such a frustrating situation! I went through something very similar when I graduated and started working full-time. The rejection code F1040-516-01 is definitely related to someone claiming you as a dependent. Before assuming it's identity theft, definitely have that conversation with your parents first. Even though you've been supporting yourself, they might have claimed you thinking they still could because they helped with tuition or kept you on their health insurance. A lot of parents don't realize the rules changed once you started earning significant income. The IRS dependency test is pretty clear - if you earned $38,000 and have been covering your own living expenses (rent, food, utilities, etc.), you almost certainly shouldn't be claimed as anyone's dependent, regardless of who paid for what specific bills. If it turns out your parents did claim you, they'll need to file Form 1040X (amended return) to remove you as their dependent. Yes, this means waiting 8-12 weeks for their amendment to process before you can file electronically, but it's better than the alternative of filing competing paper returns and letting the IRS sort it out (which takes even longer). If no family member claimed you, then definitely treat this as potential identity theft and contact the IRS Identity Protection Unit immediately. Either way, document all your income and expenses for 2024 - you may need to prove you supported yourself. Hang in there - this will get resolved!

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

This is really solid advice, Abby! I'm going through something similar right now and your point about the dependency rules is spot on. I had no idea that earning $38,000 would essentially disqualify me from being claimed as a dependent regardless of other factors. One thing I'm wondering about - if my parents do need to file that amended return, is there any way to speed up the 8-12 week processing time? Like, can they mark it as urgent or pay for expedited processing? I really need my refund for some upcoming expenses and the thought of waiting that long is stressing me out. Also, when you went through this, did your parents face any penalties for claiming you incorrectly, or was it just a matter of fixing the mistake?

0 coins

Charlie Yang

•

Unfortunately, there's no way to expedite the processing of an amended return - the IRS doesn't offer expedited service for Form 1040X even if you're willing to pay extra. The 8-12 week timeframe is pretty firm, and sometimes it can take even longer during busy periods. As for penalties, in most cases there aren't any penalties if it was an honest mistake and your parents file the amended return to correct it. The IRS understands that tax situations can be confusing, especially when kids transition from being dependents to being independent. They only impose penalties if they determine there was intentional fraud or if someone refuses to correct a known error. I know the wait is frustrating when you need your refund, but once their amendment processes, you should be able to file electronically right away and get your refund within the normal 21-day timeframe. It's definitely worth having that conversation with your parents sooner rather than later though - the clock doesn't start ticking on that 8-12 weeks until they actually file the Form 1040X. In the meantime, you might want to check if you have any other options for the expenses you mentioned - maybe a small personal loan or asking family for temporary help if that's possible.

0 coins

Sofia Gomez

•

I actually had this exact same issue with E*TRADE last month - got a 1099-MISC with $0.03 in box 3 that was driving me nuts! After reading through these responses, I called E*TRADE and they confirmed it was from their share lending program too. The customer service rep explained that when they lend out your shares to short sellers, sometimes there are tiny fractional payments that get rounded to the nearest penny. She said this happens more often than people realize, especially if you hold dividend-paying stocks that get borrowed frequently. I ended up following the advice here and put it on Schedule 1 as "Other Income" with the description "substitute payment - securities lending" and TurboTax accepted it without any issues. No more error messages blocking my e-file! It's crazy how such a small amount can cause so much confusion, but at least now I know what to expect if it happens again next year. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - definitely saved me hours of frustration!

0 coins

This whole thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with the exact same situation - got a 1099-MISC from Schwab with $0.02 in box 3 and was completely baffled. Reading everyone's experiences makes me feel so much better that this is actually normal. I had no idea that brokerages automatically enroll you in share lending programs. It seems like they should be more transparent about this since it creates these confusing tax situations. I'm definitely going to call Schwab tomorrow to get the details and then follow the advice here to report it on Schedule 1 instead of Schedule C. Thanks to everyone who shared their stories - it's amazing how a community can solve problems that would take hours to figure out on your own!

0 coins

Laila Prince

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a CPA and see this issue constantly during tax season. Just to add some official context - the IRS specifically states in Publication 550 that substitute payments in lieu of dividends from securities lending should generally be reported as "Other Income" rather than self-employment income. The reason TurboTax defaults to Schedule C is because box 3 of Form 1099-MISC is labeled "Other Income" and the software assumes it could be business-related. But substitute payments from share lending are investment-related, not business activities, so Schedule 1 Line 8z is the correct placement. For anyone still dealing with this - you can usually find more details about the payment in your brokerage account's tax documents section or monthly statements from when the payment was made. Most major brokers (Schwab, Fidelity, Robinhood, etc.) will show these as "substitute payments" or "payments in lieu of dividends" in your transaction history. Don't stress about the small amounts - just make sure they're categorized correctly to avoid any potential issues down the road!

0 coins

Lia Quinn

•

Thank you so much for the professional insight! As someone who's completely new to investing and taxes, this explanation really helps clarify things. I had no idea there was an actual IRS publication that addresses this specific situation. I'm curious - when you help clients with these substitute payments, do you ever recommend they opt out of the securities lending programs altogether to avoid this confusion in the future? Or is the income (even though it's tiny amounts) generally worth keeping the lending enabled? I'm wondering if there are pros and cons I should consider beyond just the tax reporting headache. Also, is there a way to tell from the 1099-MISC itself that it's specifically from securities lending, or do you always have to call the brokerage to confirm? It would be helpful to know what to look for so I can handle this myself next year if it happens again.

0 coins

@469cf7521cca This is incredibly helpful professional guidance! I'm wondering if there's a threshold amount where the IRS might actually flag these substitute payments for review? Like if someone had hundreds of these tiny transactions throughout the year, would that create any red flags even if they're properly reported on Schedule 1? Also, do you know if there's any difference in how these substitute payments are treated for state tax purposes? I'm in California and want to make sure I'm handling this correctly at both the federal and state level. My Robinhood 1099-MISC shows the same $0.01 amount but I haven't seen any specific state guidance on where to report it.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding the multi-generational wealth transfer potential of 529 plans! I'm curious about one aspect that hasn't been fully explored yet - the investment growth implications over long time horizons. If you're truly using 529 plans as a multi-generational strategy, you could potentially have funds growing tax-free for 50+ years before they're needed for education expenses. The compounding effect could be massive, but I'm wondering about the practical considerations: 1. How do you balance aggressive growth investments (appropriate for long time horizons) with the need for more conservative allocations as beneficiaries approach college age? 2. Do most 529 plans offer age-based portfolios that automatically adjust, or do you need to actively manage the asset allocation as beneficiaries age and new ones are added? 3. If you're changing beneficiaries frequently across generations, how do you handle the fact that different beneficiaries might be at very different life stages and need different investment approaches? I'm thinking about setting up 529s for my newborn grandchildren, but I want to make sure I'm not just focusing on the tax benefits while ignoring the investment strategy that will actually determine how much wealth gets transferred. Anyone have experience managing 529 investments across multiple generations with varying time horizons?

0 coins

Great questions about the investment management side! I'm relatively new to this whole 529-as-wealth-transfer concept, but from what I've been researching, it seems like the investment strategy becomes really complex when you're dealing with multiple generations and potential beneficiary changes. From what I understand, most 529 plans do offer age-based portfolios that automatically shift from aggressive to conservative as the beneficiary approaches college age. But like you said, this gets tricky when you might change beneficiaries - suddenly your "aggressive growth" portfolio designed for a newborn could be assigned to a 16-year-old who needs college funds in 2 years. I've been wondering the same thing about whether you need to actively manage these transitions or if there are 529 plans that handle multiple beneficiaries with different timelines more elegantly. It seems like you'd almost need separate accounts for different generations to maintain appropriate asset allocations, but then you lose some of the flexibility that makes 529s attractive for wealth transfer in the first place. Has anyone found 529 plan providers that are particularly good at handling these complex multi-beneficiary situations? Or do most people just accept that they'll need to actively manage the investment allocations as they shuffle beneficiaries around?

0 coins

Diego Fisher

•

The investment management aspect is crucial and often overlooked when people get excited about the tax benefits of 529s for wealth transfer. I've been managing a multi-generational 529 strategy for about 8 years now, and here's what I've learned: Most age-based portfolios are designed around a single beneficiary's timeline, so they don't work well when you're planning to change beneficiaries across generations. I ended up using static allocation portfolios instead - maintaining separate 529 accounts with different investment strategies based on likely usage timelines. For example, I have one account with aggressive growth investments for my youngest grandchildren (won't need funds for 15+ years), another with moderate allocation for kids who are 10-12 years from college, and a third with conservative investments for near-term education expenses. When I need to change beneficiaries, I can move them between accounts based on their timeline rather than trying to manage one account with conflicting investment needs. The key insight: treat it like a family of 529 accounts rather than trying to make one account serve multiple generations. Yes, it's more administrative work, but it lets you optimize the investment strategy for each time horizon while maintaining the beneficiary flexibility that makes this wealth transfer strategy work. One tip: Vanguard and Fidelity both offer good static allocation options and make it relatively easy to transfer funds between accounts when changing beneficiaries. The investment growth potential over 20-50 year horizons really is substantial if you can stay appropriately aggressive in the early years.

0 coins

@Diego Fisher This is exactly the kind of strategic thinking I was hoping to find! Your approach of maintaining separate 529 accounts for different time horizons makes so much sense - I can t'believe I was trying to figure out how to make one account work for everyone. I m'curious about the administrative complexity though. When you have multiple accounts like this, how do you handle the gift tax implications? Can you still use the 5-year front-loading election for each account separately, or do you have to spread your contributions across all the accounts to stay within the annual limits? Also, when you transfer beneficiaries between accounts say (moving a grandchild from the aggressive "growth account" to the moderate "allocation account" as they get closer to college age ,)is that process straightforward with Vanguard/Fidelity? I m'imagining there might be timing issues where you have to liquidate investments in one account and then reinvest in another, potentially missing market movements. This multi-account strategy seems like it could really optimize the wealth transfer potential while managing investment risk appropriately. I m'definitely going to explore this approach instead of trying to make a single account work for multiple generations with different needs.

0 coins

This is such a frustrating situation, but you're definitely not alone! The same thing happened to me a few years ago and it was a real wake-up call about how withholdings actually work. One thing that might help immediately - check if you had any life changes this year beyond the raise. Did you get married, divorced, have a baby, or lose any dependents? Sometimes people forget these changes affect their tax situation significantly. Also, did you itemize deductions last year but take the standard deduction this year (or vice versa)? The other thing to look at is whether you received any one-time payments this year - bonuses, overtime, commission, etc. These are often taxed at a flat 22% rate for withholding purposes, but depending on your actual tax bracket, that might not be enough to cover what you'll actually owe on that income. For the immediate problem, definitely look into an IRS payment plan. You can often set one up online through their website without having to call, and the fees are pretty reasonable. It's much better than trying to scramble for the full amount right now. Going forward, I'd really recommend doing a "paycheck checkup" quarterly, especially after any salary changes. The IRS actually has a withholding calculator on their website that can help you figure out if you need to adjust your W-4. Better to catch these things early than get surprised again next year!

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

This is such solid advice about checking for life changes and one-time payments! I totally overlooked that bonuses and overtime might be withheld at a different rate than regular income. That could definitely be part of my problem since I did get some overtime hours during our busy season this year. The quarterly paycheck checkup idea is brilliant - I'm definitely going to start doing that. It's way better to catch these issues early and adjust rather than getting blindsided every April. Thanks for mentioning the IRS withholding calculator too, I had no idea that existed on their website. Going to bookmark that for sure! I'm feeling a bit less panicked knowing there are reasonable payment plan options available. At least I won't have to completely drain my savings over this mess.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

I've been through this exact nightmare! Last year my $2,500 raise somehow turned into a $3,200 tax bill shock. What I discovered was that my employer's payroll system was still using withholding tables from when I started at my lower salary, so even though my gross pay went up, the withholding percentage didn't adjust automatically. Here's what saved me: I printed out every single pay stub from both years and highlighted the "Fed Tax Withheld" line on each one. When I added them up, I realized that even though my income went up 5%, my total withholding for the year only went up about 1%. That gap is exactly where my surprise tax bill came from. The really frustrating part is that nobody tells you this stuff! Your employer just processes whatever W-4 you have on file - they don't automatically recalculate your withholding when your salary changes. It's like they expect you to be a tax expert on top of your actual job. For immediate relief, definitely apply for an IRS payment plan online - it's way easier than calling and the monthly fees are reasonable. And going forward, I now update my W-4 every time I get any kind of pay increase, even small ones. It's annoying extra paperwork but way better than another surprise bill!

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! The pay stub comparison idea is brilliant - I'm going to do that this weekend to see exactly where the gap occurred. It's so frustrating that this is basically a hidden gotcha that nobody warns you about when you get a raise. I really appreciate you mentioning that the withholding percentage needs to be manually adjusted - I had no idea the system worked that way. I just assumed everything would scale automatically with salary changes. Definitely going to make updating my W-4 part of my routine going forward, even for small increases. The online payment plan option sounds like a lifesaver right now. At least I can breathe a little easier knowing I don't have to come up with thousands of dollars immediately. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helping me feel less alone in this mess!

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

The bucket analogy from Chloe really resonated with me too! I've been helping friends and family with their taxes for years, and capital loss carryovers are always the trickiest part to explain. One additional tip that might help: when you're filling out line 1, always double-check that your Schedule D line 16 shows a LOSS (negative number). If line 16 shows a gain, you wouldn't use the Capital Loss Carryover Worksheet at all - it's only for when your losses exceed your gains. Also, don't forget that if you're married filing separately, your annual deduction limit is only $1,500 instead of $3,000. I've seen people miss that detail and wonder why their calculations don't match the worksheet. The IRS really should simplify these instructions, but understanding that you're essentially rationing your losses over multiple years (because of the annual limit) is the key concept that makes everything else fall into place.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

Thank you Emma for that important clarification about Schedule D line 16 needing to show a loss! I actually made that mistake on my first attempt - I was trying to use the carryover worksheet when I had a small net gain, which obviously didn't make sense. The married filing separately limit is also something I completely overlooked. My spouse and I file separately due to some complicated business income situations, so I should be using $1,500 as my limit instead of $3,000. That changes my whole calculation! Between the bucket analogy from @fa0c4e8d1f86 and your reminder about the filing status limits, I think I finally have a clear picture of how to tackle this worksheet. It's frustrating that something so fundamental to tax planning is explained so poorly in the official instructions, but this community discussion has been incredibly helpful.

0 coins

I went through this exact same struggle with the capital loss carryover worksheet last tax season! The "bucket with a drain" analogy that Chloe shared is spot on - it really helped me visualize what's happening. One thing that also helped me was creating a simple checklist to make sure I was doing line 1 correctly: 1. Check Schedule D line 16 - does it show a LOSS (negative number)? If not, you don't need this worksheet. 2. Enter that loss amount in line 1 first part (the "bucket") 3. For line 1 second part (the "drain"), enter the SMALLER of: your loss from step 2 OR your filing status limit ($3,000 for most people, $1,500 if married filing separately) 4. The difference between parts 1 and 2 is what carries forward to next year I also keep a simple spreadsheet tracking my carryover amounts from year to year, which makes it much easier when I have to deal with this worksheet again. The IRS instructions make this seem way more complicated than it actually is once you understand the basic concept of the annual deduction limit. Hope this helps anyone else wrestling with this confusing form!

0 coins

This checklist approach is incredibly helpful! I'm definitely going to save this for when I tackle my taxes next month. The step-by-step breakdown makes it so much less intimidating than trying to decipher the IRS instructions. I especially appreciate the tip about keeping a spreadsheet to track carryover amounts year to year. I sold some investments at a loss this year and I know I'll have carryovers to deal with for the next few years, so having a simple tracking system will save me so much confusion down the road. It's amazing how much clearer this whole process becomes when people explain it in plain English instead of tax jargon. Between the bucket analogy, the checklist, and all the real examples everyone has shared, I actually feel confident about handling this worksheet now. Thank you for putting together such a practical guide!

0 coins

Prev1...341342343344345...5645Next