


Ask the community...
Fyi - I tried doing this with TurboTax last year and their software didn't properly support Form 8919. Ended up having to switch to TaxAct at the last minute. Glad to hear FreeTax USA supports it better!
I went through this exact situation two years ago and can confirm FreeTax USA does support Form 8919. Here's what worked for me: Log into FreeTax USA, go to the "Income" section, then look for "Other Income" or "Miscellaneous Income." There should be an option for "Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax" or you can search for "8919" directly in their help search. One important tip - make sure you have your employer's EIN handy when filling out the form. You'll also need to calculate the Social Security and Medicare taxes that should have been withheld (7.65% of your wages). The form will walk you through this calculation. For Form SS-8, as others mentioned, that's filed separately. You can download it directly from IRS.gov and mail it in. Don't wait on the SS-8 determination to file your taxes though - you can still file with Form 8919 using Code G while the determination is pending. Document everything now while it's fresh in your memory - work schedule requirements, equipment provided, training received, etc. This will be crucial for your SS-8 submission.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I was getting overwhelmed trying to figure out where to even start with this process. Your step-by-step instructions for finding Form 8919 in FreeTax USA are exactly what I needed. I do have my employer's EIN from my 1099, so that should be straightforward. One quick question - when you calculated the 7.65% that should have been withheld, did you base that on your total 1099 income or did you need to make any adjustments for business expenses first?
Quick tip from someone who dealt with this exact issue: If your employer refuses to issue corrected W-2s, you can actually file Form 8889 (Health Savings Accounts) correctly regardless of what your W-2 says. Line 2 of Form 8889 asks for employer contributions to your HSA, which you should fill out accurately even if Box 12W on your W-2 is wrong. This form becomes part of your tax return and shows the IRS the correct contribution amounts. I've done this for two tax years without any issues. Just keep your HSA statements showing all contributions as backup documentation.
Wouldn't this create a mismatch between your W2 and your tax return though? Seems like that would trigger an audit flag.
That's a really good point about Form 8889. The IRS actually expects there might be discrepancies between W-2s and tax returns in certain situations - employer reporting errors are one of them. Form 8889 is specifically designed to capture the correct HSA contribution information regardless of what's on your W-2. The key is documentation. As long as you have your HSA account statements showing all contributions (yours and your employer's), you're covered. The IRS computer systems might flag the discrepancy initially, but if you ever get questioned, you can provide the supporting documentation showing the employer error. I'd still recommend trying to get corrected W-2s first, but if that fails, filing Form 8889 accurately with good records is definitely a solid backup plan.
I went through this exact same situation about two years ago and can confirm you're absolutely correct about the Box 12W reporting requirements. Both employee and employer HSA contributions must be included in that box. Here's what I learned from my experience: Start by sending a polite but firm email to your former employer's payroll department explaining the error and citing IRS Publication 969. Include specific dollar amounts and tax years affected. Give them about 30 days to respond. If they cooperate, they'll issue W-2c forms for the affected years. If they don't, you have two solid options: file Form 4852 (Substitute W-2) or ensure you complete Form 8889 accurately on your tax returns regardless of the W-2 error. Keep all your HSA statements as documentation. The good news is that since HSA contributions are pre-tax whether they come from you or your employer, this reporting error likely didn't affect your actual tax liability. The IRS is mainly concerned with contribution limit violations and improper deductions, neither of which applies to your situation. I'd recommend getting the corrected W-2s if possible for clean records, but don't stress too much about amending past returns if your tax liability wasn't affected. Just make sure you have good documentation in case of future questions.
This is really helpful information everyone. As someone who's been through a complex audit situation, I can confirm that having proper documentation and understanding the process makes a huge difference. One thing I'd add is that the IRS distinguishes between different types of "intent" when evaluating fraud. They look for specific intent to evade taxes (which requires fraud penalties) versus general intent to underreport (which might only warrant accuracy-related penalties). The key evidence they examine includes whether you had knowledge of a legal duty, took affirmative steps to conceal income or inflate deductions, and showed a pattern of underreporting over multiple years. From my experience, being proactive and cooperative during the examination process goes a long way. Even if there are legitimate errors in your returns, demonstrating good faith efforts to comply with tax laws can influence whether the IRS pursues fraud penalties versus treating issues as negligence or substantial understatement. The civil fraud penalty is severe (75% of the underpayment attributable to fraud), so the IRS doesn't apply it lightly. They need to meet that "clear and convincing evidence" standard, which is higher than the typical civil burden of proof.
This is exactly the kind of practical insight I was hoping to get from this discussion. The distinction between specific intent to evade versus general intent to underreport is something I hadn't seen explained clearly elsewhere. It makes sense that the IRS would need to prove you deliberately set out to cheat the system rather than just made errors or took aggressive positions. Your point about being proactive and cooperative is really important too. I imagine the examiner's notes about taxpayer behavior probably carry weight when fraud technical advisors are reviewing cases for penalty recommendations. Being defensive or uncooperative probably just adds to the "badges of fraud" they're looking for. The 75% penalty rate definitely explains why they don't throw around fraud allegations casually. That's a career-ending financial hit for most people, so it makes sense they'd reserve it for cases where they have strong evidence of intentional wrongdoing.
One aspect that hasn't been covered yet is the appeals process specifically for civil fraud penalties. If the IRS does propose a fraud penalty after their examination, you have several options before it becomes final. You can request an appeals conference where an independent appeals officer (not involved in the original examination) reviews the case. Appeals officers have the authority to settle fraud penalty cases if they believe the IRS position isn't strong enough to sustain the "clear and convincing evidence" standard. I've seen cases where appeals officers reduced fraud penalties to accuracy-related penalties (20% instead of 75%) when they felt the evidence showed negligence or substantial understatement rather than intentional fraud. The appeals process is often more flexible than people realize - they can consider the hazards of litigation and whether the IRS would actually prevail if the case went to Tax Court. If you disagree with the appeals determination, you can still petition Tax Court before paying any of the assessed penalties. In Tax Court, the burden is on the IRS to prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence, and you get a real trial with witness testimony and document evidence. Many taxpayers don't realize they have this option to contest fraud penalties in court rather than just paying them.
This is incredibly valuable information about the appeals process. I had no idea that appeals officers have the authority to negotiate down from fraud penalties to accuracy-related penalties. That seems like it could be a huge difference - going from 75% to 20% penalty rates. The point about Tax Court is especially important. So many people probably just pay penalties they receive rather than realizing they can actually contest them in court and force the IRS to prove their case. Having the burden on the IRS to demonstrate "clear and convincing evidence" in front of a judge seems like it would weed out the weaker fraud cases. Do you know roughly how often taxpayers succeed in getting fraud penalties reduced or eliminated through the appeals process? I'm wondering if it's worth pursuing appeals even in cases where someone thinks the IRS might have a decent case, just because of the high penalty rate differential.
Since no one mentioned it yet - don't forget that 2025 tax rules now allow each qualifying child to potentially get you up to $2,000 in tax credits (that's the increased amount after the recent tax law changes). So make sure whoever claims each child can actually benefit from the full credit amount. If your girlfriend doesn't have enough tax liability due to her part-time work, she might not be able to claim the full child tax credit amount even though she's eligible to claim your son. Something to consider when deciding who claims which child!
Small correction - part of the Child Tax Credit is refundable (the Additional Child Tax Credit), so even if she doesn't have enough tax liability, she could still get some benefit. But you're right that maximizing the non-refundable portion is important for the overall household finances!
You're absolutely right about the refundable portion - thanks for the correction! The Additional Child Tax Credit can provide up to $1,600 as a refundable credit even if tax liability is lower. Still, for maximum household benefit, it's worth calculating which arrangement gives the best overall result when factoring in both the refundable and non-refundable portions. Every family situation is different, and running the numbers through tax software both ways (with each parent claiming different combinations of children) can often reveal the optimal filing strategy.
Great question! I was in a nearly identical situation a couple years ago. One thing that really helped me was getting everything organized early in the year rather than scrambling at tax time. Since you're paying the mortgage and most household expenses, you should definitely qualify for Head of Household status when claiming your daughter. Just make sure you're tracking everything - I started keeping a simple monthly log of who paid what, which made things so much clearer when it came time to file. Also worth noting that the IRS has gotten stricter about auditing HOH claims in recent years, especially when there are multiple taxpayers at the same address. But if you legitimately pay more than 50% of household costs and have proper documentation, you should be fine. The key is being able to prove your contribution level if they ever ask. One last tip - consider having a quick consultation with a tax professional this year to make sure you're set up correctly going forward. It's much easier to establish the right pattern from the beginning than to fix problems later!
This is really solid advice! I'm just starting to think about my tax situation for next year and keeping a monthly log sounds like a game-changer. Do you have any specific format you'd recommend for tracking expenses? Like should I separate things by category (utilities, groceries, etc.) or just track the total amounts each person contributes? Also curious about your comment on IRS getting stricter - did you end up getting audited or just hear about it happening to others? Want to make sure I'm being extra careful with documentation from the start.
Carmen Ruiz
Quick question for everyone - does anyone know if QuickBooks can handle this conversion properly? I'm trying to figure out if I need to make manual journal entries to adjust everything or if there's a built-in process for transitioning the books from LLC to S Corp. Our bookkeeper isn't familiar with this specific situation.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
β’QB doesn't have an automatic conversion feature, but you can definitely handle it with the right journal entries. I did this last year by creating an opening balance sheet as of the S Corp effective date. You'll need to create entries that zero out the retained earnings and establish your new equity accounts, including paid-in capital and AAA.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
I just went through this exact conversion process six months ago and can share some practical insights. The key thing to understand is that you're essentially creating a brand new entity (the S Corp) and transferring assets from your old entity (the LLC). For Schedule L, you definitely need to complete both beginning and ending balance sheets. The beginning balance sheet shows your S Corp's position on day one (conversion date) with assets at fair market value. The ending balance sheet shows where you stand at year-end. Regarding retained earnings - this was the most confusing part for me too. Since you were an LLC, you don't actually have "retained earnings" in the corporate sense. What you had was owner's equity/member capital. When you convert, this becomes your initial capital contribution to the S Corp and gets recorded as paid-in capital, not retained earnings. Your AAA (Accumulated Adjustments Account) starts at zero on conversion day and tracks the S Corp's income/losses/distributions going forward. Don't try to carry over your LLC's accumulated earnings into AAA - that's not how it works. One more tip: make sure you properly document the conversion with corporate resolutions and keep detailed records of asset valuations. The IRS may ask questions later, especially if you have significant appreciation in assets. Good luck with your conversion!
0 coins
Astrid BergstrΓΆm
β’This is incredibly helpful! I'm actually going through this exact same process right now and your explanation about the AAA starting at zero really clarifies things. One quick follow-up question - when you say assets should be at fair market value on the conversion date, did you find that the IRS has specific requirements for how recent the valuation needs to be? I'm wondering if I can use valuations from 30-60 days before my conversion date or if they need to be exactly on the conversion date itself.
0 coins