Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with a $25,000 retention bonus that I had to repay when I left my job earlier this year. The company made it clear the repayment was required, but they didn't provide much guidance on the tax implications. From reading everyone's experiences here, it sounds like the credit method under Section 1341 would likely be better for me too, especially since my income was actually higher in the year I received the bonus compared to this year. One question I have - does it matter HOW you repaid the bonus? I had to write a personal check back to the company rather than having it deducted from final paychecks. I'm assuming that doesn't change the Section 1341 treatment, but I want to make sure I have the right documentation. Also really appreciate the mentions of taxr.ai and Claimyr - sounds like both could be helpful for getting the calculations right and actually talking to someone at the IRS about this. This is definitely not something I want to mess up!
Welcome to the Section 1341 club! The method of repayment shouldn't affect your eligibility for the credit treatment - whether you wrote a personal check, had it deducted from final pay, or even had wages garnished, what matters is that you actually repaid income that was previously included in your taxable income. Just make sure you keep excellent documentation: your original W-2 or 1099 showing the bonus, proof of the repayment (canceled check, bank statement, receipt from the company), and any correspondence with your employer confirming the repayment was required. The IRS will want to see a clear paper trail. With a $25k repayment and higher income in the bonus year, you're likely looking at significant tax savings with the credit method. Given the amount involved, I'd definitely recommend getting professional help or using one of the tools mentioned here to make sure you're maximizing your benefit and filing correctly. One mistake on a calculation this size could cost you thousands!
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a tax preparer and see Section 1341 situations maybe 2-3 times per year, so I don't always feel confident with the calculations. What I've learned from experience is that the documentation is absolutely critical - the IRS will scrutinize these claims pretty carefully. A few additional points for anyone dealing with this: 1) Make sure the repayment was actually REQUIRED, not voluntary. If you had a choice about whether to repay, Section 1341 doesn't apply. 2) The repayment has to be for income that was included in a prior year's return AND you had a legal obligation to repay it when you originally received it (even if that obligation was contingent). 3) If you're married filing jointly but only one spouse received/repaid the bonus, you still calculate as if it affected the joint return in both years. The $3,000 threshold mentioned earlier is correct - amounts under that must be handled as itemized deductions only. For amounts over $3,000, definitely run both calculations because sometimes the itemized deduction method can be better, especially if you're in a lower tax bracket now than when you received the income. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences with the various tools and services - it's good to know what resources are out there for these complex situations!
This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping to find! I'm dealing with my first Section 1341 situation and your point about the repayment being REQUIRED vs voluntary is really important - I hadn't considered that distinction before. In my case, the bonus repayment was definitely required due to a contract clause that triggered when I left within 12 months. I have the original employment agreement that spells this out, plus the company's demand letter for repayment. Your mention of the legal obligation existing when the income was originally received is interesting - does that mean if someone got a discretionary bonus with no strings attached, but then their company later demanded it back due to performance issues, Section 1341 wouldn't apply? Just trying to understand the nuances here. Also, really appreciate the reminder about running both calculations even for larger amounts. With all the discussion about the credit method usually being better, I was starting to assume that was always the case!
Join the conversation
I'm having the exact same problem! Just tried to log into WMR about an hour ago and got the "exceeded daily limit" message, but I know for certain I haven't checked my refund status since Tuesday. It's incredibly frustrating when you're just trying to get a simple update on your return. After reading through everyone's experiences here, I feel so much better knowing this is clearly a widespread system issue affecting tons of taxpayers, not something I messed up on my end. The explanation about partial login attempts and session cookies getting corrupted during server overload makes perfect sense - the IRS systems are probably struggling with the volume during peak filing season. I'm definitely going to try the 24-hour wait approach that so many people have had success with. It's really reassuring to hear that this is just an access/authentication issue and won't actually impact our refund processing timeline. That was my main worry! Thanks to everyone for sharing their solutions and experiences. This community has been a lifesaver for troubleshooting these frustrating IRS technical problems. I'll report back tomorrow after trying the reset method!
I'm experiencing this exact same issue too, Drake! Got locked out this morning even though I haven't checked WMR since the weekend. It's such a relief to find this thread and see that literally dozens of us are dealing with the same problem - definitely confirms this is a major system-wide issue with the IRS authentication servers, not anything we did wrong. The 24-hour wait method seems to be the go-to solution that's working for most people here. I'm going to try that approach too and hopefully we'll both be able to get back in tomorrow. Thanks for sharing your experience - it really helps to know we're not alone in dealing with these frustrating technical glitches during an already stressful tax season!
I'm experiencing this exact same issue! Just tried to check WMR this afternoon and got the daily limit message even though I haven't logged in since Thursday. It's so frustrating when you're just trying to track your refund progress. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - it's clear this is a major system-wide authentication problem affecting tons of taxpayers right now. The explanation about partial login attempts and server overload makes perfect sense, especially considering how overwhelmed the IRS systems get during peak filing season. I'm definitely going to try the 24-hour wait approach that so many people here have had success with. It's reassuring to know from everyone's experiences that this is purely an access issue and won't actually delay our refund processing. That was my biggest concern! Has anyone noticed if this issue is more common during certain times of day? I'm wondering if trying to access WMR during off-peak hours (like early morning) might help avoid these authentication errors in the future. Thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences - this community is so helpful for navigating these IRS technical headaches!
Hey Haley! I've been following this thread closely since I'm dealing with the same issue, and from what I've observed, several people mentioned that accessing WMR during off-peak hours (early morning or late evening) seems to help avoid these authentication problems. It makes sense since the servers are probably less overwhelmed during those times. I'm planning to try again tomorrow morning around 6-7 AM after my 24-hour wait period. It's been such a relief reading through everyone's experiences here - knowing this is affecting so many people really confirms it's a system-wide problem and not something we did wrong. Hopefully the early morning approach works better for future checks once we get back in!
Join the conversation
Looking at all these responses, it sounds like you have three solid options to compare: staying on the domestic partner plan with the tax hit, getting your own ACA plan with unemployment subsidies, or considering marriage if that was already in your future plans. From a purely financial perspective, I'd strongly recommend getting actual quotes for an ACA plan before deciding. Since you just lost your job, your projected 2024 income might qualify you for substantial subsidies that could make individual coverage much cheaper than the ~$500+ monthly tax hit you'd face on your fiancée's plan. Here's what I'd do in your shoes: 1) Get that detailed breakdown from HR that Camila mentioned to make sure their $1,668 calculation is correct, 2) Get ACA quotes on healthcare.gov using your projected annual income including any unemployment benefits, and 3) Calculate the real after-tax cost of the domestic partner option using your fiancée's actual marginal tax rate plus FICA. The marriage route is definitely the cleanest solution tax-wise if you were planning to get married anyway - employer health benefits for spouses are completely tax-free. But if you weren't ready for that step, don't let health insurance be the only reason to rush it. Whatever you choose, make sure to act quickly since you mentioned your current coverage ends soon. Both ACA enrollment and adding you to your fiancée's plan will take some processing time.
This is exactly the kind of comprehensive breakdown I needed to see! You've laid out all three options really clearly. I think you're absolutely right about getting actual numbers before making any decisions - I've been trying to estimate costs in my head but haven't done the real calculations. The point about acting quickly is definitely weighing on me. My coverage ends in less than two weeks, so I need to move fast on whichever option I choose. I'm going to call my fiancée's HR department tomorrow to get that detailed breakdown of the $1,668 calculation, and then spend this weekend getting ACA quotes based on my projected income for the rest of 2024. The marriage option is interesting because we were actually talking about a small ceremony later this year anyway, but I don't want to rush such an important decision just for health insurance. Though if the tax savings are really that significant, it might be worth having a serious conversation about timeline. Thanks for the practical action steps - having a clear plan makes this feel much more manageable!
I've been following this thread and wanted to share some additional considerations that might help with your decision. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the potential impact on your fiancée's other tax benefits if her income increases by $1,668 monthly due to the imputed income. That extra $20,000+ in annual income could potentially push her into a higher tax bracket or affect eligibility for certain deductions and credits. For example, if she's close to income thresholds for student loan interest deduction, IRA contribution limits, or other phase-outs, this could create additional hidden costs beyond just the direct tax on the imputed income. Also, regarding the ACA option - make sure to factor in the potential differences in coverage quality. Employer plans often have better networks and lower deductibles compared to marketplace plans, even with subsidies. You might save money on premiums but end up paying more out-of-pocket for actual care. One more timing consideration: if you do decide on the domestic partner route, ask HR if there's any flexibility on the start date. Sometimes you can delay the coverage start by a few days to align with when your current coverage ends, which might save you from paying for overlapping coverage or having a gap. The documentation point that Malik made is really important too - I'd also suggest keeping records of any communications with HR about how they calculated the fair market value, just in case you need to justify it to the IRS later.
This is such a good point about the cascading tax effects! I hadn't even thought about how that extra $20k in imputed income could bump someone into higher tax brackets or mess with other deductions. That could make the real cost way higher than just calculating the basic tax rate on the imputed amount. The coverage quality comparison is also really important - I've been so focused on the premium costs that I forgot to think about deductibles and networks. My current employer plan has a pretty low deductible and good network coverage, so I should definitely compare that to what's available on the marketplace before assuming ACA is automatically better just because of subsidies. Thanks for mentioning the timing flexibility with HR too. I didn't know that was even possible to ask about, but avoiding a coverage gap or double-paying would be really helpful right now while I'm unemployed.
Join the conversation
For anyone dissolving a C-corp soon - remember that timing can be crucial for tax purposes! We intentionally delayed our liquidation to January so the tax impact hit in the following year. This gave shareholders more time to plan for the capital gains taxes. Also, if your corporation has accumulated E&P (earnings and profits), distributions will be taxed as dividends until E&P is exhausted, before being treated as return of capital. This sequencing can significantly impact the tax treatment of your liquidation. You must exhaust your E&P through dividend distributions before you can distribute amounts that are treated as return of capital or liquidation proceeds.
Do you know if you're supposed to file separate 5452 forms for dividend distributions (from E&P) versus the liquidation distributions? Our accountant mentioned something about this but wasn't clear.
Yes, you'll typically need to file separate Form 5452s for different types of distributions during liquidation. Distributions from E&P are reported as dividends (usually on Form 1099-DIV in boxes 1a/1b), while liquidation distributions are reported separately (boxes 8 or 9 depending on complete vs partial liquidation). The timing Oliver mentioned is crucial - you must first distribute all accumulated E&P as dividends before any distributions can be treated as return of capital or liquidation proceeds. Each Form 5452 filing should clearly indicate the nature of the distributions being reported using the appropriate checkboxes. Your accountant should be able to determine if your corporation has accumulated E&P from prior years that needs to be distributed first.
One important detail that hasn't been mentioned yet - when completing Form 5452 for liquidation distributions, make sure you're consistent with how you report the distributions across all shareholders AND on the corporation's final Form 1120. The IRS will cross-reference these forms, so if you report $X as liquidation distributions on Form 5452, that same amount should appear on the corporation's final return. Also, remember that the corporation must provide each shareholder with their Form 1099-DIV by January 31st following the year of liquidation - these forms will show the liquidation distribution amounts in box 8 or 9. A common mistake is forgetting to file Form 966 within 30 days of adopting the plan of liquidation. This is separate from Form 5452 and is required even for small family corporations. The IRS can impose penalties if Form 966 is filed late, so don't overlook this step in your dissolution timeline.
This is exactly the kind of comprehensive guidance I was hoping to find! As someone new to corporate dissolution, the cross-referencing requirement between Form 5452 and the final Form 1120 is something I definitely wouldn't have thought about on my own. Quick question - you mentioned Form 966 needs to be filed within 30 days of adopting the liquidation plan. Does this mean 30 days from when the shareholders formally vote to dissolve, or 30 days from when we actually start distributing assets? We're planning to have the shareholder meeting next week but won't distribute assets until the following month. Also, thanks for the reminder about the 1099-DIV deadline. I assume the corporation issues these even though it's being dissolved? Do we need to maintain any corporate status just to handle these final tax reporting requirements?
Noah Lee
Has anyone tried the IRS Direct File program this year? I heard they expanded it to more states for 2025 filing season. Wondering if it works better than dealing with OLT or TurboTax.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•I used it last season and it was surprisingly good! Very basic interface but it gets the job done with no upsells or hidden fees. The downside is it only works for pretty simple tax situations - W-2 income, standard deduction, some basic credits. If you have self-employment income, investments beyond basic interest, or itemize deductions, you can't use it yet.
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
This is exactly why I always bookmark the official IRS Free File page (https://www.irs.gov/filing/free-file-do-your-federal-taxes-for-free) at the beginning of tax season. These companies count on people going directly to their commercial websites where they can charge for "premium" features. What's really frustrating is that OLT's marketing emails don't even mention that their completely free version is still available through the IRS portal. They're deliberately steering people toward their paid service. I fell for this exact trick with H&R Block a few years ago before I learned about the Free File program. Pro tip: If you qualify for Free File (AGI under $79,000 for most providers), bookmark that IRS page and ONLY access tax software through those links during filing season. Don't trust the "free" versions on company websites.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•This is such a helpful tip! I had no idea there was a difference between the IRS Free File portal and going directly to the company websites. I've been getting charged for state returns for years thinking that was just normal. Does the $79,000 AGI limit apply to all the companies on the Free File list, or do some have different thresholds?
0 coins