IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Jenna Sloan

•

The IRS can also cross-reference your income reported on Schedule C with your claimed retirement contributions to see if they're reasonable. If you're claiming max contributions but only reporting modest business income, that might trigger questions. Make sure your profit sharing contributions actually align with your reported business profits!

0 coins

This happened to my brother last year! He claimed the full employer contribution but his Schedule C profit wasn't high enough to justify it. Got a letter from the IRS about 6 months after filing.

0 coins

Another important point about IRS verification - they also use data matching algorithms that compare your reported retirement contributions across multiple forms. For example, if you claim a solo 401k deduction on your 1040 but the amounts don't match what's reported on your business return, that can trigger automated flags. I learned this the hard way when I made an error calculating my maximum employer contribution. The IRS computer systems caught the discrepancy between my Schedule C net profit and the employer contribution I claimed. Even though it was an honest mistake, I had to provide extensive documentation to prove my contributions were legitimate. My advice: run your numbers through multiple calculators before making contributions, and keep a spreadsheet showing exactly how you calculated both your employee and employer contribution limits. This saved me during my correspondence with the IRS because I could show my methodology even though I made an arithmetic error.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This is really helpful - I hadn't thought about the cross-referencing between forms! Do you know if there's a safe harbor amount or percentage where the IRS algorithms are less likely to flag contributions? Like if I keep my total retirement contributions under a certain percentage of my Schedule C income, would that reduce audit risk? I'm planning my 2025 contributions now and want to be strategic about avoiding unnecessary scrutiny while still maximizing my tax-advantaged savings.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly educational! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my company gave out quarterly bonus advances that were taxed normally, but they're now recovering them through straight payroll deductions after taxes. What's really helpful is seeing all the different approaches people have used to resolve this - from talking directly with payroll using specific language about gross vs. net wage adjustments, to using tools like taxr.ai to analyze the situation, to even getting IRS confirmation through services like Claimyr when needed. The key takeaway seems to be that this is a fixable problem, but it requires being proactive. I'm planning to approach our HR department this week with the specific question about whether they're reducing gross wages or taking after-tax deductions, and I'll reference IRS Publication 15 if needed. One thing I'm curious about - for those who successfully got their employers to fix this mid-year, did they also issue corrected paystubs for the periods where it was handled incorrectly? Or did they just adjust the method going forward? I want to make sure I don't lose out on the tax overpayment from the earlier deductions. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these complex payroll tax issues!

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•

Great question about the corrected paystubs! In my experience, most employers will just adjust the method going forward rather than issuing corrected paystubs for previous periods. However, you absolutely should ask for this when you talk to HR. If they won't issue corrections, make sure to document exactly how much you were overtaxed during the incorrect periods. You can calculate this by figuring out what your tax withholding should have been if they had reduced your gross wages instead of taking after-tax deductions. Keep detailed records because you'll need this information when filing your tax return to claim back any overpayment. Some companies are more willing to make corrections if you frame it as helping them ensure compliance rather than just asking for money back. You could say something like "I want to make sure our records are accurate for year-end tax reporting" - this sometimes gets better results than just asking them to fix your individual situation. The approach you outlined sounds perfect - having that direct conversation with specific language and IRS publication references really does make a difference in how seriously they take the issue.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

This is exactly why I love this community - so many people sharing practical solutions to complex payroll issues! I'm in a very similar boat where my employer gave everyone a "back-to-work" advance in January that was fully taxed, but now they're collecting it back through after-tax deductions. After reading through all these responses, I now understand that I'm essentially being double-taxed on this money. When I received the advance, I paid income tax, Social Security tax, and Medicare tax on it as if it were regular wages. But now when they're deducting the repayment from my net pay, I'm paying back the full pre-tax amount while having already lost money to taxes. I'm definitely going to use the direct approach mentioned by Ethan - asking payroll specifically "Are you reducing my gross wages or taking an after-tax deduction?" That seems like the clearest way to identify the problem and explain why it needs to be fixed. For anyone else in this situation, I think the key is to act quickly. The longer this incorrect method continues, the more complicated it becomes to track and potentially correct. I'm also going to request all my pay stubs from the advance period to make sure I have proper documentation of exactly what happened. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it's reassuring to know this is a common (and fixable) problem rather than something unique to my company!

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

You're absolutely right about acting quickly! I was in a nearly identical situation earlier this year and waiting too long definitely made things more complicated to track and resolve. One thing that really helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to document everything - the advance amount, taxes paid on it, and each repayment deduction. This made it much easier to show my payroll department exactly how much I was being overtaxed with each incorrect deduction. Having the numbers laid out clearly really helped them understand the problem. Also, when you talk to payroll, it might help to mention that this affects everyone who received the advance, not just you. Sometimes framing it as a company-wide compliance issue rather than an individual complaint gets faster action. My employer ended up being grateful that I brought it to their attention because they realized they needed to fix it for the entire staff. Good luck with your conversation - the direct questioning approach really does work well. Most payroll departments want to do things correctly, they just need to understand what the correct method actually is!

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

I just went through this exact transition two weeks ago and wanted to share my experience to help ease your concerns. When my WMR switched from Tax Topic 152 to the FAQ page, I was initially worried something had gone wrong with my return. Here's what actually happened in my case: - WMR changed to FAQ on a Wednesday - Transcript remained completely static for 4 days (no new codes, no updates) - On Sunday night/Monday morning, my transcript suddenly updated with cycle code 20241205 and TC846 with a deposit date - Refund hit my account exactly on the date shown What I learned is that this FAQ transition typically happens when your return moves from the automated processing system into the final human review/approval queue. The IRS systems don't communicate well with each other during this handoff, which is why you see the generic FAQ page instead of useful status information. The key thing that helped my sanity was understanding that transcript inactivity during this period is completely normal - the internal processing continues even when external systems show no updates. Your return is likely progressing normally behind the scenes. Based on the patterns I've observed from this community and others, you're probably within 5-10 days of seeing transcript movement, assuming no additional complications. Stay patient and keep checking that transcript in the early morning hours!

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I'm currently on day 2 since my WMR switched to the FAQ page, and your timeline gives me so much hope. The fact that your transcript stayed completely static for 4 days before suddenly updating matches what I'm experiencing right now. I've been checking my transcript obsessively every morning at 6 AM, and seeing absolutely no movement has been making me anxious that something went wrong. Your explanation about the handoff between automated processing and human review makes perfect sense - it explains why the systems seem to go dark during this phase. I'm going to try to be more patient and stop refreshing so frequently. Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed information about your experience!

0 coins

I'm currently experiencing this exact same situation! My WMR just switched from Tax Topic 152 to the FAQ page yesterday, and like many of you, my transcript is showing absolutely no activity. Reading through all these experiences is incredibly reassuring - it sounds like this is actually a normal (though poorly communicated) part of the process. What's particularly helpful is learning about the overnight processing windows and the 6 AM check timing. I had no idea the IRS systems updated in batches like that. It also makes sense that this represents a transition between different internal systems rather than an actual problem with our returns. I'm going to try to be patient and follow the advice here about checking transcripts in the early morning rather than obsessively refreshing throughout the day. Based on the timelines everyone has shared, it seems like most people see transcript movement within 4-10 days of this WMR change, which gives me hope that my refund is still on track. Thanks to everyone who shared their detailed experiences - this community is a lifesaver during tax season stress!

0 coins

Kelsey Chin

•

Anyone know if we're supposed to enter these 1042-S values in local tax software? I use the Australian equivalent of TurboTax and there's nowhere obvious to put "foreign tax paid" from these forms.

0 coins

For Australian tax returns, you would typically report the income from your 1042-S in the "Foreign Income" section of your tax return (usually question 20 in the individual tax return). The tax withheld shown on your 1042-S can be claimed as a foreign income tax offset. When using Australian tax software, look for options related to "foreign income" or "foreign tax credits" - most software has these sections but they might be in different places depending on which program you're using. If you're using myTax through the ATO portal, there should be a specific section for foreign income where you can enter both the income amount and tax paid.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

Great breakdown from everyone here! As someone who's been through this exact situation, I want to emphasize that the 1042-S is really just a "receipt" showing what happened with your US-source income and withholding. The key thing to check is Box 7a (withholding rate) against your country's tax treaty rate. Australia has a pretty favorable treaty with the US - for most types of income like AdSense, the rate should be 0% or very low. If you're seeing 30% withholding, that means your W-8BEN wasn't properly processed or there was some other issue. One thing I learned the hard way: even if everything looks correct on your 1042-S, make sure you're reporting this income on your Australian tax return. The ATO can cross-reference this data, and you'll want to claim any foreign tax credits for whatever was withheld. Keep these forms with your tax records - they're essentially proof of income and tax paid that you may need later. If you're getting different withholding rates year over year for the same income source, that's usually a red flag that something needs to be fixed with your W-8BEN.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm also from Australia and just received my first 1042-S from Google AdSense. The withholding rate shows 0% which seems right based on what you're saying about the Australia-US treaty. I'm a bit confused about one thing though - do I report the gross income amount (before any withholding) or just the net amount I actually received? And since there was 0% withholding, I assume there's no foreign tax credit to claim on my Australian return? Also, should I be keeping any other documentation besides the 1042-S form itself for my records?

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

The Premium Tax Credit verification process requires manual review by an IRS examiner, which is why it takes longer than standard processing. When faxing your Form 8962 and Form 1095-A, ensure you're using the correct fax number from your notice (typically CP12C or Letter 0012C). The processing timeframe after receipt is generally 6-8 weeks, though current backlog conditions may extend this slightly. Don't worry though - this is a routine verification, not an audit.

0 coins

Rudy Cenizo

•

I just went through this same verification process last month! Here's my timeline to give you a realistic expectation: I received the CP12C notice on February 5th, faxed my 8962 and 1095-A on February 8th, called to confirm receipt on February 15th (they had it), and finally received my refund on March 25th - so about 7 weeks total from when they confirmed receipt. The most stressful part was not knowing if they actually got my fax, so definitely call to confirm within a week or two. Also, make sure your 1095-A matches exactly what you put on Form 8962 - any discrepancies will cause additional delays. Good luck!

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

Thanks for sharing your timeline @Rudy Cenizo! That's actually really helpful to see real dates. I'm curious - when you called to confirm receipt, did they give you any kind of reference number or confirmation code? I'm worried about calling too soon and them not having processed the fax yet, but also don't want to wait too long if it got lost. Also, did you have any issues with the 1095-A matching your 8962? We moved states mid-year so I'm a bit nervous about potential discrepancies.

0 coins

Prev1...339340341342343...5643Next