


Ask the community...
Has anyone tried just filing without the K-1 info and then amending later? I'm in the same situation every freaking year and I'm tempted to just estimate based on last year and file on time, then deal with amendments if needed. The penalties for late filing seem worse than filing an amendment.
I did this last year and it was a HUGE mistake. The amendment process was a nightmare, and when my actual K-1 finally came, the numbers were way different than I estimated (they sold some assets I didn't know about). Ended up owing a bunch more tax plus interest. My accountant charged me double to handle the amendment too.
I feel your pain - I've been dealing with chronically late K-1s for years from a real estate partnership I'm in. One thing that worked for me last year was escalating beyond just the finance person. I sent a certified letter (not just email) directly to the managing partner referencing the September 15th deadline and IRS penalties for late filing. Within 48 hours of them receiving that letter, my K-1 was in my mailbox. Sometimes you need to make it clear this isn't just a "when you get around to it" situation - there are real legal deadlines and consequences. Also, for future reference, I now include a clause in any new partnership agreements requiring quarterly estimates and timely K-1 delivery. It's worth negotiating this upfront if you're considering any new partnership investments. The good partnerships don't have issues with this request - it's usually a red flag if they push back on basic tax reporting timelines.
That's brilliant advice about the certified letter! I never thought about escalating beyond just the finance person. As someone new to partnership investments, I'm curious - what specific language did you use in that certified letter? Did you mention the $290 penalty per K-1 that was mentioned earlier, or did you keep it more general about IRS deadlines? I'm dealing with my first late K-1 situation and want to strike the right tone - firm but not overly aggressive since I'll need to work with these people ongoing.
Has anyone considered Section 179 deduction for some of the more expensive components? I found that for some of the higher-end networking equipment I keep on hand (like $500+ items), my accountant suggested using Section 179 instead of supplies or CoG since they have a longer useful life.
Section 179 is definitely worth considering for more expensive items, but you need to be careful about the "placed in service" requirement. Items must actually be used in your business during the tax year to qualify for Section 179, not just sitting on a shelf as backup inventory.
This has been such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my small tech consulting business. Based on all the discussion here, it seems like the key is whether your business is primarily service-based (which it sounds like yours is) and whether the parts are incidental to your services rather than merchandise for sale. From what I've gathered, since you're an MSP providing services and the components are a small percentage of revenue (5%) and often not separately billed, treating them as supplies expense on line 22 of Schedule C seems appropriate. The fact that you're under the gross receipts threshold mentioned earlier also helps with simplified accounting methods. One thing I'd add is to make sure you document your reasoning - keep records showing the percentage of revenue from parts vs services, and note when parts are included in service fees vs separately billed. This will help if you're ever questioned about your classification choice.
Thanks for the great summary! You've really captured the key points from this discussion. I'm new to this community but dealing with the exact same issue with my small IT business. One question - when you mention documenting the reasoning, do you think it's worth creating a formal policy document for my business files, or is it enough to just keep good records in my accounting software showing the revenue percentages and billing practices?
Remember that different PARTS of your settlement might be taxed differently. This is something my accountant explained that I hadn't considered: 1. Compensation for physical injuries/sickness: NOT taxable 2. Emotional distress stemming from physical injuries: NOT taxable 3. Emotional distress without physical injury: TAXABLE 4. Punitive damages: Always TAXABLE 5. Lost wages/back pay: TAXABLE 6. Interest on any of the above: Always TAXABLE The paperwork should break this down. If it doesn't clearly state how much falls into each category, you should absolutely ask for clarification from whoever is administering the settlement.
This is super helpful. Quick question - what if the settlement doesn't specify which portion is for what? Mine just gives a lump sum amount with no breakdown at all. How do you handle that on your taxes?
If your settlement doesn't break down the amounts, you'll need to request clarification from the settlement administrator or your attorney. The IRS requires proper characterization of settlement payments, so you can't just guess or make assumptions. Contact whoever sent you the settlement paperwork and ask for a detailed breakdown showing what portion (if any) relates to physical injuries, emotional distress, lost wages, punitive damages, etc. They should be able to provide this information since they'll also need it for their own tax reporting purposes when they issue you a 1099. If they refuse or can't provide the breakdown, you may need to work with a tax professional to analyze the original lawsuit claims and settlement agreement to determine the proper tax treatment. Don't just assume the entire amount is taxable or non-taxable without proper documentation.
One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the timing of when you receive your settlement versus when it's taxable. I learned this the hard way with my own harassment settlement - even if you receive the money in December, you might be able to defer some of the tax impact depending on how the settlement is structured. Some settlements are paid out over multiple years, which can help with the tax bracket issue that Yuki mentioned. Others allow you to choose between a lump sum or structured payments. If you have that option, it's worth running the numbers both ways since spreading the income over several years could significantly reduce your overall tax burden. Also, don't forget about state taxes! Some states don't tax settlement income the same way the federal government does. I was so focused on federal taxes that I completely forgot to research my state's rules until tax time. The key is getting all this figured out BEFORE you receive the money so you can plan accordingly. Once that check is deposited, your options become much more limited.
This is really valuable advice about timing and payment structure! I wish I had known about the option to spread payments over multiple years before accepting my settlement. My lawyer never mentioned this as a possibility. Quick question about state taxes - do you know if there's an easy way to research how different states handle settlement income? I'm in California and trying to figure out if they follow federal rules or have their own classification system. I don't want to get surprised by state tax implications on top of everything else I'm trying to figure out. Also, when you say options become limited after depositing the check - what kind of options are you referring to? Is there anything specific I should be asking for or negotiating before I accept the settlement terms?
Have u tried TurboTax's W-4 calculator? It helped me way more than the IRS one tbh. Takes like 10 min and tells u exactly what to put on each line of ur W-4. Got my refund down from like $1400 to around $300 which was perfect 4 me. Their calculator seems more user friendly than the govt one lol
The TurboTax one is good but I think HR Block's is better. It lets you pick a target refund amount and works backwards from there. Super easy.
Thanks for the suggestion! I used the TurboTax one because I already had an account with them from filing my taxes, but I'll check out HR Block's calculator next time I need to make adjustments.
Another option that worked well for me is to calculate how much extra you're getting refunded and divide that by your remaining paychecks for the year. Then add that amount to Step 4(b) as additional deductions on your W-4. For example, if you're getting $900 back and have 20 paychecks left this year, that's about $45 per paycheck that's being over-withheld. You could add roughly $180 in additional deductions (since you're probably in the 25% bracket, $180 Γ 0.25 = $45 less withheld per check). The key is being conservative - start with a smaller adjustment and see how it affects your paychecks. You can always submit a new W-4 if you need to fine-tune it further. Better to get a small refund than owe a bunch at tax time!
This is really helpful math! I've been struggling with the same issue and this makes it so much clearer than trying to figure out the W-4 form on my own. Just to make sure I understand - if I'm getting about $800 back and have roughly 16 paychecks left this year, that would be $50 per paycheck over-withheld, so I'd want to add around $200 in additional deductions to Step 4(b)? And then adjust it again for next year once I know my full annual situation?
Donna Cline
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - if you do get the retroactive S-Corp election approved, make sure your CPA prepares a reasonable compensation study to justify whatever salary you're setting for yourself. The IRS really scrutinizes S-Corps because they know owners try to minimize salary (which is subject to employment taxes) in favor of distributions. Have you actually calculated how much you might save by switching to S-Corp status for 2022? It's mainly the Medicare and Social Security tax savings on the distribution portion, but you need to weigh that against the additional complexity and compliance costs.
0 coins
Harper Collins
β’What exactly is a "reasonable compensation study"? Is this something any CPA can do or do you need a specialist?
0 coins
Donna Cline
β’A reasonable compensation study is essentially documentation that supports the salary you've set for yourself as an S-Corp owner. It doesn't have to be a formal study done by a third party (though those exist), but should include evidence showing your salary is appropriate based on factors like: - Industry salary surveys for similar positions - Your qualifications, experience and time committed to the business - Geographic location salary data - The size and complexity of your business - Compensation for non-owner employees performing similar work - What competitors pay for similar roles Most CPAs who work regularly with small businesses and S-Corps can help put this together. The key is having it prepared before the IRS asks for it. If you're retroactively becoming an S-Corp and the IRS reviews your election, having this documentation ready shows you're making a good faith effort to comply with the "reasonable compensation" requirement.
0 coins
Oliver Becker
I went through a very similar situation about two years ago and successfully did the retroactive S-Corp election. A few things I learned that might help: First, yes, Rev. Proc. 2013-30 is absolutely legitimate, but timing is crucial. You have 3 years and 75 days from the original due date you wanted the election to be effective. So for 2022, you'd need to act soon. Second, the "reasonable cause" statement is critical. I used the fact that my previous tax preparer never mentioned S-Corp elections as an option despite my business income level. The IRS accepted this reasoning. Document everything - emails, conversations, even the lack of discussion about entity elections. Third, calculate the potential savings first before diving in. In my case, I saved about $18k in self-employment taxes, but I also had to establish a reasonable salary (I used about 60% of net income based on industry data) and file amended returns for multiple years. The process took about 6-8 months total to get fully resolved, but it was absolutely worth it. Make sure your new CPA has experience with late S-Corp elections - not all tax professionals are familiar with the process. Good luck!
0 coins
Gianna Scott
β’This is really helpful, thank you! I'm curious about the 60% salary figure you mentioned - how did you arrive at that percentage? I've been researching and seeing conflicting advice about what constitutes "reasonable compensation." Some sources say 40-60% of net income, others suggest looking at what you'd pay someone else to do your job. Did the IRS question your salary determination at all during the process, or did having the industry data backing it up make it smooth sailing? Also, when you say it took 6-8 months to get fully resolved, was most of that time just waiting for IRS processing, or were there back-and-forth communications required?
0 coins