IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This is exactly the kind of situation where having proper documentation from the start is crucial. I went through something similar when my aunt in British Columbia passed away last year. One thing I'd emphasize is to get copies of ALL Canadian tax documents - not just the final returns, but also any T3 slips for trust distributions, T4RSP slips for RRSP withdrawals, and documentation of any capital gains reported in Canada on the property deemed disposition. The Canadian estate executor should provide these. Also, don't overlook provincial taxes! Each Canadian province has different tax rates, and Ontario (where your parents' rental properties are) has its own additional considerations. The foreign tax credit calculation gets more complex when you're dealing with both federal and provincial Canadian taxes. I found it helpful to create a timeline of when each asset was transferred to me, the fair market values at death, and the Canadian taxes paid on each. This made the US reporting much cleaner and helped my tax preparer calculate the foreign tax credits accurately.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about documentation! I'm just starting to navigate this whole process and hadn't thought about the provincial tax complications. When you mention creating a timeline with fair market values - did you need to get formal appraisals for the properties, or were there other ways to establish those values for tax purposes? I'm worried about the cost of getting everything properly valued, especially since there are multiple rental properties involved.

0 coins

For the rental properties, you'll typically need formal appraisals to establish fair market value at the date of death - this is required for both the Canadian deemed disposition calculation and your US basis. I ended up getting appraisals from licensed Canadian real estate appraisers who were familiar with cross-border estate work. The cost was around $500-800 CAD per property, but it was absolutely worth it. Having solid documentation prevented any disputes with either tax authority and gave me confidence in my foreign tax credit calculations. Some estate lawyers can recommend appraisers who specialize in this type of work. For the RRSP/retirement accounts, the fair market value is usually easier to establish since the financial institutions provide statements showing the account values at death. Just make sure you get official documentation from the Canadian financial institutions rather than relying on online screenshots or informal records. The investment in proper valuations upfront can save you thousands in potential penalties or disputes later, especially when you're dealing with multiple properties and significant account values.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now - my mother passed away in Toronto last month and I'm inheriting her RRSP and a condo downtown. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful, especially the points about getting proper appraisals and documentation. One thing I wanted to add that I learned from my cross-border tax advisor: if your parents are still alive, consider having them convert some of their RRSP funds to a TFSA (Tax-Free Savings Account) if they have contribution room available. TFSAs are treated much more favorably for US tax purposes when inherited - the US generally recognizes them as tax-free, whereas RRSPs create that double taxation headache you're worried about. Also, for the rental properties, ask about whether your parents have been claiming capital cost allowance (depreciation) on their Canadian tax returns. If they have, there could be "recapture" of that depreciation that gets added to the capital gains calculation when the properties are deemed disposed of at death. This affects both the Canadian tax liability and your foreign tax credit calculations. The whole process is definitely complex, but getting the right professional help upfront (whether it's the AI tools others mentioned, professional tax advisors, or both) can save you major headaches down the road.

0 coins

That's really smart advice about the TFSA conversion - I wish I had known about that option when my parents were still doing their estate planning. The point about capital cost allowance recapture is something I hadn't considered either. Do you know if there's a way to find out how much depreciation was claimed on the rental properties over the years? I'm wondering if this information would be in their past Canadian tax returns or if I'd need to request it from their accountant. This could significantly impact the tax bill, so I want to make sure I'm not missing anything when I start working with a cross-border tax professional.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a similar situation and wanted to share what I learned from my tax preparer. The key thing to remember is that RSUs and SSARs are handled differently for tax purposes, but both should already be included in your Box 1 wages. For your specific situation with the $7,500 SSAR sale, you absolutely need to find the original exercise documentation to determine your cost basis. This is critical because without it, you might end up paying taxes twice - once when the SSARs were exercised (already included in a previous year's W2) and again when you report the sale. A few places to check for this information: 1. Your company's equity portal (Fidelity NetBenefits, E*TRADE, etc.) 2. Email confirmations from when you exercised the SSARs 3. Previous year tax documents if you exercised them recently 4. Contact your HR department - they should have records of all equity transactions Don't guess at the cost basis or leave it blank on Form 8949. The IRS will assume zero basis if you don't provide it, which could result in paying tax on the full $7,500 sale amount even though you already paid income tax when the SSARs were exercised.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! I'm new to dealing with equity compensation and had no idea about the double taxation risk. Your point about the IRS assuming zero basis is particularly scary - that could result in a huge tax bill. I'm going to check all those sources you mentioned, starting with my company's equity portal. I think I remember getting some emails when I first started receiving stock grants, but I probably deleted them thinking they weren't important. Lesson learned about keeping all tax-related documents! One quick question - if I find the exercise documentation but it's from multiple different exercise dates, how do I figure out which specific shares I sold? Do I need to use FIFO (first in, first out) or can I choose which lots to report?

0 coins

Great question about lot identification! You typically have a choice between FIFO (first in, first out), LIFO (last in, first out), or specific identification if you can document which exact shares you sold. Most brokerages default to FIFO unless you specify otherwise. The key is being consistent and having documentation to support your choice. If your brokerage statement shows specific lot information (like "sold 100 shares from 03/15/2022 grant"), use that. Otherwise, FIFO is the safest approach since it's the default method. Your cost basis will be the exercise price per share (from your SSAR exercise confirmation) multiplied by the number of shares sold. Make sure to keep all your exercise confirmations - you'll need them not just for this year's taxes but potentially for future sales too. Also, check if your company's equity portal has a "tax center" or "cost basis" section. Many of the major administrators (Fidelity, E*TRADE, Morgan Stanley) now provide downloadable reports that show exactly what basis to report for each sale, which makes filing much easier.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

I went through this exact same confusion with RSUs and SSARs last year, so I totally understand the frustration! Here's what I learned that might help: The Box 14 amounts on your W2 are indeed already included in your Box 1 income - they're just there for informational purposes to help you understand what types of compensation you received. So you don't need to report the $4,050 RSU or $19,250 SSAR amounts separately as additional income. For the $7,500 SSAR sale, you absolutely need to find your original exercise documentation to determine the cost basis. Without it, you'll likely overpay taxes since the IRS will assume zero basis if you don't provide proper documentation. A few tips from my experience: - Check your company's stock plan website (like Fidelity NetBenefits or E*TRADE) - they usually have a "Tax Documents" or "Cost Basis" section - Search your email for confirmations from when you exercised the SSARs - Contact your company's stock plan administrator directly - they're required to maintain these records The key thing to remember is that you already paid income tax on these SSARs when they were exercised (they would have appeared in a previous year's W2), so you only owe capital gains tax on any appreciation from the exercise date to the sale date. Don't leave the cost basis blank on Form 8949 - it could cost you thousands in unnecessary taxes!

0 coins

Yara Haddad

•

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for breaking it down so clearly! I'm new to this community and dealing with my first year of stock compensation, so posts like this are a lifesaver. I had no idea that leaving the cost basis blank could result in the IRS assuming zero basis. That's terrifying! I'm definitely going to dig through my emails and check our company's stock portal immediately. One thing I'm curious about - you mentioned that SSARs would have appeared in a previous year's W2 when exercised. How can I tell which year that was if I can't remember when I exercised them? Should I be looking through old W2s to try to match up the amounts, or is there an easier way to figure out the timeline? Also, does anyone know if there's a statute of limitations on requesting these records from the stock plan administrator? I'm worried that if the exercise was several years ago, they might not still have the documentation.

0 coins

Alice Fleming

•

I'm in the exact same boat as so many of you here! Mailed my paper return about 5 weeks ago and have been checking that IRS portal religiously with no luck - just that same "Return Not Processed" message every single time. Reading through everyone's experiences has been both eye-opening and incredibly reassuring. I had no idea paper returns would take 8-12 weeks just to show up in their system! I was starting to panic that my return got lost or I made some major error, but it sounds like we're all just stuck in the same incredibly slow processing queue. I'm definitely going to set up that ID.me account this week based on everyone's recommendations to hopefully get more detailed information than just that vague portal message. The taxr.ai tool that several people mentioned also sounds really helpful for getting realistic timeline predictions instead of being left completely in the dark. It's honestly comforting (in a misery-loves-company way) to know so many of us are dealing with these exact same frustrating delays. At least now I know this is just the reality of paper filing right now and not something wrong with my specific return. Thanks to everyone for sharing their timelines and experiences - this community has made what could be a really stressful situation much more manageable! I've absolutely learned my lesson about e-filing for next year. I chose to mail because I thought it was "safer" but the months of anxiety definitely aren't worth it. Here's hoping we all start seeing some movement in our returns soon!

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

I'm dealing with almost the exact same timeline - mailed my return about 6 weeks ago and have been obsessively checking that portal! This thread has been such a lifesaver because I was genuinely convinced my return had disappeared into some kind of postal black hole. The 8-12 week processing timeline everyone keeps mentioning is absolutely mind-blowing to me. I had no idea paper returns would take this long just to get acknowledged by the system - I was expecting maybe 4-6 weeks maximum! I definitely should have done more research before choosing to mail instead of e-file. I'm going to set up that ID.me account this weekend based on all the recommendations here, and I'm also planning to try the taxr.ai tool around the 8-week mark for better timeline predictions. Anything has to be more helpful than just staring at that frustrating "not processed" status that tells us absolutely nothing! Thanks for sharing your experience - it's so reassuring to know we're all stuck in this same slow processing nightmare together. At least now I can stop checking that portal multiple times a day knowing this delay is completely normal for paper filers! Definitely joining the "e-filing next year" club after going through this stress.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

I'm in almost the exact same situation as everyone here - mailed my paper return about 4 weeks ago and that "Return Not Processed" message has been driving me absolutely crazy! This entire thread has been such a huge relief because I was starting to think the IRS lost my return or I made some catastrophic filing error. The consistent 8-12 week timeline that everyone is sharing is honestly shocking to me. I had no idea paper returns would take this long just to show up in their system - I was naively expecting maybe 3-4 weeks maximum! I definitely should have researched this better before choosing to mail instead of e-file. I'm going to follow all the great advice here and set up that ID.me account this week to hopefully get more detailed information than just that vague "not processed" status. The taxr.ai tool that several people have mentioned also sounds really promising for getting realistic timeline predictions instead of being left completely in the dark about where my return is in the queue. Thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences and timelines - knowing that we're all stuck in this same incredibly frustrating processing situation makes the wait so much more bearable. This community has turned what could have been months of panic into just... well, months of informed waiting! I've absolutely learned my lesson about e-filing for next year. I thought paper filing was "more secure" but the anxiety definitely isn't worth it. Here's hoping we all start seeing some movement in our returns soon. At least we're all in this slow processing nightmare together!

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

Quick question - has anyone had this issue with TurboTax or other tax software? I'm trying to file both my federal and local returns through TurboTax but it keeps flagging the missing boxes and won't let me proceed.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

I had this issue with H&R Block software. There should be an option to manually override or indicate that "no tax was withheld" for the locality. Look for that checkbox or option in the W-2 entry screen. If you're stuck, their customer support was actually pretty helpful with walking me through it.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

Thanks for the tip! I found a similar override option in TurboTax. Had to click on "I'll enter this myself" when it was asking about the local tax information, then check a box confirming that no local tax was withheld. Seems to be working now and letting me proceed.

0 coins

Don't panic - this is actually more common than you think! The blank boxes 18-20 on your W-2s simply mean your employers didn't withhold local municipality taxes from your paychecks during the year. This doesn't mean you don't owe them - it just means you'll need to pay them now when you file. For your municipality filing, here's what you should do: - Use the wage amount from Box 1 (your federal wages) as your local taxable wages - Enter "0" for local tax withheld since nothing was taken out - For the locality name, use the municipality where you physically worked (or your employer's location) The reason your third W-2 has this information filled in is probably because that employer was located in your municipality and properly withheld local taxes throughout the year. You should also ask your employers (the ones with blank boxes) why they weren't withholding local taxes - they might need to correct this going forward so you don't face a big tax bill again next year. Some employers don't realize they need to withhold for the municipality where their employees live or work.

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with something similar right now. Just to clarify - if my employer is located in a different state but I work remotely from home in my municipality, which location should I use for the locality name? My employer is in Delaware but I live and work from home in Pennsylvania. I want to make sure I'm reporting this correctly to avoid any issues later.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

This discussion has been incredibly enlightening! I'm facing a very similar situation where my employer has been treating backup childcare benefits as taxable imputed income, and I had no idea this could potentially violate Section 129 rules. What really strikes me from reading everyone's experiences is how widespread this issue seems to be across different companies and backup care providers. It appears there's a significant knowledge gap between what the tax code actually allows (the $5,000 exclusion for qualifying dependent care assistance) and how many payroll departments are actually implementing these benefits. I'm planning to follow the proven strategy that multiple people have shared: handle this year's taxes properly by claiming the imputed income amounts on Form 2441 (since I'm effectively "paying" for that care through additional taxes), while simultaneously working with HR to correct this for future years. The advice about approaching HR collaboratively rather than confrontationally seems crucial. I'm going to ask them to walk me through their reasoning for the current classification, then share documentation from our backup care provider showing how their program is structured to meet Section 129 requirements. Several people mentioned that the providers themselves design these programs specifically to qualify for the tax exclusion, which really reinforces that employers should be excluding these benefits up to the annual limit. It's frustrating that working parents have to become tax experts just to ensure we're not overpaying on benefits designed to help us, but this community discussion has made the path forward much clearer. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it's exactly this kind of support that makes these complex tax situations manageable!

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

I've been following this thread closely as someone dealing with the exact same issue! My employer has been adding about $2,600 in backup childcare benefits as imputed income to my W-2 this year, and reading through everyone's experiences has been incredibly helpful. What really resonates with me is how this seems to be a systemic problem affecting working parents across many different companies. The disconnect between what Section 129 actually allows (up to $5,000 exclusion for qualifying dependent care assistance) and how payroll departments are implementing these benefits is clearly widespread. I'm definitely going to take the dual approach that seems most successful here: claim the imputed income amounts on Form 2441 for this tax year since I'm effectively "paying" for that care through extra taxes, while also working with HR to get this corrected going forward. The strategy about asking HR for their written rationale first, then sharing documentation from the backup care provider about Section 129 compliance, seems like the most diplomatic way to approach this. Making it collaborative rather than confrontational is clearly key to getting positive results. One thing I wanted to add - I noticed several people mentioned getting documentation directly from their backup care providers. This seems like a really smart move since these companies have designed their programs specifically to meet tax code requirements and probably have materials ready to help employers implement the benefits correctly. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions. It's made what seemed like an impossible tax situation much more manageable!

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

This has been such an incredibly valuable thread for understanding what's clearly a widespread issue! I'm new to this community but dealing with the exact same situation - my employer has been treating our backup childcare benefits as fully taxable imputed income when it sounds like they should qualify for the Section 129 exclusion. What really stands out to me from reading through everyone's experiences is how consistent the pattern is across different companies and providers. It seems like there's a real education gap where many HR departments either don't know about the dependent care assistance rules or are defaulting to the "safe" approach of taxing everything rather than risk getting it wrong. The dual strategy that multiple people have outlined makes perfect sense - handle this year's taxes correctly by claiming the imputed income amounts on Form 2441 (since we're effectively paying for that care through additional taxes), while also working to get the underlying issue fixed with our employers for future years. I'm particularly grateful for all the tactical advice about approaching HR diplomatically. The suggestion to ask for their written rationale first, then share documentation from the backup care provider about Section 129 compliance, seems like a much more effective approach than just showing up with tax code printouts and telling them they're wrong. As a newcomer to navigating these complex tax situations, this community support has been invaluable. It's frustrating that working parents have to become tax experts just to make sure we're not overpaying on benefits that are supposed to help us, but at least we don't have to figure it out alone!

0 coins

Prev1...344345346347348...5643Next