IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ryder Greene

β€’

I've been dealing with a similar situation with multiple K-1s from various investment platforms. One approach that's worked well for me is using TurboTax's "Interview Mode" rather than "Forms Mode" when entering K-1s. In Interview Mode, TurboTax asks you questions about your investments and can handle multiple entries more efficiently. When you get to the partnership section, there's an option to "Add Another Partnership" that maintains context from your previous entries, so you don't have to re-enter common information like your personal details. Also, before you start entering data, I'd recommend sorting your K-1s by the boxes that contain information. Many startup K-1s only have entries in boxes 1, 11, and 20, so you can group them and enter similar ones consecutively. This reduces the mental switching between different types of entries. One last tip: TurboTax Premier has a feature called "Easy Entry" for investments that can handle multiple similar entries more efficiently than the standard interface. It's not prominently advertised, but you can access it through the investment income section.

0 coins

Thanks for mentioning the Interview Mode vs Forms Mode distinction! I didn't realize there was a difference in how they handle multiple K-1 entries. When you say "Easy Entry" for investments, is that something that shows up automatically when you have multiple partnerships, or do you need to specifically look for it in the menu? I'm using TurboTax Premier but haven't seen that option yet - might be because I haven't started the investment section.

0 coins

As someone who's been through this exact nightmare with 60+ K-1s from various crowdfunding platforms, I feel your pain! Here's what finally worked for me after years of trial and error: First, upgrade to TurboTax Premier if you haven't already - the basic versions just can't handle this volume efficiently. Second, before you start entering anything, create a simple spreadsheet where you categorize all your K-1s by the types of entries they contain. Most startup K-1s follow similar patterns (ordinary income in Box 1, Section 199A info in Box 20, etc.). The game-changer for me was using TurboTax's "batch entry" approach in the partnerships section. After entering your first complete K-1, look for the "Similar to Previous" option when adding the next one. This copies the structure and you just update the amounts and company info. Also, don't overlook TurboTax's import feature for investment statements - while it doesn't work directly with Angellist CSVs, you can sometimes format your data to match what TurboTax expects for bulk import. One warning: be extra careful with your Section 199A deductions across multiple K-1s. TurboTax sometimes miscalculates these when you have many partnerships, so double-check that total manually.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

β€’

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your experience with 60+ K-1s! I'm particularly interested in the "Similar to Previous" option you mentioned. When I tried entering my first few K-1s, I didn't see that option appear. Does it only show up after you've completed the entire first K-1 entry, or should it appear when you click "Add Another Partnership"? Also, regarding the Section 199A warning - can you elaborate on what kind of miscalculations you noticed? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything when I do my manual double-check.

0 coins

Mateo Warren

β€’

Clay, I've been in a very similar situation and wanted to share what worked for me. I had Schedule C losses for 3 consecutive years due to equipment purchases and startup costs, and I was terrified about the hobby loss rule. The key thing I learned is that the IRS doesn't just look at the mechanical 2-of-5 year test - they evaluate your overall business behavior and profit motive. Your situation actually has some strong positive indicators: taking time off in 2023 for your partner's illness shows you make rational business decisions rather than just pursuing a hobby, and investing $14k in new equipment demonstrates serious commitment. Here's what I did that helped during my informal IRS inquiry: I kept a detailed business journal documenting not just expenses, but my business activities, market research, networking efforts, and how I was adapting my strategy based on lessons learned. I also created a formal business plan showing realistic projections for profitability within 2-3 years. Since you're essentially restarting in Colorado, this is actually a perfect opportunity to strengthen your position. Consider getting a new EIN for the fresh start, maintain separate business banking, and document everything that shows this is a legitimate business venture rather than a hobby. The depreciation on your equipment will count toward your loss calculation, but it also demonstrates substantial business investment. Just make sure you can document the business necessity of the equipment and how it fits into your plan for achieving profitability. Don't let the fear of the hobby loss rule paralyze you - focus on running your business professionally and documenting your legitimate business intent, and you should be fine.

0 coins

Sophia Russo

β€’

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who's been through a similar situation! The business journal idea is brilliant - I've been focused mainly on tracking expenses, but documenting the strategic thinking and business activities makes so much sense for proving profit motive. I'm definitely going to look into getting a new EIN for the Colorado restart. Quick question though - when you created your formal business plan showing 2-3 year profitability projections, how detailed did you make it? Did you include specific revenue targets, market analysis, etc., or was it more of a strategic overview? I want to make sure I'm creating something substantive enough to satisfy IRS scrutiny if it ever comes up. Also, when you mention "informal IRS inquiry," was that something they initiated, or did you proactively reach out to them? I'm wondering if it's worth being proactive about addressing the hobby loss concern given that I'm in year 3 with expected continued losses. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's exactly the kind of practical guidance I needed to feel more confident about moving forward with the equipment purchase and business restart!

0 coins

Clay, your situation with the equipment depreciation and hobby loss concerns is totally understandable. I went through something similar when I had to rebuild my consulting practice after a family emergency forced me to shut down for almost a year. The $14k equipment depreciation will definitely count toward your loss calculation for the 2-of-5 year rule, but here's the thing - the IRS isn't just robotically applying that test. They're looking at whether you're operating with genuine profit motive versus treating this as a tax-shelter hobby. Your circumstances actually work in your favor: pausing in 2023 due to your partner's illness shows rational business decision-making, not hobby behavior. The substantial equipment investment demonstrates serious commitment. And relocating to restart strategically shows business planning. A few practical suggestions from my experience: 1. **Document everything beyond just expenses** - Keep records of market research, business planning sessions, networking activities, and how you're adapting your strategy based on lessons learned. 2. **Consider the fresh start angle** - Since you're essentially restarting in Colorado with new equipment and location, this could strengthen your case for having genuine business intent rather than just accumulating losses. 3. **Create a realistic business plan** - Not necessarily formal, but something showing how you plan to achieve profitability within 2-3 years based on your new setup and lessons from previous years. The key is showing this is a legitimate business venture that you're approaching professionally, not just a way to generate tax losses. Your equipment investment and strategic restart suggest you're definitely on the right track!

0 coins

I went through this exact scenario last year and wanted to share what I learned the hard way. You're absolutely right to be concerned - FanDuel will likely report your qualifying wins (individual wins of $600+ that are 300x your wager) on W-2G forms regardless of your net position for the year. Here's what happened to me: I had about $12,000 in reported winnings but was only net positive around $300 for the year. I initially panicked thinking I'd owe taxes on the full $12K, but here's what saved me: **Documentation is everything.** I downloaded my complete transaction history from FanDuel and created a spreadsheet showing every session - dates, amounts wagered, wins, and losses. This let me calculate my total losses to offset against the winnings. **Run the numbers both ways.** I compared taking the standard deduction vs. itemizing with gambling losses on Schedule A. In my case, since I don't have a mortgage and my other itemizable deductions were minimal, the standard deduction was still better even though it meant paying some tax on the reported winnings. **The math worked out fine.** Even paying tax on part of those "winnings," my actual tax impact was pretty small since my true profit was so low. My advice: Download your FanDuel annual statement right now, calculate your true net position, and don't panic about the gross winnings number. The tax system isn't perfect for gambling, but it's usually not as bad as it first appears when you're basically break-even for the year. Good luck with tax season!

0 coins

This is such a relief to hear from someone who actually went through the same situation! I was honestly losing sleep over this thinking I'd get hit with taxes on the full $13,500 when I'm barely ahead. Your point about the math usually working out even with the standard deduction makes me feel a lot better. Quick question - when you downloaded your FanDuel annual statement, did it clearly show your total deposits vs withdrawals for the year? I'm hoping that makes it easy to prove my actual net position if I ever need to explain this to a tax professional or the IRS. Also, do you remember roughly what percentage of your reported winnings you ended up paying tax on after taking the standard deduction? Thanks for sharing your real-world experience - this is way more helpful than trying to decode IRS publications!

0 coins

Klaus Schmidt

β€’

Yes, the FanDuel annual statement was really clear! It shows your total deposits, withdrawals, and net position right at the top, which makes it super easy to document your actual profit/loss for the year. I'd definitely recommend downloading it ASAP since they sometimes make older statements harder to access. As for the tax impact, I ended up paying tax on probably about 60-70% of my reported W-2G winnings since I took the standard deduction. But since my true net was only around $300, even paying tax on a few thousand dollars of "winnings" only added maybe $400-500 to my tax bill. Not fun, but not the disaster I thought it would be. The key insight I learned is that the IRS system treats each winning session as separate taxable income, but the actual dollar impact isn't usually catastrophic when your net position is small. Just make sure you have that documentation ready - the annual statement plus screenshots of your account summary should cover you if you ever need to explain your situation.

0 coins

I just went through this exact situation last year and want to give you some realistic perspective. FanDuel will indeed report your qualifying winnings (typically $600+ wins that are 300x your wager) on W-2G forms, so you'll likely see tax documents showing that $13,500 even though you're only up $200 net. Here's what I learned: Yes, you have to report all those winnings as income, but you can deduct your losses up to the amount of winnings IF you itemize on Schedule A. The key decision is whether itemizing beats your standard deduction (~$13,850 for single filers). My advice: Download your complete FanDuel transaction history RIGHT NOW and save it in multiple places. Take screenshots of your account showing total deposits vs withdrawals. Most people in your situation (small net gain, no mortgage) end up better off with the standard deduction, which means paying some tax on the reported winnings but usually not a huge amount. Don't panic about the gross winnings number - when your true profit is only $200, even paying tax on several thousand in "winnings" typically adds just a few hundred to your tax bill, not thousands. The system isn't perfect for gambling, but it's rarely as catastrophic as it first appears when you're basically break-even. Get your documentation organized now and you'll be fine come tax season!

0 coins

Lia Quinn

β€’

This is exactly the kind of realistic perspective I needed to hear! I've been stressing about this for weeks thinking I'd be on the hook for taxes on the full $13,500. Your point about it typically adding just a few hundred to the tax bill rather than thousands is really reassuring. I'm definitely going to download everything from FanDuel today - you're not the first person to emphasize getting that documentation saved ASAP. One thing I'm curious about though - when you say "qualifying winnings," do you know if there's an easy way to estimate how much of my total winnings will actually get reported on W-2G forms? I had a lot of smaller wins throughout the year mixed in with some bigger ones, so I'm wondering if I can get a rough idea of my actual tax exposure before I talk to a tax professional. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's so much more helpful hearing from someone who actually went through this rather than trying to decipher IRS guidelines!

0 coins

Great question about estimating your W-2G exposure! The easiest way is to look through your FanDuel transaction history for individual wins of $600 or more where your payout was at least 300 times what you wagered. For example, if you bet $5 and won $1,500, that would definitely trigger a W-2G since $1,500 is way more than 300x your $5 bet. Most sports betting wins don't hit that 300x threshold unless you had some really long-shot parlays or big single-game bets that paid out huge. The $600 minimum is more commonly triggered. When you download your annual statement, look for any individual winning sessions over $600 - those are likely what will show up on W-2G forms. In my case, I had maybe 4-5 W-2G qualifying wins out of hundreds of smaller sessions throughout the year. The total on my W-2G forms was about $8,000 even though my overall winnings were around $12,000. So not every dollar of winnings gets formally reported, which actually helped reduce my tax exposure. If you want to be really precise, you could go through and flag every win over $600 in your transaction history, but honestly the annual statement approach works well for getting a ballpark estimate of your tax situation.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

β€’

This is a complex situation that many of us face with aging parents. One additional consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet is the potential impact of state gift taxes. While most states don't have their own gift tax, a few do (like Connecticut and Minnesota), so if you're in one of those states, you might need to factor that into your planning as well. Also, if your dad's condition progresses and he eventually needs more intensive care like assisted living or nursing home care, the financial dynamics change significantly. Many of these facilities can provide detailed breakdowns of medical vs. custodial care costs, which becomes important for both gift tax purposes and potential Medicaid planning down the road. Have you considered setting up a formal care agreement with your father? This could help clarify the arrangement and potentially provide additional tax benefits. Some families find it helpful to have a written agreement that specifies what expenses are being covered and by whom, especially when multiple family members might be contributing to care costs.

0 coins

Brooklyn Knight

β€’

That's really helpful about the state gift tax consideration - I hadn't thought about that at all! I'm in Texas so I think we're okay there, but definitely something for others to check. The formal care agreement idea is intriguing. Would something like that need to be drafted by an attorney, or are there standard templates available? I'm wondering if having a written agreement might also help if there are ever questions from siblings about how money is being spent on dad's care. Right now it's just informal arrangements, but as his needs increase, having everything documented seems smart. Also, regarding Medicaid planning - is there a lookback period I should be aware of if dad might need nursing home care in the future? I want to make sure these payments for caregiving services don't create issues later if we need to apply for Medicaid benefits.

0 coins

Regarding your questions about formal care agreements and Medicaid planning - these are excellent considerations that can save you headaches down the road. For the care agreement, while you can find templates online, I'd strongly recommend having an elder law attorney draft one for your specific situation. A proper agreement should specify what services are being provided, payment amounts, and clearly distinguish between medical and non-medical care. This documentation can be invaluable not only for family transparency but also for potential future Medicaid applications. As for Medicaid lookback, there's a 5-year lookback period for asset transfers. However, payments made directly to care providers for your father's benefit (like you're doing now) generally aren't considered improper transfers during the lookback period, since you're paying for services rather than gifting assets. The key is maintaining good records showing the payments were for legitimate care expenses. One strategy some families use is transitioning to paying from the parent's own funds (if available) as their care needs increase, which eliminates both gift tax concerns and potential Medicaid complications. If your dad has assets but limited liquid funds, converting some assets to cover care costs might be worth exploring with a financial planner who specializes in elder care. The documentation you're building now by tracking medical vs. non-medical expenses will be extremely valuable if Medicaid planning becomes necessary later.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

β€’

This is incredibly helpful information about the formal care agreements and Medicaid planning. I've been avoiding thinking about the potential Medicaid implications, but you're absolutely right that documenting everything properly now could save major headaches later. Quick question about the 5-year lookback - if I'm paying the caregiving company directly (like the original poster is doing), and I can show those payments were for legitimate medical and personal care services, would those payments be safe from the lookback period even if they exceed the annual gift tax exclusion? I'm thinking specifically about the non-medical portions that would technically count as gifts. Also, do you know if there are specific elder law attorneys who specialize in these types of care agreements, or should I just look for any elder law practice? I want to make sure I find someone who really understands the intersection of gift taxes, Medicaid planning, and caregiving arrangements.

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

β€’

Quick question for everyone - does anyone know if QuickBooks can handle this conversion properly? I'm trying to figure out if I need to make manual journal entries to adjust everything or if there's a built-in process for transitioning the books from LLC to S Corp. Our bookkeeper isn't familiar with this specific situation.

0 coins

QB doesn't have an automatic conversion feature, but you can definitely handle it with the right journal entries. I did this last year by creating an opening balance sheet as of the S Corp effective date. You'll need to create entries that zero out the retained earnings and establish your new equity accounts, including paid-in capital and AAA.

0 coins

Ruby Blake

β€’

I just went through this exact conversion process six months ago and can share some practical insights. The key thing to understand is that you're essentially creating a brand new entity (the S Corp) and transferring assets from your old entity (the LLC). For Schedule L, you definitely need to complete both beginning and ending balance sheets. The beginning balance sheet shows your S Corp's position on day one (conversion date) with assets at fair market value. The ending balance sheet shows where you stand at year-end. Regarding retained earnings - this was the most confusing part for me too. Since you were an LLC, you don't actually have "retained earnings" in the corporate sense. What you had was owner's equity/member capital. When you convert, this becomes your initial capital contribution to the S Corp and gets recorded as paid-in capital, not retained earnings. Your AAA (Accumulated Adjustments Account) starts at zero on conversion day and tracks the S Corp's income/losses/distributions going forward. Don't try to carry over your LLC's accumulated earnings into AAA - that's not how it works. One more tip: make sure you properly document the conversion with corporate resolutions and keep detailed records of asset valuations. The IRS may ask questions later, especially if you have significant appreciation in assets. Good luck with your conversion!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful! I'm actually going through this exact same process right now and your explanation about the AAA starting at zero really clarifies things. One quick follow-up question - when you say assets should be at fair market value on the conversion date, did you find that the IRS has specific requirements for how recent the valuation needs to be? I'm wondering if I can use valuations from 30-60 days before my conversion date or if they need to be exactly on the conversion date itself.

0 coins

Prev1...343344345346347...5644Next